Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: NAUGHTY MEL - GO TO HELL  (Read 5710 times)


20 review(s) for NAUGHTY.MEL (15 positive, 2 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline TheOracle

Punters do not like to feel they are part of a conveyor belt.  However conveyor belts are far more prevalent than punters would like to admit to themselves. 

In Mel's case she does wash properly between clients (straight into the shower with you).  I do like the fact that all her clients see this, even if you lose 5mins off the end of your punt, this essential bit of quality control is being verified by everybody who sees her.

This "losing 5 minutes at the end of the punt" is ridiculous: most punters shower at the beginning, and a lot of prossies demand it, so she should just jump in the shower with them if she is having appointments back to back and make that part of the experience. I'm sure a lot of people would enjoy that more than seeing her disappear in the last minutes of the punt, or hearing her say "you have 10 more minutes, I need 5 minutes to get ready" when it's minute 38 into the punt...

Offline Vivago

   
Vivago, was the number you called 02032890323? 

Yes it was an 020 number. So she says it was a maid that I was speaking to? That is odd  because I am sure that I asked if that was Mel and she confirmed it was. No matter. She still appears to me to be a greedy pro$$ie who tries to shoehorn as many clients as possible into a working day. Her habit of short changing punters on time is scandalous. If I am paying £150, I expect her undivided attention for the full hour and not to be bundled out of the door early so that she can powder her nose and wash her fanny for the next customer. She should do that on her own time. Of course I didn't know this at the time but been aware of it now is good and means that there is no way that I would want to rejoin her conveyor belt queue.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2015, 09:58:43 AM by Vivago »

Offline smiths

Punters do not like to feel they are part of a conveyor belt.  However conveyor belts are far more prevalent than punters would like to admit to themselves. 

In Mel's case she does wash properly between clients (straight into the shower with you).  I do like the fact that all her clients see this, even if you lose 5mins off the end of your punt, this essential bit of quality control is being verified by everybody who sees her.

That's some punters, I view ALL WGs as running a conveyor belt if they are that busy as to me that's the logical thing to do. Obviously some fluffies and others don't like to believe their fave WG/s work like that though. I couldn't care less as long as I get a good service.

Agreed regarding back to back, although it has to be managed properly.

A professional like a lawyer or a doctor will effectively be booked back to back, but with enough transition time to get between meetings, and with the expectation that he/she will be properly prepared and presentable. 

I don't care who the WG has been seeing before me, but she should leave at least 15 mins between bookings so that she doesn't smell of someone else's cum! We can't check whether she takes a shower or no, but if a WG doesn't smell fresh then during an initimate interaction with the client (kissing, DATY, being close to her skin) that's unreasonable and it would be a turnoff!

In Mel's case, she was cocky and greedy.

She is definitely off my hotlist, it's not the most concerning thing about this thread though,that has to be vivago's latest profile pic,what the fuck is that?looks like a drowned rat!

Offline doobes

Agreed regarding back to back, although it has to be managed properly.

Agreed. Doubly so if there's more than one WG at the location. The maids/girls at Golders Green and Tufnell Park seem to understand this and stagger client times and as a result I've only ever had to wait once. Other locations, not so much.

Offline The_Don

Agreed. Doubly so if there's more than one WG at the location. The maids/girls at Golders Green and Tufnell Park seem to understand this and stagger client times and as a result I've only ever had to wait once. Other locations, not so much.

Indeed managed well and not noticing how other punters enter and exit. Is in IMO less disruptive for all parties involved.

Some location I try and avoid now due to the bluntness of conveyor belting. Beep, beep, beep

Offline Vivago

She is definitely off my hotlist, it's not the most concerning thing about this thread though,that has to be vivago's latest profile pic,what the fuck is that?looks like a drowned rat!

 :lol:..I prefer to call it the 'ridden hard and put away wet' look.

:lol:..I prefer to call it the 'ridden hard and put away wet' look.

Eeeeeewwww...

:lol:..I prefer to call it the 'ridden hard and put away wet' look.
Even by the standards of this forum,you are  real gent aren't you!

Offline Jason

Yes it was an 020 number. So she says it was a maid that I was speaking to? That is odd  because I am sure that I asked if that was Mel and she confirmed it was.
Well that is what the receptionist was paid to do. To pretend to be Mel, answer questions and take bookings on her behalf. It happens all the time with EE girls in managed/shared flats where the maid answers the phone. The difference here is that this receptionist was a “professional” (as well as professional liar). 

