bareback board

[UKBB]

I accept that it is - in general - openly frowned upon but secretly (by a great many) eagerly and enthusiastically pursued.

If this domain is truly punter-centric, can I suggest a Neutral policy where BB is concerned. Most/all are happy to accept (with unrestrained positive enthusiasm) OWO, why can't we have a grown-up, mature attitude to bareback vaginal sex?

To that end, I would ask not only for a neutral policy - allowing individuals the freedom to be who they want to be  (bareback isn't a crime!) - but also a dedicated bare backers board.

[yorkshire123]

Forum rule

- Bareback / Unprotected sex
Allowed, but other members have the right to express disapproval of such activities.

Take it up with admin

[galcom666]

There is a huge board dedicated to BB sex. It is very easy to find online.

It is useful as a tool to find out who to avoid.

[Sir Lance-a-lot]

I don't really see how it would work.  We have a regional review section and a regional  discussion section for each region - would there be a barebackers section for each region too?  If not, why would a punter in Aberdeen want to read about barebackers in Plymouth?

[Happyjose]

why can't we have a grown-up, mature attitude to bareback vaginal sex?

I think we do.

[royalzop]

No thanks

[James999]

but also a dedicated bare backers board.

If you think there's a need why not go and create such a forum instead of telling admin how to run his forum 

[UKBB]

Forum rule

Take it up with admin

I'm politely challenging the policy.

I'm not asking anyone to engage or to be pro-bb, I'm just asking for acceptance that many do choose to engage and it would be sensible to acknowledge that and take a neutral position. Why is OWO ok, but BB vag isn't? Its herd mentality.

[UKBB]

If you think there's a need why not go and create such a forum instead of telling admin how to run his forum 

I don't think I've told admin what to do, I've politely requested. Quite different.

[UKBB]

To be fair; I don't actually think I'm challenging the policy. The right to object is understood, accepted and not disputed. The policy is - at admin level - seemingly neutral.

It might still be helpful though to have a dedicated board on the forum to truly reflect that admin policy.

[James999]

To be fair; I don't actually think I'm challenging the policy.

There is not a "policy" if you want a board to discuss bareback skanks then start one, hurry up before you cock drops off (or they ring the school bell)

[The_Don]

hurry up before you cock drops off (or they ring the school bell)

lol blunt and to the point MrJames 

[myothernameis]

why can't we have a grown-up, mature attitude to bareback vaginal sex?

Because bareback vaginal sex, isn't safe, at sometime your going to catch something, or unknowingly pass it on to an escort

[myothernameis]

I don't think I've told admin what to do, I've politely requested. Quite different.

Now I'm sure admin, will ask you politely that's the rules, if you dont like them, then that's tough

[Steely Dan]

Bareback vs OWO vs OW vs Not visiting escorts.  Perhaps the first 3 are wrong.  But there is more to it. See this link.

External Link/Members Only

I think it is great that you can post bareback reviews here.  Keep doing it.  Others post experiences with other extreme things - look at the Berlin thread for example. You express your views, I'll express mine.  But I agree with others, cant see the benefit of posting it separately.

[Turtle1]

I couldnt care less about what others think on this but im totally agaist Bare back on a WG, you may not give a shit about your own health but i do. 

I dont want to catch an STD. Best way to prevent this is by using a god damn condom. Its a WG youre shagging, many others have done so and lets not forget pimps dealers too.

Bareback your wife or GF not the WG, especially if they are from say Romania where there is a huge Hiv surge inrecent years.

[PLeisure]

The one advantage of having such a dedicated board is to identify which WGs to avoid.

[AnthG]

I accept that it is - in general - openly frowned upon but secretly (by a great many) eagerly and enthusiastically pursued.

If its secretly pursued how do you expect them to suddenly post in an entire section of the board for it?

Why not just in the region you are based start a bareback topic. And see how popular it becomes.

If it becomes freakishly popular and a load of people start posting in it. Then you have the backup evidence there to ask Admin to possibly start the section as its clearly needed. I get the feeling however, only you and possibly one or two others will ever post in it though.

