Anyone seen anyone other than Lindsey lately?

[d00fer]

Guys, I was merely providing evidence to backup my agreement with tonysoprano and his view that there are a number of reviewers here competing for one-upmanship.
Who said anything about me reading reviews I knew I wouldn't like?
D00fer, so you have some reviews under your belt - great. It doesn't give you some kind of authority to being a dick though. You know that this place is all about opinions?  That's sort of why we're all here - to express opinion. And I have every right to express mine.Was the little HD sign off really necessary? I'm afraid I can't take you seriously with your compulsion to include your own name in everything that you write.

Of course and you're perfectly entitled to express them. You don't like the one-upmanship nature of the way some people write their reviews, fine. I just don't understand why you'd bother commenting about it though. There are plenty of reviews on here that I'm not interested in or don't like, but I just move on.

The point about gems was included for no reason as there is no evidence members are hiding gems. Just a counter attack with several +1's. We're more mature than to make baseless assumptions to counter a point.

I can think of one recent post by a member here (not this thread) who said that they weren't going to post any positive reviews. There was support from other members for this approach. It isn't a baseless assumption

[LL]

Of course and you're perfectly entitled to express them. You don't like the one-upmanship nature of the way some people write their reviews, fine. I just don't understand why you'd bother commenting about it though. There are plenty of reviews on here that I'm not interested in or don't like, but I just move on.

Touché. I shouldn't need to comment on it. I just find it all a bit pathetic sometimes. I'll try and do better!

[SamLP]

I can think of one recent post by a member here (not this thread) who said that they weren't going to post any positive reviews. There was support from other members for this approach. It isn't a baseless assumption

That's exactly the point. Why bring up a baseless point made by one member on another thread to counter a point being made here by members who haven't made that point? It's immature and the +1's and defence of a baseless argument in this instance is immature. Anyway, I  have no issue with the reviews being written. My point was on the multliple reviews being written by several members in a short period of time and it's not just limited to Lindsey. It's better to let this topic move down the page.

[d00fer]

That's exactly the point. Why bring up a baseless point made by one member on another thread to counter a point being made here by members who haven't made that point? It's immature and the +1's and defence of a baseless argument in this instance is immature. Anyway, I  have no issue with the reviews being written. My point was on the multliple reviews being written by several members in a short period of time and it's not just limited to Lindsey. It's better to let this topic move down the page.

I'll let it lie after this, promise.

I don't see how it's a baseless point when the evidence exists on this forum. The fact that it doesn't exist on this thread shouldn't matter. The threads posted shouldn't be taken in isolation of one another. Also I'm not sure why you feel a baseless point is immature, irrelevant maybe, but labelling it immature, with the negative connotations of the word doesn't help your argument.

Don't take any of this personally

[backofthenet]

Now I like reading a good juicy review of your antics with Lindsey_xxx as much as anyone but they do seem to be dominating the London review section recently.

So please fellow punters and lurkers, post some reviews of girls other than Lindsey!

have just obliged you

[kazred]

"upmanship" - As the chap who posted the god forbid 6 pop review I have a right to reply.........

The very idea I would engage in a game of 'I can do better than he can' is absurd - There are many members here who go further than I would - I just happened to have had a great overnight with loads of eeeerrrrr sex......If that's an issue then that's not my prob..............crikey ....you get an o/night that's fantastic, post a review, and get by a small minority slated for posting the fucking review 

I am gonna do  kdd / lindsey duo next after reading this thread.....

Enjoy it - I'll begin the title with KDD so it won't clash with Lindsey to keep you happy LOVL

[LL]

"upmanship" - As the chap who posted the god forbid 6 pop review I have a right to reply.........

No, it was this review I was referring to not yours:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=48366.0

Ok only 5 pops but he did it in 2 hours. So that's pretty good going!
Yours was an overnight so is perhaps not all that remarkable compared to some of the other members (sorry) although it's 3 more than I've personally been able to muster up in a single 24-hour period.
If members want to try to get one over on each other that's up to them. I've already stated I'm planning to keep schtum about it from now on, so chill 

[lewishamguy]

If members want to try to get one over on each other that's up to them.....

Indeed and Lindsey is the best boat at this moment specially those who're in the race of review counting. Would be great to read more combinations like..

FMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMF
FMMMMMMMMMMF
FMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMFMMMMMM

and so on.. .


also instead of overnights I'm looking forward to read some reviews--


"A week/month trips to heaven with Lindsey...99999999999999999 Pops!"


