Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Creampiecumsluts  (Read 4459 times)

Offline Daffodil

I do feel there is hypocrisy when punters do owo, but chastise those who do bareback. The only difference is the degree of risk, and I feel that they're probably closer in terms of risk than we'd like to imagine.

I have heard far more tales on here of punters catching STDs from oral sex than from bareback sex. That's not to say that I think bareback is safer than owo, it likely represents the fact barebackers are fewer in number than those who do owo and also that barebackers are less likely to talk openly about it, but STDs are caught through oral sex.

I also think it's naive to assume a prostitute doesn't do bareback sex because she says she doesn't do bareback sex. A lot do it with punters, off the record. I've been directly and indirectly offered it. Prossies also tend to be promiscuous by nature and are probably fucking all sorts on a Friday night.

It's fine to avail yourselves of the risks and make a choice that feels right for you. I, myself, have started erring towards covered oral. But try to do it on real risks, rather than perceived risks, and be careful in your glass houses.

Offline jay0707

I do feel there is hypocrisy when punters do owo, but chastise those who do bareback. The only difference is the degree of risk, and I feel that they're probably closer in terms of risk than we'd like to imagine.

I have heard far more tales on here of punters catching STDs from oral sex than from bareback sex. That's not to say that I think bareback is safer than owo, it likely represents the fact barebackers are fewer in number than those who do owo and also that barebackers are less likely to talk openly about it, but STDs are caught through oral sex.

I also think it's naive to assume a prostitute doesn't do bareback sex because she says she doesn't do bareback sex. A lot do it with punters, off the record. I've been directly and indirectly offered it. Prossies also tend to be promiscuous by nature and are probably fucking all sorts on a Friday night.

It's fine to avail yourselves of the risks and make a choice that feels right for you. I, myself, have started erring towards covered oral. But try to do it on real risks, rather than perceived risks, and be careful in your glass houses.

I agree, regardless of myself always going for OWO. I mean we can never truly tell if an escort offers bareback to people regardless of her stating it. But I tend to think that the girls (regulars) I visit don't because after a handful of meets and more with regulars haven't offered it directly or indirectly to me yet. But that's merely anecdotal assumption.

For all we know barebackers might be safer to fuck assuming they'll be more health concious getting regular tests as they know they have more exposure to std's etc than people whore fuck covered. But that's not something I want to assume, merely another way of looking at the issue.

Offline jsparky

For all we know barebackers might be safer to fuck assuming they'll be more health concious getting regular tests as they know they have more exposure to std's etc than people whore fuck covered. But that's not something I want to assume, merely another way of looking at the issue.

You're making the wrong assumptions, the barebackers are definitely the less health conscious, they  know if they are infected its because they got it from punters/pro$$ies alike; to them its only fair game they infect other punters/pro$$ies.

If you read the post on forums by barebackers carefully and you'll realized this is the kind of attitudes shown by the barebackers.

Offline jay0707

Yeah likely is the wrong assumption.

To be fair kinda clicked on from UKBB's posts. He won't state who is barebacking, because it's probably a little game to him to send people off thinking they might be fucking a WG who he fucked bareback. Or he's frauding. Either way, being a prick.

Yeah likely is the wrong assumption.

To be fair kinda clicked on from UKBB's posts. He won't state who is barebacking, because it's probably a little game to him to send people off thinking they might be fucking a WG who he fucked bareback. Or he's frauding. Either way, being a prick.
He's just a cunt no other way to describe the fucker

Offline Smoking joe

Agreed with all the above - UKBB, this is a forum for sharing information, not gloating that you've fucked WG's BB when they don't offer it.

The most fair thing for you to do, would be to name these WG' s and let other punters make an informed decision about whether they want to see them. Irrespective of whether you've caught no worse than chlamydia (but that's still pretty bad), the next punter she saw after you may have infected her with something worse.

If women offer BB then fine, that's their prerogative. The ones that don't but do it are the worry.

Agreed, bloke is an idiot. Will he carry on if/ when he is HIV positive?  Moron.

And frankly, I don't want to risk having your sloppy seconds. So well done, you've had your moment and got one over on non barebackers, but have the humility to name them please.

UKBB might be trying to whined us all up or maybe not but I think its pretty safe to say that there are plenty of BB punters out there who don't admit to it, keeping it hidden and are probably shagging all the highly rated non-BB WIGs out there as well.

for example:
UKBB claims he has seen https://www.adultwork.com/2441391 she doesn't offer BB but due to her not being as popular as many other wigs no one is really going to care but what happens if he goes and sees say tiffany snow or ava grace et

Also OWO is not risk free either but plenty of Punters do it so god knows whats being passed on there.

Reality is, this is a very risky game even, if you are trying to be careful there's no guarantees the wig has been as careful in choosing her clients. It's probably her only source of income so she will take on majority of people who contact her and not question their punting history.


BTW I think UKBB is Leicester based majority of the girls he has talked about are based in Leicester or have toured there so you could avoid Leicester in general but, all of this is relative, as I have said we don't know who a WIG has BB'd with or the clients she has seen and OWO is no less risky than BB


2 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

Repetition doesn't make a 'fact' accurate. Don't forget, for years we were told saturated fats made us fat and that diet low in fat and high in carbohydrate was the way to go to stay slim.

No repetition doesn't but the fact that it is a "fact" does!!! Doing BB with a WG is your choice the fact that in the hundreds of BB fucks you've had you've only caught Chlamydia indicates you're lucky. Ive had hundreds of fucks too and never caught anything because I avoid women who advertise they do BB. I'm choosy about who I punt with and I practice safe sex when I punt. It is a FACT that unprotected sex carries a higher risk of an STI being transmitted and for the majority of people on here that's an unacceptable risk!

Offline Ben4454


For me it is strictly protected sex and oral WITH.
Banning reason: Ignored admin warning after temporary banning and signed up to malicious troll anti-UKP site

UKBB has finally done it, he's gone and seen Mandy of Leicester, who is probably the best thing out there and is now ruined. we can all grill him but that's pointless, start warning the Leicester girls they have a real threat out there to their business


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)