Well reviewed girls = off putting

[CR_Steeele]

Been meaning to start this for a while, and apologies if it has been done before, but does anyone else find that the more reviews girls get the less appealing they become?

For me, it's slightly off putting that they're getting used more and more often. It also becomes somewhat of a chore reading the reviews which, while written differently, say pretty much the same thing.

For example, Around this time last year I was all booked up to see Miss KDD (until my gf at the time surprised me with book of Mormon tickets. Great show btw) I was disappointed obviously but could probably write a review on her just based on the reviews on here and be reasonably accurate.

My latest fav in London (Elle) seems to have a new review every other day and her AW ratings seem to be in double figures every 7 days which is quite of putting after a while and I have unfortunately lost the will to see her again.

Sorry for the ramble!!

[Ben4454]

Yes I get what you mean. I do not see the popular girls on the site. Too much hassle trying to book them when I can be doing other things and seeing other potential prossies.

[peter_bungee]

same i never read the reviews with the intention of meeting someone, i find someone i like then see what the reviews are like.

Also i avoid the ones constantly mentioned here e.g. xenia harrow or Hot Ameera etc.

[Lz-129]

Been meaning to start this for a while,

Again you mean! Not the 1st time you've whined about it!


For me it's the opposite! The more reviews and the dirtier the reviews the more appeal for me, this is a review site, I just can't see the problem! You will be the 1st to moan when you waste your money on some crap punt. I come here to read reviews and base my punt on that knowing what sort of service I will get

[tantric talents]

Familiarity breeding contempt?
Well I do sort of understand the OP's point but you know, the girls are mostly professionals. If they weren't plying their trade with us guys it would be with someone else who has never read this forum. So you might as well get real and try to see the ones who are good, have been well reviewed (especially, constantly) here, rather than waste time or money seeing some unknowns who most likely won't press your buttons!
That said it's great to TOFTT occasionally. It helps to build up the hard core of good and worthwhile girls. Vfm or otherwise.

[Asianspice]

I use to want to read my own feedback because some WGs won't see you unless you have some positives. I cannot agree with you more, especially when these do get sent until a month after your visit when you read the same feedback almost word by word from the other clients or your own report. I have no dought that they could not rember the booking anymore than what I done at work the very same day. Some clients who regularly visits a WG will receive a glowing feedback from her client for fear of retribution. Personally these days, I rarely make it a routine to see the same girl more than a few times. The visits become too casual and more chat than sex takes place, so it's good to use UKP to get a more unbiased report than Adultwork review.

[smiths]

Been meaning to start this for a while, and apologies if it has been done before, but does anyone else find that the more reviews girls get the less appealing they become?

For me, it's slightly off putting that they're getting used more and more often. It also becomes somewhat of a chore reading the reviews which, while written differently, say pretty much the same thing.

For example, Around this time last year I was all booked up to see Miss KDD (until my gf at the time surprised me with book of Mormon tickets. Great show btw) I was disappointed obviously but could probably write a review on her just based on the reviews on here and be reasonably accurate.

My latest fav in London (Elle) seems to have a new review every other day and her AW ratings seem to be in double figures every 7 days which is quite of putting after a while and I have unfortunately lost the will to see her again.

Sorry for the ramble!!

If in fancy a WG her having as many reviews as possible by punters I find credible is a very good thing for me to have, it doesn't put me off of them at all.

The problem can be with such WGs that they become very hard to book and/or put their prices up off the back of their forum popularity, what I call forum darling status, and some insist punters book them using the A/W booking system and/or the punter needs good A/W feedback, I punt to suit me NOT WGs so some of those forum darlings are on zero interest to me though I dont doubt they offer a generally good service.

[Cuntminion]

Don't bother me

Neither here nor there

[Jeff_withpetersen]

I don't think it should bother a punter how often a WG works. If it does then perhaps the punter needs to have a word with themselves about why that is?

[Trevor12]

Doesn't put me off at all. More positive reviews usually mean a safer punt.

However, if she becomes too difficult to book or increases her prices to above what I would pay, I'll just move on to somebody else. I would also never book somebody I didn't find attractive, just because she was well reviewed by others.

[pdq]

I sometimes check reviews to see if someone else gets a different treatment.
I saw a wg in donny who had 3 folks who all wrote fr's on aw for the same day
I was surprised they didnt seem to do half the stuff I did in meet. 

Why not ? perhaps they were more fluffy and didnt have the nerve to ask to try certain things

 

 

[smiths]

I don't think it should bother a punter how often a WG works. If it does then perhaps the punter needs to have a word with themselves about why that is?

