Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Sexy summer  (Read 5973 times)


13 review(s) for ~SexySummer~ (11 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline seeker

Asif it would help others if you actually
told us who you are talking about   
"Come on get with the program. .and grow a pair"  :P

Offline seeker

As always
Anyone who wants to visit Summer
are free to do so and can ignore my comments
we all have different tastes and
we all enjoy different things .
She probably is a nice person ...
But come on Summer
update your profile  :hi:




Offline asif

Asif it would help others if you actually
told us who you are talking about   
"Come on get with the program. .and grow a pair"  :P

Naming her isn't a problem.

The more important point is that she, like Sexy Summer has many positive reviews on this site but I too did not like what I saw.

The lesson I learnt was to take reviews with a "large pinch of salt."



Offline Tjkooker

Like I said .
I wouldn't fuck her for free BUT that's Me .
you pays yer money and makes your choice  :hi:
How long has she had that one utterly useless picture up  :unknown:
I only went to see her as there are so many good reviews about her .
Would one of you admirers actually go and see her
and come back and tell the forum I am wrong about her age and size .
Or you can carry on having  a tizzy fit on your computer keyboards
in the luxury of your wanking chariots :sarcastic: :sarcastic:


You seem to either have severe memory issues or can't read. Several posters have stated your wrong on size. To make it easy for you I'll state again.  I seen her two month ago. Nowhere near a 16! As for age mid 30's to 40 max.

I hope you enjoyed your wank after having walked. You could have been balls deep in her arse then filling her mouth with cum for a fair price in Glasgow terms.
Banning reason: Outing and trolling a punter because he posted a negative about his favourite prossie. White-knight fluffy that pretends otherwise.

Offline Tjkooker

Did you really walk? Summer is pretty adamant you didn't. Apparently you told her you liked the way she grinded on your cock????? Starting to ring any bells?? Hope you enjoyed you pre and post punt shower also. If you didn't like the lass at least be honest about the details instead of trying to fool your fellow punters.
Banning reason: Outing and trolling a punter because he posted a negative about his favourite prossie. White-knight fluffy that pretends otherwise.

Offline 306

guess what others are saying is more of a neutral as you walked
and chose not to spend your money and punted another day.
that's what ukp is about each to their own
 .yes i feel bad giving a netural review to a wg but ony if i had seen or tryied to see then first
Banning reason: Constantly making nonsensical useless posts + Constantly ignoring admin requests

Offline 306

this came from a long gone poster read and agree or disagree as you wish
Quote
So onto what is “Bad” this one has more consensuses but can still be subjective. We seem to agree more on what is bad service more that what is good, this would be my list

1) Pictures are inaccurate the WG is who she advertised she was.
2) Location is not warm, spotless, fresh sheets, smelling clean.
3) WG is not dressed as I requested should match the picture in my mind as I walk up the path.
4) No warm Welcome.
5) WG is not spotlessly clean and smelling fresh (All of her)
6) Time wasting
7) Not ALL services the services that are advertised are enthusiastically offered
8) The WG does not make you feel wanted, valued and respected
9) No energetic performance.
10) You do not get her full attention for the whole time you have paid for.
11) At the end you are not thanked for your custom.
12) Price paid is not as advertised.

I think you could translate most of the about points into any experience we might have in a service industry. I would expect similar if I went into a restaurant. Price paid is irrelevant  None of the above points would cost money just effort on the part of the WG. Yes I do accept that environment would be affected by the price you pay but clean is clean wherever you are.
Banning reason: Constantly making nonsensical useless posts + Constantly ignoring admin requests

Offline seeker


You seem to either have severe memory issues or can't read. Several posters have stated your wrong on size. To make it easy for you I'll state again.  I seen her two month ago. Nowhere near a 16! As for age mid 30's to 40 max.

I hope you enjoyed your wank after having walked. You could have been balls deep in her arse then filling her mouth with cum for a fair price in Glasgow terms.


Read the original post deputy tj
do I not say size 14 to 16  :unknown:
and aged around 38 ...I think that is less than your stated 40 years  above 
so where I'm I wrong or misleading
and I didn't have a wank
I rattled a lovely girl on Friday .
 :cool:
If you like s.summer and the service she provides
good for you dog :thumbsup:

Offline Tjkooker

Banning reason: Outing and trolling a punter because he posted a negative about his favourite prossie. White-knight fluffy that pretends otherwise.


