Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Profiles without Face Pics . . .  (Read 2359 times)

Online Jimmyredcab

+1

That's why i need to see face. No face picture - no booking.

Punting "blind" is like turning the clock back 20 years before the Internet.

If I want to gamble I will visit a casino.    :hi:

Offline Roth

You're too generous. I'm sure not everyone checks for a pulse. :rolleyes:

Pulse? :unknown: :wacko: :crazy: :unknown: What pulse?!  :lol: :lol: :wacko: :lol: :lol:

Just had a message back on AW with not t bottom

This member has opted to show you their Face Picture.

Has anyone else seen this before ?

Offline pking_paul

No, not seen that before?

I prefer the part timers who rarely show their faces for obvious reasons, in private either.

So far they've been my best punts.

Offline Roth

Just had a message back on AW with not t bottom

This member has opted to show you their Face Picture.

Has anyone else seen this before ?

Sounds dodgy.  :scare:  :bomb:  Not had that before.  :unknown:

Sounds dodgy.  :scare:  :bomb:  Not had that before.  :unknown:
Was quite useful, she was even willing to pop out at 530am, local ATM was doing its maintenance so didn't work out for me but useful to know.

I absolutely respect all the guys here who say;
No face picture no punt
No phone number no punt
Ironically one of the best punts I ever had was with a girl who posted neither.
Comms were slow and measured too but I was patient.
One day she phoned me discretely.
We arranged to meet.
I ended up fucking the most unimaginably beautiful and sexed up supermodel I had ever seen!
Life is all about managed risk, so sometimes it might be worth bending your own "rules" a little.
Just saying  :hi:
« Last Edit: August 17, 2015, 09:32:28 AM by tantric talents »

Offline smiths

I absolutely respect all the guys here who say;
No face picture no punt
No phone number no punt
Ironically one of the best punts I ever had was with a girl who posted neither.
Comms were slow and measured too but I was patient.
One day she phoned me discretely.
We arranged to meet.
I ended up fucking the most unimaginably beautiful and sexed up supermodel I had ever seen!
Life is all about managed risk, so sometimes it might be worth bending your own "rules" a little.
Just saying  :hi:

What others do is up to them but if I said no face pic no punt and no number no punt my choice of WGs would be severly cut down, just no number no punt is my rule that suits me.

Offline greychap

I will not see any girl without a Face Pic.

I will not risk turning up somewhere having arranged to pay a lot of money to see what turns out to be a munter. Yes, I can walk - but what a waste of my time and hers.

I do not buy the "privacy", "anonymity" and "discretion" arguments when a WG has Face Pics in her Private Gallery. If a WGs was genuinely concerned about their Face Pics not getting into the public sphere, they would have no Face Pics at all. Such WGs are, it seems, very happy to have their Face Pics in the public sphere providing the public pay for them (I will not).

Any views from the community?

I agree with the face pic argument if they have them in private gallery then there after the money from that so obviously don't have a problem with there face on show anyway.

But I am more then happy to see a girl with no face pic as most wont show because of family or they have a career and doing this on the side, I sometimes find some that do show there face usually don't give a shit and dont have another job outside of this and tend to live a more trashy life plus if there doing incalls at there home and showing there face not very discreet so im happy with a girl that hides there face as this is there secret life.

Some girls that are in your face with what they do and everyone knows what they do are not always discreet and a lot of the scanks and blackmailers tend to have everyone knowing what they do to make money.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline G.Raff

Great reviews from trusted punters here are worth more to me than face pics.  I've seen a few  recommendations including MissKDD with no face pics and they have all been top drawer punts.
Also seen a few like Lindsey and Koa32 who provide photos on request via email - ie at no extra charge. Again  trusted reviews were a much better indicator than AW profile.
No question in my mind there are perfectly legit reasons why a WG would prefer to keep her identity secret and the element of surprise can simply add to the punt.

This is despite having been b&s'd in the past and seen girls who had no face pics but also no decent reviews here. You pays your money you make your choice, a well informed choice is obviously smarter.  :unknown:

+1

I've had very good punts with WGs who didn't show face pics and am happy that I didn't exclude them as otherwise I wouldn't have seen them.
I see the whole face pic issue with a pinch of salt, I think the criteria of me choosing a WG is much more complex and face pics is just one of them but not the primary one.
Reviews, body pics, the "feel" of the profile, and other subconscious factors.

Online Jimmyredcab


I see the whole face pic issue with a pinch of salt, I think the criteria of me choosing a WG is much more complex and face pics is just one of them but not the primary one.
Reviews, body pics, the "feel" of the profile, and other subconscious factors.

I agree to a certain extent, I have one rule that I will never break and that is NO ROMANIANS under any circumstances.

I will sometimes break the photo rule if enough of the other boxes are ticked such as location, age, price and services.

A pro$$ie has a perfect right not to show her face -------------- and we have a perfect right to reject her.    :hi:

Offline Daffodil

I am loathe to have absolute rules in punting. Yes, I prefer a face picture and yes, I prefer a telephone number, but I've had some excellent punts with girls who display neither.

