Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: White knight/fluffy behaviour  (Read 3557 times)

Offline Gothic D

I think this whole thing is taken a touch too serious...! you would think it was a forum discussing how to solve the worlds problems.! its paying girls to fuck! and commenting on if it was worth it or not..!! It seem there are a few who live there lives here, but hey each to there own..! don't get me wrong I enjoy some of the craic but seem to spend a lot of my time thinking "FFS fellas lighten up", were all strangers to each other if some guys wanna fly a flag for there fave girl let them crack on, I really couldn't care less just ignore it...!  :drinks:

So why don't we just discuss solving the worlds problems instead of trying to pass on useful punting information on a site soley dedicated to punters.
The whole idea is to prevent punters getting ripped off.
I don't know about you but I have to work fucking hard for my money and I really do not want to waste it on some lying,cheating slapper.
I would willingly give it to a WG who will provide me with the service I am wanting though.

Offline Gothic D

Not a chance, if I had a shit punt with a well reviewed lass then my review would reflect exactly what happened and how I felt. I rate my reviews as I see fit and I don't give a toss if others like them or not.

Which is exactly how it should be.
BUT you should also be aware that if it's one of the "untouchables" you will get a veritable shit storm of abuse from their fan club.

Offline Looking4fun

Not a chance, if I had a shit punt with a well reviewed lass then my review would reflect exactly what happened and how I felt. I rate my reviews as I see fit and I don't give a toss if others like them or not.
That's my point exactly but if a member decides that they've had a great punt they should also be allowed to post their comments
I think when members call other members white knights or fluffy it's just a childish way of disagreeing with them

So why don't we just discuss solving the worlds problems instead of trying to pass on useful punting information on a site soley dedicated to punters.
The whole idea is to prevent punters getting ripped off.
I don't know about you but I have to work fucking hard for my money and I really do not want to waste it on some lying,cheating slapper.
I would willingly give it to a WG who will provide me with the service I am wanting though.

the point I was trying to make was some guys seem to live there lives here like its life and death....! which is fair enough, but just use the site for what it is..! somewhere where people put reviews of girls... just let all the other "your this" "your that" pass you by... I couldn't care less what people think of me or my opinions I give them, if people wanna listen then okay.... if they don't equally fair enough.... I'll say it again its only a site about reviews of  paying girls for sex...!

Offline AnthG

Perhaps we could have a list of the girls who aren't allowed to be badly reviewed no matter how crap their service is and lets be perfectly honest here Zara has given a pathetic service to many punters.The old "your too big"lie or "my teeth are coming through"rubbish.

I don't think Zara would be on that no bad comments list as it seems I am the one going against the trend by really liking my booking with her - if it is the case of she upped her game because she was told I was turning up by Diamonds. I really wish I had of asked for A-levels now as she may have tried it :)

But in terms of the topic. In my opinion I think the ones that possibly cause the issues on the forum are the ones who are not members here. So they cannot come on and provide any response to any negative reviews about them, or any negative comments. But they also sometimes want to respond. So have to do it through a punter, or they do it on a blog, which needs a punter to quote it or copy and paste it to the thread. The number one that jumps to mind for the north east for that issue above is Northern Kara / Tori Taylor.

She was a member here a long time ago but was banned. But she is also easily in the top three providers in the north east. She also it seems gets quite upset by negative comments about her. She also leaves the industry a lot, and constantly changes her name, which people worry /jump to conclusions is all due to those negative comments made about her. So this causes potential problems as it causes people to possibly feel  to themselves "I must challenge this as I don't want her to quit this industry as a result".

The other girl who at the moment is causing discussions is LillyD. However with LillyD she is a member here. She also seems very intelligent and knows this business well so she responds by herself very well needing no help from any punter. She also does not stick around so there is little chance of her ever getting banned as she only turns up to respond to criticisms, fixes them and then leaves the forum to only come back when any more turns up.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2015, 01:29:22 PM by AnthG »

In my opinion;

1 - If you are completely honest in what you post.
2 - What you post is based solely on YOUR own experience & not 'clouded' by other peoples experiences.
3 - If what you post is fact based and doesn't get personal / rude / obnoxious towards other forum members.
4 - If you are not being deliberately obtuse or offensive or trying to hijack a thread to suit your own agenda.
5 - If you are not a 'Troll' :thumbsdown:

Then I think all is well.





