I would avoid bare backers as much as the next reasonable minded punter but as much as you might disagree with it, there are punters who enjoy barebacking and seek out recommendations on that basis. Are bare backers excluded from this site and if so where do we draw the line? OWO is also high risk but I do that. Who are we to judge moral standards and levels of risk? You pay your money and you make your own adult decisions about what is safe and what your own levels of risk are. I really don't think that it is for you or anyone else on this site to moralise about the issue. Sure, I like to think that punters can be educated and be persuaded into pursuing safe sexual practices by using this site but moralising on the issue is more than a little hypocritical.
On UKP barebacking is discouraged, and rightly so. However there are known members on here (including 1 long-standing member) whose reviews mainly consist of punts with BB.
Warning: Do not click any of his links, cos majority of us would not want to punt with those WGs, bareback or not).
Also, there is a dedicated site/forum for those punters who actively seek barebackers, including licking out a previous punter's cum froma WG's pussy
I won't publicise that site, but it has been mentioned on UKP on numerous occassions. You only need to search on Google a known barebacker (using her AW link) and chances are she has been mentioned on that site.