Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: White knight/fluffy behaviour  (Read 3556 times)

Offline baresi

people need to remember these lasses aren't their friends, they're whores who do it for the money,and if by giving a little extra to a 'face' it might encourage others to visit, too many get carried away with their apparent relationships with the girls and quite frankly come over as utter tossers

Offline 306

some punters pay or hope for more from a vist to a wg
or just have a wank and save yourself £100 plus
so all tossers /wankers have got the money side right!!
Banning reason: Constantly making nonsensical useless posts + Constantly ignoring admin requests

Offline greychap

I'm really interested in opinions on this topic guys
If I have a great punt with a wg that has previously had a negative review & post a positive review does that make me a white knight or fluffy?
If I've had a great punt with a wg & post my opinion on somebody else's negative/neutral review does that also make me fluffy/ white knight?
So here's an example
I booked teen Jade when she was getting slated for being a time-waster & had a great time so I post a positive review because I had a great punt am I a white knight/fluffy or just posting about my experience?

Sometimes the term fluffy is over used in my opinion and there has been times when someone has been called it when I am not sure why.

But equally there is some wg's where I think they have some punters eating out of there hands and will defend them on here and the wg's obviously know what there nicknames are on here so they see the punter sticking up for them and maybe the punter feels like they have a special relationship. :D

I have also seen it and has happened with myself with an agency where because it is there fave agency the punter will be attacked because  there here to defend the agency owner, so its not just a escorts it can be agencies too.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline greychap

I still think write whatever you like as long as it is a true account of what has happened wether its an amazing positive review or a horrible negative review.

I don't think any escort should be avoided given a negative just because they have a fan club, if there popular anyway it wont make a difference punters will still see them if they want to.

I don't always agree with every negative but I accept its there opinion and it wont put me off booking if I think there just nit picking.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline Looking4fun

I still think write whatever you like as long as it is a true account of what has happened wether its an amazing positive review or a horrible negative review.

I don't think any escort should be avoided given a negative just because they have a fan club, if there popular anyway it wont make a difference punters will still see them if they want to.

I don't always agree with every negative but I accept its there opinion and it wont put me off booking if I think there just nit picking.
My thoughts exactly it's a shame that others on here feel the need to make childish comments towards the op when they don't agree with the review

Offline AnthG

because it is there fave agency the punter will be attacked because  there here to defend the agency owner, so its not just a escorts it can be agencies too.

I do not think its fluffyness to defend an agency. Fluffyness is when people think there is a budding romantic relationship brewing when there is not and she couldn't care less about you. Nobody is going to think that exists with an agency, or an agency owner. That person would be certifiable if they did. With regards to agencies it is just good customer service gets good customer loyalty.

For example I am into computers. I have bought a lot of stuff from Scan computers. As a result they have don't a lot in return for me as they say each time on doing it because "I am a good customer" - e.g allowed items to be returned for free postage when it should have been I needed to pay postage. RMA'd items due to firmware issues when really RMAs are for hardware issues only. Offered to update the firmware on hardware for me before posting it out. Gave me discounts on many specific items at my request via email.

As a result I am a very happy customer of theirs and post on computer forums that Scan are a good place to buy from. And when people come along and say Scan are terrible. I say they have always went out of their way for me so I disagree.

Nobody has ever come along and said to me on computing forums that you are a fluffy for liking scan. But in this industry it seems different. As it seems many believe liking an agency is effectively the wrong thing to do.

Offline greychap

My thoughts exactly it's a shame that others on here feel the need to make childish comments towards the op when they don't agree with the review

I have not done many reviews of late not so much because of people nit picking more I am a bit more careful to my identity and don't want girls knowing my nickname on here and putting 2 and 2 together.

Writing something negative caused me trouble a lot of trouble and now I am more careful of my identity but I will still say what I think on here that wont change but it does not need to be nasty we are all grown ups well most of us anyway :lol:
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline greychap

I do not think its fluffyness to defend an agency. Fluffyness is when people think there is a budding romantic relationship brewing when there is not and she couldn't care less about you. Nobody is going to think that exists with an agency, or an agency owner. That person would be certifiable if they did. With regards to agencies it is just good customer service gets good customer loyalty.

