Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Sarah- jane  (Read 3881 times)

This review has not been indexed yet.

Offline Ricco

http://www.allureescortagency.co.uk/sarah-jane--newcastle-escort.html

Saw SJ for the first time yesterday, she is fantastic, good comms, dressed as requested straight into DFK once through the door.
OWO with fantastic eye contact, RO, rubbered up & had several positions. the final OWO & CIM was out of this world.
Anal on offer but kept it for next time .

Offline David1970

Hi Ricco is she still doing bellend to clit without protection?
Was the anal on offer extra and if yes how much?

Offline Ricco

there is no bell end to clit without a mac, appointment was 50 for 30min.

Offline David1970

Thanks for that mate, hopefully she got the message about safe sex, and anal not as an extra, result.

Yeah, anal was never an extra.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2015, 08:21:49 PM by stanleyjohn »

Offline Houdini

Thanks for that mate, hopefully she got the message about safe sex, and anal not as an extra, result.
She has always been very safe sex aware when I have seen her and I have never been told it is extra for anal.

Offline David1970

The only reason I asked was tinman did a review of her and mentioned unsafe sex practice by her and just checking as lots of ladies extra for anal.

When I was punting I saw a lot of WG's over 30+ yrs, Sarah Jane was up there with the best I saw to the extent that I saw her a lot and I mean a lot!
Every  time she insisted on safe practices and she never wavered from that so I am dubious of punters saying anything different.
As far as I am concerned Sarah Jane is very clean , safe and a genuine lass.
I do miss her :(


Offline Looking4fun

When I was punting I saw a lot of WG's over 30+ yrs, Sarah Jane was up there with the best I saw to the extent that I saw her a lot and I mean a lot!
Every  time she insisted on safe practices and she never wavered from that so I am dubious of punters saying anything different.
As far as I am concerned Sarah Jane is very clean , safe and a genuine lass.
I do miss her :(
I thought she had only been working for a few months ?

Offline Houdini

When I was punting I saw a lot of WG's over 30+ yrs, Sarah Jane was up there with the best I saw to the extent that I saw her a lot and I mean a lot!
Every  time she insisted on safe practices and she never wavered from that so I am dubious of punters saying anything different.
As far as I am concerned Sarah Jane is very clean , safe and a genuine lass.
I do miss her :(
+1

I thought she had only been working for a few months ?

I believe Sarah Jane started working in April and after MM2 I was among the first to see her, and I saw her quite a few times before I stopped punting and she is the 1 that tempts me to return.

Offline frenchhorn

I 2nd that mate
she's faultless in every way imo
trying to pack it in aswell , but as long as she's available its going to be virtually impossible
the cleanest friendliest sexiest girl I've come across in the last 10 years of doing this
so defo time to give it up
Banning reason: Idiot who won't accept rule against STD allegations

Offline David1970

I have attached the report about Sarah-Jane and unsafe sex practice.
As you can see the report was a Positive, so was not having a go at her.


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=62882.0

Offline Houdini

I 2nd that mate
she's faultless in every way imo
trying to pack it in aswell , but as long as she's available its going to be virtually impossible
the cleanest friendliest sexiest girl I've come across in the last 10 years of doing this
so defo time to give it up
Totally agree. Always immaculately presented, clean sexy as hell and one of the most attractive I have seen.

Offline Looking4fun

I have attached the report about Sarah-Jane and unsafe sex practice.
As you can see the report was a Positive, so was not having a go at her.


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=62882.0
It was a good review seems to me that the fan boys are hypocrites, if it was a Romanian or another less popular lady they wouldn't have been as quick to jump to her defence as its been pointed out as an un- safe sexual practice

Offline frenchhorn

only being a hypocrite if I have a go at some one else for doing the same thing
looking4fun needs to get his dictionary out !
he was right about one thing at least it was a good review , appealed to me
Banning reason: Idiot who won't accept rule against STD allegations

Offline greychap

Without any doubt Sarah Jayne provides a very pleasing service at a very good price I don't think many could say she does not, very good value for money.

I doubt she does the bare back rubbing with every guy she meets and probably would avoid doing it with punters she knows or suspects are from UKP as it can be easily be put on here.

But as she has done it with tinman and David said she tried it with him but he did not want it I should imagine there is more punters she has done it with.

To say Sarah Jayne is very safe and careful sex wise with her health is not really true if she was that careful she would not have bare back vagina and cock rubbing and be offering CIM if she was so health conscious as there is risks with both of those activities of catching STD's. I know lots of punters love CIM and no doubt some would love the clit rubbing but lets not all pretend what she or other girls offer is safe.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline greychap

It was a good review seems to me that the fan boys are hypocrites, if it was a Romanian or another less popular lady they wouldn't have been as quick to jump to her defence as its been pointed out as an un- safe sexual practice

I do think if there was an unpopular girl doing bare back rubbing she would be slagged off by most and avoided, so yes I do agree with you on that one.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline Looking4fun

only being a hypocrite if I have a go at some one else for doing the same thing
looking4fun needs to get his dictionary out !
he was right about one thing at least it was a good review , appealed to me
So what your saying is bareback sex with escorts appeals to you?

Offline frenchhorn

lots of different points made it a good review
Banning reason: Idiot who won't accept rule against STD allegations

Offline greychap

There will be some punters that have seen the review of the bare back rubbing and will want that from her so will probably make a booking to get that so it will appeal to some. There is a lot that lurk on here that don't need to post or that are not a member.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline David1970

First can I clear something up, I did not claim that Sarah Jane tried unsafe sex with me. I did a review on her which as neutral, it was neutral because I thought she was ok and that is all.
It was thetin_man she preformed unsafe sex on and he gave her a positive review.
Can I say I am worried as Sarah Jane preformed OWO on me.
The members who are fans of hers are missing the point; she is very popular and sees lots of punters, even if she has unsafe sex with 1 in 5 that is a lot.
Would you return to a restaurant which were the staff were nice and the food good when you find out there is a good chance you could get food poising, no would not. You would tell your friend that is all the people highlighting this are doing. So could the fans of Sarah Jane please accept this?

Offline Looking4fun


I've seen sj thought she was great & only after I did my review & thought about it, did I remember her doing the same thing with me, I should have posted it on here but because she was quite new to the game i let it go, but did confide in someone on here who suggested I go for a gum check.
Sj was probably doing it for all the right reasons & without a doubt she is very clean, but who knows about all the punters she's seen in the past 4 months.
To all the fan boys out there it's not an attack on Sj, it's warning everybody on this punting site of a serious issue, which I have no doubt she has already been warned about by her boss

Offline Looking4fun

First can I clear something up, I did not claim that Sarah Jane tried unsafe sex with me. I did a review on her which as neutral, it was neutral because I thought she was ok and that is all.
It was thetin_man she preformed unsafe sex on and he gave her a positive review.
Can I say I am worried as Sarah Jane preformed OWO on me.
The members who are fans of hers are missing the point; she is very popular and sees lots of punters, even if she has unsafe sex with 1 in 5 that is a lot.
Would you return to a restaurant which were the staff were nice and the food good when you find out there is a good chance you could get food poising, no would not. You would tell your friend that is all the people highlighting this are doing. So could the fans of Sarah Jane please accept this?
+1

Offline Big_Yin

Anyone one done a MMF with SJ?  Do you think she would be up for a DP?




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)