Amour still pulling wool over punters eyes

[Chestercopperpot]

It would seem Amour are still letting Cassie aka Tori Taylor work from shared premises. she's at the same location as Tiffany from Amour aka Busty Tiffany and Sophia Jones. Seems like they wait for backlash to die down whilst spouting they don't let girls work same premises. Crock of shite...

[dannybouys]

spot on ..
they are all at it, I was at the staithes a week or so

 another prossie in the other bedroom (a very well known one) should know better

though has been mentioned about her on the forum before

[TIFFANY]

Hi guys we do all work from the same apartment but we are never there at the same time we work different days or different hours, so I wouldn't worry xx

[dannybouys]

thanks for that tiffany

I could name both of them that were there working that day at the same time diff punters diff room

[Chestercopperpot]

Hi guys we do all work from the same apartment but we are never there at the same time we work different days or different hours, so I wouldn't worry xx

Thanks for clarifying Amour are breaking the law Tiffany!! It's illegal to work from same premises regardless of what times you are there!

[grey402]

I don't use amour anymore I tend to stick to independents now, but surely that can't be discreet all them girls using the same apartment?

[Chestercopperpot]

Just looking at Amour's calander ...are Franchesca & Jessamy at the same North Shields flat too?

[ohfook1t]

What about when you offer duo's with tori?  So you do it via video link? As you have said only one girl there at a time

[dino1990]

What about when you offer duo's with tori?  So you do it via video link? As you have said only one girl there at a time

excellent point. I know rosina stopped doing DUO's as this broke the law and she didn't want the risk. I mentioned on this forum a while ago that amour had 2 girls in the same flat or sharing a hotel room so its been going on for a while

[Gothic D]

Could someone enlighten me as I hear a lot about the two girls in one flat situation.
I know that technically it's illegal but what are the chances of the police ever bothering to do anything about it?
They have enough to do as it is and with the continual budget cuts they are even less likely to bother.
Surely now that they have practically wiped out the street scene in most towns and cities they are content just leaving it at that.
In the very unlikely event of a raid who gets done.The punter,the girl,the agency,the flat owner or all of them?

[OldAdmin]

Amour threatened to sue me unless I deleted all posts about them operating brothels.

Still waiting...

[Looking4fun]

Do you really think it's just agency's that do this some of the Indy girls share premises if your bothered by it don't visit them it's that easy
As for the legality of it I would think plod has to much on their hands to be worried about it

[Chestercopperpot]

It's the agency that gets done, not the punter or the girl but no fun being involved in a raid. Escort Dreams was raided and owner imprisoned and more recently Escorts Northeast.

External Link/Members Only

[Mansell]

There are an awful lot of the girls in the NE working out of the same flat. All the Diamonds girls must do it as Diamonds provide the flat !! There are also loads of AW I could name, but not going to.

Unlike some it just doesn't bother me in the slightest. There is far more risk of getting scammed than meeting Mr PC.

Anyway Copperwhateveryoucallyourself which WG are you ? Getting a spat of you girls coming on here and trying to have a go at the moment. You have only posted 4 times and all on this thread. You'd be better off trying harder, you might get more punters then !!

[The fishman 2014]

This whole saga is all a bit confusing when it comes to the laws. Watched a documentary ages ago where it stated its illegal to run a brothel but it's not illegal to work in one. So yes people are correct in saying it would be the agency getting in trouble but it's not actually the agency(amour in this case) that provides or has anything to do with the renting of the property. Yes it may have been two of their girls using the same place, at different times or not but if only one of them is actually working for amour that day and the other is indie, then how is that the agency's fault? Are they therefore meant to question all their girls to see if they will be sharing with an indie (potentially not even on their books) that day and pray they tell the truth. I'm kinda with "looking4fun" in that if you're not happy then don't use girls u know do this. SIMPLES!

[Francesca-xxx]

Hi guys,
My property is nearer the Tynemouth end, Jessamy is more central to North Shields. hope this helps

[Looking4fun]

It's the agency that gets done, not the punter or the girl but no fun being involved in a raid. Escort Dreams was raided and owner imprisoned and more recently Escorts Northeast.