[vt]

The increased risks of a BB sex industry are well-documented in S Africa where 60% of providers have an HIV, so for good reason there's a healthy skepticism of engaging in BB sex in a commercial setting.

By all means, play Russian Roulette with your long-term health, but don't expect a huge amount of back-slapping on here.

[James999]

If its secretly pursued how do you expect them to suddenly post in an entire section of the board for it?

It would be like the "sensual massage" forum, where it's endless, she wanked me off, she doesn't do that arguments, it would be she took a load bareback, with replies of she doesn't do that she's a clean girl arguments 

[Sir Lance-a-lot]

Another problem: what is a barebacker?  It's not particularly clear-cut.

Plenty of EE girls (especially Romanians) have bareback on their profile without apparently knowing what it means.  Some will probably offer it at an extra price (despite claiming that it's included), others won't.  Some British girls offer it as a paid extra: if it's £20 extra, they can be classed as "barebackers", but if it's £100 extra, essentially they aren't, as hardly anyone would pay that much when they can get it cheaper elsewhere.

Then there are those who might offer it as a special treat for a regular.  How regular, exactly?  If it's "anyone I've seen at least once before", she's a barebacker.  If it's "only you, because I've seen you dozens of times and we've already had several free overnights", she's basically your girlfriend.

It wouldn't be particularly easy to decide who should be discussed on such a board.  Both the clueless EE girl and the semi-girlfriend might be mortified to find themselves on it!

[johnnyboy61]

I accept that it is - in general - openly frowned upon but secretly (by a great many) eagerly and enthusiastically pursued.

I think that a great many might dream about having BB sex with their favourite WGs but I doubt that many actually actively pursue it as you suggest. In this instance little brain's pleas for bareback sex should be completely drowned out by big brain. The risks of passing something on through vaginal sex (or worse still anal) are incomparably greater than through unprotected oral, however my chances of catching something through oral are significantly increased if you are going around barebacking the same WGs that I am seeing. In which case a auto-censored might be very useful for the rest of us so as to avoid your possibly disease-ridden trail. My saved AW searches are already set to exclude those who list bareback in their enjoys list. I would never ever bareback my most trusted regular even if we both had a fresh clean bill of health from the GUM clinic.

[NottsNylonLuvr]

If you read the board you will notice that both punters and (some) WG's are very concerned about STI's recently.
Some WG's taking owo off the menu & some punters considering only ow.

Your post, unfortunately, is a matter of bad timing I'm afraid.

That said, barebacking antics are indeed frowned upon here.

It's a ticking timebomb & it's not if but WHEN your 'fuse' gets lit.

[smiths]

I accept that it is - in general - openly frowned upon but secretly (by a great many) eagerly and enthusiastically pursued.

If this domain is truly punter-centric, can I suggest a Neutral policy where BB is concerned. Most/all are happy to accept (with unrestrained positive enthusiasm) OWO, why can't we have a grown-up, mature attitude to bareback vaginal sex?

To that end, I would ask not only for a neutral policy - allowing individuals the freedom to be who they want to be  (bareback isn't a crime!) - but also a dedicated bare backers board.

Admin set the rules on here and he has ruled posters can post their views on BB and that's exactly what I shall do unless he changes that.

[punk]

I accept that it is - in general - openly frowned upon but secretly (by a great many) eagerly and enthusiastically pursued.

If this domain is truly punter-centric, can I suggest a Neutral policy where BB is concerned. Most/all are happy to accept (with unrestrained positive enthusiasm) OWO, why can't we have a grown-up, mature attitude to bareback vaginal sex?

To that end, I would ask not only for a neutral policy - allowing individuals the freedom to be who they want to be  (bareback isn't a crime!) - but also a dedicated bare backers board.

Why the fuck would you want to jizz into some prossie ,who has fucked hundreds of men before you? So you spunk inside her and just 20 minutes before some cunts already jizzed in her pussy. 

[superchamp]

I accept that it is - in general - openly frowned upon but secretly (by a great many) eagerly and enthusiastically pursued.

If this domain is truly punter-centric, can I suggest a Neutral policy where BB is concerned. Most/all are happy to accept (with unrestrained positive enthusiasm) OWO, why can't we have a grown-up, mature attitude to bareback vaginal sex?

