Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: bareback board  (Read 5751 times)

Offline UKBB

I accept that it is - in general - openly frowned upon but secretly (by a great many) eagerly and enthusiastically pursued.

If this domain is truly punter-centric, can I suggest a Neutral policy where BB is concerned. Most/all are happy to accept (with unrestrained positive enthusiasm) OWO, why can't we have a grown-up, mature attitude to bareback vaginal sex?

To that end, I would ask not only for a neutral policy - allowing individuals the freedom to be who they want to be  (bareback isn't a crime!) - but also a dedicated bare backers board.

Offline yorkshire123

Forum rule

Quote
- Bareback / Unprotected sex
Allowed, but other members have the right to express disapproval of such activities.

Take it up with admin
Banning reason: Making false malicious allegations against admin

Offline galcom666

There is a huge board dedicated to BB sex. It is very easy to find online.

It is useful as a tool to find out who to avoid.

I don't really see how it would work.  We have a regional review section and a regional  discussion section for each region - would there be a barebackers section for each region too?  If not, why would a punter in Aberdeen want to read about barebackers in Plymouth?

Offline Happyjose

why can't we have a grown-up, mature attitude to bareback vaginal sex?


I think we do.



Offline James999

but also a dedicated bare backers board.

If you think there's a need why not go and create such a forum instead of telling admin how to run his forum  :hi:

Offline UKBB

Forum rule

Take it up with admin

I'm politely challenging the policy.

I'm not asking anyone to engage or to be pro-bb, I'm just asking for acceptance that many do choose to engage and it would be sensible to acknowledge that and take a neutral position. Why is OWO ok, but BB vag isn't? Its herd mentality.

Offline UKBB

If you think there's a need why not go and create such a forum instead of telling admin how to run his forum  :hi:

I don't think I've told admin what to do, I've politely requested. Quite different.

Offline UKBB

To be fair; I don't actually think I'm challenging the policy. The right to object is understood, accepted and not disputed. The policy is - at admin level - seemingly neutral.

It might still be helpful though to have a dedicated board on the forum to truly reflect that admin policy.

Offline James999

To be fair; I don't actually think I'm challenging the policy.

There is not a "policy" if you want a board to discuss bareback skanks then start one, hurry up before you cock drops off (or they ring the school bell)

Online The_Don

hurry up before you cock drops off (or they ring the school bell)

lol blunt and to the point MrJames  :hi:


why can't we have a grown-up, mature attitude to bareback vaginal sex?

Because bareback vaginal sex, isn't safe, at sometime your going to catch something, or unknowingly pass it on to an escort


I don't think I've told admin what to do, I've politely requested. Quite different.

Now I'm sure admin, will ask you politely that's the rules, if you dont like them, then that's tough

Offline Steely Dan

Bareback vs OWO vs OW vs Not visiting escorts.  Perhaps the first 3 are wrong.  But there is more to it. See this link.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wronger_than_wrong

I think it is great that you can post bareback reviews here.  Keep doing it.  Others post experiences with other extreme things - look at the Berlin thread for example. You express your views, I'll express mine.  But I agree with others, cant see the benefit of posting it separately.

Offline Turtle1

I couldnt care less about what others think on this but im totally agaist Bare back on a WG, you may not give a shit about your own health but i do.  :dash:

I dont want to catch an STD. Best way to prevent this is by using a god damn condom. Its a WG youre shagging, many others have done so and lets not forget pimps dealers too.

Bareback your wife or GF not the WG, especially if they are from say Romania where there is a huge Hiv surge inrecent years.

Offline PLeisure

The one advantage of having such a dedicated board is to identify which WGs to avoid.

Offline AnthG

I accept that it is - in general - openly frowned upon but secretly (by a great many) eagerly and enthusiastically pursued.

If its secretly pursued how do you expect them to suddenly post in an entire section of the board for it?

Why not just in the region you are based start a bareback topic. And see how popular it becomes.

