Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: AMBER RYDER ADULTWORK NOTTINHAM  (Read 10114 times)


21 review(s) for AmberRyder (18 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline Owwhatanight

Is her special all inclusive or still +£20 for up the bum fun?  Not in nottingham at all for the next few weeks but 120 all in may tempt me..i keep meaning to retir from this game too :thumbsdown:

It's still £120 + £20 for turd burglaing

I'm finding it hard to believe coming from a newbie and why would she give her full name out to somebody she's only seen a few times?

Me and a few others got screwed over last year with another girl who I'd known for years and now she's blacklisted on here. It's probably cost her thousands in lost bookings and I don't think Amber would be stupid enough to chuck all her positive feedback down the drain and I still plan on meeting her one day

I'm finding it hard to believe coming from a newbie and why would she give her full name out to somebody she's only seen a few times?

Me and a few others got screwed over last year with another girl who I'd known for years and now she's blacklisted on here. It's probably cost her thousands in lost bookings and I don't think Amber would be stupid enough to chuck all her positive feedback down the drain and I still plan on meeting her one day

+1

Offline Taggart

This is about him wanting a piece of her. More than possessive She Said this has happened to him before with another local now gone WG.

Knowing who OWAN is referring to, what is the possiblilty this is the same 'punter'?  The punter has made a serious allegation, and how many of us who are experienced punters and know the East Midlands actually believe his post?

The problem is that shit sticks. 

He's a one-shot, one-post wonder who has made the allegation, not bothered to add further detail, and just sat back and watched the flames. Someone did this with Holly G when she operated as Rosie20 - and it cost me a booking. He's a cunt, a fantasist, and a danger to women.

Why would Amber, with such stong positive feedback, and presumably no money worries being popular WG, stoop to steal or con money?  The OPs story stinks, is IMHO, a total fabrication, and more seriously it's libellous. Far too many hide behind non de plumes, dish out the shit, oblivious to the fact they are libelling people.

Also, why post a negative FR on here yet he has not posted anything on the AW feedback?  Did he even see Amber or was he rebuffed?

The real problem is that it may well have damaged Amber's reputation, and maybe that was his plan?  There are far too few quality ladies of Amber's size offering the ranger of services she does in the East Midlands.

Someone knocked up a negative report around 18 months back on Little Honey Jessica, later admitting it to be false.
Some guys really are fucked up. Care in the Community doesnt come anywhere close.

Someone knocked up a negative report around 18 months back on Little Honey Jessica, later admitting it to be false.
Some guys really are fucked up. Care in the Community doesnt come anywhere close.
It also ruins true negatives, from genuine victims.  The way he has not responded to any prods or questions has made my mind up on the matter. 

Offline Ipunter

I think admin should change this to a netrual and add 'UNVERIFIED' after the subject.

Online Turtle Z

I think admin should change this to a netrual and add 'UNVERIFIED' after the subject.

Unverified under whose rules? Do we then scrap every first review until a punter builds up credibility on this board? The guy is clearly a fucking idiot but I for one believe she took his money. You talk about destroying her credibility but the best the guy could come up with was that he paid her money up front and she failed to uphold her end of the deal. Bit weak really isn't it considering what could have been made up to destroy her credibility. She then gets punters to comment on here as to how she hasn't slept all night through worry. Why didn't she answer the allegations herself instead of sending her white knight in? If i was going to make something up to destroy a WG's credibility then I'd make something up that didn't also make me look like a fucking idiot.

Offline Diehard

Ok Diehard I will do just that for you tomorrow :D but no half hour here with a girl like her. I do not give a fuck about him.
I choose my women, I pay my money to fuck then fuck off home a happy punter
 :drinks:

You flash fuck! So confident it will stay hard for the hour....or you popping a blue one before you go?
 :wacko:

Offline Owwhatanight

Here we go again Black knight attack.TurtleZ I asked her to go on here to give her side of the story but you know what some just don't want to come on here and take this kind of shit. White Knight who cares I have had worse names in this big bad world of business. I just wanted to cancel my booking today and rebook. Maybe I was the only guy she has phoned today.
It your opinion but I will express mine too.

Offline Owwhatanight

You flash fuck! So confident it will stay hard for the hour....or you popping a blue one before you go?
 :wacko:
[/quote

Oh dear  :lol:


Online Turtle Z

Here we go again Black knight attack.TurtleZ I asked her to go on here to give her side of the story but you know what some just don't want to come on here and take this kind of shit. White Knight who cares I have had worse names in this big bad world of business. I just wanted to cancel my booking today and rebook. Maybe I was the only guy she has phoned today.
It your opinion but I will express mine too.

Really clever how you came up with the Black Knight counter in response to being called a White Knight. Perhaps we should get it added to the glossary to be used when  a punter rushes to the defence of what he believes is a genuine review.

White Knight however, is already in the glossary...  White Knight: Popular internet slang for a forum member that rushes to a defend a prostitute after she has been poorly reviewed. He might not have seen her or could be a pimp.