To that end, I would ask not only for a neutral policy - allowing individuals the freedom to be who they want to be  (bareback isn't a crime!) - but also a dedicated bare backers board.

If that's what you believe to be true of the majority of UKP forum members then you're posting on the wrong forum. I've made a note to blacklist the two that you've reviewed today.

[RedKettle]

even ignoring the very good reasons it is frowned upon it would be a strange thing to have a separate board on.  Why not one for girls with big baps, or one for girls without tats or one for girls that take it up the bum!!!   Why spin out one particular aspect or service?

[Salt]

I accept that it is - in general - openly frowned upon but secretly (by a great many) eagerly and enthusiastically pursued.

If this domain is truly punter-centric, can I suggest a Neutral policy where BB is concerned. Most/all are happy to accept (with unrestrained positive enthusiasm) OWO, why can't we have a grown-up, mature attitude to bareback vaginal sex?

To that end, I would ask not only for a neutral policy - allowing individuals the freedom to be who they want to be  (bareback isn't a crime!) - but also a dedicated bare backers board.

Sorry bbuk it may not be a crime but it's sure as shit crazy! 

[MancSean]

Another problem: what is a barebacker?  It's not particularly clear-cut.

Plenty of EE girls (especially Romanians) have bareback on their profile without apparently knowing what it means.  Some will probably offer it at an extra price (despite claiming that it's included), others won't.  Some British girls offer it as a paid extra: if it's £20 extra, they can be classed as "barebackers", but if it's £100 extra, essentially they aren't, as hardly anyone would pay that much when they can get it cheaper elsewhere.

Then there are those who might offer it as a special treat for a regular.  How regular, exactly?  If it's "anyone I've seen at least once before", she's a barebacker.  If it's "only you, because I've seen you dozens of times and we've already had several free overnights", she's basically your girlfriend.

It wouldn't be particularly easy to decide who should be discussed on such a board.  Both the clueless EE girl and the semi-girlfriend might be mortified to find themselves on it!

If a punter sticks his cock up a whore's twat or arse without protection them bareback has taken place easy no confusion what so ever. The cost is irrelevant and so is the number of times the punter has seen 5he girl.

[MancSean]

Why the fuck would you want to jizz into some prossie ,who has fucked hundreds of men before you? So you spunk inside her and just 20 minutes before some cunts already jizzed in her pussy. 

Because there are quite a few sick cunts out there that have no self respect or respect for others.
I remember when I first started using aw in 2008 reading quite a few FRS where punters had requested prostitutes to not clean their vag 's after being creampied by previous punters especially so they could fuck their spunky cunts. I never read aw reviews anymore so don't know if this still gets reported.
Double edge sword though because as much as I dislike it would be good to know girls that allow bb but act like they don't.  But this has been covered on other threads before

[Brazilian Martian]

His name says it all a misguided fool bbuk gladly I dnt punt with any of the girls he does but I just find it hard to understand how a guy can Bb a prossie.

[cueball]

To pick up on op, you can't expect a neutral policy on a open forum, forums are about the right to openly express your opinion. Barebacking is not a banning offence on here but don't expect applause neither.

I for one have a bareback hotlist that I put local lasses in so I know to avoid them and keep tabs on if they drop the bareback (I still avoid ex as well as current barebackers).

We're all big boys and make our own choices, it's not for me but it's handy to know who to avoid, so keep doing the reviews op

[Cuntminion]

Hard hat, high vis, steel toe caps, condom

Safe sex is the sensible way

[MancSean]

Here is a perfect example of a girl that doesn't state she offers bb but obviously does.
External Link/Members Only

Here is here profile
External Link/Members Only

She has changed her profile many times in the past and has been on aw all the time I have since 2008. She previously hid her feedback.
I punted with her back in 2009 wasn't a great punt but she did owo/cim and rimming.  She asked me if I wanted to fuck I said yes then she said you can bb me if you want. I was in shock and got out of there as soon as possible.  It was a 30 min punt so didn't lose much. I never reviewed her as made booking by phone but have always known to avoid her since. Flat was a pig stye plus she opened the door in a wet towel just out of shower.
For the record I didn't have sex with her and visited a GUM clinic the next day and was clear plus am regularly checked so didn't catch owt from her. Just goes to show not every wg is honest about what they offer even though not advertised

[arthur]

even ignoring the very good reasons it is frowned upon it would be a strange thing to have a separate board on.  Why not one for girls with big baps, or one for girls without tats or one for girls that take it up the bum!!!   Why spin out one particular aspect or service?

