Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Should it be illegal to pay for sex in the UK?  (Read 4910 times)

Ah, but we're not paying for sex are we? We're paying for the company.

Should it be illegal to pay for sex in the UK?

Yep, it should be illegal to pay for sex, it should be freely available to all.

IT IS freely available to all, we are just paying for a guarantee. :lol:

Offline smiths

Ah, but we're not paying for sex are we? We're paying for the company.

No idea what you do, I am paying for sex, I don't need company.

Offline Loverat

No idea what you do, I am paying for sex, I don't need company.

You don't need company? Are you paying to do it on your own?
Banning reason: Constant issues with UKP, problem fixed you're banned

jcdmj12

I wonder how significant a factor it was in the result?

It actually got me interested in politics for once, I'm probably not alone.

Offline spkmstr48

Should it be illegal to pay for sex in the UK?

Yep, it should be illegal to pay for sex, it should be freely available to all.

 :drinks:
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy

Offline adindas

No.

Will not changemy behaviour as well ...

What they are going ot do . Put people in jail ??
Do they have enough space ???

Offline Ben4454



I gave my girlfriend £200 for her birthday we then decided to have sex afterwards.

Liar ! You paid her for sex. Criminal.
« Last Edit: May 10, 2015, 09:51:24 PM by Ben4454 »
Banning reason: Ignored admin warning after temporary banning and signed up to malicious troll anti-UKP site

Offline Aspen

Will not changemy behaviour as well ...

What they are going ot do . Put people in jail ??
Do they have enough space ???

They do in Sweden.

Must be more space there.

It'll be interesting to see how it's handled in NI. My guess is that they'll be quite aggressive through the summer, simply to justify the law's existence.
Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"

Making it illegal makes it more dangerous for both us and WGs. It will never happen here (crosses fingers).

Fine ,can't or refuse to pay =Jail.Sex offenders register regardless.That would be my guess.lifestyle fascism!Shouldn't happen under Tories though.Should be safe for 5 years.

Damn computers!I will get my coat!

Offline smiths

They do in Sweden.

Must be more space there.

It'll be interesting to see how it's handled in NI. My guess is that they'll be quite aggressive through the summer, simply to justify the law's existence.

Previous laws around prostitution such as brothels and the street scene which have been wholly illegal for many years yet in some areas thrive and have for many years means
 my logic tells me IF the police in areas where the top cops allow those to operate which are the easiest to catch pimps and for the street scene, WGs and punters, they aren't going to aggressively go after punters who punt with Indies which would be much harder police work and more costly.

A law to criminalise punters is primarily to put punters off punting in the first place by scaring them in my view, something that would work with some punters as the risk as they see it would be too great, and in areas where the top cops have a zero tolerance to prostitution they might mount operations. Harriet Harridans coercion law in 2009-10 hasn't led to mass convictions, it WAS designed to scare punters off punting primarily.

The police prostitution lead Armett (may have changed now) said a year or two ago that he had no problem what adults did behind closed doors if consentual, so the government passing another law on prostitution by no means means for certain the police will enforce it, just as they don't with brothels in many areas. Though that COULD change at any moment of course, so having a law to wheel out at any time it suits the police certainly wouldn't be good for punters obviously.

Tony Montana

The problem is that if it is legalised the councils will get involved in licensing brothel premises and there is bound to be draconian rules about where a brothel can be situated e.g. not within 5 miles of a primary school, not within 3 miles of a pub etc.

It will also be taxed heavily like other vices i.e. alcohol, smoking & gambling.

I prefer the situation as it is in Manchester and MK where decent brothels are tolerated and monitored.  Any breach of trafficking laws, signs of drug use, tax evasion, money laundering etc and they get raided and shut down.


Offline smiths

The problem is that if it is legalised the councils will get involved in licensing brothel premises and there is bound to be draconian rules about where a brothel can be situated e.g. not within 5 miles of a primary school, not within 3 miles of a pub etc.

It will also be taxed heavily like other vices i.e. alcohol, smoking & gambling.

