Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Christina Grey - Is she guilty as well of outing a punter?  (Read 2912 times)

Offline Roth

https://www.adultwork.com/2872087 or https://www.adultwork.com/xChristina%5FGreyx

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=58145.msg749147#msg749147

https://twitter.com/ChristinaGrayAW

As a prossie mate of XNickeyx, is she guilty by association and by retweeting the outing of a punter?
 :manhater: :bomb:

Should she be added to the Prossie Blacklist?  :unknown: :bomb:


Offline OakTree

Yes, all her followers are now Privy to that tweet and information contained in it. What's gone on here with these girls beggars belief.

Offline Roth

Yes, all her followers are now Privy to that tweet and information contained in it. What's gone on here with these girls beggars belief.

Looks like she's retiring anyway but that probably cos she found some cunt-struck twat to pay her bills.   :dash: :dash:

But once a prossie, always a prossie and she'll be back once his cash runs out no doubt.  :scare:

So I think she should still be Blacklisted for outing!  :bomb:



Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
Check blacklist she's long been added.

Offline Chuckman

Wow, what a nasty vindictive bitch she is.

I only hope the punter knows about it and hasn't been screwed over by it.

Offline Aspen

Wow, what a nasty vindictive bitch she is.

I only hope the punter knows about it and hasn't been screwed over by it.

Maybe he realised at the last minute and decided not to go  :)

There could be all sorts of reasons why he didn't make it. Whatever, it doesn't justify plastering his picture and phone number on the net.
Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"

Offline Roth

Maybe he realised at the last minute and decided not to go  :)

There could be all sorts of reasons why he didn't make it. Whatever, it doesn't justify plastering his picture and phone number on the net.

+1

Offline Corus Boy

Anyone looked to see if SAAFE has any comments or feedback on hese revelations?

Offline Aspen

Anyone looked to see if SAAFE has any comments or feedback on hese revelations?

I doubt they'd be bothered. Why should they be?

Most of them wouldn't condone it I'm sure, but by the same token lots of them are so desperate to reduce the timewasters that they'd not be bothered about anything that discourages them. Timewasters give a bad name to all of us actually.

The only thing that would put the issue on the safe agenda is if numbers of them got black listed. ParisB did big time, but I don't think it was ever mentioned. At least on the visible forums on safe.
Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"

Offline greychap

https://www.adultwork.com/2872087 or https://www.adultwork.com/xChristina%5FGreyx

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=58145.msg749147#msg749147

https://twitter.com/ChristinaGrayAW

As a prossie mate of XNickeyx, is she guilty by association and by retweeting the outing of a punter?
 :manhater: :bomb:

Should she be added to the Prossie Blacklist?  :unknown: :bomb:

Well she is certainly not innocent in spreading the word but because it has been highlighted here that would have got far more people looking then ever they would have had on there little twitter accounts.

So in a way the original girl wanted a lot of people looking at his details and she has got her wish.

Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline greychap

I doubt they'd be bothered. Why should they be?

Most of them wouldn't condone it I'm sure, but by the same token lots of them are so desperate to reduce the timewasters that they'd not be bothered about anything that discourages them. Timewasters give a bad name to all of us actually.

The only thing that would put the issue on the safe agenda is if numbers of them got black listed. ParisB did big time, but I don't think it was ever mentioned. At least on the visible forums on safe.

Although they report a lot of timewasters to there fellow workers on there so the girls can avoid them but I doubt they would agree with this method involved.

If the bloke had hit the girl or robbed her then the photo would be justified but not under this reason, it makes her look like she is used to getting revenge on people on a regular basis.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline OakTree

Well she is certainly not innocent in spreading the word but because it has been highlighted here that would have got far more people looking then ever they would have had on there little twitter accounts.

So in a way the original girl wanted a lot of people looking at his details and she has got her wish.

I suppose that's one (odd) way of looking at it but it's also highlighted what a devious little shit she is and therefore the same people who've gone looking will now never book her.

Offline greychap

I suppose that's one (odd) way of looking at it but it's also highlighted what a devious little shit she is and therefore the same people who've gone looking will now never book her.

Cannot see many people wanting to book her when they read what she does to timewasters and goes out of her way to find ways to get the revenge like she openly admits on her profile.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline greychap

I suppose that's one (odd) way of looking at it but it's also highlighted what a devious little shit she is and therefore the same people who've gone looking will now never book her.

I get the feeling she has had a lot of messers and now she has a lot of angry bitter thoughts in general of men.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline Happyjose

Fucking bitch. Did it even cross her mind the consequences this could have for the poor guys family?

Offline OakTree

I get the feeling she has had a lot of messers and now she has a lot of angry bitter thoughts in general of men.

She's in the wrong job then.

Offline Aspen

I get the feeling she has had a lot of messers and now she has a lot of angry bitter thoughts in general of men.

Not the sort of girl you really want to go and meet anyway then.

There are a lot like that, and part of the selection skill is detecting them early on.
Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"

Offline Chuckman

Maybe he realised at the last minute and decided not to go  :)

There could be all sorts of reasons why he didn't make it. Whatever, it doesn't justify plastering his picture and phone number on the net.

Completely agree. Only hope it hasn't ruined him.

Offline Roth

Advertising that all her prices are reduced now.  :wackogirl: 

Wonder if its cos her phones been dusty?  :bomb:

Offline Roth

And now her profile says she's escorting for the last time!   :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Last chance to fuck her?  :unknown:  No thanks!  :dash: :dash:

Online James999

Looks like she's retiring anyway

Her profile says she's 24, yet the pictures show a middle aged woman, and the size of those thighs, I've seen slimmer ones on Russian powerlifters  :vomit:

Offline Roth

And stretch marked tits.   :thumbsdown:  Acceptable on civvies but not if your paying for it!  :scare:
« Last Edit: August 06, 2015, 12:54:47 PM by Roth »

I've seen her, no real issues and I think she's fairly pretty but I don't think her heart's in it. Good as a plan b

Although they report a lot of timewasters to there fellow workers on there so the girls can avoid them but I doubt they would agree with this method involved.
They remove some of the numbers by the looks of it, which seems a more fair option.


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)