+1 he thinks the BB thing makes him special and wants attention

[tbrad]

I suppose I would have a place to report all those hookers that have tried to bareback me!

[Hyperchicken]

If someone wants BB then that's their choice, but I think the OP is being a bit dramatic. There is no official policy to rally against, no secret club just waiting for a place to discuss their likes. Basically he's just asking to be able to talk about something that he knows other people think is dumb without them being able to say that they think it's dumb.

[broksonic]

Why not just go to that auto-censored with all the other disease carrying cunts

[punk]

If someone wants BB then that's their choice, but I think the OP is being a bit dramatic. There is no official policy to rally against, no secret club just waiting for a place to discuss their likes. Basically he's just asking to be able to talk about something that he knows other people think is dumb without them being able to say that they think it's dumb.

Well according to HP, he gets lots of requests from blokes enquiring about BB tarts via PM,so many in fact, there is a large minority of men who want to perform BB with prossies,so it seems.

If so they should have the bollocks and come clean.

[regular punter]

I suppose I would have a place to report all those hookers that have tried to bareback me!

I have actually had this happen

[FCB]

Because bareback vaginal sex, isn't safe, at sometime your going to catch something, or unknowingly pass it on to an escort

or unknowingly pass it on to wife/girlfriend/partner

[webpunter]

or unknowingly pass it on to wife/girlfriend/partner

You've got to have sex with the OH for this to happen.  Highly unlikely to pass it on using the wrong toothbrush.  Or [blunt] razor which she uses on her minge

[Cuntminion]

Would neeeevvvvveeerrrr ever ever sleep with a wg that offered bb

I want to die by something exotic like being eaten by sharks not nob rot

I don't judge but a wg that offered this would be instant no

[regular punter]

Would neeeevvvvveeerrrr ever ever sleep with a wg that offered bb

I want to die by something exotic like being eaten by sharks not nob rot

I don't judge but a wg that offered this would be instant no

And how do u know some WGs dont offer this for 'regs'
I know of 1 that does but does not advertise it.

Imagine the poor punter whose condom bursts and does not know said WG does BB with regs!!!

[Horizontal pleasures]

The one advantage of having such a dedicated board is to identify which WGs to avoid.

there are two advantages, the other is to identify the ones you may wish to meet after some careful background research.

[Cuntminion]

And how do u know some WGs dont offer this for 'regs'
I know of 1 that does but does not advertise it.

Imagine the poor punter whose condom bursts and does not know said WG does BB with regs!!!

Well you don't do you, you just use the knowledge at hand and if that changed react accordingly

No one's a mind reader are they

But if I know I wouldn't eve entertain the thought of seeing that wg

[Horizontal pleasures]

Well according to HP, he gets lots of requests from blokes enquiring about BB tarts via PM,so many in fact, there is a large minority of men who want to perform BB with prossies,so it seems.

If so they should have the bollocks and come clean.

I receive these requests but I do not usually reply.

[stevedave]

I know of 1 that does but does not advertise it.

If that is the case, I think it would be appreciated if you named the lady in question, so other members can decide if they wish to see her - or not see her, more appropriately - on that basis.

This is a punters feedback forum, this kind of information is important.

[Horizontal pleasures]

If that is the case, I think it would be appreciated if you named the lady in question, so other members can decide if they wish to see her - or not see her, more appropriately - on that basis.

This is a punters feedback forum, this kind of information is important.

+1

[Watts.E.Dunn]

As pleasant as BB can be until such times as an antiviral drug is invented against the AIDS virus and one for Herpes, and there is an easy vaccination agin Gonorrhoea, Chlamydia and a several others I can't think of at the moment  but until such times in the manner of Alfie Solomons;

External Link/Members Only

BB IS   


           "NOT DISCUSSED"!!!