Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: When not to leave a review?  (Read 2114 times)

SirFrank

  • Guest
What informs your decision not to leave a review on UKP? I've had 3 punts this year and I've done 1 review. Judging by most review counts on here, most of us have punts that, for whatever reason, we don't review. My general rule of thumb seems to be, if I have an exceptional good or bad experience, I'll leave a review. If it's meh, I usually won't bother, not even a neutral. I do work on the basis that if I've got nothing meaningful to say, I'll usually say fuck all.

Offline Punting Valley

I don't leave reviews if it is the same type of punt with the same girl. Unless the session is radically different from the previous review, I can see no point writing duplicate reviews without offering something constructive for other punters to rely on.

1st review :thumbsup:
2nd review if same as first review (touting imo)
2nd review if different from first review :thumbsup:

Drillakilla

  • Guest
I left my reviews on the basis that could help punters decide wether to see the girl or not, reasons that they may not discover till punting, for example one was a neutral, pretty good punt, but no face pics, and she wasn't the prettiest.

 Also her working attire was horrendous, I asked he to turn up to my hotel wearing a micro skirt, and she said for obvious reasons that's not possible, so I suggest a long coat and no one is the wiser.....so she turns up wearing that tan coloured sheepskin coat Del Boy wears in only fools and horses and it was the biggest turn off ever, kept imagining her saying mid punt, lovely jubbly!

Offline hendrix

I mostly see regulars, so unless it's a new combination or a different type of punt with one of them, overnight or TS or whatever, there's no need to review. Sometimes, if I see the same combo, I might add a comment saying that the second punt was as good as the first (or not) because that's worth confirming I think.

yorkshire123

  • Guest
If I think it will add value to the forum.
Personally I stopped reviewing when the NW's self elected administrator was at his full pomp.
Now he's stopped posting I've stopped punting so I have no reviews to do, maybe he had more influence over me than I would like to think   :scare:

Offline nike

Ive had plenty of punts that I've not reviewed.  My reasons for not reviewing is if a wg has had plenty of good feedback and I have nothing new to add.  I'll usually post something if I read a review which was quite different to my experience or if I've had a bad experience.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2015, 10:11:43 pm by nike »

Offline LanceVance

I only review if I haven't reviewed the girl before. If I have and I see her again, I don't write one.

Offline Roth

I don't leave reviews if it is the same type of punt with the same girl. Unless the session is radically different from the previous review, I can see no point writing duplicate reviews without offering something constructive for other punters to rely on.

1st review :thumbsup:
2nd review if same as first review (touting imo)
2nd review if different from first review :thumbsup:

I wouldn't be so hard and fast to say that 2+ similar reviews on the same prossie is touting.   :thumbsdown: Depends on the time between them.   :unknown:

Yes if it is days or even weeks apart but a few months apart I could live with.   :thumbsup:

A few reviews over a reasonable period lets you know if the prossie has stayed the same or upped her game or is providing a worse service.  :thumbsup:

This is assuming the punter who posts the reviews is not a luvved-up, cunt-struck fluffie twat!   :dash:

SirFrank

  • Guest
If I think it will add value to the forum.
Personally I stopped reviewing when the NW's self elected administrator was at his full pomp.
Now he's stopped posting I've stopped punting so I have no reviews to do, maybe he had more influence over me than I would like to think   :scare:

Now I'm intrigued. Who was the self elected mayor of poontang town?

Siadwel

  • Guest
I haven't bothered reviewing any of the AW girls I saw before I joined UKP. They were too long ago, at least two years. They were mostly positive, with one skank who's no longer active, and a duo, neither of whose faces I can remember, let alone their fake names. I'll name and fame/shame if anyone thinks it'll be worth it.

The others I punted before I joined were a succession of parlours and Daily Sports, most of whom I've forgotten and the rest I'd rather not remember.

I've been to see one girl I reviewed three more times since the review External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only but didn't see any mileage in writing another one.


bensonhedges20

  • Guest
If she already has plenty reviews i dont leave any anymore unless it adds anything

Or if shes not had any reviews and i take one for the team i only review if she isnt a low volume one. Met a couple who did escort then quit but still see old clients Or dont want added publicity.

If i meet a horror show and toftt ill rate it. These days not punting as much as last few years

Flunt

  • Guest
So far this year I've had three regular short punts: one has several reviews already on here (Thai Kimmie), the second was MKHelen who has more written about her than most and the third was a review from davidgood that lead me to Morena in MK, my review of her would have been a copy and paste of his. My three other punts have been overnights which would be very long and dull and not much use to most punters.