External Link/Members Only

Another timewaster book the girls you want to see & stop complaining about girls you probably have no intention of seeing

[wheatbeerlover]

The thing that most annoyed ppl is Amour were always insistent they had one girl, one flat, so they reckoned they stayed within the law, Amour been caught out on this more than once, why trust them again.

If anyone has the time to look thru the girls on the website, quite a few are down under two names and quite a few have left recently, not taken off the site, just no hours down for them...not alls as well as Stacey likes to make out...

[The fishman 2014]

I see what you're saying but In cases I know of amour didn't personally have 2 in one place. They had one on their books that was sharing with an indie outside of their knowledge.

[wheatbeerlover]

I see what you're saying but In cases I know of amour didn't personally have 2 in one place. They had one on their books that was sharing with an indie outside of their knowledge.

Stacey was so adament it was one girl at a time, she should have told the girls who work independent what she wanted so they could take it or leave it

[Looking4fun]

Are you representing a new agency by any chance ?

[The fishman 2014]

I think what I said has been misunderstood by "wheatbeerlover". I'm meaning ones that amour don't know, have never met or spoke to.

[wheatbeerlover]

Are you representing a new agency by any chance ?

Dunno if that was meant for me? But if it was, no. I've been here longer than that

[greychap]

It would seem Amour are still letting Cassie aka Tori Taylor work from shared premises. she's at the same location as Tiffany from Amour aka Busty Tiffany and Sophia Jones. Seems like they wait for backlash to die down whilst spouting they don't let girls work same premises. Crock of shite...

Amour will always pull the wool over some punters eyes.

The problem with Amour is they tell lies rather then ignore the fact it had been brought to the attention that there is brothels being run with multiple girls working from the same places they make big statements saying it never happens rather then ignoring what punters have said like Naughty Northern escorts and Diamonds do the same they don't discuss it or make it worse for themselves.

Then because I highlighted it more I get threatened by a thug and have to change phone number and moved from my place.

From the girls point of view I can see why they want to share places for security and to keep the costs of renting somewhere cheap in a way I can understand it as lets face it Amours fees start at £50 and they still have to pay money out of that so renting somewhere or a hotel could be at least 2 jobs and they might only get 2 jobs for the day.

Personally for me I would rather they were independent and charging £70 for the hour but with a decent hotel or flat with no sharing but a lot of punters would rather have the £50 fee but then I think you have to put up with the sharing as they don't want to pay out too much on rent with such little prices.!!!

[greychap]

Amour will always pull the wool over some punters eyes.

The problem with Amour is they tell lies rather then ignore the fact it had been brought to the attention that there is brothels being run with multiple girls working from the same places they make big statements saying it never happens rather then ignoring what punters have said like Naughty Northern escorts and Diamonds do the same they don't discuss it or make it worse for themselves.

Then because I highlighted it more I get threatened by a thug and have to change phone number and moved from my place.

From the girls point of view I can see why they want to share places for security and to keep the costs of renting somewhere cheap in a way I can understand it as lets face it Amours fees start at £50 and they still have to pay money out of that so renting somewhere or a hotel could be at least 2 jobs and they might only get 2 jobs for the day.

Personally for me I would rather they were independent and charging £70 for the hour but with a decent hotel or flat with no sharing but a lot of punters would rather have the £50 fee but then I think you have to put up with the sharing as they don't want to pay out too much on rent with such little prices.!!!

I meant £70 for 30 mins.

[greychap]

Hi guys we do all work from the same apartment but we are never there at the same time we work different days or different hours, so I wouldn't worry xx

Still classed as a brothel and I remember a case in the newspaper where 2 girls were sharing a flat and they got arrested and charged and a prison sentence as the police decided to take it to court.

If you get found out and reported lets hope your tax registered and paying your taxes as they will come down on you even more if your not declaring!!

[Chestercopperpot]

I see what you're saying but In cases I know of amour didn't personally have 2 in one place. They had one on their books that was sharing with an indie outside of their knowledge.