Offline Daffodil

I don't think that having face pictures in private galleries is purely to make money and, even if so, I don't have a big problem with it as prossies are in this business to make money. Many use the credits earned to display their number or "available today". As is apparent from this thread, not all punters need a face picture so in some ways it's an extra.

In addition having a face picture in private is one extra layer of anonymity. It means only guys who have signed up and given AW money will see it, guys who are likely punters with an interest in seeing the girl, rather than schoolboys browsing the site for giggles. It's not foolproof, but it does improve anonymity.

Offline Hatcher

The principle - why pay to look at adverts? I can test drive a Ferrari for nowt, so ....
Banning reason: Troll previously banned as "itsmekurt"

Offline Luke

Most don't show it as they are not pretty, there are very few who don't show for other reasons,

Offline Marmalade

Most don't show it as they are not pretty, there are very few who don't show for other reasons,

Something in that I suppose. A mercenary girl with a pretty face can more efficiently find a well-heeled meal ticket to marry her than charge 'per plunge'. A good looking verification photo would be Guinness Book of Records material. But many a girl looks pretty through beer goggles or cock pressure. The most beautiful girl in the world is an ugly cow if she stabs you in the back.

I don't expect prossies to have a beautiful face: but nicely presented and not hideously ugly is reasonable.


What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

Offline Marmalade

The principle - why pay to look at adverts? I can test drive a Ferrari for nowt, so ....

If I am actually on the point of buying I might think it's worth looking at the speel. 50p on a PG has helped me rule out many a prostitite.

Offline Siadwel

I've punted girls with and without face pics. Rarely will I pay for a PG to see a face pic, but I will pay for a PG for an unshopped naked body pic, which is more important to me.

'Good-Looking', 'Attractive', 'Munter' and 'Pug-Ugly' are purely subjective observations, anyway. My Ex won't win any prizes, but when the light catches her just right, and she's smiling, my heart still skips a beat.

My attitude is that I'm no oil-painting but I'm willing to pay the price. If a girl's no oil-painting but gives a good service for that price, then we're two ugly fuckers fucking each other and both getting what we want.

Fine by me.

Online Jimmyredcab

If I am actually on the point of buying I might think it's worth looking at the speel. 50p on a PG has helped me rule out many a prostitite.

I agree but very few private galleries are 50 pence ----------- I am willing to pay £2 to see a private gallery but only if I am on the verge of making a booking.

I have seen the management of Adultwork described as scumbags and robbers ---------- I would say they are very astute businessmen, they are not a charity.     :hi:

Offline Marmalade

'Good-Looking', 'Attractive', 'Munter' and 'Pug-Ugly' are purely subjective observations, anyway.
Well no they're not actually. They are socially derived norms which we ignore selectively.

I think it was maybe Anth that posted a chart and it's probably on UKP wiki. If you put Charlize Theron next to some fat old minger scumbag with no teeth and a drool, an exveedingly high number of people will plump for Theron as the most attractive.

Ignoring this is at the root of fluffies making ridiculously overblown compliments about a woman's looks. They might none of them be catwalk models but that still leaves a very big range. To ignore this objectively is to mislead other punters.

Quote
My Ex won't win any prizes, but when the light catches her just right, and she's smiling, my heart still skips a beat.
that would be a "10" for lighting then...

Quote
My attitude is that I'm no oil-painting
Bet you knew that without a torch  ;)

Offline Marmalade

I agree but very few private galleries are 50 pence ----------- I am willing to pay £2 to see a private gallery but only if I am on the verge of making a booking.

I see quite a few at 50p up here. I might spend £2 as an exception but think it's a bit much. Any more than £1 would be a post-punt splurge on a (comparatively speaking) very attractive prossie to savour. I can think of about 2, maybe three, where that was worth it. Both of them students who had bothered doing non-professional but very nice photos.

Where it was a reg or I'd taken the photos I'd expect a passkey of some sort!

Offline Hatcher

I don't expect prossies to have a beautiful face: but nicely presented and not hideously ugly is reasonable.

Not fussed about the face and will choose a nice arse every time, but I walked last year when a fit-bodies Romanian hooker smiled at me showing a mouth full of black teeth. I often look at the PG if I'm pretty sure I'm going to go for it, but I won't pay silly prices - up to a quid or so.
Banning reason: Troll previously banned as "itsmekurt"

Offline Roth

Verification pics can be handy if the prossie happens to be verified and allow them to be viewed.  :thumbsup:

Online Jimmyredcab

Verification pics can be handy if the prossie happens to be verified and allow them to be viewed.  :thumbsup:

Very few pro$$ies allow their verification photo to be viewed, maybe one in twenty ------- if that.   :hi:

I am one of the most particular (although some would say picky  :P ) punters, a face pick is a must for me and time and money is so precious for us all unless reliable sources can attest to the WG's beauty.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)