Plus how can a punter be certain how many punters most WGs get anyway, her saying its a max of say 3 a day doesn't make it true, smart WGs know it puts some punters off to know the WG does back-to-back bookings which I view EVERY WG I punt with as doing, as my view is if a WG is popular why on earth wouldn't they cash in while they could.

[Mansell]

The more positive reviews on here the better, at least you know your going to have a good time. Although sometimes it is difficult to get bookings.

[Lz-129]

It's not different to hotel reviews or restaurant reviews! The better the review the harder it is to get in and more expensive it gets! Keeping a good girl secret for your own benefit does nothing for fellow punters or indeed for the girl

[SamLP]

The fluffy reviews are off putting and not the amount of reviews a girl has. I usually prefer to go for an unreviewed girl or someone reviewed a few times as it gives me a sense of the unknown going into a punt. There are times however when a well reviewed girl looks appealing and I decide to see her.

[Little Katie]

Been meaning to start this for a while, and apologies if it has been done before, but does anyone else find that the more reviews girls get the less appealing they become?

For me, it's slightly off putting that they're getting used more and more often. It also becomes somewhat of a chore reading the reviews which, while written differently, say pretty much the same thing.

For example, Around this time last year I was all booked up to see Miss KDD (until my gf at the time surprised me with book of Mormon tickets. Great show btw) I was disappointed obviously but could probably write a review on her just based on the reviews on here and be reasonably accurate.

My latest fav in London (Elle) seems to have a new review every other day and her AW ratings seem to be in double figures every 7 days which is quite of putting after a while and I have unfortunately lost the will to see her again.

Sorry for the ramble!!

So basically..
If we provide a bad service, we'll get negative reviews and put you off.
If we provide a good service, we'll get positive reviews and put you off..
 

[Lz-129]

So basically..
If we provide a bad service, we'll get negative reviews and put you off.
If we provide a good service, we'll get positive reviews and put you off..
 

In a nutshell!

[Little Katie]

Sorry OP.. To elaborate further..
I speak to many other WG's (both popular and less so) and I can assure you there is no correlation to support the evidence that well reviewed prossies are being any more "used" than those less well reviewed.
There is simply no way of knowing how many punters a girl is seeing based on her amount of feedback/reviews so to draw that conclusion based on an otherwise positively reviewed girl is a little unfair in my opinion. x

[Boundless]

So basically..
If we provide a bad service, we'll get negative reviews and put you off.
If we provide a good service, we'll get positive reviews and put you off..
 

I was chatting to my most regular girl recently, she has about 15 feedbacks on AW, and her feeling was that she didn't want too many feedbacks as she thought that this might "put guys off". On the other hand, another regular of mine has almost 200 feedbacks and is obviously not concerned about it.

Personally, if I see that a girl has 20-30 or more good feedbacks I would see that as a good endorsement of her service. If she had over 100 I would almost certainly put her in the "to see" list!

[smiths]

So basically..
If we provide a bad service, we'll get negative reviews and put you off.
If we provide a good service, we'll get positive reviews and put you off..
 

Indeed, but its hardly a new revelation of course, some punters really don't like the thought that WGs are sucking and fucking god knows how many punters a day, now in my view such punters are wise to get real or take up pulling instead, but that's up to them.

[SamLP]

For me, it's slightly off putting that they're getting used more and more often. It also becomes somewhat of a chore reading the reviews which, while written differently, say pretty much the same thing.

I disagree with this quote. Having more reviews does not necessarily mean a girl is being used more often. Plenty of unreviewed girls are busy and fully booked and you have well reviewed girls that are available when you call them. It's not always the case of course, and you could always ignore a review of a popular girl so that it doesn't become a chore reading it. The fact is UKP punters make a small percentage of punters seeing girls. You have the lurkers and you have those who don't know UKP exists and they're booking the same girls we are without reviewing them so a WG is getting "used more" than you'd like to think but there's no review to show it.

[spkmstr48]

OP I admire your sacrifice, same to everyone who agrees with you. 

Please go ahead and ignore the girls who, by popular consensus are the best.

Should make it easier for me to get a booking. 

No wait, since my regular is one of these girls it's already OK 

 

[CR_Steeele]

So basically..
If we provide a bad service, we'll get negative reviews and put you off.
If we provide a good service, we'll get positive reviews and put you off..
 

1. I never mentioned negative reviews??
2. Tedium is the issue I think.

[CR_Steeele]

OP I admire your sacrifice, same to everyone who agrees with you. 

Please go ahead and ignore the girls who, by popular consensus are the best.

Should make it easier for me to get a booking. 

