Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Well reviewed girls = off putting  (Read 3224 times)

Offline spkmstr48

1. I never mentioned negative reviews??
2. Tedium is the issue I think.

Thanks for giving me a laugh to brighten a dull day.

Seriously you carry on  :lol:

 :drinks: :diablo: :lol:
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy

Offline smiths

Sorry OP.. To elaborate further..
I speak to many other WG's (both popular and less so) and I can assure you there is no correlation to support the evidence that well reviewed prossies are being any more "used" than those less well reviewed.
There is simply no way of knowing how many punters a girl is seeing based on her amount of feedback/reviews so to draw that conclusion based on an otherwise positively reviewed girl is a little unfair in my opinion. x

I agree with this except forum darlings are often booked up solid well in advance, an example being Michelle Independent so punters know for sure she is sucking and fucking loads of punters. But yes a lack of reviews or other feedback doesn't necessarily mean a WG is less busy than ones with lots of reviews/other feedback, I know this from personal experience of punting with many A/W WGs who ONLY worked off their phones and even months later had little A/W FB, yet I know from punting with them that they were busy as I was a regular but still had problems on occasion getting a booking, though most would fit me in.

Over many years of reading punting forums its a widespread concern of some punters that WGs they want to punt with were punting with loads of other punters, it really does put some off, yet the fact is of course that's what a WG does. Punting isn't for the squeamish, fortunately I have learnt over 30 plus years to only concern myself that I get a good service from those that interest me, I have no way of knowing for sure what any WG might be getting up to and with whom, so its not worth me worrying about it as that would spoil my fun.

Offline sam55

Sorry OP.. To elaborate further..
I speak to many other WG's (both popular and less so) and I can assure you there is no correlation to support the evidence that well reviewed prossies are being any more "used" than those less well reviewed.
There is simply no way of knowing how many punters a girl is seeing based on her amount of feedback/reviews so to draw that conclusion based on an otherwise positively reviewed girl is a little unfair in my opinion. x

Absolutely LK.
If any guys are drawing that conclusion then they are deluded, there is absolutely no correlation between feedbacks and amount of punters seen.
I was referring in my other post to feedback on AW by the way. As for UKP reviews, as fantastic as this site is, I believe that we represent a fairly small percentage of total punters.
As I say, my 2 regulars are almost certainly equally busy, one with 15 and one with 150 FB's on AW.
Some Thai massage girls, around here anyway, have zero feedback but provide a superb service.
In my experience, some girls ask specifically if you will do feedback, in which case I'm usually happy to oblige, others don't mention it so if I haven't booked through AW then  I won't.


Other than Lindsey and kdd I have seen all of the darlings and agree with the op that it does get boring reading the same stuff,but at the same time you cannot deny they are good whores

The last few months I have been seeing lots of new girls who are not heavily reviewed on here and have on the whole been having great punts so personally for me that is more satisfying than following the herd on here  :hi:

I have no way of knowing for sure what any WG might be getting up to and with whom, so its not worth me worrying about it as that would spoil my fun.
And they also have no idea what you are getting up to also.  As  long as on my time phones off as I consider that cheating then what more do these people expect.

Offline smiths

The most useful for me are the outcall only reviews and I love them.  I can an do a lot of outcalls which many cannot and the great outcall reviews really inspire me with confidence when getting my sex delivered.

Very popular and well reviewed incallers however can be more difficult to arrange a meet and I respect that, as a business owner myself you have to admire.

In my case I could do Outcalls but choose not to as I wish to punt as anonymously as possible and wouldn't trust any WG to come to my home, and I never had, and only visit WGs in Hotels which they are staying in. As ever its what suits the punter that matters.

Offline smiths

And they also have no idea what you are getting up to also.  As  long as on my time phones off as I consider that cheating then what more do these people expect.

Indeed they don't, but I am certainly not capable of shagging loads of WGs per day, as they are punters, my cock says no to that. :D

Offline yorkshire123

Its not the amount of reviews that puts me off but the multiple, suck up to a prossie, competition style  warts n all reviews of every suck & dribble that does & unfortunately they do seem to go hand in hand , however that particular subject matter has been done to death recently so I won't harp on about it.

But along with the OP I'm allowed my opinion irrespective if others agree or not & if they don't like what I have to say they are more than welcome to kiss my hairy arse  :thumbsup: (for a fee)

 
Banning reason: Making false malicious allegations against admin

Welcome to kiss my hairy arse  :thumbsup: (for a fee)
How much then, do you do extras my friend wants to kiss you while your shitting !  :lol: :lol: :lol:

Offline sam55

Its not the amount of reviews that puts me off but the multiple, suck up to a prossie, competition style  warts n all reviews of every suck & dribble that does & unfortunately they do seem to go hand in hand , however that particular subject matter has been done to death recently so I won't harp on about it.

