The girl has banned the guy and no doubt the agency has as well. He's not the first guy to have been banned by an escort/agency and he won't be the last.
That's all there is to it no matter what Anth or others might think about going public and forcing the girl or punter to state why she has banned him. It has nothing to do with anyone else.
If she feels the need to ban a client that's up to her, and she certainly doesn't have to come on here, or anywhere else for that matter, and justify her actions.
However that is not the issue at play here.
Alenski has came onto the forum and posted a negative review. Claiming he has tried to book with Morgan 5 times. She has messed him about coming up with timewasting reasons and not seen him. He has posted a complaint about it on the forum and he has now found on attempt number 6 of seeing her that she may have banned him as a result of solely posting this criticism of her in April.
Morgan has come on here to challenge that negative review by hinting he was banned from seeing her for something he did in a booking in the past with her. He has tried to rebook and he would have known he was banned.
The issue therefore is what he did in my eyes over whether he would or should have known he wouldn't be welcome back and thus whether the negative review is justified or not.
The topic has then turned into a tangent due to some other girl claiming to another punter anonymously that Alenski was violent with her. So then people are saying this means Alenski must have been violent with Morgan too.
This review with lack of information is kind of worthless and just makes both Alenski and Morgan look bad when one of them effectively shouldn't be.
As people seem to be forgetting there is still very much the possibility here that Alenski was "banned" solely for posting those comments on the forum towards her and had no clue he was not welcome.