They had Tiffany and Cassie offering in calls at same premises albeit different times but are we suppose to believe that they did not notice they were giving out same address to punters? Tiffany herself posted that they are working at same place. I see she has been removed from Amour's site. probably pop up in few days with new name ..

[Chestercopperpot]

Anyway Copperwhateveryoucallyourself which WG are you ? Getting a spat of you girls coming on here and trying to have a go at the moment. You have only posted 4 times and all on this thread. You'd be better off trying harder, you might get more punters then !!

For the sake of clarity nigelmanselorjensonbuttonorwhoever my username is chestercopperpot and I am most definitely not a WG.

[Mansell]

For the sake of clarity nigelmanselorjensonbuttonorwhoever my username is chestercopperpot and I am most definitely not a WG.

Time will tell, but your behaviour at the moments points to you being one or a competing agency. As you register for the site and your first post is a complaint about an agency and other WG’s and this is the only thing you have posted on. Raising a subject that was done to death a few months ago and which we have all made our own minds up about one way or the other. So history is against you and I for one remain cynical until proven otherwise, I’m sure others do to.

[johnr1]

Ummm sounds like it could be another agency stirring it as it's a cut  throat game and it's been done before, I personally don't mind two in a flat even though it's not legal but that's me and respect some people will not accept it and need to know when making a booking

I also think Amour is one of the more strict agencies as regards flat sharing, and yes this topic has been done to death and the situation will never change, it's safer for the gird for one thing and they can share the cost of the flat plus it makes it a little difficult when booking a duo 

[greychap]

Time will tell, but your behaviour at the moments points to you being one or a competing agency. As you register for the site and your first post is a complaint about an agency and other WG’s and this is the only thing you have posted on. Raising a subject that was done to death a few months ago and which we have all made our own minds up about one way or the other. So history is against you and I for one remain cynical until proven otherwise, I’m sure others do to.

Yes it has been done before and discussed BUT the poster has made a point of saying its still going on with Amour so it is useful information for any punters that could book thinking they do not do that and they only want to visit a girl with no other girls or punters there working there for legal reasons and discretion so that is pulling the wool over punters eyes.

I do not know who the poster is but if its information that is true then that is of benefit to many.

Remember lots of punters lurk a lot for a long time and might only sign up if they have some information to give and share relevant info to some posts.

[Mansell]

Yes it has been done before and discussed BUT the poster has made a point of saying its still going on with Amour so it is useful information for any punters that could book thinking they do not do that and they only want to visit a girl with no other girls or punters there working there for legal reasons and discretion so that is pulling the wool over punters eyes.

I do not know who the poster is but if its information that is true then that is of benefit to many.

Remember lots of punters lurk a lot for a long time and might only sign up if they have some information to give and share relevant info to some posts.

I agree it's useful to anyone who won;t visit girls that are sharing, I'm not sure that's as many as you suggest Greychap, but I do seem to remember you don;t like it and that's your own personal choice, which is fine. But as I said before I think most of us who have been around for a while know who is and who isn't sharing especially if you start looking at Duo's. As JohnR1 says Amour do seem to be one of the better Agencies.

It just annoys me when a potential other WG or Agency comes on here and has a go. I always thought first rule of business was not to complain about the competition, just make sure your better than them. Worked for me for years. Maybe whoever is posting is a genuine punter, if so fine, we will find out over time.

[AnthG]

Time will tell, but your behaviour at the moments points to you being one or a competing agency.

In my opinion it does look like he has a bit of an agenda. As every one of his 6 posts since joining have been in this sole topic.

But to hopefully put the issue to bed and to keep punters informed. I have stated this topic so if in the future anyone on amour does it. There is that topic to make people easily become aware so they can choose then whether to book those girls or not.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=54851.0

[greychap]

In my opinion it does look like he has a bit of an agenda. As every one of his 6 posts since joining have been in this sole topic.

But to hopefully put the issue to bed and to keep punters informed. I have stated this topic so if in the future anyone on amour does it. There is that topic to make people easily become aware so they can choose then whether to book those girls or not.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=54851.0

Maybe he does or maybe he does not.

But remember we don't want to accuse every new poster of something especially if the information they bring is fact and can be useful to some.

