Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Kendra - Glasgow  (Read 7685 times)


7 review(s) for K_E_N_D_R_A (5 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


if a girl wants to charge a certain rate she has the right to do so... 

her profile seems clear on what she does and does not do.

she looks better than most the girls on here...  and does not look like she does this coz she NEEDS the money so she can charge what ever she feels like you should not be moaning about it

if u cant afford it with out moaning get something else .......

If you don't like seeing a negative/neutral review of your favourite girl then don't read it

my understanding of the said review Whilst she charges 120 she only gives a 100 performance.

Offline Happy99

well done for the honest review  :thumbsup:

I see the amended blog is back up........ And I still stick with my original comments....

Offline RandyF

if a girl wants to charge a certain rate she has the right to do so... 

her profile seems clear on what she does and does not do.

she looks better than most the girls on here...  and does not look like she does this coz she NEEDS the money so she can charge what ever she feels like you should not be moaning about it

if u cant afford it with out moaning get something else .......

That's not even fluffy Raith. That's just moronic.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline RandyF

I read it earlier when it contained a couple of usernames.

I was going to say, for Kendra's sake - I was glad it was gone, as the hoor haters, and misogynists would've had a field day with it...but she's put it back up now  :rolleyes: Obviously she feels it needs saying.

Through every single one of those 2500 words, there's just one strong overriding impression I get from this hoor -  She has never ever been comfortable being a prostitute. Not even close.

I'm reading it and thinking why does she do this!?  It clearly doesn't suit her - doesn't suit 98% of the world female population either, she just happen to be one of the 98.
 
I think she's become hooked on the cash.  Hairdressers pay -HMRC's (remember them?) cut on civvy street?  Nahh it's is just tooo nasty to contemplate.

Banning reason: Troll

Offline Happy99

one fluffy troll banned  :yahoo: amazingly the more blatantly obvious white knight continues to post.

Offline chico1000

Fcuk me! This forum must be melting my brains, or what passes for brains.

I thought he meant 'plates of meat' as in rhyming slang - a foot fetish thing!

Must be my age.
"Fcuk me" yourself, a simple mistake, not heard of it before, no need to go into meltdown.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline rogue5

One review in a whole year and she goes ballistic, god knows what negative would of given us  :wacko:

Offline tryssic

Although there is a right to reply etc., she's not gone the best way about it and from the tone of her blog it feels as though (whether she admits it or not) she resents us punters. Coupled with the fact she's put up a amendment stating she had to remove usernames but given the chance she'd put them back on, well maybe it's time for her to think about a career change as she only want fluffy customers.

There have been plenty of punts where I've come away where there hasn't been anything wrong but I've not been entirely happy, and in that case it's hard to justify a positive. Maybe that's the way the OP felt. But as the saying goes 'one man's pleasure is another man's poison' (or something to that effect).

Either way, because of the way she's reacted, that's Kendra off my hotlist (not that she'd be bothered).

Offline tryssic

My bad, she doesn't explicitly mention that she'd put usernames back into the blog, but you get the impression she's not happy about removing them.

Offline RandyF


well maybe it's time for her to think about a career change as she only want fluffy customers.


Yeah, you'd think she just lock it right down to the regular fluffy punters she allegedly adores only, and give a big fuck off to everyone else that she happily admits to loathing. Plenty of hoors have done exactly that over the years.

...but there's a problem with this route. £££. Say she has two dozen regulars visiting sporadically, what once in a few weeks at most? How often does a diehard fluffy really visit, once a week at best?  Whatever that figure is - this doesn't don't bring in enough money. That'd be almost verging on a civvy salary.  She needs the general punter cock  to continue. She needs the 'vile, disgusting' UKP cock too unfortunately  :lol:

Just imagine having to live on a civvy salary AND pay tax lads  :vomit:  Worrying about every poxy measly 20 quid.  Ughh horrid  :vomit:  Think I might be tempted to sook the old man cock  masell.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline grey402

that blog is rediculous I think she has a cheek to call it only £20 quid aye a £20 quid we have to work hard for.

Offline tallguy74

You know the price before you pay. If you don't think its fair or you can't afford it, then its YOUR fault not Kendras
Banning reason: Previously banned (Ben1122)

Offline RandyF

You know the price before you pay. If you don't think its fair or you can't afford it, then its YOUR fault not Kendras

This 'poxy' 20 quids only relevant because the reviewer pumped at both £120 & £100, and felt 120 was too much for the limited services, but at 100 it'd have been a positive review.  Seems like a fair enough conclusion.

