Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Lily Delphine  (Read 6910 times)


21 review(s) for LilyDelphine (19 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline sentinel

Oh dear Lily, all those years at University and they still didn't teach you how to spell.

Just joking of course.  ;) ;) ;) ;) Don't mind me, I'm just old-fashioned.

But seriously don't listen to tight buggers like Anth, if you think £120 is a good deal then stick with it.   :thumbsup: 
Banning reason: Fluffy dick

Offline AnthG

her being on Amour gives them exposure  ..........i think Anths point is how come LillyD can come on here and get away with charging her prices when other good escorts dont feel the need to up their price? well its a case of where you pitch your price , its as simple as that, her choice and no reason to question  her for it.

My point is I don't like it when girls charge one rate to some people but a different one to to others. And that is what those girls are doing by charging £100 if I book via the agency, but £120 plus if I book direct.

I said the same in the Tiffany topic, and the same in the Loretta topic. But to be honest I feel kind of bad saying it in the Lily topic as she comes across as very likable in her forum posts and always comes back with the right, and pleasant, things to say. But I would be feeling a personal hypocrite to myself if I didn't raise it as I personally think its very wrong to do.

Some people could call the girls greedy but I bed some of the girls call you a tight arse behind your back :lol: :lol:

To be honest when I first started out punting I tried to be friends with all the girls both that I booked and on the forums. And it still resulted in them pretty much either disliking me anyway or trying to take me for a ride.

I think every punter needs to accept the girls behind their backs pretty much dislike them immensely. Believing otherwise you risk falling into the Denyason trap.

I am not a rich person by any long stretch. And thus I want good value for money when I book someone. I do think given she looks very attractive and she comes across as very articulate that LilyD is providing good value for money at £120. But she is much better value for money booking her via the agency for £100. So I guess someone shoot me for thinking that :)

Offline greychap

Oh dear Lily, all those years at University and they still didn't teach you how to spell.

Just joking of course.  ;) ;) ;) ;) Don't mind me, I'm just old-fashioned.

But seriously don't listen to tight buggers like Anth, if you think £120 is a good deal then stick with it.   :thumbsup:

Anth just likes to get the cheapest deal he can get, problem is though a lot of the girls end up hating you for it and sometimes the service will suffer, I have heard many girls really slag off other punters for being too tight, it does not always pay off for the punter.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline greychap

My point is I don't like it when girls charge one rate to some people but a different one to to others. And that is what those girls are doing by charging £100 if I book via the agency, but £120 plus if I book direct.

I said the same in the Tiffany topic, and the same in the Loretta topic. But to be honest I feel kind of bad saying it in the Lily topic as she comes across as very likable in her forum posts and always comes back with the right, and pleasant, things to say. But I would be feeling a personal hypocrite to myself if I didn't raise it as I personally think its very wrong to do.

To be honest when I first started out punting I tried to be friends with all the girls both that I booked and on the forums. And it still resulted in them pretty much either disliking me anyway or trying to take me for a ride.

I think every punter needs to accept the girls behind their backs pretty much dislike them immensely. Believing otherwise you risk falling into the Denyason trap.

I am not a rich person by any long stretch. And thus I want good value for money when I book someone. I do think given she looks very attractive and she comes across as very articulate that LilyD is providing good value for money at £120. But she is much better value for money booking her via the agency for £100. So I guess someone shoot me for thinking that :)

I get your point about why work for £70 when independent as £120 but she barely works at Amour so that answers the question and deep down she knows she is worth more then the cheaper prices they charge.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline greychap

My point is I don't like it when girls charge one rate to some people but a different one to to others. And that is what those girls are doing by charging £100 if I book via the agency, but £120 plus if I book direct.

I said the same in the Tiffany topic, and the same in the Loretta topic. But to be honest I feel kind of bad saying it in the Lily topic as she comes across as very likable in her forum posts and always comes back with the right, and pleasant, things to say. But I would be feeling a personal hypocrite to myself if I didn't raise it as I personally think its very wrong to do.