There is a lot of lurkers on here and I can bet some wont join because of being accused of things just because there new.

Sometimes you need an open mind not everybody has an agenda, some people might join and think I know something that these punters don't know so I will share this.

[Pimpmasterflex]

The person who.made this post runs another agency WELL TRIES TO don't be fooled

[Chestercopperpot]

The person who.made this post runs another agency WELL TRIES TO don't be fooled

Don't run an agency nor do I try to. I'm not a WG. I don't have an agenda with the agency in question. I know other agencies do it, only reason I posted was don't like liars and hypocrisy. Had a few punts here and there but I'm no major player in the punter world! Believe what you want. The original post was informative not malicious. Pimasterflex comes across to me or someone from Amour. That's just my opinion not fact and tbh not going to keep debating about it or join in any agency wars.

I may make future posts or I may not. I don't sit and read this forum daily but have a look from time to time. This is a cyber world and anyone posting in it can be fake. I don't take everything I read on here as gospel and neither should anyone else unless proven. Tiffany's response to the post proved its fact. The information is here for those who want it and can be disregarded by those who don't. End of debate.

[greychap]

The person who.made this post runs another agency WELL TRIES TO don't be fooled

If you are going to say that you should say how you know this for a fact which must mean the person that highlighted the topic must have told you personally then???

[greychap]

Don't run an agency nor do I try to. I'm not a WG. I don't have an agenda with the agency in question. I know other agencies do it, only reason I posted was don't like liars and hypocrisy. Had a few punts here and there but I'm no major player in the punter world! Believe what you want. The original post was informative not malicious. Pimasterflex comes across to me or someone from Amour. That's just my opinion not fact and tbh not going to keep debating about it or join in any agency wars.

I may make future posts or I may not. I don't sit and read this forum daily but have a look from time to time. This is a cyber world and anyone posting in it can be fake. I don't take everything I read on here as gospel and neither should anyone else unless proven. Tiffany's response to the post proved its fact. The information is here for those who want it and can be disregarded by those who don't. End of debate.

There is always accusations on here sometimes true sometimes not.

Personally I don't know wether you are or not but I like to give people the benefit of the doubt.

You have highlighted something that is still going on and you are right to say they are liars because there the only agency that screams from the roof tops they don't do this when we all know they do.

They also made themselves look stupid saying they are taking legal action against admin for the brothel thread if he did not remove the topic...what a load of crap how can they take legal action when there guilty of it and a lot more as well with that just being the iceberg.

[OldAdmin]

It would seem Amour are still letting Cassie aka Tori Taylor work from shared premises. she's at the same location as Tiffany from Amour aka Busty Tiffany and Sophia Jones. Seems like they wait for backlash to die down whilst spouting they don't let girls work same premises. Crock of shite...

Static IPs, they don't change:
Hidden Image/Members Only

[OldAdmin]

Slagging off own agency, what's the tactic here then.

EDIT: Other posts picking on AnthG, that is not surprising from Amour pimp - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=731368

[themademan2]

Slagging off own agency, what's the tactic here then.

EDIT: Other posts picking on AnthG, that is not surprising from Amour pimp - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=731368

A few amour lasses were outed... Looks like there own agency did it and tried to pin it on another rival agency... Caught with there pants down 

[OldAdmin]

Just noticed this old post by me:

Amour threatened to sue me unless I deleted all posts about them operating brothels.

Still waiting...

And I'm still waiting.
Her fat pig PR spokesperson previously threatened to get me prosecuted for posting Amour's IP. But I've just done it again above, naughty me 

[OldAdmin]

In my opinion it does look like he has a bit of an agenda. As every one of his 6 posts since joining have been in this sole topic.

But to hopefully put the issue to bed and to keep punters informed. I have stated this topic so if in the future anyone on amour does it. There is that topic to make people easily become aware so they can choose then whether to book those girls or not.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=54851.0

The Amour pimp previously claimed it's not her IP, totally ignoring the hard fact her account's last IP was the Virgin Media broadband IP.