"A terrific MMMF with Lindsey guess who?--David Cameron/Ed Millband"

 

[Type_O_Negative]

Sooner or later they will fuck her to death.

And they will have to find replacement. And then - once again - the same story: fap fap fap...

P.S. very good topic 

[hendrix]

Sooner or later they will fuck her to death.

And they will have to find replacement. And then - once again - the same story: fap fap fap...

P.S. very good topic 

Already found one  gorgeous, filthy and a bargain.

Not sharing 

[Sylvester]

Already found one  gorgeous, filthy and a bargain.

Not sharing 

Well that's what buddies are for...

[Bigus Dickus]

Already found one  gorgeous, filthy and a bargain.

Not sharing 

Now now! Sharing's caring! 

[kazred]

Hendrix, let's avoid a scrum so just pm me when you can 

Where do you find these girls chaps? I'd love to discover a naughty newbie.....

[password02]

It's not that she's the only one people are seeing, but it seems that there are punters who seem to write a new review every time they see her. Some have reviewed her 3+ times in just under 6 weeks. I see some girls regularly but don't feel the need to write a new review for every single meet. I feel the new rule in allowing multiple reviews on the same girl written should be amended to a specific time period.

I have seen her a few times but each time it is a different view/situation/different either with sole or as a 3some -

She has I think 34 positive  reviews so far on UK written by 16/17 different UKP members - she has 55 AW FB - Now some UKP guys have not reviewed her - Had they posted then the numbers would have been a lot higher - Also some AW punters are not active on UKP -

On a couple of posts There is BigDawg who confirmed he was seeing her as she was on his list  but has not or does not want to write a review - Also backofthenet on a thread said he was enjoying Lindsey as she was lying naked next to him in his bed and there were laughing with some of the UKP posts - so if you add these 2 guys then the numbers would easily have a lot more ''different'' members posting reviews on Lindsey which would make the situation a lot more clearer with the so called few numbers doing multiply reviews for the same girl. There are probably another 5-6 UKP members who did not write a review as they may have felt that she has enough exposure - Its their right to post or not. I would prefer them to post so I can read the different experiences members get up to as I enjoy the read.

Now my point is that she is a very versatile AW girl who can cater for most demands - she can be the perfect GFE and the perfect submissive girl - Therefore she caters for a wider audience and can see the likes of Mr Hendrix as awell as the fluffy guys like Unclesweetheart and Mr Q.

She does group sex and also 3somes = she is  able to mix it up and can be your best GFE you never had or your slutty slut GFE that you always wished you had.

So I will continue to review my sessions and share with other members here on UKP - If ADMIN feels that I have overstepped the mark then he can delete my reviews or ban me -
Last point is that if you do not like reading the reviews on Lindsey or any other girl reviewed by myself then simple - DO NOT READ

It is that simple - This forum is for sharing good and bad Girls for members to decide to see or not -

The  members who are looking at this in a negative way perhaps are the people that either have not had the good fortune to meet Lindsey or it could be that the girl is out of their price bracket.

 

[password02]

Also just to make you aware I posted this back In January - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=48042.0

Should make an interesting read as the 'GEM' was in fact Lindsey! - Some members did guess it was her after a few weeks.



 

[password02]

Yes. It's just the same few guys reviewing her over and over again.

I think I counted 15/16 different guys plus already mentioned some members who posted here on UKP that they had or were booked to see her but for what ever reason decided not to post. If they had you could be looking at close to 40 reviews from approx 20 UKP members - On average 2 reviews per member

[password02]

i agree its boring and adds little overall value to the site,in time it will pass and she will be replaced by a new apple of their eyes

As mentioned before i counted 15/16 different guys so no idea how you have said same guys? Maybe 15/16 same guys is what you meant to say?

Also as you have posted several times here on UKP YOU did have the chance to book her at £100 ph but did not get around to booking her until she become too popular 2 months after and now very difficult to book - She does have a full time job 9-6 and works 5 days a week - How do I know? When we did the O/N she came straight from work and I saw her work top in her bag with the name of the company she works for.