I don't have a problem with you expressing 'YOUR' view, my problem is with you coming on to express the prossies view.

'Big bad world of business' WTF are you talking about?


Offline Jackjones

« Last Edit: August 10, 2015, 07:59:53 PM by Jackjones »

Offline Owwhatanight

What's the point here ??? This aggressive attitude do we really need it ?

Offline Ipunter

Wow! Come on... Should we trust a one post negative review? With all the positives?? Maybe not maybe reviews should be moderated to a certain extent first. As it's unfair.

Can we really trust the review?

Offline arthur

Shes claiming its all made up, if OP can provide proof that a transaction took place, even just email exchanges referring to it then she will be proven to be lying, its all in the hands of OP now, if theres no reply and no proof we have to assume its false, admin can easily see when he has been checking the thread through IP even if he doesn't log on so he better reply soon

Offline yorkshire123

Shes claiming its all made up, if OP can provide proof that a transaction took place, even just email exchanges referring to it then she will be proven to be lying, its all in the hands of OP now, if theres no reply and no proof we have to assume its false, admin can easily see when he has been checking the thread through IP even if he doesn't log on so he better reply soon

Quote
Jasper56 
Last Active: Today at 07:28:27 pm
Banning reason: Making false malicious allegations against admin

Unverified under whose rules? Do we then scrap every first review until a punter builds up credibility on this board? The guy is clearly a fucking idiot but I for one believe she took his money. You talk about destroying her credibility but the best the guy could come up with was that he paid her money up front and she failed to uphold her end of the deal. Bit weak really isn't it considering what could have been made up to destroy her credibility. She then gets punters to comment on here as to how she hasn't slept all night through worry. Why didn't she answer the allegations herself instead of sending her white knight in? If i was going to make something up to destroy a WG's credibility then I'd make something up that didn't also make me look like a fucking idiot.

I think that is an interesting and valid point!  :thumbsup:

Online badsin

I couldn't be arsed to read the report: to long an non-sensical.

I have seen Amber, few years ago now. But she had glowing feedback etc. I thought she was no more than average, and wouldn't provide a second shag within the hour. I left, a tad annoyed - and never returned.

If you have poor service, vote with your feet.

As one of the opening replys, to the thread "fool an his money easily parted" and "wg are in it for the money". Both statements true, make your decisions based on your own experience.
Of this guy is trolling, or worse - then yes he's a twat. If he's turned from fluffy to stalker, also a twat. If he's been ripped off, he has the right to express an opinion - as what Amber does if she wants :hi:

I won't read this thread again :thumbsup:

Online Turtle Z

What's the point here ??? This aggressive attitude do we really need it ?

"Aggressive', really? Aren't you being a little overly sensitive in this big bad world of business? The point here is that I don't agree with you, simple as that. I don't think punters should be white knighting on behalf of prossies and I think she took the guys money. Like I said OWAN, I don't have a problem with your opinion but don't be getting sucked in to doing their dirty work because  they 'don't want the shit.'






Online Turtle Z

Wow! Come on... Should we trust a one post negative review? With all the positives?? Maybe not maybe reviews should be moderated to a certain extent first. As it's unfair.

Can we really trust the review?

I really think you're failing to separate two key issues. This isn't about her service, though Badsin says she was average at best and that he left annoyed, this is about whether or not she took someones money upfront and reneged on the deal. It's not really got a lot to do with her positive service reviews. She fucks punters for cash but you think her moral standards exclude her from taking cash upfront because she has positive reviews for service. My bet is that she hasn't come on here herself in case the guy gets really annoyed with her lies and posts the damning evidence.

Offline Owwhatanight

Sensitive is not a bad thing ! It seems that is what your lacking here. I am not on here to be told like a child what I should be doing because it's in your manual,  were all individuals & different as many threads have stated. Tommorow I have a meeting with Amber and if she tells me more should I not let you guys know? Maybe put it in my review, but if you do not want to read it just jog on.

Online Turtle Z

Sensitive is not a bad thing ! It seems that is what your lacking here. I am not on here to be told like a child what I should be doing because it's in your manual,  were all individuals & different as many threads have stated. Tommorow I have a meeting with Amber and if she tells me more should I not let you guys know? Maybe put it in my review, but if you do not want to read it just jog on.

Can you even follow your own logic... you say I'm aggressive then agree that you're sensitive but that's not a bad thing, though you were adopting a rough tough stance earlier in this big bad world of business.

I'm waiting with baited breath so please do tell us every word and perhaps even take notes or a dictaphone to make sure its 100% accurate  because I'm sure every word will be true. 'Jog on' how old are you, 17?


Timmy2


Offline Owwhatanight

It's pointless as you just try to twist every thing I say.
Fuck it.

Online Turtle Z

It's pointless as you just try to twist every thing I say.
Fuck it.

No, you manage that perfectly well by yourself.




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)