No wait, since my regular is one of these girls it's already OK 

 

I admire your amazing use of Smiley's

[vw]

The most useful for me are the outcall only reviews and I love them.  I can an do a lot of outcalls which many cannot and the great outcall reviews really inspire me with confidence when getting my sex delivered.

Very popular and well reviewed incallers however can be more difficult to arrange a meet and I respect that, as a business owner myself you have to admire.

[spkmstr48]

1. I never mentioned negative reviews??
2. Tedium is the issue I think.

Thanks for giving me a laugh to brighten a dull day.

Seriously you carry on 

 

[smiths]

Sorry OP.. To elaborate further..
I speak to many other WG's (both popular and less so) and I can assure you there is no correlation to support the evidence that well reviewed prossies are being any more "used" than those less well reviewed.
There is simply no way of knowing how many punters a girl is seeing based on her amount of feedback/reviews so to draw that conclusion based on an otherwise positively reviewed girl is a little unfair in my opinion. x

I agree with this except forum darlings are often booked up solid well in advance, an example being Michelle Independent so punters know for sure she is sucking and fucking loads of punters. But yes a lack of reviews or other feedback doesn't necessarily mean a WG is less busy than ones with lots of reviews/other feedback, I know this from personal experience of punting with many A/W WGs who ONLY worked off their phones and even months later had little A/W FB, yet I know from punting with them that they were busy as I was a regular but still had problems on occasion getting a booking, though most would fit me in.

Over many years of reading punting forums its a widespread concern of some punters that WGs they want to punt with were punting with loads of other punters, it really does put some off, yet the fact is of course that's what a WG does. Punting isn't for the squeamish, fortunately I have learnt over 30 plus years to only concern myself that I get a good service from those that interest me, I have no way of knowing for sure what any WG might be getting up to and with whom, so its not worth me worrying about it as that would spoil my fun.

[Boundless]

Sorry OP.. To elaborate further..
I speak to many other WG's (both popular and less so) and I can assure you there is no correlation to support the evidence that well reviewed prossies are being any more "used" than those less well reviewed.
There is simply no way of knowing how many punters a girl is seeing based on her amount of feedback/reviews so to draw that conclusion based on an otherwise positively reviewed girl is a little unfair in my opinion. x

Absolutely LK.
If any guys are drawing that conclusion then they are deluded, there is absolutely no correlation between feedbacks and amount of punters seen.
I was referring in my other post to feedback on AW by the way. As for UKP reviews, as fantastic as this site is, I believe that we represent a fairly small percentage of total punters.
As I say, my 2 regulars are almost certainly equally busy, one with 15 and one with 150 FB's on AW.
Some Thai massage girls, around here anyway, have zero feedback but provide a superb service.
In my experience, some girls ask specifically if you will do feedback, in which case I'm usually happy to oblige, others don't mention it so if I haven't booked through AW then  I won't.

[claretandblue]

Other than Lindsey and kdd I have seen all of the darlings and agree with the op that it does get boring reading the same stuff,but at the same time you cannot deny they are good whores

The last few months I have been seeing lots of new girls who are not heavily reviewed on here and have on the whole been having great punts so personally for me that is more satisfying than following the herd on here 

[vw]

I have no way of knowing for sure what any WG might be getting up to and with whom, so its not worth me worrying about it as that would spoil my fun.

And they also have no idea what you are getting up to also.  As  long as on my time phones off as I consider that cheating then what more do these people expect.

[smiths]

The most useful for me are the outcall only reviews and I love them.  I can an do a lot of outcalls which many cannot and the great outcall reviews really inspire me with confidence when getting my sex delivered.

Very popular and well reviewed incallers however can be more difficult to arrange a meet and I respect that, as a business owner myself you have to admire.

In my case I could do Outcalls but choose not to as I wish to punt as anonymously as possible and wouldn't trust any WG to come to my home, and I never had, and only visit WGs in Hotels which they are staying in. As ever its what suits the punter that matters.

[smiths]

And they also have no idea what you are getting up to also.  As  long as on my time phones off as I consider that cheating then what more do these people expect.

Indeed they don't, but I am certainly not capable of shagging loads of WGs per day, as they are punters, my cock says no to that.

[yorkshire123]

Its not the amount of reviews that puts me off but the multiple, suck up to a prossie, competition style  warts n all reviews of every suck & dribble that does & unfortunately they do seem to go hand in hand , however that particular subject matter has been done to death recently so I won't harp on about it.

But along with the OP I'm allowed my opinion irrespective if others agree or not & if they don't like what I have to say they are more than welcome to kiss my hairy arse  (for a fee)

 

[vw]

Welcome to kiss my hairy arse  (for a fee)

How much then, do you do extras my friend wants to kiss you while your shitting ! 