To be honest when I first started out punting I tried to be friends with all the girls both that I booked and on the forums. And it still resulted in them pretty much either disliking me anyway or trying to take me for a ride.

I think every punter needs to accept the girls behind their backs pretty much dislike them immensely. Believing otherwise you risk falling into the Denyason trap.

I am not a rich person by any long stretch. And thus I want good value for money when I book someone. I do think given she looks very attractive and she comes across as very articulate that LilyD is providing good value for money at £120. But she is much better value for money booking her via the agency for £100. So I guess someone shoot me for thinking that :)

Also rather then thinking the girls are just greedy for charging more independent it is more odd the fact that they are seen else where far cheaper, its not a good business model for the girl to be seen cheaper and very pointless in Lilly's case where she  sees more punters independent anyway.

Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

Offline Toshiba



i book keeva always independently, never through the agency, but i must admit i'd think twice at £120 knowing i could get her for less....i guess Anth if like me money sometimes is an issue then we look at any savings as a bonus

Offline Toshiba

It certainly gives them exposure now she has built up a good reputation they need her more then she needs them.

It does look a little pointless that she would want to work for them and get £70 rather then the £120 but I think they keep her on there site more to look good as its obvious she does independent work a lot more then bothering with them.

i find it hard to understand what she gets out of working for them tbh

Personally I am perfectly happy to pay the AW prices. I know for a fact I am going to get excellent service from Lily who as I have said before many times is the best escort I have ever seen by far. She is only charging the same as the majority of dodgy Romanians and not much more than for possibly good possibly shite service from assorted agency girls. Punting is expensive full stop. If we are going to indulge go for the best.

I have decided to go for a Heaton double next week. One hour with Lily and then a duo 2 days later if I can book it. Eva is also outstanding as every punter who has ever seen her will testify.


Offline wheatbeerlover

I am going to say the same as I said on another thread on the subject, it's a business, the girls can charge what they want, if it's too high they won't get any work, simple.

Anth just seems to want everything his own way...all costs the same, the girls face on show, enhanced or real boobs, charge less than their hourly rate to have dinner with him..the list goes on
Banning reason: Constantly trolling AnthG and touting Allure and attacking rival agency (Amour) - Most likely prostitute posing as punter

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
Anth just seems to want everything his own way...all costs the same, the girls face on show, enhanced or real boobs, charge less than their hourly rate to have dinner with him..the list goes on

Maybe because he's the customer, spending his hard earned money and this is a PUNTER forum :rolleyes:

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
You seem overly interested in AnthG, a quick glance shows that many of your 45 posts are directed at him...

Offline AnthG

I am going to say the same as I said on another thread on the subject, it's a business, the girls can charge what they want, if it's too high they won't get any work, simple.

Anth just seems to want everything his own way...all costs the same, the girls face on show, enhanced or real boobs, charge less than their hourly rate to have dinner with him..the list goes on

You say in your first paragraph its all just business. And yet you then imply in your second paragraph that I am wrong for treating this as nothing more than a business transaction.  :unknown:

I am a customer, this is a customer based discussion forum. These are service providers and agencies offering services. Where else but here are people going to say and discuss what they want or what they are seeking from the service providers.

*Edit* Seems I was typing the same thing as Admin at the same time.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2015, 12:40:49 AM by AnthG »

Anth you may recall I said that I had not seen Lily and thus any idea of her being untouchable is meaningless to me. All I said was that personally I don't mind the added charge if you do don't see her. Simple. She's not going to change her rates nor do I think she should.

Am I the only 1 that thinks she's not "that attractive" I wished I didn't start reading this thread as once I started I had to finish!

Am I the only 1 that thinks she's not "that attractive"
:scare: You've just opened a new can of worms there  :sarcastic:

no oil painting to me, but will be for some evidently.
So what what would be your score out of 10 for visuals?
we need a poll function here i think  :unknown:



Offline Toshiba

Am I the only 1 that thinks she's not "that attractive" I wished I didn't start reading this thread as once I started I had to finish!


Attractive can be many things to many people.