I prefer the situation as it is in Manchester and MK where decent brothels are tolerated and monitored.  Any breach of trafficking laws, signs of drug use, tax evasion, money laundering etc and they get raided and shut down.

Indeed, once the council got their snouts in the trough prices would no doubt rise, it would also mean WGs would be known to be WGs by councils whereas at present a WG can be a WG for as long as she wants and then leave to start a new life without officially being known as a WG and the stigma that still holds.

In New Zealand I read only covered services like OW no OWO are on offer in legal brothels, from my selfish point of view I require OWO as OW does zero for me, so the present grey area is the best scenario although I would like to see WGs able to legally work together in the same premises without a pimp. In reality punting has had pimps involved in it all the time and I cant see that changing anytime soon though.

I just wondered if anyone knew if there was a recorded correlation between making prostitution illegal and sexual assaults against women?

Offline comaminion

Nope I think it should be made legal, make it safer for all involved

I'm not coming at that as a liberal I'm quite centered, God forbid weed ever gets legalized and stuff like that, nothing would ever got done

I'm not even approaching thinking of myself

Just simply it would make it safer and lessen the exploitation that does happen sometimes
Banning reason: White-knighting

jcdmj12

A punting ban is very unlikely to happen now the British Electorate have done the sensible thing and told the lefties to sling their hook.    Too many Tories are dirty buggers who exist on a diet of anal sex with Polish women delivered to their hotel room.

Anyway, after Osbourne has been at public services with his axe again, there won't be enough police resources to waste on this sort of crap.  Hopefully Dave will dismantle the State at such a rate the socialists wouldn't be able to start bossing people around again even if they got in again next time.

« Last Edit: May 11, 2015, 11:05:51 PM by jcdmj12 »

Offline comaminion

A punting ban is very unlikely to happen now the British Electorate have done the sensible thing and told the lefties to sling their hook.    Too many Tories are dirty buggers who exist on a diet of anal sex with Polish women delivered to their hotel room.

Anyway, after Osbourne has been at public services with his axe again, there won't be enough police resources to waste on this sort of crap.  Hopefully Dave will dismantle the State at such a rate the socialists wouldn't be able to start bossing people around again even if they got in again next time.

But did that reasoning sway your vote 8D
Banning reason: White-knighting

jcdmj12

But did that reasoning sway your vote 8D
Yep, absolutely, pretty much the only reason I voted for them. Upsetting smug liberal Guardian readers was the other one.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2015, 01:15:17 AM by jcdmj12 »

Offline comaminion

I don't mind politics but I think I avoided papers for two months whilst it was propaganda overdrive

Thoroughly enjoyed paxman tearing them apart though
Banning reason: White-knighting

Offline Aspen

Making it illegal makes it more dangerous for both us and WGs. It will never happen here (crosses fingers).

Who's really worried about the danger? Only the people who are exposed to the danger. No-one else is.

I saw a recording of an edition of 'this week' recently with Rupert Everett as guest along with Andrew Neill, Portillo and Abbott. He was expressing the view that it will be brought in, but very strongly opposed (he was on the game at one time).  That was worrying because he moves in well informed circles.
Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"

Offline Turtle1

It is illigal to pay for sex outright. We are paying for time and company. Anything thrown in is with consent between the Adults.

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
It is illigal to pay for sex outright. We are paying for time and company. Anything thrown in is with consent between the Adults.

I dearly hope you are joking. In case anyone thinks otherwise.

Offline Aspen

It is illigal to pay for sex outright. We are paying for time and company. Anything thrown in is with consent between the Adults.

I dearly hope you are joking. In case anyone thinks otherwise.

As of today in NI it is, so it's not a joke there, and the RoI is set to follow suit. The time and company excuse won't wash either.

Wait and see how many raids and stings there are. I expect there will be a few.
Banning reason: Secret barebacker who used the name "Loneranger" to slag off UKP and spread malicious claims against admin + Previously banned as "overhead". Also known as "Warwick"


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)