Offline Roth

So far this year I've had three regular short punts: one has several reviews already on here (Thai Kimmie), the second was MKHelen who has more written about her than most and the third was a review from davidgood that lead me to Morena in MK, my review of her would have been a copy and paste of his. My three other punts have been overnights which would be very long and dull and not much use to most punters.

Every review is useful from a different punter.   :thumbsup:  Maybe just keep them short?  :unknown:  Worth doing.  :thumbsup:

Offline FLYING BLUE

Now I'm intrigued. Who was the self elected mayor of poontang town?

Surely you jest Sir Frank ......

Offline nigel4498

If a punt is neutral or negative then I will write a review as I think they are more beneficial to other punters.
If it's a regular I have reviewed or a well reviewed SP I don't bother with a positive review anymore.
I haven't punted this year yet though so nothing to report.

Offline FLYING BLUE

Surely you jest Sir Frank ......

PS....I leave reviews  if I think it will genuinely help other punters to choose. I  leave reviews both good and bad  but NEVER just to have a moan about a punt or an agency.
I subscribe  to the whole ethos of sharing information  in a hobby that's full of risk - simple really.

Offline cueball

I never leave a review for the same girl twice. I see no problem reviewing well reviewed lasses,  all opinions are valid and everybody puts different facts in

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

Only for repeat visits where nothing new to add for me.

JackDaniels

  • Guest
Anyone worry about leaving a negative review, the WG recognizing you from it and doing something spiteful?

Offline cueball

Anyone worry about leaving a negative review, the WG recognizing you from it and doing something spiteful?

No, I would put a negative review up if need be, if concerned leave a week or two gap from punt to review.

Offline tesla

Now I'm intrigued. Who was the self elected mayor of poontang town?

that would be infoseeker

Offline Blackpool Rock

Anyone worry about leaving a negative review, the WG recognizing you from it and doing something spiteful?
Bad reviews need to be posted to keep UKP reviews accurate otherwise it becomes as meaningless as AW feedback.

I have been posting reviews as I've only been a member since the start of the year so a review for the 1st punt with a girl but not the 2nd or 3rd visit (apart from a 2 girl where one had already been reviewed).
Could consider reviewing the girl again after say a year if she was still good or there was something specific to say but a review needs to be either new or bring something else to the party

Offline anyfucker

i have had about 20-25 punts this year but not written any reviews.
Why? they are all with well reviewed WGs (have been working through other people's "best of 2014" lists) and have gone well as expected  :yahoo:
i will do a review just as soon as i receive a poor experience or decide to meet someone who is not already well reviewed.

Offline IAMBATMAN

ive actually reviewed every new girl ive seen since the start of the year as when i joined UKP i vowed i would, i usually write it the day of or day after i seen her unless its a negative as it says in the punting bible thou shalt not do a bad review unless waited at least 2 weeks, you must protect yourself from angry backlash
« Last Edit: April 01, 2015, 09:00:28 am by IAMBATMAN »

Offline Roth

ive actually reviewed every new girl ive seen since the start of the year as when i joined UKP i vowed i would, i usually write it the day of or day after i seen her unless its a negative as it says in the punting bible thou shalt not do a bad review unless waited at least 2 weeks, you must protect yourself from angry backlash

Maybe don't give your tactics away for the surfing prossies to see just in case the ones you give negatives to work out who you are and it's used against you. :unknown:
« Last Edit: April 01, 2015, 11:58:57 am by Roth »

Offline Jimmyredcab

What informs your decision not to leave a review on UKP? I've had 3 punts this year and I've done 1 review. Judging by most review counts on here, most of us have punts that, for whatever reason, we don't review. My general rule of thumb seems to be, if I have an exceptional good or bad experience, I'll leave a review. If it's meh, I usually won't bother, not even a neutral. I do work on the basis that if I've got nothing meaningful to say, I'll usually say fuck all.

I rarely punt now ------------------- but I would never do a neutral review, totally pointless.  :thumbsdown:

We have some members who are only interested in increasing their review count.    :thumbsdown:

Offline Bangers and Gash

My reasons for not reviewing is if a wg has had plenty of good feedback and I have nothing new to add.

That's fair enough, but a pro$$ie could have plenty of reviews by people who the prospective punter doesn't trust or rate.

Offline Hobbit

What informs your decision not to leave a review on UKP? I've had 3 punts this year and I've done 1 review. Judging by most review counts on here, most of us have punts that, for whatever reason, we don't review. My general rule of thumb seems to be, if I have an exceptional good or bad experience, I'll leave a review. If it's meh, I usually won't bother, not even a neutral. I do work on the basis that if I've got nothing meaningful to say, I'll usually say fuck all.