For example I am into computers. I have bought a lot of stuff from Scan computers. As a result they have don't a lot in return for me as they say each time on doing it because "I am a good customer" - e.g allowed items to be returned for free postage when it should have been I needed to pay postage. RMA'd items due to firmware issues when really RMAs are for hardware issues only. Offered to update the firmware on hardware for me before posting it out. Gave me discounts on many specific items at my request via email.

As a result I am a very happy customer of theirs and post on computer forums that Scan are a good place to buy from. And when people come along and say Scan are terrible. I say they have always went out of their way for me so I disagree.

Nobody has ever come along and said to me on computing forums that you are a fluffy for liking scan. But in this industry it seems different. As it seems many believe liking an agency is effectively the wrong thing to do.

I have liked agencies before and the owners that run them but I don't know them really well there nice to me because I pay for there lifestyle I am not stupid to think them being nice and friendly is genuine it is to get my money.

If the owners were all such lovely people they would not be in this type of industry selling the girls for them to have a better lifestyle then just an average job.

But I don't doubt for one minute this is not a normal industry and to be in this type of industry you have to be a certain type of person and that comes with criminals and thugs entering this underworld or at least the owners having back up of thugs on hand.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline Reeson69

I don't think Zara would be on that no bad comments list as it seems I am the one going against the trend by really liking my booking with her - if it is the case of she upped her game because she was told I was turning up by Diamonds. I really wish I had of asked for A-levels now as she may have tried it :) o respond to cr


My issue was with the timing of your review which came only a few days after a negative review and ongoing discussion about the same girl where others had expressed opinions similar to the OP. I appreciate she was on your hotlist but personally, having read the discussion about her, she would have at best went to the bottom of my hotlist but more than likely I'd have crossed her off altogether.
It's obvious though that she divides opinion.

Offline Looking4fun

My issue was with the timing of your review which came only a few days after a negative review and ongoing discussion about the same girl where others had expressed opinions similar to the OP. I appreciate she was on your hotlist but personally, having read the discussion about her, she would have at best went to the bottom of my hotlist but more than likely I'd have crossed her off altogether.
It's obvious though that she divides opinion.
So what your saying is if a wg gets a bad review we should stop booking her &
That still doesn't excuse childish bullying comments

Offline AnthG

personally, having read the discussion about her, she would have at best went to the bottom of my hotlist but more than likely I'd have crossed her off altogether.

Like I mentioned in the review thread itself she was actually totally crossed off my to see list on reading the negative. This was until she came onto the forum and gave the reply she did in that negative review. Which I really liked what she said. I then seen the punter never came back to challenge what she said at all so I made an internal decision that I believed her side on that issue.

So it was actually that negative review, or more specifically the way she handled it, was what made me want to see her more than I already had been.

In my opinion when a girl comes onto the forums and gives a good reply to criticism. Like Zara did, and like LilyD did. It actually makes me personally really want to see them.  It just humanizes that girl and makes her more attractive/interesting to me than just a name and some stats on an agency website. I would have booked LilyD back in February but she suddenly said "no more bookings from people who haven't seen me before as a response to her negative review.

To also add this review has been my first review since last October (so first one in six months). So its not like I am "Mr put right the negative reviews" guy.

Offline Reeson69

So what your saying is if a wg gets a bad review we should stop booking her &
That still doesn't excuse childish bullying comments
Have I actually said that?
I don't speak for "we" either, I speak just for myself.


Offline Looking4fun

My issue was with the timing of your review which came only a few days after a negative review and ongoing discussion about the same girl where others had expressed opinions similar to the OP. I appreciate she was on your hotlist but personally, having read the discussion about her, she would have at best went to the bottom of my hotlist but more than likely I'd have crossed her off altogether.
It's obvious though that she divides opinion.
was that not what you were implying in you post?

Offline johnr1

Like I mentioned in the review thread itself she was actually totally crossed off my to see list on reading the negative. This was until she came onto the forum and gave the reply she did in that negative review. Which I really liked what she said. I then seen the punter never came back to challenge what she said at all so I made an internal decision that I believed her side on that issue.

So it was actually that negative review, or more specifically the way she handled it, was what made me want to see her more than I already had been.

