I don't see what's misleading about the pics. The nude of her in front of the steel grate shows a tatoo near her groin which is also visible in the shot with the fishnet outfit. And anyone with a modicum of photography experience can tell you that girls can look very different depending on lighting, angles, makeup, time of month etc. A girl posts heavily photoshopped pics, punters complain. A girl posts natural pics, punters complain.
Second, people can have different feelings on this, but, my criteria of misleading photos is when they are not of the girl in question , and at least the photos are actually her.
I said that the pics are *misleading*. I didn't say they are fake. I don't know if in the US the word misleading has a different meaning but here is the what the dictionary says: misleading=giving the wrong idea or impression.
Furthermore if you were so observant as you think you are you would have noticed that the first two set of pics are from her previous profile that I saved on my computer. They are not displayed on her current profile. The third one which I tagged as misleading is from her current profile and the only set of pics that punters can base their decision on.
When I look at photos of WGs wether on an agency site or their own page, I assume a certain amount of photoshopping, selective camera angles, possible older photos etc
If purpose of your post is to demonstrate that you know the tricks of glamour photography and Photoshop and that like a superhuman you are capable to mentally process the misleading images of the third set and convert them into accurate ones (like those of the first and second set) in your head then congratulations. The rest though, the mere mortals, do not possess such superhuman abilities. They need a picture so I showed them one. Now if you suggest that the first two sets (the reality) are equally appealing to the third one just because they not photoshopped then what can I say? This is all I need to know about your taste.
As with marketing automobiles, the product will be presented in the best light possible. This is why it is important to read reviews and base the decision to pull the trigger on more than photos. For me , since he did not actually sample the board of fare, the OPs post is about as useful as a restaurant review where someone walked out because they didn't like the font on the menu.
First this is not a review. It is a post in the regional section. I chose not post it as a review because I want all my published reviews to be about completed bookings. But if I wanted I could (post it as a review) as in this forum the rules do allow reviews about incomplete bookings. Do you question Admin's decision? Do you think that warnings about timewasters, etc (which are also not completed bookings) should not be posted at all? Not even in the regional section? Post more comments such as this and tick-tick, tick-tock...
Also your attempts at making analogies are really pitiful and pathetic, your logic is flawed and the conclusions you arrive at result from fallacies. So let me help you realise the propose of my post:
1. It links the new AW profile of this girl with her previous one as well as her agency profiles. It therefore links to all her previous feedback and comments.
2. It displays the pictures that used to be visible in her previous profile including an accurate face picture as well as accurate body shots. Why do you think that Lucia deleted her previous profile with the accurate pics and took new ones using every dirty trick of glamour photography? In your car analogy this is equivalent of me wanting to sell an old car using honest photos and failing to do so I post a new ad with pics taken with camera tricks. Most people don't keep track of the ads. So what I did is to make you aware of the previous honest ad. The ad of the car that you previously dismissed.
3. I don't need to complete a booking to comment on the facial attractiveness of a girl. In your car analogy I don't need to drive the car to comment on its appearance. You yourself said that you would read reviews to get a better idea about the accuracy of the pics. Now not only I comment on the car's external appearance I even show you an accurate picture to see it yourself.
4. The stated age is false/fake. She shoved off a decade. In your car analogy it is like advertsing a 1999 model as a 2009 one. Isn't this misleading? Do I need to drive the car to comment on this?
5. The post links all her agency profiles together. The agency profiles use photoshopped pics and anyone who searches here her agency profile url will be able to see natural pics of her.
6. Anyone who considered booking her via an agency and finds this post, sees the natural pics and still wishes to meet her they can do so for £60 less (£140 Vs £200)
7. It dispels the bullocks of West8 that she looks far better in the flesh and that she looks like her potoshopped pics.
Next time do yourself a favour and try to not get humiliated.
