Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Poor £250 punt  (Read 4368 times)

Offline NIK

Katie Amari joined UKP to have right of reply which she was granted.

She now wants the thread removing as, for some reason, she has started receiving threats (unspecified) from a female allegedly as a result of this thread. Why it was as a result of this thread and not the orginal auto-censored FR I don't know. Furthermore why she wanted right of reply on UKP but didn't write a rebuttal on auto-censored which as far as I know is still permitted I don't know.
Of course there is also no way of knowing whether she is actually telling the truth, but whether or not it is true why it has started happening as a result of being mentioned on UKP and not on auto-censored I don't know.
What I do know however is that it in her interests to have the thread removed and prostitutes have certainly frequently been known to lie to preserve or promote their interests.
I also know that Smiths is an experienced punter and a respected member of UKP, so personally I know who I am definitely more likely to believe.

UKP is here to expose poor service and attitude and not to protect it, therefore the thread stays.

I suggest Ms Amari starts to provide good service and hopefully she will get correspondingly good feedback.
Either that or she sticks to porn, and from her posing solo examples I have seen this doesn't seem to involve much interaction with others or particularly hard work.

In the unikely event it should be discovered that a member of UKP is making threats against anyone they will have their membership terminated.

However UKP will continue to fight for decent service for punters, and the information of experienced and respected punters will be valued more highly than that of prostitutes with dubious reputations.

This is only fair, as everywhere else concerning the paid sex scene on the internet, it is the other way around.  :cool:
 

Offline smiths

Katie Amari joined UKP to have right of reply which she was granted.

She now wants the thread removing as, for some reason, she has started receiving threats (unspecified) from a female allegedly as a result of this thread. Why it was as a result of this thread and not the orginal auto-censored FR I don't know. Furthermore why she wanted right of reply on UKP but didn't write a rebuttal on auto-censored which as far as I know is still permitted I don't know.
Of course there is also no way of knowing whether she is actually telling the truth, but whether or not it is true why it has started happening as a result of being mentioned on UKP and not on auto-censored I don't know.
What I do know however is that it in her interests to have the thread removed and prostitutes have certainly frequently been known to lie to preserve or promote their interests.
I also know that Smiths is an experienced punter and a respected member of UKP, so personally I know who I am definitely more likely to believe.

UKP is here to expose poor service and attitude and not to protect it, therefore the thread stays.

I suggest Ms Amari starts to provide good service and hopefully she will get correspondingly good feedback.
Either that or she sticks to porn, and from her posing solo examples I have seen this doesn't seem to involve much interaction with others or particularly hard work.

In the unikely event it should be discovered that a member of UKP is making threats against anyone they will have their membership terminated.

However UKP will continue to fight for decent service for punters, and the information of experienced and respected punters will be valued more highly than that of prostitutes with dubious reputations.

This is only fair, as everywhere else concerning the paid sex scene on the internet, it is the other way around.  :cool:

Thanks NIK, and this thread might save punters wasting their money. ;)

Offline Jerboa

So what happened to Katie's post?

Offline NIK

So what happened to Katie's post?

It's still there, quoted in message 23.

Offline Jerboa

It's still there, quoted in message 23.

Yes I see her post quoted by Smiths, but what happened to her original post If she posted on this thread?  :wackogirl:

Offline mattylondon

Thanks NIK, and this thread might save punters wasting their money. ;)

My aw profile has no negative feedback. So do you not think its odd thathe booked me through aw, but only gave me bad feedback here and on auto-censored?

Thanks For Reading
Katie.

No Katie, I don't find it odd at all, considering how AW feedback works! I also think a couple of her singular feedbacks on there are suspicious, but that's another story!

Perhaps one reason why that poor sod didn't submit a negative report on Adultwork is that we all know the site is geared in the escort's favour.

She would've simply made up some false shit about him and posted a negative report on him herself, therefore potentially ruining his reputation with other wgs. She wouldn't even have to mark his booking as 'complete', hence he wouldn't have the opportunity to rate her negative, but would only be able to 'leave feedback only'.

Of course, on auto-censored and here, she cannot 'stitch him up' with a made up negative report, in the same way. One reason why that site isn't reliable for escort feedback.

Of course she's receiving no threats from any girls. And if she was, simply name them and provide the evidence.

No wonder she wanted Nik to censor this thread!
« Last Edit: December 28, 2011, 12:41:46 AM by mattylondon »

Offline smiths

Yes I see her post quoted by Smiths, but what happened to her original post If she posted on this thread?  :wackogirl:

I assume although i admit its a guess, NIK thought she was lying which she was about her previous behaviour 100% and she got the heave-ho of a ban.

I note the FR was deleted so that was adjudged to be iffy, but i know she is diabolical so in this case i would believe the FR author over her. Probably be a new name next and some other poor guy will suffer a bad punt. She deserves to be outed to punters so they know she is one to avoid in my opinion. ;)

Offline adindas

This is also a question I would like to ask, as I have got this experience few times in my previous punting.

The common signal that they are using is the dress immediately after you cum.

In this situation I think, even you ask for partial refund  are we going to do if she does not want to do .....

If there is a good way of getting a refund I also would like to know, I tend to use a non  connotative way ...


How does a punter make a WG give him his full time if she doesnt want to do so though?

Offline James999

The common signal that they are using is the dress immediately after you cum.

Hide their clothes till your time is up  :hi:


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)