Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Members who only write positive reviews.  (Read 4089 times)

Offline RandyF

No, I'd say the content of the reviews much more important than the overall ratings. Even the worst, fluffiest reviews ever have some merit. Even if it's just to confirms that the hoor exists, or someone or other probably exists at the other end of the profile...

Fluffies have wised up. They'll write reviews that are 99.9% positive, gushing, over the top with real passionate love making...then out of blue comes a 'Neutral' rating, due to the fact she kept him waiting 10mins or wasn't wearing the correct type of gusset.  The contents basically all subservient & fluffy, it's the ratings there doctoring.

Banning reason: Troll

Offline AnthG

I can find a girl on AW and within 10 mins looking on UKP will know whether she's worth visiting, and that'll be my research done.

But what would you use to form your research?

Say for example a girl has a positive review from two brand new members who posted them and never returned again afterwards, and another two from members who post a lot on the forum but have 20 positives to their name and no neutral or negatives.

Would you go ahead with this trusting research complete?

Offline Big Cat

So how many positive reviews does the girl need for you to take the plunge, 2, 10, 20.    :unknown:

Sometimes you have to take a gamble, new girls on the scene will not have any reviews.

Just the one if it's coming from someone who's got more than 5 posts. I agree it's obviously useful when people TOFFT but to say researching a girl is "nonsense" makes no sense - isn't that what this board is essentially for?
Banning reason: Previously banned fluffy troll (Daniel Bryan)

Offline The_Don

No, I'd say the content of the reviews much more important than the overall ratings. Even the worst, fluffiest reviews ever have some merit. Even if it's just to confirms that the hoor exists, or someone or other probably exists at the other end of the profile...

Fluffies have wised up. They'll write reviews that are 99.9% positive, gushing, over the top with real passionate love making...then out of blue comes a 'Neutral' rating, due to the fact she kept him waiting 10mins or wasn't wearing the correct type of gusset.  The contents basically all subservient & fluffy, it's the ratings there doctoring.


Punters are willing to pay for different things and to some. Not having a W/G fulfill some requirement may mean they rate as one thing. But the contents may (subjectively) read differently to some one else.


Offline Big Cat

But what would you use to form your research?

Say for example a girl has a positive review from two brand new members who posted them and never returned again afterwards, and another two from members who post a lot on the forum but have 20 positives to their name and no neutral or negatives.

Would you go ahead with this trusting research complete?

It's not that complicated really. By research I mean simply pasting the girl's ID into the search box and reading all the reviews. Hardly extensive stuff but in my experience it's helped me and most of the time I've found other people's reviews are on the money.

The situation you describe might sound a bit iffy but then it's up to you if you go for it. Even if a girl has 20 positive reviews from 20 long time members, you still never know how you're going to click with a WG.
Banning reason: Previously banned fluffy troll (Daniel Bryan)

Offline Mansell

AnthG's made a good point, in each area you get to know who gives reviews it's worth believing and for me they always take precendence over someone I hardly know reviewing.

Offline AnthG

The situation you describe might sound a bit iffy but then it's up to you if you go for it. Even if a girl has 20 positive reviews from 20 long time members, you still never know how you're going to click with a WG.

The best thing in my opinion for research is to find a punter who you know from past reviews has liked the same girls you have liked, and who hasn't like the same girls you haven't and then effectively follow them like a hawk.


Even though I'm semi-retired from punting, I still search the UKP reviews section in the fading hope of finding that golden nugget hidden under the mountain of over-priced and over-hyped manure that fills AW.... but my question is this:

Do other members ignore reviews from punters who only do positive reviews?

Surely a credible punter will have a decent mix of positive, neutral and negatives?

Are they really lucky, rich, fluffy, easily pleased or just lying to avoid embarrassment / being blacklisted?

 :hi:

I posted a negative review about Lizzie 18 and her friend Summer when it happened. I don't know what happened to it but it should be in Google caches somehow, I'm not sure. Most of my negative experiences were in my early days of punting in Amsterdam. I wrote those negatives in my reviews on Ignatzmice which is a forum about Amsterdam and the RLD. As I have said in another thread, it's like betting on Arsenal vs Hull. I've learned from my mistakes in my youth to now go with the favourite. If I have a negative experience then I will post about it as I will continue to post about my positive ones.

Offline The_Don

It's not that complicated really. By research I mean simply pasting the girl's ID into the search box and reading all the reviews. Hardly extensive stuff but in my experience it's helped me and most of the time I've found other people's reviews are on the money.

The details and experiences of the UKP membership base, can be useful in many ways.

The situation you describe might sound a bit iffy but then it's up to you if you go for it. Even if a girl has 20 positive reviews from 20 long time members, you still never know how you're going to click with a WG.

indeed, YMMV with any W/G.


The best thing in my opinion for research is to find a punter who you know from past reviews has liked the same girls you have liked, and who hasn't like the same girls you haven't and then effectively follow them like a hawk.