If it becomes freakishly popular and a load of people start posting in it. Then you have the backup evidence there to ask Admin to possibly start the section as its clearly needed. I get the feeling however, only you and possibly one or two others will ever post in it though.
« Last Edit: June 24, 2015, 03:36:10 PM by AnthG »

Online vt

The increased risks of a BB sex industry are well-documented in S Africa where 60% of providers have an HIV, so for good reason there's a healthy skepticism of engaging in BB sex in a commercial setting.

By all means, play Russian Roulette with your long-term health, but don't expect a huge amount of back-slapping on here.


Offline James999

If its secretly pursued how do you expect them to suddenly post in an entire section of the board for it?

It would be like the "sensual massage" forum, where it's endless, she wanked me off, she doesn't do that arguments, it would be she took a load bareback, with replies of she doesn't do that she's a clean girl arguments  :sarcastic:

Another problem: what is a barebacker?  It's not particularly clear-cut.

Plenty of EE girls (especially Romanians) have bareback on their profile without apparently knowing what it means.  Some will probably offer it at an extra price (despite claiming that it's included), others won't.  Some British girls offer it as a paid extra: if it's £20 extra, they can be classed as "barebackers", but if it's £100 extra, essentially they aren't, as hardly anyone would pay that much when they can get it cheaper elsewhere.

Then there are those who might offer it as a special treat for a regular.  How regular, exactly?  If it's "anyone I've seen at least once before", she's a barebacker.  If it's "only you, because I've seen you dozens of times and we've already had several free overnights", she's basically your girlfriend.

It wouldn't be particularly easy to decide who should be discussed on such a board.  Both the clueless EE girl and the semi-girlfriend might be mortified to find themselves on it!

Offline johnnyboy61

I accept that it is - in general - openly frowned upon but secretly (by a great many) eagerly and enthusiastically pursued.
I think that a great many might dream about having BB sex with their favourite WGs but I doubt that many actually actively pursue it as you suggest. In this instance little brain's pleas for bareback sex should be completely drowned out by big brain. The risks of passing something on through vaginal sex (or worse still anal) are incomparably greater than through unprotected oral, however my chances of catching something through oral are significantly increased if you are going around barebacking the same WGs that I am seeing. In which case a BB forum might be very useful for the rest of us so as to avoid your possibly disease-ridden trail. My saved AW searches are already set to exclude those who list bareback in their enjoys list. I would never ever bareback my most trusted regular even if we both had a fresh clean bill of health from the GUM clinic.
Banning reason: Successfully caused damaging problems on UKEscorting

If you read the board you will notice that both punters and (some) WG's are very concerned about STI's recently.
Some WG's taking owo off the menu & some punters considering only ow.

Your post, unfortunately, is a matter of bad timing I'm afraid.

That said, barebacking antics are indeed frowned upon here.

It's a ticking timebomb & it's not if but WHEN your 'fuse' gets lit.

Online smiths

I accept that it is - in general - openly frowned upon but secretly (by a great many) eagerly and enthusiastically pursued.

If this domain is truly punter-centric, can I suggest a Neutral policy where BB is concerned. Most/all are happy to accept (with unrestrained positive enthusiasm) OWO, why can't we have a grown-up, mature attitude to bareback vaginal sex?

To that end, I would ask not only for a neutral policy - allowing individuals the freedom to be who they want to be  (bareback isn't a crime!) - but also a dedicated bare backers board.

Admin set the rules on here and he has ruled posters can post their views on BB and that's exactly what I shall do unless he changes that.

Offline punk

I accept that it is - in general - openly frowned upon but secretly (by a great many) eagerly and enthusiastically pursued.

If this domain is truly punter-centric, can I suggest a Neutral policy where BB is concerned. Most/all are happy to accept (with unrestrained positive enthusiasm) OWO, why can't we have a grown-up, mature attitude to bareback vaginal sex?

To that end, I would ask not only for a neutral policy - allowing individuals the freedom to be who they want to be  (bareback isn't a crime!) - but also a dedicated bare backers board.

Why the fuck would you want to jizz into some prossie ,who has fucked hundreds of men before you? So you spunk inside her and just 20 minutes before some cunts already jizzed in her pussy.  :crazy: :wacko:


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)