[Boundless]

Its not the amount of reviews that puts me off but the multiple, suck up to a prossie, competition style  warts n all reviews of every suck & dribble that does & unfortunately they do seem to go hand in hand , however that particular subject matter has been done to death recently so I won't harp on about it.

But along with the OP I'm allowed my opinion irrespective if others agree or not & if they don't like what I have to say they are more than welcome to kiss my hairy arse  (for a fee)

Well, the struggle I've had trying to get a punt today I might take you up on that.
Do UKP members get a discount?

[congo66]

This is a stange thread.

Personally I don't really look too much at or worry about good reviews I only look for bad ones once I've found someone who offers the services I'm after for the price I'm prepared to pay and who I find attractive.

I've had fantastic times with 2 girls on AW with 500+ escort feedbacks and who have a large number of positive reviews here. I've seen a fair few with 200+  and they were also pretty good too with one exception who has plenty of negatives here but I thought it was worth a go as a backup punt and it really wasn't.

Positive reviews aren't a guarantee that I'll click with a girl anyway but I guess it does usually confirm that their services and pictures are accurate and give you an opinion on their real age v's prossie age but I already assume +5 years on that anyway.

I'm under no illusion about what the girls do or that I'm the only person they see on a particular day.

[Little Katie]

I agree with this except forum darlings are often booked up solid well in advance, an example being Michelle Independent so punters know for sure she is sucking and fucking loads of punters. But yes a lack of reviews or other feedback doesn't necessarily mean a WG is less busy than ones with lots of reviews/other feedback, I know this from personal experience of punting with many A/W WGs who ONLY worked off their phones and even months later had little A/W FB, yet I know from punting with them that they were busy as I was a regular but still had problems on occasion getting a booking, though most would fit me in.

Over many years of reading punting forums its a widespread concern of some punters that WGs they want to punt with were punting with loads of other punters, it really does put some off, yet the fact is of course that's what a WG does. Punting isn't for the squeamish, fortunately I have learnt over 30 plus years to only concern myself that I get a good service from those that interest me, I have no way of knowing for sure what any WG might be getting up to and with whom, so its not worth me worrying about it as that would spoil my fun.

I've never spoken to Michelle so I've no idea how many men she sees but I know from personal experience that being booked up in advance does not neccesarily indicate more meetings are taking place.
It all depends on the amount of requests a WG recieves vs the amount of time she has available for meetings. Eg. I know of a WG that tells me she recieves an average of 7 requests a day and sees 5 of them. She is almost always available on the day and is never booked up in advance. I currently recieve about 25 requests a day and see 1 of them. Im never available on the day and I've always been booked up 4-6 weeks in advance. Just that one example is proof that it is indeed entirely feasible that many well reviewed girls on here are actually seeing far less punters than those that are less reviewed/unreviewed.

[Cuntminion]

Its not the amount of reviews that puts me off but the multiple, suck up to a prossie, competition style  warts n all reviews of every suck & dribble that does & unfortunately they do seem to go hand in hand , however that particular subject matter has been done to death recently so I won't harp on about it.

But along with the OP I'm allowed my opinion irrespective if others agree or not & if they don't like what I have to say they are more than welcome to kiss my hairy arse  (for a fee)

Mcfly springs to mind

No one, I mean no one really wants to hear about him downing an arse and spit juice cocktail

It's not that thinking of two stunning birds getting busy does not do anything for me I just can't annex the scenario and mentally picture mcfly (the mental image I have made up)
weeping, Cock in one hand, thank you card in the other, face like a two year old who's been given a jar of nutella

And this fucks any chance of me getting the mills and boon vibe he was hoping to achieve

[spkmstr48]

Its not the amount of reviews that puts me off but the multiple, suck up to a prossie, competition style  warts n all reviews of every suck & dribble that does & unfortunately they do seem to go hand in hand , however that particular subject matter has been done to death recently so I won't harp on about it.

With that I agree

[spkmstr48]

I've never spoken to Michelle so I've no idea how many men she sees but I know from personal experience that being booked up in advance does not neccesarily indicate more meetings are taking place.
It all depends on the amount of requests a WG recieves vs the amount of time she has available for meetings. Eg. I know of a WG that tells me she recieves an average of 7 requests a day and sees 5 of them. She is almost always available on the day and is never booked up in advance. I currently recieve about 25 requests a day and see 1 of them. Im never available on the day and I've always been booked up 4-6 weeks in advance. Just that one example is proof that it is indeed entirely feasible that many well reviewed girls on here are actually seeing far less punters than those that are less reviewed/unreviewed.

