Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Brooke Knights frustrations - a normal experience?  (Read 6290 times)

Offline LilyD

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 29
I ok'd the blog entry with Tori cause in our minds, it was just a bit of fun to get you guys going.
This entire industry is built around the idea of fantasy. This should not be confused with any of our personal lives, as they are entirely separate things. It was not in any way intended to cause drama, although the part about Eva being whisked away in a limo is obviously true. Obviously!   :wackogirl:
Banning reason: Abusive

Offline AnthG

I ok'd the blog entry with Tori cause in our minds, it was just a bit of fun to get you guys going.
This entire industry is built around the idea of fantasy. This should not be confused with any of our personal lives, as they are entirely separate things. It was not in any way intended to cause drama, although the part about Eva being whisked away in a limo is obviously true. Obviously!   :wackogirl:

And like I said, for every single other girl I go "yeah right". But for you and Eva I believed it.

It was actually part of the draw you both had as it was so realistic a portrayal. You are basically getting in to a duo on a real couple.

No offence, but you have totally ruined that very well crafted image by this new marketing ploy. As I for the first time truly and completely hands down believed it. And I bet many others did too and that is why they were so up for a duo with you both.

There is no need to get offended at being called anything, you played the image of the bad guy. And you got called for it. Thats the downsides of playing the bad guy.

Offline smiths

I ok'd the blog entry with Tori cause in our minds, it was just a bit of fun to get you guys going.
This entire industry is built around the idea of fantasy. This should not be confused with any of our personal lives, as they are entirely separate things. It was not in any way intended to cause drama, although the part about Eva being whisked away in a limo is obviously true. Obviously!   :wackogirl:

So its YOU that is responsible for posting it on the net you stupid fucking idiot, don't blame punters for your own stupidity. You posted it to get punters going in the hope it would get you more punters then you moan about the consequences that you have caused for yourself. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline LilyD

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 29
M point is, if you can't tell the difference between fantasy (ie. the way we present things in our professional lives) and reality (ie. the bits that are not relevant so aren't shared with you) then this is obviously concerning. There are no good or bad guys, we're talking about the sex industry, most of the people involved are in some way being "bad".
Banning reason: Abusive

Offline smiths

Do people really believe these WG's get together off the clock for filth? Or that they are in real relationships?

Put it this way I would have to see them together as a couple to believe it in a social setting which isn't going to happen. For some its just marketing bollocks to entice gullible punters of course.

Offline Looking4fun

not sure how this went from being about bk to an argument about Lily & Tori but i might as well have my say
my opinion is as long as the girls provide a great service i really don't care what they get up to outside of my appointment as I'm sure once that door closes behind me, I'm the last thing on their mind & they really don't care what i do in my private life so why would i care what they do in theirs

Don't try posting fiction as fact, it's that simple really. Some people, myself included, take people by their word No matter what the 'industry' or 'profession' is. I'm a straight up honest guy in my business, in my personal life and when punting also.

Offline smiths

M point is, if you can't tell the difference between fantasy (ie. the way we present things in our professional lives) and reality (ie. the bits that are not relevant so aren't shared with you) then this is obviously concerning. There are no good or bad guys, we're talking about the sex industry, most of the people involved are in some way being "bad".

As you should know some guys aren't too smart, some are gullible where pussy is concerned and some others get turned on by the thought of 2 WGs really being together which is what your aim was of course, all to entice more punters to you. You then have the brass neck to come on here  and post crap, YOU are responsible for the consequences of what YOU choose to post on the net.

Offline johnny34

M point is, if you can't tell the difference between fantasy (ie. the way we present things in our professional lives) and reality (ie. the bits that are not relevant so aren't shared with you)

The point is, YOU have shared info about the fact that you & Eva were a real couple, which is why some now are questioning the wording of the blog that was posted.

I do think it would be worth while you trying to explain the pricing structure mind. Because I do feel you seem to have messed that up.

Offline LilyD

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 29
I'm happy to explain the pricing structure! What's the confusion?
xo
Banning reason: Abusive

As solo you charge £120 and tori £100. Yet as a duo you want £240. Seems a bit off to me. Don't get me wrong I have no interest in booking a duo. Or booking you as a solo the way you messed me around previously.