Offline CooperD

Some great prossie defending going on here. Tjkooker going for white knight of the day award, even getting in touch with the prossie for a story from her.  :lol: :lol: :lol: 
The facts are she DOES falsely advertise. She is no where near 30 or a size 10.  :wacko: A defo 40 imo and probably a size 14, her lower half is extremely large! If she wasn't what you expected from the profile then good for you for walking. The feedback that says she's good looking, attractive or whatever is bull, wouldn't give her a second glance.  :vomit:

Offline chico1000

Some great prossie defending going on here. Tjkooker going for white knight of the day award, even getting in touch with the prossie for a story from her.  :lol: :lol: :lol: 
The facts are she DOES falsely advertise. She is no where near 30 or a size 10.  :wacko: A defo 40 imo and probably a size 14, her lower half is extremely large! If she wasn't what you expected from the profile then good for you for walking. The feedback that says she's good looking, attractive or whatever is bull, wouldn't give her a second glance.  :vomit:
Wait a minute here. If you don't think that 99.9% of wg's gild the Lilly a little on their profiles you are seriously deluded. The main objection here is in my opinion is to describing her as a fat munter and apparently not worthy of a try out but a runaway down the stairs shouting for your mammy.  It is not Mr seekers minor criticisms that are on issue it is the suggestion that Summer is some kind of mutant luring unsuspecting punters into her witches coven which is the issue.  Do you honestly feel the need to turn out the white knight mantra again and again.  All we are asking for is a bit of balance and not exaggerate the reality of her description. I think TJ is right Seeker wrote his profile in such a way  for shock and awe purposes and create a good going ding dong on the forum.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline DG

Some great prossie defending going on here. Tjkooker going for white knight of the day award, even getting in touch with the prossie for a story from her.  :lol: :lol: :lol: 

TJ a White Knight?  :lol: :lol: :lol: I so wish it was true. To be fair he is right to offer an opinion about a girl he's met, especially when his opinion of the girl differs so much from the OP. Sure I've seen that kind of behaviour somewhere before.....

I am very intrigued by all of this as I have often thought about meeting Summer; her pic fits my prefererence, but if it's way off looks like I might be disappointed. On the other hand if she were to update it and give a true reflection of her current appearance, then I'd be happy to see her given all the positive comments I'm reading from reliable sources on UKP.

Also fair play to him for seeking out the other version of events; don't want to give the Sexy Adventurer types a platform on here.
« Last Edit: April 25, 2015, 11:27:35 PM by DG »
Banning reason: White-knight

it is the suggestion that Summer is some kind of mutant luring unsuspecting punters into her witches coven which is the issue...  All we are asking for is a bit of balance and not exaggerate the reality of her description. I think TJ is right Seeker wrote his profile in such a way for shock and awe purposes and create a good going ding dong on the forum.
I agree, nearly all WG’s on AW embellish their stats, however, to suggest Summer is a ‘lying fat munter’ is in my humble opinion was well off the mark. Granted she looks older than her stated age, however, you could never describe her as fat. She has a great ass, large suckable nipples and knows how to expertly ride and suck a hard cock to completion. Her smokers breath means that I would think twice before booking her again, however, the service she provided to me was easily a 8.5/9 out of 10.

Offline Banquo

I'm a wee bit surprised by this thread. Just to be clear, I have not seen Sexy Summer and have no realistic intentions of doing so.

The thing that surprises me is that nearly all posters agree that her AW profile is innacurate and yet there appears to be strong support for her. Many other profiles would get slaughtered for such exagerations.

Age stated as 30 - most posters estimate 35-40.

Dress size 10 - most posters estimate 12-14.

Perhaps there would be more positive comments if her profile was more honest?

I'm a wee bit surprised by this thread. Just to be clear, I have not seen Sexy Summer and have no realistic intentions of doing so.

The thing that surprises me is that nearly all posters agree that her AW profile is innacurate and yet there appears to be strong support for her. Many other profiles would get slaughtered for such exagerations.

Age stated as 30 - most posters estimate 35-40.

Dress size 10 - most posters estimate 12-14.

Perhaps there would be more positive comments if her profile was more honest?
I agree, and I wish she was more honest about her age, however, you could say the same about a lot of the ‘more mature’ AW profiles.
 
I am no age/size expert, however, when I met her in 2011/12(?) I would say she looked about 34 and a size 12 (this is not a fat munter in my punting book). Looks wise I would say she was a 7.5/10, however, I know looks can be subjective. The sexual service she provided to me was superb and as Seeker didn’t stay around to sample these skills he is unable to judge this side of her. It’s fine not to like a girl and make your excuses, however, in my opinion seeker’s ‘fat munter’ tag was over the top.

Offline Banquo

I agree, and I wish she was more honest about her age, however, you could say the same about a lot of the ‘more mature’ AW profiles.
 