I call girls pretty and others good looking but i prefer pretty girls to good looking(hope that makes sense)

She's very pretty imho, but shes also top notch at what she gives you, something more important in my book

This thread seems to going round in circles; it’s a simple choice if you want to see her sooner you pay her higher Indy price otherwise wait for availability on Armour.

If people are willing to pay her higher price she would be stupid to turn it down, which you can tell by her posts she isn’t. If you were in her position would you turn down the chance to earn extra money for providing the same service doubt it?


If people are willing to pay her higher price she would be stupid to turn it down, which you can tell by her posts she isn’t. If you were in her position would you turn down the chance to earn extra money for providing the same service doubt it?

Exactly..I saw Lily a couple of months ago and booked her via Amour for the Friday and then had no qualms whatsoever about seeing  her again four days later with her AW rates.
In my opinion she provides a superb service.

Offline Mansell

Personally I am perfectly happy to pay the AW prices. I know for a fact I am going to get excellent service from Lily who as I have said before many times is the best escort I have ever seen by far. She is only charging the same as the majority of dodgy Romanians and not much more than for possibly good possibly shite service from assorted agency girls. Punting is expensive full stop. If we are going to indulge go for the best.

I have decided to go for a Heaton double next week. One hour with Lily and then a duo 2 days later if I can book it. Eva is also outstanding as every punter who has ever seen her will testify.

Exactly what I was thinking, just don't understand the EE girls and won;t see any more of them whilst they are overpriced. If Lily's business dries up then she will have to charge less but I wouldn't want to wait till 2050 !!

Offline greychap

Am I the only 1 that thinks she's not "that attractive" I wished I didn't start reading this thread as once I started I had to finish!

I have seen her just the once, I would say she is fairly attractive compared to a lot in the industry, not stunning or anything, but think for the money she charges she gives a lot, so I think a lot of the punters compare the whole deal they get with her.
Banning reason: North East shit stirrer who contributes nothing

I've must have been spoilt as most of my punts have been abroad. With a better looking girl £120 would pay for a week and I'd have do a disappearing act to rid her.

Depends what we've been used to and personal standards.

Am I the only 1 that thinks she's not "that attractive" I wished I didn't start reading this thread as once I started I had to finish!

Attraction is purely subjective, as are most things in life, e.g. music. I could write down exactly what I think ticks all my boxes but I've been caught out many a time with girls I never thought would do it for me (strangely, and as much as I try to fight it, I find Eileen Grimshaw attractive, hahaha). Anyhow, I personally think Lily's stunning and can't wait to spend some time with her... £100 / £120... I totally get her strategy... so, if you don't like the prices, shop elsewhere. There will always be objections and sure she'll get 100 thumbs up for every 1 thumb down. Each to their own.

Offline Warwick Hunt

Supposing Lilly never covered any work for her agency, would her rate be questioned?
It seems that she has a bond with the agency and owner, that is the reason why she continues to give up some of her time, supporting Amour. This is the way i picked up Lilly's post.
The question Anth asked was fair enough in my view, but Lilly's answers was emphatic.
It sounds to me that should you manage to get a booking through Amour then you would be getting a bargain, as opposed to paying over the odds outside, at least you have a choice.
I have never met LD, but if the service is as good as she says (and i don't doubt her) then surely that must be worth paying a little extra for. We know some girls hold their agency rates, which is great for us, but i wouldn't mind paying a little extra for Savannah for example, because we rate them highly.

Banning reason: Mouthpiece of banned pimp + Exposed as making false claims in relation to banned pimp

If I had a choice of reading this thread or watching Jeremy kyle ..... I would be watching jezza!
 :sarcastic:
Out of ten personally speaking I would say 7 max. Eva would be a 11. Lil hasn't got any thing special about her she's beautiful but so are most uni students. But then again I used to fantasize about Gillian Anderson (scully of X files )so what do I know  :D

But then again I used to fantasize about Gillian Anderson (scully of X files )so what do I know  :D

I've ruined many a sock fantasising over GA




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)