Virgin Media IPs don't change. They are very handy in catching out those evading bans as they can't get rid of their IPs easily.

[AnthG]

The Amour pimp previously claimed it's not her IP, totally ignoring the hard fact her account's last IP was the Virgin Media broadband IP.

Virgin Media IPs don't change. They are very handy in catching out those evading bans as they can't get rid of their IPs easily

Slagging off own agency, what's the tactic here then.

EDIT: Other posts picking on AnthG, that is not surprising from Amour pimp - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=731368

But there is something really odd about all this. As for one Stacey is not going to post like that about her own girls on her books - especially if she was sussed out before with the Geordieland account. And especially not towards the likes of Tori Taylor who alongside LilyD is the agencies golden girl and the one they would want to really please and not ever risk losing from their books.

And secondly, that long post criticizing me in the other thread. Its not Stacey's writing style.

Just thinking of possible explanations/reasons here, but could that PC be the shared PC that many of the people from Amour use, and it could be a disgruntled girl who was on the phones for them. e.g Savannah, Jo, Keeva or any of the others who manage the phones and bookings for them.

That's all I am saying as my thoughts, and especially as whenever I get involved in these discussions on either side all hell breaks loose and next week I am very busy so don't want distractions.

I really do not think that is Staceys writing style those posts.

[themademan2]

But there is something really odd about all this. As for one Stacey is not going to post like that about her own girls on her books - especially if she was sussed out before with the Geordieland account. And especially not towards the likes of Tori Taylor who alongside LilyD is the agencies golden girl and the one they would want to really please and not ever risk losing from their books.

And secondly, that long post criticizing me in the other thread. Its not Stacey's writing style.

Just thinking of possible explanations/reasons here, but could that PC be the shared PC that many of the people from Amour use, and it could be a disgruntled girl who was on the phones for them. e.g Savannah, Jo, Keeva or any of the others who manage the phones and bookings for them.

That's all I am saying as my thoughts, and especially as whenever I get involved in these discussions on either side all hell breaks loose and next week I am very busy so don't want distractions.

I really do not think that is Staceys writing style those posts.

Desperate times call for desperate measures is my answer

Ps LilyD and Tori aka cassie do minimal shifts for Amour so what difference would that make 

[AnthG]

Ps LilyD and Tori aka cassie do minimal shifts for Amour so what difference would that make 

I would say its good PR for an agency that it attracts the popular girls in the region onto its books.

And it also ups the esteem of the other girls on the books just by association.

Its like the football team that has Stephen Gerard playing for it now. It immediately ups the caliber of the team and the other players just for him being on the books.

[OldAdmin]

But there is something really odd about all this. As for one Stacey is not going to post like that about her own girls on her books - especially if she was sussed out before with the Geordieland account. And especially not towards the likes of Tori Taylor who alongside LilyD is the agencies golden girl and the one they would want to really please and not ever risk losing from their books.

And secondly, that long post criticizing me in the other thread. Its not Stacey's writing style.

Just thinking of possible explanations/reasons here, but could that PC be the shared PC that many of the people from Amour use, and it could be a disgruntled girl who was on the phones for them. e.g Savannah, Jo, Keeva or any of the others who manage the phones and bookings for them.

That's all I am saying as my thoughts, and especially as whenever I get involved in these discussions on either side all hell breaks loose and next week I am very busy so don't want distractions.

I really do not think that is Staceys writing style those posts.

Whatever the truth might be, Stacey's previous defense that I was making it up is bollocks. If it's not her she should investigate rather than suggest I was lying.

[OldAdmin]

I remember reading a comment by her how all girls who work for her love her.
If they are shitstirring against her agency then obviously that is not the case.

[Mansell]

Static IPs, they don't change:
Hidden Image/Members Only

Pleased you found out and banned that one Admin, nice to know I was right both with Chestercopperpot & Wheatbeerlover.

But tend to agree with Anth and yourself it just doesn't make any sense having a go at your own Agency, really odd.

[Marmite]

But tend to agree with Anth and yourself it just doesn't make any sense having a go at your own Agency, really odd.

Maybe it was a distraction to facilitate a longer term strategy.