In general this is has merits. But I've punted W/G that I did negative reviews on but other did positives. IMO, YMMV with any W/G.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2015, 09:37:16 PM by The_Don »

Offline Jimmyredcab

When I read some of the reviews on here it is obvious to me that some guys would fuck anything with a pulse ----- as long as the price was right.    :unknown:

I am fussy, maybe too fussy but I am not prepared to hand my money over to lowlife skanks, that is why I rule out ALL Romanians.

Offline yorkshire123

When I read some of the reviews on here it is obvious to me that some guys would fuck anything with a pulse ----- as long as the price was right.    :unknown:

I am fussy, maybe too fussy but I am not prepared to hand my money over to lowlife skanks, that is why I rule out ALL Romanians.

I get that Jimmy but out of curiosity has that always been the case?

As I stated earlier the longer I have been a member on here the more picky I have become & came to a conclusion to cease punting for while as I wasn't really getting what I wanted out of it.

Like I said its not a dig I'm just curious if this is a cycle that long term punters go through (maybe a another topic?)
Banning reason: Making false malicious allegations against admin

Offline smiths

When I read some of the reviews on here it is obvious to me that some guys would fuck anything with a pulse ----- as long as the price was right.    :unknown:

I am fussy, maybe too fussy but I am not prepared to hand my money over to lowlife skanks, that is why I rule out ALL Romanians.

Up to you who you rule in or out and how fussy you are, your money your rules, but after actually having some good punts with WGs who advertised as and said they were Romanians I go on the individual WGs attitude myself as that's what makes a good or bad WG. One of the points to UKP is punters can choose to share information so the idea is you read reviews/feedback of punters you find credible and take their word the WG offered them a good service etc and punt accordingly if that's what you choose.

Because you, I or others might find a WG unattractive or worse its a fact some others might not, that's always been the case of course and I daresay always will be. As to the price being right yes well some of us want VFM as we see it when punting and nothing at all wrong with that, unlike you we don't all exclude ALL WGs who charge under £100 an hour and from experience of punting with some of them as reviews show know there are good WGs in all price brackets from Soho Walk-Ups to many hundreds of pounds or more an hour. All a case of locating the good ones obviously which UKP can be a great help with.

Offline Jimmyredcab

I get that Jimmy but out of curiosity has that always been the case?

As I stated earlier the longer I have been a member on here the more picky I have become & came to a conclusion to cease punting for while as I wasn't really getting what I wanted out of it.

Like I said its not a dig I'm just curious if this is a cycle that long term punters go through (maybe a another topic?)

I think we all rely too heavily on Adultwork, my best punting days were long before AW came on the scene ----- but in those days I had a dozen brothels within a 30 minute drive, they have all closed down.

I rarely punt now and I can't say I miss it.    :hi:

Members who only write positive reviews are members who don't want to admit they had a bad punt or punts because it would ruin their "I am the perfect punter" image. Also quite often they book well reviewed prossies ONLY and they think they can be "tough guys" here with their ALL positive reviews.

Offline cueball

Well, I don't know how others work it but if I've enjoyed myself and left smiling it's positive, if I've wondered why I bothered its neutral and if I've left regretting the experience it's negative.

I don't know any other way to honestly write a review.

Offline pking_paul

think I have a good attitude going into punts and don't treat WGs like they are just a hole for my penis.


+1 on that.

I had a great punt on a bad night that really cheered me up and turned my day around. Turned out she has shit reviews on here but mine was a real positive experience. Because I went against the flow the locals had a bit of a go but as far as I'm concerned I speak as I find.


Members who only write positive reviews are members who don't want to admit they had a bad punt or punts because it would ruin their "I am the perfect punter" image. Also quite often they book well reviewed prossies ONLY and they think they can be "tough guys" here with their ALL positive reviews.
Some get upset if the 52nd review of the girl they saw doesn't get any comments, well done's or tally ho's.

Well, I don't know how others work it but if I've enjoyed myself and left smiling it's positive, if I've wondered why I bothered its neutral and if I've left regretting the experience it's negative.

I don't know any other way to honestly write a review.

Not surprisingly, I agree with Cue. We share a lot of info via PM as we have similar tastes. He's one of my trusted NW punting pals. There are others in the NW I'm more cautious about......

tcm

Offline Marmalade

On advice: If you read UKP and still have to ask how to consider the pros and cons maybe try sonething safer like ludo.  :hi:

As to people who only write "positive" reviews, if they have genuinely fucked the girl, it probably means she exists and you'll probably learn if the towels are nice and fluffy or very nice and fluffy.

FFS if you were in a market and some geezer tells trust him cos he only deals with genuine people then you deserve what you get I think.