But along with the OP I'm allowed my opinion irrespective if others agree or not & if they don't like what I have to say they are more than welcome to kiss my hairy arse  :thumbsup: (for a fee)

Well, the struggle I've had trying to get a punt today I might take you up on that.
Do UKP members get a discount?

Offline congo66

This is a stange thread.

Personally I don't really look too much at or worry about good reviews I only look for bad ones once I've found someone who offers the services I'm after for the price I'm prepared to pay and who I find attractive.

I've had fantastic times with 2 girls on AW with 500+ escort feedbacks and who have a large number of positive reviews here. I've seen a fair few with 200+  and they were also pretty good too with one exception who has plenty of negatives here but I thought it was worth a go as a backup punt and it really wasn't.

Positive reviews aren't a guarantee that I'll click with a girl anyway but I guess it does usually confirm that their services and pictures are accurate and give you an opinion on their real age v's prossie age but I already assume +5 years on that anyway.

I'm under no illusion about what the girls do or that I'm the only person they see on a particular day.

Offline Little Katie

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 74
I agree with this except forum darlings are often booked up solid well in advance, an example being Michelle Independent so punters know for sure she is sucking and fucking loads of punters. But yes a lack of reviews or other feedback doesn't necessarily mean a WG is less busy than ones with lots of reviews/other feedback, I know this from personal experience of punting with many A/W WGs who ONLY worked off their phones and even months later had little A/W FB, yet I know from punting with them that they were busy as I was a regular but still had problems on occasion getting a booking, though most would fit me in.

Over many years of reading punting forums its a widespread concern of some punters that WGs they want to punt with were punting with loads of other punters, it really does put some off, yet the fact is of course that's what a WG does. Punting isn't for the squeamish, fortunately I have learnt over 30 plus years to only concern myself that I get a good service from those that interest me, I have no way of knowing for sure what any WG might be getting up to and with whom, so its not worth me worrying about it as that would spoil my fun.

I've never spoken to Michelle so I've no idea how many men she sees but I know from personal experience that being booked up in advance does not neccesarily indicate more meetings are taking place.
It all depends on the amount of requests a WG recieves vs the amount of time she has available for meetings. Eg. I know of a WG that tells me she recieves an average of 7 requests a day and sees 5 of them. She is almost always available on the day and is never booked up in advance. I currently recieve about 25 requests a day and see 1 of them. Im never available on the day and I've always been booked up 4-6 weeks in advance. Just that one example is proof that it is indeed entirely feasible that many well reviewed girls on here are actually seeing far less punters than those that are less reviewed/unreviewed.
Banning reason: Misuse of pm facility

Offline comaminion

Its not the amount of reviews that puts me off but the multiple, suck up to a prossie, competition style  warts n all reviews of every suck & dribble that does & unfortunately they do seem to go hand in hand , however that particular subject matter has been done to death recently so I won't harp on about it.

But along with the OP I'm allowed my opinion irrespective if others agree or not & if they don't like what I have to say they are more than welcome to kiss my hairy arse  :thumbsup: (for a fee)

Mcfly springs to mind

No one, I mean no one really wants to hear about him downing an arse and spit juice cocktail

It's not that thinking of two stunning birds getting busy does not do anything for me I just can't annex the scenario and mentally picture mcfly (the mental image I have made up)
weeping, Cock in one hand, thank you card in the other, face like a two year old who's been given a jar of nutella

And this fucks any chance of me getting the mills and boon vibe he was hoping to achieve

Banning reason: White-knighting

Offline spkmstr48

Its not the amount of reviews that puts me off but the multiple, suck up to a prossie, competition style  warts n all reviews of every suck & dribble that does & unfortunately they do seem to go hand in hand , however that particular subject matter has been done to death recently so I won't harp on about it.

With that I agree
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy

Offline spkmstr48

I've never spoken to Michelle so I've no idea how many men she sees but I know from personal experience that being booked up in advance does not neccesarily indicate more meetings are taking place.
It all depends on the amount of requests a WG recieves vs the amount of time she has available for meetings. Eg. I know of a WG that tells me she recieves an average of 7 requests a day and sees 5 of them. She is almost always available on the day and is never booked up in advance. I currently recieve about 25 requests a day and see 1 of them. Im never available on the day and I've always been booked up 4-6 weeks in advance. Just that one example is proof that it is indeed entirely feasible that many well reviewed girls on here are actually seeing far less punters than those that are less reviewed/unreviewed.