No matter. She still appears to me to be a greedy pro$$ie who tries to shoehorn as many clients as possible into a working day. Her habit of short changing punters on time is scandalous. If I am paying £150, I expect her undivided attention for the full hour and not to be bundled out of the door early so that she can powder her nose and wash her fanny for the next customer. She should do that on her own time. Of course I didn't know this at the time but been aware of it now is good and means that there is no way that I would want to rejoin her conveyor belt queue.
Her back to back bookings and the short-changing in time has been an issue from the very beginning. At some point she did listen to advices and rectified it (e.g. by spacing bookings 10-15mins) but each time her gold digging spirit eventually took over and she reverted back to her original habits. This is mainly because in her mind she thinks she is worth at least £200ph so short-changing you 5-10mins and doing back to back is not an issue as long as she takes a shower before every meeting. And if you want more time then you should pay for a longer booking. What I mentioned in blue italics is her prossie logic.  :wacko:

P.S: I completely agree with ytettzru that she now (well last time I saw her) looks *a lot* (like 80-85%) like Jennifer Pussy in this picture. However before her transformation in late January 2015 she looked exactly like Denise Richards in this video.

Offline Vivago

Even by the standards of this forum,you are  real gent aren't you!

That's me...always the perfect gent and what is more a gent who never betrays a confidence unlike some cads around here. :sarcastic:



That's insane. For that price I expect them to at least have starred in a TV documentary where they make a complete cunt out of themselves and slag off punters  :lol:

Offline pong

profile has disappeared.

Naa, still around https://www.adultwork.com/3033921
Changed profile a while ago ... I guess to get rid off negative comment(s).


8 review(s) found for LOVELYMEL linked to in above post (7 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)

Offline boardyhell

Stunning girl. Average service,no cim although listed at the time
Methinks she has got it all wrong,she should charge 200 but deliver a top service
I I think there would be nothing but praise then
Btw she told me one punter offered her a grand to bugger her and I seem to remember her sitting on a rubber ring while she told me

Offline The_Don

Stunning girl. Average service,no cim although listed at the time
Methinks she has got it all wrong,she should charge 200 but deliver a top service
I I think there would be nothing but praise then
Btw she told me one punter offered her a grand to bugger her and I seem to remember her sitting on a rubber ring while she told me

She currently charging £150 P/H, your advising she raised her rates :thumbsdown:

Offline boardyhell

Take less clients and provide a much better services. Very pretty and has a stunning body. Basically she provides an average service with back to back clients. I was rushed out
She is better looking than most girls I have seen for more
At 150 I didn't return. She has got the potential
At the moment there is a lot better out there for 150

Offline anyfucker

She currently charging £150 P/H, your advising she raised her rates :thumbsdown:
She previously raised her rates to £200/ph but then lowered them again after a while.
Mel is smart enough to decide her own rates based on what she wants to earn.
At £200 she had fewer clients than at £150 so decided to go back to £150 and do the conveyor belt.
At £150 she is pretty much as fully booked as she wants to be.
AW removed her previous profile (like many WGs have found), nothing to do with getting rid of a negative review.
« Last Edit: November 24, 2015, 11:04:15 AM by anyfucker »

Offline yumyum3

Quote
She currently charging £150 P/H, your advising she raised her rates :thumbsdown:
Indeed, Don. Some of the nonsense written on here leaves me incredulous. To read people sticking up for some soppy prossie who's clearly a scammer providing a crap service is fucking deluded. There's one born every minute  :rolleyes:

Offline boardyhell

i am not standing up for her,i am merely stating she has the tools to do the job,i won't and haven't returned
i have seen much better providers such as naughty natt( better looking imho) suppose i am touting for her now
however there are girls earning a lot more not as good looking as her making a lot more money
i saw passion paula yesterday and had a much better time with a girl who had a good attitude and a better bj
i was merely expressing an opinion

Offline The_Don

I rank service and attitude, above looks and body type.

As for than Naughty Natt, I've not been back to punt her since her price increase. Was £80, then £100 now £120, in less than 1 year. I've punted W/G from £80 to £100 mark that were more attractive (subjective, I know). And they also provided me with a good service and attitude.
« Last Edit: November 24, 2015, 11:57:16 PM by The_Don »

Offline boardyhell

don can you please let me know better girls than natt please,have you seen her lately as i had a superb time with her recently and i have been doing this for along time, i do know its subjective about whatever rocks your boat

Offline Liam52

I seen her before profile went down, she was a plan b when another girl let me down. 

She's pretty hot and got a good service but she did me out of 5 minutes at the end.  Someone else lined up straight after like she does to everyone else




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)