Offline comaminion

I would write a neg and slam it down so quick if warranted
In the same breath I'm quite easily pleased so you would have to try hard to get a neg from me
I mean if I turned up and it was not the girl but a goat , as long as the goat was attentive I would be happy
If it was a scam and I scrapped with a Sergei I would be cool, I like a fight

I always try list what others may not like though even in positive reviews but in a nice way, so there's no offense to the wg but a heads up for others

Two instant infractions that get a straight neg


Theft


Sergei stabs me


This is where I stand on this
Banning reason: White-knighting

Offline AnthG


Two instant infractions that get a straight neg


What about timewasting?

So you are phoning the girl to get her house number and she doesn't answer, and doesn't answer, and doesn't answer. With you standing feeling awkward in the street till you go home frustrated and panicking that you've done something wrong?

Or

So you are phoning the girl to get her house number and she doesn't answer, and doesn't answer, and doesn't answer. With you standing feeling awkward in the street till after about 15mins worth of trying till she finally does and you come up to her place. You say, so thats an hour and you give her your £100.

In 45mins she says, time to end as I have my next punter due as you were 15mins late.

Or

You get in the flat and shes doesn't have any condoms so cannot do sex, so she spends 15mins hunting her place for some. In your paid time

Or

You get to her place and she says, "yeah kissing thats an extra £30, oh you mean you want oral, that's another £30 too. Oh sorry I misunderstood you want to give oral onto me, yeah that ones only an extra £20...

Offline RandyF



, so there's no offense to the wg but a heads up for others

Two instant infractions that get a straight neg


Theft


Sergei stabs me


This is where I stand on this

A fluffy, in other words.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline smiths

What about timewasting?

So you are phoning the girl to get her house number and she doesn't answer, and doesn't answer, and doesn't answer. With you standing feeling awkward in the street till you go home frustrated and panicking that you've done something wrong?

Or

So you are phoning the girl to get her house number and she doesn't answer, and doesn't answer, and doesn't answer. With you standing feeling awkward in the street till after about 15mins worth of trying till she finally does and you come up to her place. You say, so thats an hour and you give her your £100.

In 45mins she says, time to end as I have my next punter due as you were 15mins late.

Or

You get in the flat and shes doesn't have any condoms so cannot do sex, so she spends 15mins hunting her place for some. In your paid time

Or

You get to her place and she says, "yeah kissing thats an extra £30, oh you mean you want oral, that's another £30 too. Oh sorry I misunderstood you want to give oral onto me, yeah that ones only an extra £20...

All negatives off me though I wouldn't be panicking, I would be pissed off realising the WG was a low life, then I would ring my plan B option.

Offline Marmalade

I would write a neg and slam it down so quick if warranted
In the same breath I'm quite easily pleased so you would have to try hard to get a neg from me
I mean if I turned up and it was not the girl but a goat , as long as the goat was attentive I would be happy
If it was a scam and I scrapped with a Sergei I would be cool, I like a fight

I always try list what others may not like though even in positive reviews but in a nice way, so there's no offense to the wg but a heads up for others

Two instant infractions that get a straight neg


Theft


Sergei stabs me


This is where I stand on this

This is known as being a fluffy. You will possibly grow out of it. There's no need for a prossie to be offended by honesty (i.e. accuracy). If someone has a genuine problem with your product, service, whatever you do for a living, wouldn't rather know??

Reviews are not the same as how you speak to her face to face. Face to face, you owe her money and politeness (unless she tries to scam you or is fucking rude). An honest review is passionless. Re-living your shag by writing some nice soft porn, beautifully tailored at the edges is not really a review. It's just a fluffie saying, "Hey, look I got a shag! Whoopee!" (we are very happy for you).

Some fuckers only take any notice when they get a bad review. However you phrase it, giving a "positive" when it was a bit shit is like recommending 5-day old street food to your mates in the hope that they won't get stomach ache.

An unfair review is slagging her off when the appointment didn't take place (all you know is she didn't conclude the appointment, whether by your or her fault, but you have no info on whether she is otherwise vfm). An unfair review is when you cannot distinguish between material facts and opinion (both are useful but to say she was shite in bed cos she never advertised anal and refused your cock up her arse is unfair: simply to to say she doesn't offer anal is useful info.)

Writing reviews and imagining the prossie is reading them is what people do on AW (ok if honest and to get a couple of decent feedbacks for your own profile) or on prossie-run 'punter' sites (which is despicable).

Most people start off punting by maintaining the fantasy that they have met a nice girl and simply paid her. That is not the case since you do not know her as a person, whatever she tells you. You know her as prossie. Like the TV repair man. Good job? Felt satisfied? Rushed? Looked ok but tv still didn't work after five minutes? Reviews should not be fanmail, at least on here.

It's good to be polite to the prossie in person. Firstly you are more likely to get what you came for and secondly she won't go blacklisting you as a prick that forgot to wash his cheese off. There's nothing duplicitous about it. Merely efficiency. On UKP, it is not very efficient to write for the prossie's sake, but some people have a job getting past it. Just do your best.

Offline Marmalade

oh... and do read the UKP wiki guidelines and keep your identity separate on here from your UKP identity


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)