Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: should wg who advertise bb be made to have regular health checks?  (Read 1075 times)

Offline gary03

looking at adultwork there are a significant minority of girls with enough feedback to show they have regular unprotected sex with punters.should aw ensure they also have to show regular health screenings so they can continue to advertise?
these girls seem either to enjoy the thrill of bb sex or have found it only way to attract enough custom
what do you think?


Offline hexohm

Simple answer is no.  you cant force her.

 If a prostitute has unprotected sex is almost a guarantee she will have some form of STI at some point.  If you want to go bareback its your choice and your risk.

Offline Aspen

That's stupid, really stupid. Sounds like you want the authorities involved in what goes on behind closed doors. Who would police it? I can't think of anything worse.

It's up to everyone to take responsibility for what they do, not have some nanny following them around making sure they don't get hurt.


Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"

Offline daviemac

looking at adultwork there are a significant minority of girls with enough feedback to show they have regular unprotected sex with punters.should aw ensure they also have to show regular health screenings so they can continue to advertise?
these girls seem either to enjoy the thrill of bb sex or have found it only way to attract enough custom
what do you think?

How can you tell if they actually do bb or if it's just sergi ticking boxes to attract punters and how could you enforce it?

Don't forget they all bb someone.

Offline Aspen

it's just sergi ticking boxes to attract punters

Yes, and if you do what I do and tick the dislike box against BB and unprotected, hey presto! many of the EE's and fakes vanish from the selection.

I only wish that there was a no box for private gallery, but somehow I think that's not going to ever appear.
Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"

Offline mf_1101

Think a wg who advertises BB should have their head examined.


Seems to more of the cunts that do it as well

Online James999

I always assume that if bareback is offered its as a result of

A. She's already infected so she doesn't care
B. She's mentally unstable
C. Serious drug issues
D. Being forced
E. Combination of the above

As such avoid  :vomit:

Offline TheBSG

Only way to enforce it would be to legalise and regulate prostitution which has been debated for eternity

Offline comaminion

It's like kirie, who I believe actually insisted on it at one point


 :vomit:


I would put money on her having a handful of std's if not worse
Banning reason: White-knighting

How can you tell if they actually do bb.
it's just sergi ticking boxes to attract punters.
how could you enforce it?
they all bb someone.

All four of these astute statements are abolutely true.
So often on EE and especially Romanian sites Sergei has ticked all the boxes and yet when you read the Q & A you often find complete contradictory statements often with a cut and pasted style such as
" No I value my health and so should you. Or,  If you ask me for BB I will report you ! Etc etc

Offline gary03

i dont want authorities involved either
but surely anything that can help keep sti down is worth a thought

Offline Aspen

i dont want authorities involved either
but surely anything that can help keep sti down is worth a thought

I feel sure that your personal exposure to sti's is down to your own behaviour. Involving 'authorities' won't make any difference to the risk to you. Same applies to us all.

You watch out for yourself and let everyone else watch out for themselves.
 
Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"

Offline Malvolio

You can't force adults to undergo medical procedures - and Adultwork will accept any advert that's legal and earns them money.

Anyone who decides to BB a prossie can't be unaware of the risks involved - if they choose to accept those risks that's up to them.

AW is just an advertising mechanism. It's those that turn up and buy that have the responsibility to either protect themselves or not. Any WG who decides to offer punters BB has issues IMO.  :hi:

Offline SamLP

Think a wg who advertises BB should have their head examined.

Too many times it's a pimp that manages a girls profiles but if a WG 'willingly' and that's the key word offers BB then I agree with you. Similarly there are many punters that request BB. Several WG's have told me they get requests all the time for BB sex. They too (the punters) need their heads examined, and probably even more so.

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
So you think girls who offer BB should have to prove they have been screened regularly to AW to be able to advertise on their.  What about those who offer OWO or rimming or receive or even DFK after all these activities can cause the transfer of STIs and with rimming other infections too. A woman who offers OWO can transfer by DFK If she has it in her throat or mouth (very low minimal risk but still a risk) and if she offers rimming and DFK she could give you lots of nasty little bugs and bacteria
Where do you draw the line? Why is the risk you don't like more important than the risks others might think too high?

Plus there would just be loads of fake Certs sent in as Sergei isn't going to pay £50 a time for a real cert so again it wouldn't work and also by the time you have your results back to get a cert it is already out of date as on average it's 10days to have the cultures grown and tested and by then she could have fucked 50 men BB

What they should do is license prossying and make it illegal to pay a prossie and illegal to work as one if not licensed. As part of the license you have to have monthly GUM checks to get it renewed

Offline gary03

yes i think thats what happens in amsterdam
of course im not suggesting theres a perfect solution & everyone has to make there own decisions & be free too do so.also there is no reason for the punter not to get himself checked out too.

Offline shagbambi

What they should do is license prossying and make it illegal to pay a prossie and illegal to work as one if not licensed. As part of the license you have to have monthly GUM checks to get it renewed

This is by the far the most sensible option and best for all concerned. Such laws exist on the continent (mandatory testing).

Online Jimmyredcab

Tests mean nothing if the filthy bitch is a barebacker, she could have been tested yesterday and picked up an infection today, just avoid these lowlife skanks.  :bomb:

Offline shagbambi

Tests mean nothing if the filthy bitch is a barebacker, she could have been tested yesterday and picked up an infection today, just avoid these lowlife skanks.  :bomb:

In the context of this thread you are right, avoiding  bare backing is best.  I know I was speaking more in terms of general blanket testing irrespective if BB is on offer or not for all prossies.

Online Jimmyredcab

In the context of this thread you are right, avoiding  bare backing is best.  I know I was speaking more in terms of general blanket testing irrespective if BB is on offer or not for all prossies.

Why would Adultwork care one way or the other, they are only interested in the bottom line, nothing else.  :hi:

Offline Garden69

Simple answer is no.  you cant force her.

 If a prostitute has unprotected sex is almost a guarantee she will have some form of STI at some point.  If you want to go bareback its your choice and your risk.
+1

Offline Garden69

This is by the far the most sensible option and best for all concerned. Such laws exist on the continent (mandatory testing).

Yes but as has already been said/intimated, unless a girl is tested after every encounter you are at a high risk of catching something. Not worth the chance. If they get tested once per month, and let's conservatively say they see 5 men per day, of which 20% go BB. Towards the end of the month that's 30 men she's had BB sex with. Any one of these could have an STI. You're playing Russian Roulette guys if you want to go there. Use your brain not your urges. However attractive and clean someone appears you can not tell what's going on inside their bodies.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)