Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Cassie Fox  (Read 5336 times)

Offline Giant4


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

So, Cassie Fox,

I've had her on the HL for ages and have seen her on cam a couple of times. She's fit, friendly and within my pocket money allowance... HOWEVER...... I was horrified when I noticed she does bareback!!

I've emailed to ask about it and she's read the email but hasn't replied :(

Anyone got any experiences with her?


Offline Giant4

Need some advise here guys....think I might be playing with fire...

I was emailing Cassie and informally (without a booking form) arranged a meet. On the day everything went quiet and from then onwards she began ignoring my messages (she probably thought I was a weirdo or time waster - my feedbacks crap).

I recently thought "f**k it" and put a full booking form in. I'd seen her on cam and she's stunning!

Anyway after submitting the form I heard nothing for a couple of days but then noticed her online....so I spent about ten minutes (£15) with her on cam discussing 'the meet'. However, she seemed completely none the wiser and then declared she'd accidentally deleted the request....After all this I realised she's blocked anyone from viewing her AW feedback.

I think she may be advertising as an escort to lure punters into spending cash on her cam/vids/pics. What do you think?

I've sent another message and the comms are ok again...but I'm wary that she's playing me like Peter piper!

I think she's too good looking for escorting at £100 an hour!

Any advise?

Offline anonyorks

She's hidden her feedback so that would be a big a sign as any that you might be right, she never escorts otherwise why would you hide it?. Move on and save your money.

Offline Giant4

Yeah come to think of it...i've been daft to chase! She just fits what I'm looking for!

Has nobody else had any run in's with her?

Offline p3ngu1n

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then chances are it is a duck!  :music:

Don't fall for her BS game - take your money elsewhere. Plenty of women out there mate! :cool:

babysnake

  • Guest
well guys no I dont look, sound or quack like a duck  :rolleyes: but anyhow the guy thats posted this I have explained the other week my reasoning's......maybe hes forgot so I will quickly say again.....I dont want people coming across my profile (the people that know me but have no intention of booking me) to send silly messages my way.....yes comes with the job I hear you say. So anyways I am very real, yes it is me in my pics and I do have escort ratings. They are now on show for anyone that would like a look. they may not stay up but seen as I came across this thread id like the matter clearing up.  :cool:

Offline Sparky6996

Has anyone seen her since the last post (August)?
She has her feedback viewable on AW but wanted to cross check here too

Offline stevedave

Sorry for bumping an old thread, but anyone met this lass?

She's showing as available today, I sent an email to check on rough location and got back "call for booking" and that was it.

Shitty, terse replies really get my back up! How hard would it be to type..."based in Harehills, call to book" or "based in Morley" etc.

Rant over.

Shame, she looks tidy.

Offline CityTillIDie

Sorry for bumping an old thread, but anyone met this lass?

She's showing as available today, I sent an email to check on rough location and got back "call for booking" and that was it.

Shitty, terse replies really get my back up! How hard would it be to type..."based in Harehills, call to book" or "based in Morley" etc.

Rant over.

Shame, she looks tidy.

I'm with you on this one...
I generally write two or three paragraphs to introduce self, what I'm like, what I'm looking for.
Usually get quite a nice reply which gives a good clue; anything short and terse as you say I bin. UNLESS I'm really really keen to see the WG in which case I usually write a (very witty, obviously!!  :cool:) reply to see what their problem is. Second rude reply from that WG and they get binned.
I know it's usually about the sex, but I feel if they cannot be bothered to interact reasonably amicably pre-meet, chances are they're going to be ignorant/uninterested, etc. when we do get together.

There's lots of WGs. Only one CTID haha

Offline stevedave

Good comms don't cost owt, and indicate a good level of professionalism imo, bad comms usually indicate the opposite  :thumbsdown:

Offline anonyorks

Good comms don't cost owt, and indicate a good level of professionalism imo, bad comms usually indicate the opposite  :thumbsdown:

Shit comms always equal shit punt.