I am no age/size expert, however, when I met her in 2011/12(?) I would say she looked about 34 and a size 12 (this is not a fat munter in my punting book). Looks wise I would say she was a 7.5/10, however, I know looks can be subjective. The sexual service she provided to me was superb and as Seeker didn’t stay around to sample these skills he is unable to judge this side of her. It’s fine not to like a girl and make your excuses, however, in my opinion seeker’s ‘fat munter’ tag was over the top.

I accept everything you have said, except that seekers desciption of sexy summer as a fat munter "was over the top". It was his opinion and therefore as valid as any other opinion expressed on this forum. Disagreeing with seekers opinion is fine, but stressing the point is a little white kinightey. I'm not accusing you of being a white knight, but this thread is in danger of going down that road. 

A "White Knight Debate" and I'm not involved I feel kinda disappointed  :lol: :D  :sarcastic: ......

Offline CooperD

Wait a minute here. If you don't think that 99.9% of wg's gild the Lilly a little on their profiles you are seriously deluded. The main objection here is in my opinion is to describing her as a fat munter and apparently not worthy of a try out but a runaway down the stairs shouting for your mammy.  It is not Mr seekers minor criticisms that are on issue it is the suggestion that Summer is some kind of mutant luring unsuspecting punters into her witches coven which is the issue.  Do you honestly feel the need to turn out the white knight mantra again and again.  All we are asking for is a bit of balance and not exaggerate the reality of her description. I think TJ is right Seeker wrote his profile in such a way  for shock and awe purposes and create a good going ding dong on the forum.
Of course 99% lie on their profiles but maybe by adding 3 or so years to their age not fucking 10 years. Maybe a size added but not trying to say they're  a size 10 when a 14  :thumbsdown:
The main point here is she falsely advertises!! If it was any others whore apart from one of Glasgows old matrons everyone would be in agreement that he was right to walk. Stop defending these old hags and say it how it is. Fluffy fuckers  :music:

Offline RandyF

Yeah you can't be calling the Glasgow matrons munters (apparently).

Was a dead cert they'd troop in here to defend their girlfriend's honour. They often won't do it overtly, they'll start questioning and nit picking every point in the reviewers post...."Oh but you said such and such about XYZ's size and looks 3 years ago - how can you now say this about my princess!?" "512 others have said she's beautiful!", "are you still at school?"

There's another well known matron I can think for whom it appears to be open knowledge her quoted age is way off the mark, her size is also questioned frequently.

I daren't even mention the matrons name, as all hell will break loose  :unknown:
Banning reason: Troll

Offline auldie63

Ah! go on go on go on. I dare you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Offline 306

all this discussion does is confirm aw feedback and reviews are not to be trusted
what you read and what you see
and what you get may be very different
 using aw as a guide (answer is  research as much as you can before booking)
saves upset later.
Banning reason: Constantly making nonsensical useless posts + Constantly ignoring admin requests

Offline chico1000

Come on Randy the term "Munter" evokes an impression that you will be throwing up on your cornflakes for days afterwards. Its hardly an accurate description or comment. If you have got a widely different defination let me know.
 I have a go at some OTT positive reviews why can't I have a go at some negatives without you and others troting out the same old white knight mantra. 

I can guess who you are driving at in your last post and people regularly post what age they think she is and that photos may appear to show her in a flattering light and all that is legitimate and right but to use completely over the top language in an attempt to trash her reputation and drive punters away from an overall good service is not really helping people here.
Banning reason: Troll

but to use completely over the top language in an attempt to trash her reputation and drive punters away from an overall good service is not really helping people here.

chico I've not seen this girl but have heard good stuff about her....but I cant think why a punter would want to trash another working girls reputation unless he has had a bad experience.....what would he gain from doing this?

Offline seeker

I can guess who you are driving at in your last post and people regularly post what age they think she is and that photos may appear to show her in a flattering light and all that is legitimate and right but to use completely over the top language in an attempt to trash her reputation and drive punters away from an overall good service is not really helping people here.

Chico...... I don't know what thread you been reading  :unknown:
There is only one photo and how does it show her in a flattering light
I have NOT tried to trash her reputation I have NOT remarked on her services
she's probably very good ,as a few punters have said
I have already said punters are free to go and enjoy themselves  ...so how I'm I trying
to drive punters away ..and why ...its not like I'm offering an alternative.
In the  ORIGINAL  POST i mentioned AGE and SIZE  and yes on a forum full
 of randy old men
me included ..We some times get over excited. .. She is not a munter but neither an oil painting .
She simply is not MY CUP OF TEA .
If we at ukp cannot pull up  a w.g who ever she may be ...without being berated
Then it's a sad day  :(
Now please read what I have written and understand it before replying  :hi:




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)