That's my point exactly but if a member decides that they've had a great punt they should also be allowed to post their comments
I think when members call other members white knights or fluffy it's just a childish way of disagreeing with them

I am 100% in agreement here.
Sadly, there are still some people who think it makes them more Alpha :unknown:

Offline Mansell

In my opinion;

1 - If you are completely honest in what you post.
2 - What you post is based solely on YOUR own experience & not 'clouded' by other peoples experiences.
3 - If what you post is fact based and doesn't get personal / rude / obnoxious towards other forum members.
4 - If you are not being deliberately obtuse or offensive or trying to hijack a thread to suit your own agenda.
5 - If you are not a 'Troll' :thumbsdown:

Then I think all is well.

100%  :thumbsup:   Now where is that "Like Button "

Offline Looking4fun

In my opinion;

1 - If you are completely honest in what you post.
2 - What you post is based solely on YOUR own experience & not 'clouded' by other peoples experiences.
3 - If what you post is fact based and doesn't get personal / rude / obnoxious towards other forum members.
4 - If you are not being deliberately obtuse or offensive or trying to hijack a thread to suit your own agenda.
5 - If you are not a 'Troll' :thumbsdown:

Then I think all is well.
Spot on!

Offline Gothic D

Anth I agree with pretty much all you say about the only hearing one side of the story thing if they cannot post on here.
As regards the fluffyisms we all,me included have our favourites.I have about 4 or 5 who I see a lot and their service to me is always top notch.
But I accept that someone else might not get such a good service or she could have an off day.I would not however resort to abusing the poster of the review or any other posters that might have had similar bad or indifferent service from her.
Unfortunately there will always be reviews that are just done out of malice,we have seen a couple recently and you highlighted one for Keeva.
As regards the Lilly D review and the responses which went way over the top even for her.She handled it well as I stated at the time.She admitted fault and set about trying to rectify it which was done to the satisfaction of the OP.Both parties were happy with the outcome and in reality the thread should have ended there.
But the OP of the review still had to carry on defending himself against people who practically blamed him for everything.
That sort of thing is my biggest bug bear.

I am 100% in agreement here.
Sadly, there are still some people who think it makes them more Alpha :unknown:

Absolutely not.  We all know there are some people in the world that are easily led and develop feelings and in some cases infatuations with people. It's great we get a balanced view on here and genuine fluffies need to be reigned in.

Let's just be clear in case of doubt.  We are paying to fuck girls. The good ones are great. they don't like us. They don't fancy us. They want us for money just as we want them for sex. They won't fuck us if it wasn't for the money. They give us no special treatment. We shouldn't give them any either in our minds or otherwise. It's just a business transaction.  Call out the good girls and even the good girls who piss people about.

I completely agree with the above there are two or three girls who are untouchable. I personally have been Pissed about by one and possibly another.  Everyone should be able to call that out. Equally people should be able to say they get good service and have never been messed about. But I know for a fact some popular girls piss lots of people around.  The more flames people get for calling it out, the less likely it's to happen in the future.

Don't we want to hear about it?

One more thing.  It would be interesting to know how many people on here are known to post on here by any wgs. Those people, in my view, may be less likely to post honestly or overly defend girls

Offline AnthG

I completely agree with the above there are two or three girls who are untouchable. I personally have been Pissed about by one and possibly another.  Everyone should be able to call that out.

...

Don't we want to hear about it?

Yes, for many reasons. At the very least it may make the girl up her business attitude if she has messed people around. So can I ask, why didn't you post a negative or neutral about the two who messed you about?

Offline Uniformad

So what your saying is if you had a bad punt with a top rated girl you wouldn't post a bad review?
Surely that totally defeats the purpose of this site.

It does but as I have already stated I had a not so favourable time with a top girl and I did not post a review as I know I would get hassle from certain members and I can't be arsed to reply to all to justify what I would of wrote. I understand if a first time poster comes on and gives a negative for a top girl I would just have a balanced view and discard it. However for people who have contributed over the months or years I would take there word and still use all info to use a balanced judgment as to I see the girl or not.

I'm curious to know who these 'untouchable' pro$$ies are?  :unknown:

Offline Looking4fun

It does but as I have already stated I had a not so favourable time with a top girl and I did not post a review as I know I would get hassle from certain members and I can't be arsed to reply to all to justify what I would of wrote. I understand if a first time poster comes on and gives a negative for a top girl I would just have a balanced view and discard it. However for people who have contributed over the months or years I would take there word and still use all info to use a balanced judgment as to I see the girl or not.
I understand why you didn't post a bad review because of the repercussions but if their are others doing the same thing then some of the top girls probably aren't as good as we all think

Offline AnthG

I'm curious to know who these 'untouchable' pro$$ies are?  :unknown:

Most likely; LilyD, Tori Taylor, Savannah and Keeva.

