Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: What proportion of your punts are not worth the effort?  (Read 4298 times)

Offline xuan

After my latest disaster of a punt (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=6278.0) I'm compelled to ask fellow members how many of their punts they deem not to have been worth the effort. I have a simple definition for being 'not worth the effort';

Would you rather have stayed at home and had a wank?
« Last Edit: February 25, 2012, 09:53:57 PM by xuan »

Offline xuan

At the moment, after a series of fucking shockers, I'm probably running at close to 70%. Which is fucking pitiful.

Are other members as unlucky as me?

For the money I've wasted recently on shit punts, I could have had a weekend in Manchester or somewhere, where I can use the services of trusted agencies where I've consistently had good experiences. Indeed, I think this'll have to be my new punting plan; a few weekends away a year in Manchester or London or something, and stop using these shit fucking indies every fortnight.

Offline Stiltskin

Most are good these days, but only because I don't punt that much. I'm pretty selective and after many terrible punts, very cynical.

I've come to the conclusion that there are very few good ladies out there. So, although I don't punt as often as I'd like, I'm probably having the maximum number of decent punts I could have, given the amount of dross that's out there.

Offline Boy

Would you rather have stayed at home and had a wank?

All the best orgasms of my life have been by the skill of my wanking hand  :sarcastic:


Offline Boy

I'm pretty selective and after many terrible punts, very cynical.

Me too. My region and the maximum I'm prepared to travel to, on AW, is looking profoundly tired and washed up.

None of them interest me. One is a 'maybe' but doesn't inspire me enough to go and spend that money on a gamble.

Whenever I see a new profile appear in my area of browsing profiles, it usually has all the signs of the nationwide EE Scams.


Offline philuk1uk

I've been lucky in that i've had 1 bad punt out of about 40odd with about 20 different girls, so just that one which made me feel bad and wished i'd stayed at home.

Offline Stiltskin

Me too. My region and the maximum I'm prepared to travel to, on AW, is looking profoundly tired and washed up.

Do you think things are getting worse on AW, compared to a couple of years ago? I'm finding that there are far less girls that interest me these days.

Offline mattylondon

Do you think things are getting worse on AW, compared to a couple of years ago? I'm finding that there are far less girls that interest me these days.
I do notice that it appears to be increasingly flooded with bogus profiles, the source of which are usually scam artist EE men/women. Or perhaps, my radar is more tuned to them now. I'm not sure?  :unknown:

Offline Ali Katt

I voted 40% - I think most are average or good, very few are amazing. I've only had one bad last year which was fucking awful, a few average the rest where either very good or excellent. I think the mediocre ones are forgettable - sometimes it is down to me though e.g. cumming quicker than I'd like or not being into the girl as much as I should be etc.

At the moment, after a series of fucking shockers, I'm probably running at close to 70%. Which is fucking pitiful.

Are other members as unlucky as me?

For the money I've wasted recently on shit punts, I could have had a weekend in Manchester or somewhere, where I can use the services of trusted agencies where I've consistently had good experiences. Indeed, I think this'll have to be my new punting plan; a few weekends away a year in Manchester or London or something, and stop using these shit fucking indies every fortnight.

Hard to quantify in any meaningful sense. Question is, are these punts disappointing because the WG is obviously not 'as advertised'? Or what about when they're broadly 'as advertised' but the experience just isn't very thrilling or downright poor or inept?

I work on the basis that one in three OUGHT to be good, one ought to be OK and by the law of averages, one will be crap. I think these odds do slide up and down quite a bit depending on where you are in the country. In London, my share of crap punts in the past has definitely not been as high as one in three. Maybe one in five, or better. But out of town, it slides back up the other way.



Offline NIK

A good 50% over the years, but maybe 25% in the last five.

0% anymore because I don't punt!  :cry: :D

Online Jimmyredcab

At the moment, after a series of fucking shockers, I'm probably running at close to 70%. Which is fucking pitiful.

Are other members as unlucky as me?

The truthful members are probably as unlucky as you, a fluffie posted on here the other day that he rarely has a bad punt, maybe he is very easy to please.

I am very selective these days and frankly with the internet, there's no reason not to be.

20 years ago, my success rate was 50% at best.  These days, it's nearer 80%.  Partly its research, partly it's just my being more assertive.  These days if the girl is not as enthusiastic as I expect, I have fewer qualms about just using her however I want.  A failed punt just then boils down to a girl who is a) ugly or b) not willing to fill the time having as much sex as possible.  Also I go to LMP quitea lot and it's a long time since I've had a failed punt there!

But if I were solely to think with my cock, I think my success rate would be lower.

SOD

The truthful members are probably as unlucky as you, a fluffie posted on here the other day that he rarely has a bad punt, maybe he is very easy to please.

Well, I don't think I'm a fluffie or am easy to please but I do think that basic research helps.

