Hi everyone, the whole fluffy thing is new to me (where did the name come from btw?)
As Im hoping to contribute a lot of field reports hopefully, I wanted to know where the fine lines is between harshness and fluffiness.
For example, say a girl was exactly as she was in her photo's, no airbrushing, no fake pics, its not an old pic or anything, but she's just very photogenic, but was a really nice girl, on time, great service etc, would you criticise her saying "not as nice as in photo".
Or if she was a great girl, beautiful looking, on time, polite, courteous, really amazing, but was a bit robotic in some of her services without meaning too but clearly was trying her best to please you, would you criticise her skills, if she tried everything she offered on her profile?
I would want my fr's to be useful but wouldnt want to become known as the simon cowell of punting either so just wondered where teh fine line is and when you class someone as fluffy?