Will be the ones most will be referring to as the North East's versions of it. Each region will have its few. I can bet for example Michelle Independent is one down south in the region she works, as she is very popular it seems.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2015, 08:58:21 PM by AnthG »

Offline johnr1

I understand why you didn't post a bad review because of the repercussions but if their are others doing the same thing then some of the top girls probably aren't as good as we all think

Hmmm  I think that is true and some of the so called top girls are not now as good as before but getting away with it ...just  :( but nothing lasts for ever and they will tumble sooner or later
Banning reason: White knight prick

Offline Mansell

Hmmm  I think that is true and some of the so called top girls are not now as good as before but getting away with it ...just  :( but nothing lasts for ever and they will tumble sooner or later

Every market always changes and this is just what is happening here.

Anth, I think you might have missed some of the agency girls, and how about Brooke Knight ?

Offline Bengeo13

My own view on this thread is to ask how do the 'untouchables' achieve such status? I pretty much agree with the 4 who are mentioned above, all of whom I have seen enjoyed my time with them, but they don't include any of my personal favourites. The 4 girls mentioned are all great communicators as well as highly skilled in what they do. They all have the ability to make us feel special during our time with them, perhaps to share some personal stuff, holiday and career plans, maybe some wg gossip. But as Walkingdead so eloquently puts it "they're only there because of the money", nowt else, let's not kid ourselves! So on balance the untouchables are there because they are very good, most of the time. I rarely leave reviews about the top performers because there is a lot written about them already, but if I did have a poor experience I like to think l would share it.


Yet we still get people defending her.Reeson69 was abused over several posts the other day(since removed)for speaking out against her.

As my final addition to this particular thread I would like to make a couple of things clear.

I may have abused Reeson69 for a comment he made on AnthG's report on Zara where he more or less accused Anth of being a White Knight
 - a pointless and antagonistic post in my opinion although I fully accept that he is entitled to his own opinion, it just seemed deliberately provocative towards AnthG (who is a very trusted member in my eyes) - those posts I made were removed and I completely respect Admin's reasons for removing them.

Second thing to say - Although I may have appeared to be 'supporting' Zara - I have never seen this WG in any capacity so I have no links to her nor can she be a favourite of mine. For the record, I was simply trying to take a balanced view.
FB
« Last Edit: April 26, 2015, 11:00:08 PM by FLYING BLUE »

Offline Looking4fun

As my final addition to this particular thread I would like to make a couple of things clear.

I may have abused Reeson69 for a comment he made on AnthG's report on Zara where he more or less accused Anth of being a White Knight
 - a pointless and antagonistic post in my opinion although I fully accept that he is entitled to his own opinion, it just seemed deliberately provocative towards AnthG (who is a very trusted member in my eyes) - those posts I made were removed and I completely respect Admin's reasons for removing them.

Second thing to say - Although I may have appeared to be 'supporting' Zara - I have never seen this WG in any capacity so I have no links to her nor can she be a favourite of mine. For the record, I was simply trying to take a balanced view.
FB
Your spot on again the thread wasn't about who the top girls are, or if their above getting a negative review it was about how other members react to other members reviews.
If anybody posts a review negative or positive should they then be abused for posting their opinions

Offline 306

from above  so a  cut above the rest so deserve their place at the top of the tree for now?

 girls mentioned are all great communicators as well as highly skilled in what they do. They all have the ability to make us feel special during our time with them, perhaps to share some personal stuff, holiday and career plans, maybe some wg gossip. But as Walkingdead so eloquently puts it "they're only there because of the money", nowt else, let's not kid ourselves! So on balance the untouchables are there because they are very good, most of the time.
Banning reason: Constantly making nonsensical useless posts + Constantly ignoring admin requests

Offline Looking4fun

My own view on this thread is to ask how do the 'untouchables' achieve such status? I pretty much agree with the 4 who are mentioned above, all of whom I have seen enjoyed my time with them, but they don't include any of my personal favourites. The 4 girls mentioned are all great communicators as well as highly skilled in what they do. They all have the ability to make us feel special during our time with them, perhaps to share some personal stuff, holiday and career plans, maybe some wg gossip. But as Walkingdead so eloquently puts it "they're only there because of the money", nowt else, let's not kid ourselves! So on balance the untouchables are there because they are very good, most of the time. I rarely leave reviews about the top performers because there is a lot written about them already, but if I did have a poor experience I like to think l would share it.
Your right  you should be able to leave a review about your experience without having to defend it, it's all personal to your experience with the lady your reviewing

Yes, for many reasons. At the very least it may make the girl up her business attitude if she has messed people around. So can I ask, why didn't you post a negative or neutral about the two who messed you about?

Because I didn't meet them. I did comment in other threads about it




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)