+1
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy

Offline Lz-129

Mcfly springs to mind

No one, I mean no one really wants to hear about him downing an arse and spit juice cocktail

It's not that thinking of two stunning birds getting busy does not do anything for me I just can't annex the scenario and mentally picture mcfly (the mental image I have made up)
weeping, Cock in one hand, thank you card in the other, face like a two year old who's been given a jar of nutella

And this fucks any chance of me getting the mills and boon vibe he was hoping to achieve

Well you won't have to worry about that no more as he is banned! Tbf I think he gave a warning that his post was graphic so no one had to read it but there will be no more

Offline comaminion

Well you won't have to worry about that no more as he is banned! Tbf I think he gave a warning that his post was graphic so no one had to read it but there will be no more

Was not repulsive , not one to read over coco pops either, was more

 :rolleyes:
Banning reason: White-knighting

Was not repulsive , not one to read over coco pops either, was more

 :rolleyes:
Can not watch back to the future again without thinking of this!

My mouth was now full of L’s thick saliva (from all that gagging) and K’s squirt that I had held in. In fact, a lot had overflowed from my mouth to the nearby areas, including my chin.

I slowly swallowed half of this sexy cocktail and kept the other half for L to join me and share it with me via a sloppy messy snowball. It all ended up inside L’s and my stomach. Of course, there was some mixture of K’s squirt and L’s gag produced saliva which had earlier overflowed from my mouth to nearby areas, including my chin. L couldn’t see any of that going to waste either, so she licked it all up. Dirty girl.

Its not the amount of reviews that puts me off but the multiple, suck up to a prossie, competition style  warts n all reviews of every suck & dribble that does & unfortunately they do seem to go hand in hand , however that particular subject matter has been done to death recently so I won't harp on about it.


Yes, "look at me" reviews, they do put me off.

Offline smiths

I've never spoken to Michelle so I've no idea how many men she sees but I know from personal experience that being booked up in advance does not neccesarily indicate more meetings are taking place.
It all depends on the amount of requests a WG recieves vs the amount of time she has available for meetings. Eg. I know of a WG that tells me she recieves an average of 7 requests a day and sees 5 of them. She is almost always available on the day and is never booked up in advance. I currently recieve about 25 requests a day and see 1 of them. Im never available on the day and I've always been booked up 4-6 weeks in advance. Just that one example is proof that it is indeed entirely feasible that many well reviewed girls on here are actually seeing far less punters than those that are less reviewed/unreviewed.

It all depends on the amount of requests a WG receives vs the amount of time she has available for meetings, never, thanks for posting the bleeding obvious. :rolleyes:

Offline smiths

Its not the amount of reviews that puts me off but the multiple, suck up to a prossie, competition style  warts n all reviews of every suck & dribble that does & unfortunately they do seem to go hand in hand , however that particular subject matter has been done to death recently so I won't harp on about it.

But along with the OP I'm allowed my opinion irrespective if others agree or not & if they don't like what I have to say they are more than welcome to kiss my hairy arse  :thumbsup: (for a fee)

Such reviews are of no interest me but they don't put me off the WG, I just view the punter as one who feels the need to show off when as its punting not dating there is nothing to show off about, though those punters that post they are jealous or envious presumably don't agree. Sadly from my point of view there is an increasing number of punters who feel this need to show off on here.

Offline Jimmyredcab

I currently recieve about 25 requests a day and see 1 of them. Im never available on the day and I've always been booked up 4-6 weeks in advance.

Absolute bullshit, I am sure James999 will agree with me.      :hi:

It all depends on the amount of requests a WG receives vs the amount of time she has available for meetings, never, thanks for posting the bleeding obvious. :rolleyes:
It all becomes clear

Time available - Punter 1 booking length = time left for subsequent bookings

Absolute bullshit, I am sure James999 will agree with me.      :hi:
Thought new availability for week ahead was getting published Sundays just like last Sunday.

Offline comaminion

Can not watch back to the future again without thinking of this!

My mouth was now full of L’s thick saliva (from all that gagging) and K’s squirt that I had held in. In fact, a lot had overflowed from my mouth to the nearby areas, including my chin.

I slowly swallowed half of this sexy cocktail and kept the other half for L to join me and share it with me via a sloppy messy snowball. It all ended up inside L’s and my stomach. Of course, there was some mixture of K’s squirt and L’s gag produced saliva which had earlier overflowed from my mouth to nearby areas, including my chin. L couldn’t see any of that going to waste either, so she licked it all up. Dirty girl.

So it was spunk , spit and rectum juice

I forgot about the snowballing

Banning reason: White-knighting


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)