+1

[Lz-129]

Mcfly springs to mind

No one, I mean no one really wants to hear about him downing an arse and spit juice cocktail

It's not that thinking of two stunning birds getting busy does not do anything for me I just can't annex the scenario and mentally picture mcfly (the mental image I have made up)
weeping, Cock in one hand, thank you card in the other, face like a two year old who's been given a jar of nutella

And this fucks any chance of me getting the mills and boon vibe he was hoping to achieve

Well you won't have to worry about that no more as he is banned! Tbf I think he gave a warning that his post was graphic so no one had to read it but there will be no more

[Cuntminion]

Well you won't have to worry about that no more as he is banned! Tbf I think he gave a warning that his post was graphic so no one had to read it but there will be no more

Was not repulsive , not one to read over coco pops either, was more

 

[vw]

Was not repulsive , not one to read over coco pops either, was more

 

Can not watch back to the future again without thinking of this!

My mouth was now full of L’s thick saliva (from all that gagging) and K’s squirt that I had held in. In fact, a lot had overflowed from my mouth to the nearby areas, including my chin.

I slowly swallowed half of this sexy cocktail and kept the other half for L to join me and share it with me via a sloppy messy snowball. It all ended up inside L’s and my stomach. Of course, there was some mixture of K’s squirt and L’s gag produced saliva which had earlier overflowed from my mouth to nearby areas, including my chin. L couldn’t see any of that going to waste either, so she licked it all up. Dirty girl.

[Type_O_Negative]

Its not the amount of reviews that puts me off but the multiple, suck up to a prossie, competition style  warts n all reviews of every suck & dribble that does & unfortunately they do seem to go hand in hand , however that particular subject matter has been done to death recently so I won't harp on about it.

Yes, "look at me" reviews, they do put me off.

[smiths]

I've never spoken to Michelle so I've no idea how many men she sees but I know from personal experience that being booked up in advance does not neccesarily indicate more meetings are taking place.
It all depends on the amount of requests a WG recieves vs the amount of time she has available for meetings. Eg. I know of a WG that tells me she recieves an average of 7 requests a day and sees 5 of them. She is almost always available on the day and is never booked up in advance. I currently recieve about 25 requests a day and see 1 of them. Im never available on the day and I've always been booked up 4-6 weeks in advance. Just that one example is proof that it is indeed entirely feasible that many well reviewed girls on here are actually seeing far less punters than those that are less reviewed/unreviewed.

It all depends on the amount of requests a WG receives vs the amount of time she has available for meetings, never, thanks for posting the bleeding obvious.

[smiths]

Its not the amount of reviews that puts me off but the multiple, suck up to a prossie, competition style  warts n all reviews of every suck & dribble that does & unfortunately they do seem to go hand in hand , however that particular subject matter has been done to death recently so I won't harp on about it.

But along with the OP I'm allowed my opinion irrespective if others agree or not & if they don't like what I have to say they are more than welcome to kiss my hairy arse  (for a fee)

Such reviews are of no interest me but they don't put me off the WG, I just view the punter as one who feels the need to show off when as its punting not dating there is nothing to show off about, though those punters that post they are jealous or envious presumably don't agree. Sadly from my point of view there is an increasing number of punters who feel this need to show off on here.

[Jimmyredcab]

I currently recieve about 25 requests a day and see 1 of them. Im never available on the day and I've always been booked up 4-6 weeks in advance.

Absolute bullshit, I am sure James999 will agree with me.     

[vw]

It all depends on the amount of requests a WG receives vs the amount of time she has available for meetings, never, thanks for posting the bleeding obvious.

It all becomes clear

Time available - Punter 1 booking length = time left for subsequent bookings

[vw]

Absolute bullshit, I am sure James999 will agree with me.     

Thought new availability for week ahead was getting published Sundays just like last Sunday.

[Cuntminion]

Can not watch back to the future again without thinking of this!

My mouth was now full of L’s thick saliva (from all that gagging) and K’s squirt that I had held in. In fact, a lot had overflowed from my mouth to the nearby areas, including my chin.

I slowly swallowed half of this sexy cocktail and kept the other half for L to join me and share it with me via a sloppy messy snowball. It all ended up inside L’s and my stomach. Of course, there was some mixture of K’s squirt and L’s gag produced saliva which had earlier overflowed from my mouth to nearby areas, including my chin. L couldn’t see any of that going to waste either, so she licked it all up. Dirty girl.

So it was spunk , spit and rectum juice

I forgot about the snowballing

Hidden Image/Members Only