I find I never have the time to do reviews due to work and family commitments. Also, I've seen a few of the popular ladies on here which have already been reviewed many times and are highly recommended, so I don't think I can add anything extra to that. If I ever see someone new who hasn't been reviewed, then I will write one but when I get time. Also, I find it's never a good idea to write a review immediately after a punt regardless whether it's good or bad, as leaving it for a few days helps to bring objectivity to it.

Offline IAMBATMAN

Maybe don't give your tactics away for the surfing prossies to see just in case the ones you give negatives to work out who you are and it's used against you. :unknown:
i doubt after 2-3 weeks any of them would remember a specific guy and it help if your AW name is different to your forum name

Offline cueball

it help if your AW name is different to your forum name

You're HEWASBATMAN on aw aren't you?  :lol:

Neal69

  • Guest
PS....I leave reviews  if I think it will genuinely help other punters to choose. I  leave reviews both good and bad  but NEVER just to have a moan about a punt or an agency.
I subscribe  to the whole ethos of sharing information  in a hobby that's full of risk - simple really.

+1

I thought the whole ethos of this forum was to share information.

Most of my reviews have been with WG's who have not been reviewed on here before.

But.

I recently reviewed a current favourite on the East England board and I felt that it was worthwhile just to confirm that she is still delivering the good standard of service that she has been highly rated for. There is a danger that a popular WG will "burn out" and the service level will drop off very quickly.

So IMHO all reviews contribute to the forum. Even if there are 26 for a particular WG then at least you can see that she is maintaining the standard.

As I have said previously I don't join in much on this main board as I have little to contribute amongst the seasoned punters on here and also I don't go in for all this mine is bigger than yours bollocks that sometimes goes on in this over subscribed testosterone fuelled environment. And I must confess I am rubbish at spotting the trolls.

I do like to think however that I pay my way by my contributions to the regional East England board.

This forum has been a real benefit to me and has helped me no end in finding an outlet for my punting woes and educating me in some potential pitfalls.

It even be quite fun to read at times with some of our wittier contributors.

Offline GFRadar12

I have been punting a fair bit these last few months but haven't got around to posting reviews.

Not because the service was just standard, albeit a couple of them were, but I just seem to be awful at finding the time to sit down and type out the experiences.

Seeing as I have used the reviews of others to save my money from being thrown down the drain, I feel like I should return the favour and I will   :hi:

Offline davidgood

So far this year I've had three regular short punts: one has several reviews already on here (Thai Kimmie), the second was MKHelen who has more written about her than most and the third was a review from davidgood that lead me to Morena in MK, my review of her would have been a copy and paste of his. My three other punts have been overnights which would be very long and dull and not much use to most punters.
Hi Flunt,

I hope Morena gave you a satisfactory service.

My reviews are in 2 main categories- parties and 1 to 1s.

If I had done a review on every party I have been to I would have held the record for reviews some time ago. However I concentrate on reviews of new parties I have  been to and only do further reviews if something changes such as location or organiser or if there are new girls who I think are worth mentioning. I did another review on the Retro recently as Polish Caprice who used party in London is now firmly established in the Midlands and has moved over from the Private to the Retro.

For 1 to 1s my crusade is finding girls/ladies who enjoy anal and provide a VFM service at a reasonable price. I am happy to share the findings with others and hence do reviews, usually following the first meeting if it goes well.

I usually only do follow up reviews if it is some time after the first review and I have something to add.

Having said all that there is a review of a gem I am holding fire on  as the guy who recommended her does not want her inundated with lurkers just at the moment!!

Regards,

davidgood

d00fer

  • Guest
I get a bit conflicted on writing reviews, especially as I've had, and will continue to mostly have meets with well reviewed girls on here. I'm not sure if some of my more recent reviews add much value.

If it's the first time I've met a well reviewed girl, I'll review as it adds value to the consistency of service even if there is nothing additional to add. I'll do a second review if there's something different to add

Offline IAMBATMAN

You're HEWASBATMAN on aw aren't you?  :lol:
i was IAMBATMAN until i saw vikki haha changed it about a day later for the review and it is a bit stupid having the same name 
« Last Edit: April 01, 2015, 06:46:58 pm by IAMBATMAN »

Offline Kyuss

 My creative writing skills are a bit lacking, so writing a review is like :scare: . I did write a review, it was a negative. Replies accused me of having hidden agenda which has put me off writing any further reviews.