£240 is your incall rate of 120 and Toris outcall rate of 120 on top. Dont think its that confusing either. Brooke gets extra as thats her rate and you two are happy with that. My guess

So is Evas new lady an escort too im just wondering what the next chapter will be  :D

Add to that for 2 hours you are £220 and Tori is £200 but duo is £480!

Offline Looking4fun

As solo you charge £120 and tori £100. Yet as a duo you want £240. Seems a bit off to me. Don't get me wrong I have no interest in booking a duo. Or booking you as a solo the way you messed me around previously.
i paid £220 for my last duo I think those 2 together would be worth the extra £20 imo

£240 is your incall rate of 120 and Toris outcall rate of 120 on top. Dont think its that confusing either. Brooke gets extra as thats her rate and you two are happy with that. My guess

So is Evas new lady an escort too im just wondering what the next chapter will be  :D

So what's the rate if the incall takes place at tori's? Lily's profile doesn't state 1 hour out calls.

which i take it to mean she doesnt do them so the 1 hour incall would be at her place

Offline johnny34

Book a 2hr outcall duo via Amour & it works out at £380 (£190 each, less commission).

which i take it to mean she doesnt do them so the 1 hour incall would be at her place

So tori's working for 40 quid less on your speculation. Care to tell me how you work out the 2 hour pricing? 200 for Tori plus Lily's 250 equals 450 not 480

Offline smiths

I'm happy to explain the pricing structure! What's the confusion?
xo

YOU owe punters on here an apology for the shit you have posted in my view, clearly you don't like taking responsibility for your own actions but prefer to blame others for the consequences your actions cause. YOUR a classic example of a WG who comes on here posting shit, this IS a punting forum NOT a WGs forum, I trust you understand the difference though from what I have read so far from you, you don't come across as smart, fortunately to be a WG you don't have to be smart, just offer ALL punters a good service. :rolleyes:

Id say 440 which is 220 for lily incall and 220 tori outcall. So thats £40 over priced!  :hi:

£240 is your incall rate of 120 and Toris outcall rate of 120 on top. Dont think its that confusing either. Brooke gets extra as thats her rate and you two are happy with that. My guess

So is Evas new lady an escort too im just wondering what the next chapter will be  :D

And just to say that I understand how Brooke is working it but I think punters need to be prepared to be let down. And I'm not saying this will be by Brooke.
If you've already got a booking with Brooke, that could be next week, months or even in 4 months, you can currently add 1 or more of 3 lady's to it. But if your booking isn't for say 2 months you've got to hope that none quit, take I'll, be on a period or whatever on that day you have a booking. Risky way to be doing things if you ask me as punters could be a bit miffed if let down after waitin X amount of time.

Offline themademan2

And just to say that I understand how Brooke is working it but I think punters need to be prepared to be let down. And I'm not saying this will be by Brooke.
If you've already got a booking with Brooke, that could be next week, months or even in 4 months, you can currently add 1 or more of 3 lady's to it. But if your booking isn't for say 2 months you've got to hope that none quit, take I'll, be on a period or whatever on that day you have a booking. Risky way to be doing things if you ask me as punters could be a bit miffed if let down after waitin X amount of time.
Again, would be nice for punters on here that have got sessions booked with Brooke Knights to see if she is fucking them off for better appointments.  The theory that she makes them all use booking system is bollocks as her fave one vlinders ain't got account to book her on and no doubt has seen her since he closed his own AW account at her request
Banning reason: Undesirable and untrustworthy. Treat all posts by this member with suspicion.

Again, would be nice for punters on here that have got sessions booked with Brooke Knights to see if she is fucking them off for better appointments.  The theory that she makes them all use booking system is bollocks as her fave one vlinders ain't got account to book her on and no doubt has seen her since he closed his own AW account at her request

I did recently have a booking with Brooke scheduled but I had to cancel, not Brooke. But I will say that personally I don't believe Brooke cancels bookings for different appointments. I just don't think she's that type of person. That's just my opinion though.

And in response to the pm I received, no I'm not agitated, I simply asked Lily a question and she seemed happy to respond, hopefully she will. But she did say she doesn't understand people's speculation. Then somebody tries to answer my question by speculating seemingly on her behalf.




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)