In my opinion when a girl comes onto the forums and gives a good reply to criticism. Like Zara did, and like LilyD did. It actually makes me personally really want to see them.  It just humanizes that girl and makes her more attractive/interesting to me than just a name and some stats on an agency website. I would have booked LilyD back in February but she suddenly said "no more bookings from people who haven't seen me before as a response to her negative review.

To also add this review has been my first review since last October (so first one in six months). So its not like I am "Mr put right the negative reviews" guy.

very well said Anth could not have put it any better  :thumbsup:
Banning reason: White knight prick

Couldn't agree more. Is there some sort of rule that bars any positive reviews after a negative has been posted or a time limit ?

Offline smiths

I'm really interested in opinions on this topic guys
If I have a great punt with a wg that has previously had a negative review & post a positive review does that make me a white knight or fluffy?
If I've had a great punt with a wg & post my opinion on somebody else's negative/neutral review does that also make me fluffy/ white knight?
So here's an example
I booked teen Jade when she was getting slated for being a time-waster & had a great time so I post a positive review because I had a great punt am I a white knight/fluffy or just posting about my experience?

Obviously it doesn't as long as what you post is an honest account. The fact is there are no guarantees in punting so a WG who offered you good service might not to others. I punted with a WG who had had a number of positive reviews on here and found her service poor so gave her a negative review, I couldn't give a shit what others might think of that.

What I wouldn't do is question another credible to me punters review on the same WG that differs to my experience of the WG. I might add a post to his thread saying she offered me a good or bad service or fucked me over though simply because if I get bad service or fucked over there are consequences to WGs who do that, me bad mouthing them on here, and I will do that wherever I see her name mentioned.

Offline smiths

Couldn't agree more. Is there some sort of rule that bars any positive reviews after a negative has been posted or a time limit ?

Of course there isn't as punters experiences of the same WG can be entirely different.

Offline Looking4fun

Obviously it doesn't as long as what you post is an honest account. The fact is there are no guarantees in punting so a WG who offered you good service might not to others. I punted with a WG who had had a number of positive reviews on here and found her service poor so gave her a negative review, I couldn't give a shit what others might think of that.

What I wouldn't do is question another credible to me punters review on the same WG that differs to my experience of the WG. I might add a post to his thread saying she offered me a good or bad service or fucked me over though simply because if I get bad service or fucked over there are consequences to WGs who do that, me bad mouthing them on here, and I will do that wherever I see her name mentioned.
Thanks for your comments on this & couldn't agree more theirs absolutely no need to resort to childish comments aimed at a credible member of the forums because he had a great time with a wg that's previously had a negative review

Offline Reeson69

Thanks for your comments on this & couldn't agree more theirs absolutely no need to resort to childish comments aimed at a credible member of the forums because he had a great time with a wg that's previously had a negative review

You're offended on AnthG's behalf. I think you've made that clear already.

Offline Looking4fun

You're offended on AnthG's behalf. I think you've made that clear already.
I'm not offended on Anthg's behalf this is a review forum & using childish comments towards any forum member when all they have done is post an honest review about his booking is very immature in my opinion

Offline Reeson69

I'm not offended on Anthg's behalf this is a review forum & using childish comments towards any forum member when all they have done is post an honest review about his booking is very immature in my opinion


To repeatedly go on about childish comments when it's you who's throwing his toys out the pram is pretty ironic.
You've obviously taken offence on his behalf.
AnthG admitted himself that his review might be interpreted as a defence of Zara and he was right.
Fortunately, I've had a civil discussion with him and it's sorted.
You're the only one still hurting.


Offline Looking4fun

No hurting what so ever just don't like bullies

Offline Reeson69

No hurting what so ever just don't like bullies

I don't like people being offended on behalf of others.

Am I the only one who thinks this thread has now run its course ?

FUCK THIS....!!!!  okay guys I haven't been on the forum too long, but this thread has just decided it for me im done with posting, theres more to life...!! I,ll still use it to read reviews but that'll do me,jeeeeezas fellers theres more to life and more to aim for than been popular on a punting forum... take a step back and read some of the absolute shite being typed... its fucking ridiculous... to the few I have had a bit banter with good luck guys... im out..!!  :drinks:




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)