What do you define as "easy to please" - maybe i am?


SOD

Online Jimmyredcab


What do you define as "easy to please" - maybe i am?


SOD
"Easy to please" --------- happy as long as the girl looks remotely like her picture and is no more than ten years older.
Many punters are easy to please, even if they get a totally shit service they say it can't be the girl's fault.
Read the FR's from Dreamweaverman and you will see what I mean.  :rolleyes:

Well, I'm certainly not easy to please by that definition!


SOD

Offline Cactus

I have more good than bad and of the bad only a handful have been awful.  Looking back some of my earliest punts probably were pretty crap but having little experience at the time I walked out happy enough.  I think as I've gotten older my expectations have raised, but also my selection/screening process has improved and I seem to be able to spot the dodgy burds better.  A couple of times punts have not been brilliant but still wouldn't say they weren't worth the effort, chalk it down to experience and learn for the future.

Offline Lurtz

When I first started punting, the punts were mainly terrible, but the excitement of finding a girl & entering her premises etc added some excitement to a dull night. With experience, the selection process became more successful, and with the arrival of the internet, even better. Most of my punts are excellent, but there are always one or two each year where I wished I'd chosen a different girl.

If I had a failure rate of 70% I'd probably go dogging instead.

Online Jimmyredcab



If I had a failure rate of 70% I'd probably go dogging instead.

Both myself and NIK have been punting for over 25 years, maybe that leads to our expectations being quite high, both of us virtually never punt now, that tells you all you need to know.   :dash:

Offline Lurtz

Both myself and NIK have been punting for over 25 years, maybe that leads to our expectations being quite high, both of us virtually never punt now, that tells you all you need to know.   :dash:

Jimmy, I can't understand why you have such a poor hit rate. You really enjoyed your time with Elise, didn't you? Well, she's not the only decent filly in that particular stables.

Offline xuan

Jesus, who voted 80%?

Yeah, almost at the dogging stage, Lurtz, but I'm fairly confident that my success rate will increase from here on, I certainly feel wiser and on my next punt I swear I'll be fully prepared to walk if it looks even slightly unfavorable.

But I don't think I'll be punting again until I go down to Manchester in April, I can't fucking afford it with the amount I've blown on shit punts recently. That's the thing, if I'd had one decent punt in the last month to satisfy me, then I don't think I'd have felt the need to book so many more. It's the fact that the punts have been so shit that each time I've been compelled to arrange another one straight away to make up for it. I'm addicted in a sense, I suppose. Like the gambler who keeps losing but keeps throwing more money in the machine thinking he'll win it all back.

Quote
Hard to quantify in any meaningful sense. Question is, are these punts disappointing because the WG is obviously not 'as advertised'? Or what about when they're broadly 'as advertised' but the experience just isn't very thrilling or downright poor or inept?

This isn't really relevant to the question. Regardless of the reasons of why some punts are better than others, of all your punts, how many would you have rather stayed at home and had a wank instead?

Quote
I work on the basis that one in three OUGHT to be good, one ought to be OK and by the law of averages, one will be crap. I think these odds do slide up and down quite a bit depending on where you are in the country. In London, my share of crap punts in the past has definitely not been as high as one in three. Maybe one in five, or better. But out of town, it slides back up the other way.

I think that's a sensible rate to expect, KN, and if my rate was about that I'd be happy. What do you think the reason is for London being better than the rest of the country?

Offline Lurtz


But I don't think I'll be punting again until I go down to Manchester in April, I can't fucking afford it with the amount I've blown on shit punts recently.

The success rate in Manchester must be fairly good if you select a girl carefully. Sandy's has a good reputation and both Miss A Squires and Carmen work up there.

Offline xuan

Might try Sandy's next time, Lurtz. I'm a big fan of the NB agency though and they've got some new girls since I was last down. I've had 4 punts with them so far, all of them good.

Offline philuk1uk

The success rate in Manchester must be fairly good if you select a girl carefully. Sandy's has a good reputation and both Miss A Squires and Carmen work up there.

I think you are right, if you do your homework in Manchester, it's possible to have a very high success rate, i've had 1 bad punt out of about 40 in Manchester, so that's 2.5% bad, and I would 97.5% were all good or better.  There is just so much feedback out there for girls in Manchester, though i'm sure if I had a few more punts with girls with no or little feedback I would have more bad punts, I just don't see the need, when there is so many good girls around, to take that risk.


I think that's a sensible rate to expect, KN, and if my rate was about that I'd be happy. What do you think the reason is for London being better than the rest of the country?

One word: competition.

Just did a quick AW search. AW has 16,800 prostitutes listed in the UK, and 3,800 in London. Taking all the agency (and thus mostly non-AW) girls into acount, that means that nearly one in four tarts in the UK is in the capital, but London only has something like one tenth of the UK's population.  Competition's keener, prices stay stable, quality has to be kept up.



Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)