Also Tallguy - last night on her blog she had that you were a kinky pervert that likes getting fucked in the arse by trannies, and had no right to be booking her either.  Yep, she really did I'm not making this up  :rolleyes: :lol:  No doubt, because you said earlier she was boring.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline J_H

"Fcuk me" yourself, a simple mistake, not heard of it before, no need to go into meltdown.

"Fcuk me" yourself, yourself - I thought I had got it completely wrong when I wrote that!

Offline tallguy74

This 'poxy' 20 quids only relevant because the reviewer pumped at both £120 & £100, and felt 120 was too much for the limited services, but at 100 it'd have been a positive review.  Seems like a fair enough conclusion.

Also Tallguy - last night on her blog she had that you were a kinky pervert that likes getting fucked in the arse by trannies, and had no right to be booking her either.  Yep, she really did I'm not making this up  :rolleyes: :lol:  No doubt, because you said earlier she was boring.

I was actually on her side there but its clear this girl has some serious mental problems  :dash:

Banning reason: Previously banned (Ben1122)

Offline JazzMan

I was actually on her side there but its clear this girl has some serious mental problems  :dash:

Leave the girl alone.
It was a fair review.
She offers a vanilla service and she is honest about it.
There's no need to be upsetting people.
I've never met Kendra but she seems very genuine person.



Banning reason: Slagging off membership

Offline chico1000

I was actually on her side there but its clear this girl has some serious mental problems  :dash:
To be honest I think you should be more upset at Randy for re-posting her comments about your likes.  Very few people would have seen it on her blog before the user names were taken down. Randy has just now published it for the world.  Hopefully Randy PMd you first of all to ask you but I doubt that.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline RandyF

To be honest I think you should be more upset at Randy for re-posting her comments about your likes.  Very few people would have seen it on her blog before the user names were taken down. Randy has just now published it for the world.  Hopefully Randy PMd you first of all to ask you but I doubt that.

 :D :lol:  Sensing blood Chicster?

Quick click on the gents previous posts (which I presume is what Kendra did) suggests he's fairly open minded regarding such matters, so good for him  :)

Care for some sirloin steak with your whine?
Banning reason: Troll

Offline tallguy74

To be honest I think you should be more upset at Randy for re-posting her comments about your likes.  Very few people would have seen it on her blog before the user names were taken down. Randy has just now published it for the world.  Hopefully Randy PMd you first of all to ask you but I doubt that.

She has just updated the blog, with the exact words, so it doesn't matter, who cares anyway, as someone else said I wonder what the blog would have been like if the review was negative  :scare:
Banning reason: Previously banned (Ben1122)

Offline chico1000

:D :lol:  Sensing blood Chicster?

Quick click on the gents previous posts (which I presume is what Kendra did) suggests he's fairly open minded regarding such matters, so good for him  :)

Care for some sirloin steak with your whine?
How did you know Randy he wanted broadcast? Your contradicting yourself because your pulling her up for that and then doing the same thing.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline RandyF

How did you know Randy he wanted broadcast? Your contradicting yourself because your pulling her up for that and then doing the same thing.

You score a C- for this shit stirring attempt moaning Minnie.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline RandyF

She has just updated the blog, with the exact words, so it doesn't matter, who cares anyway, as someone else said I wonder what the blog would have been like if the review was negative  :scare:

Well I do apologize for perhaps cruder than need be, but I'm a modern man about these things - always supporting the lads JH & Firebird, and no I didn't memorise or keep a copy of her 2500 word diatribe for reference :rolleyes:

You say against her at all no matter how slight, your on the shit list. It's that simple.  Black and white.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline chico1000

Well what do you expect your accusing her of being indiscrete (a cardinal sin for them) and your doing it yourself. As for shit stirrers I'm learning from a master ie you!
Banning reason: Troll

Offline RandyF

Well what do you expect your accusing her of being indiscrete (a cardinal sin for them) and your doing it yourself. As for shit stirrers I'm learning from a master ie you!

No Chico I wasn't accusing her of being indiscreet.  I wondered if she had been, and clicked Talls previous and saw where she'd probably got the info.

I brought it up because Tall had mentioned her being 'boring', and that was it, she went for him, basically screamed he had no right booking her because he enjoys the kinkier side of life  :rolleyes:
Banning reason: Troll




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)