[Mr Farkyhars]

...and just in case BestBefore feels his point has been ignored (because I didn't see anyone else engage with it - apologies if this is not the case)

Yes, but there are 4000 escorts in London listed on AW alone. Probably thousands more not on AW. So Lindsey's reviews should not be nearly 10%, more like .025%

Surely most of those 4000 are below the standard an 'average' UKP member would want to punt with - and therefore, even with the laudable TOFTT that goes on, most of the 4000 would get 'weeded out' in pre-punt deskwork. And, conversely, the 'dash for gems' phenomenon will mean that all highly recommended WGs (not just Lindsey) will get more reviews than seem to be their 'due' as anonymous individuals. So 0.025% won't apply to any WG anywhere near the top or bottom of UKP opinion.

[Type_O_Negative]

Already found one  gorgeous, filthy and a bargain.

Not sharing 

+1 

[SamLP]

I have seen her a few times but each time it is a different view/situation/different either with sole or as a 3some -

She has I think 34 positive  reviews so far on UK written by 16/17 different UKP members - she has 55 AW FB - Now some UKP guys have not reviewed her - Had they posted then the numbers would have been a lot higher - Also some AW punters are not active on UKP -

On a couple of posts There is BigDawg who confirmed he was seeing her as she was on his list  but has not or does not want to write a review - Also backofthenet on a thread said he was enjoying Lindsey as she was lying naked next to him in his bed and there were laughing with some of the UKP posts - so if you add these 2 guys then the numbers would easily have a lot more ''different'' members posting reviews on Lindsey which would make the situation a lot more clearer with the so called few numbers doing multiply reviews for the same girl. There are probably another 5-6 UKP members who did not write a review as they may have felt that she has enough exposure - Its their right to post or not. I would prefer them to post so I can read the different experiences members get up to as I enjoy the read.

Now my point is that she is a very versatile AW girl who can cater for most demands - she can be the perfect GFE and the perfect submissive girl - Therefore she caters for a wider audience and can see the likes of Mr Hendrix as awell as the fluffy guys like Unclesweetheart and Mr Q.

She does group sex and also 3somes = she is  able to mix it up and can be your best GFE you never had or your slutty slut GFE that you always wished you had.

So I will continue to review my sessions and share with other members here on UKP - If ADMIN feels that I have overstepped the mark then he can delete my reviews or ban me -
Last point is that if you do not like reading the reviews on Lindsey or any other girl reviewed by myself then simple - DO NOT READ

It is that simple - This forum is for sharing good and bad Girls for members to decide to see or not -

The  members who are looking at this in a negative way perhaps are the people that either have not had the good fortune to meet Lindsey or it could be that the girl is out of their price bracket.

 

I really don't understand the hostility in your post. Makes you seem like a bit of a twat. If you read through my posts, I haven't made an issue with any punter or girl. I simply pointed out my opinion on multiple reviews. You seem to have taken it personally and gone on the defensive. If you can't respect an opinion and reply in a dignified and respectful manner then I would suggest you avoid replying.

Many girls are seen by UKP punters and aren't reviewed. If they were then you would have dozens of girls with hundreds of UKP reviews. It's not only one or two girls.

I have no wish to see any girl that doesn't have a number to call and I don't wish to organise my punts on advance. I'm happy and content to find girls that suit the way I want to punt. It's a punt, not a date. Anyone can have the "good fortune" to see a prossie if they wish to jump through the hoops they put out. Good on you for having that good fortune. Now a little less hostility, more respect, and as I suggested earlier it is a good idea to let this topic slip down the page.

[charming_red]

Girls' popularity comes in waves and will be reflected in their reviews. Its happened in the past with Madlin Moon, Platinum Cindy, Ameera, then there was a brief stint for Kavita and now Lindsey has taken over the throne. Theres been many others too. No harm in it.

If the girl, service or reviewer doesn't appeal to you, move onto the next review or whatever girl takes your interest.

None of these popular girls appeal to me but read the odd review because its quite fun reading. The reviewers have put the time and effort (and wit!) into their writeups and its humorous and a good laugh to read 

[hendrix]

I just added my review to the MMMFF  thread, so,  avoid!!

[claretandblue]

I'll let it lie after this, promise.

I don't see how it's a baseless point when the evidence exists on this forum. The fact that it doesn't exist on this thread shouldn't matter. The threads posted shouldn't be taken in isolation of one another. Also I'm not sure why you feel a baseless point is immature, irrelevant maybe, but labelling it immature, with the negative connotations of the word doesn't help your argument.

Don't take any of this personally

it definately is irrelevant to this thread,you seem to have the stance that unless people are back slapping you and saying how great you are they are not allowed to express an opinion,that certainly is immature

[Dogfather]

Presume this rule is still in place?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=41675

Or has this been updated?