Katie Amari joined UKP to have right of reply which she was granted.
She now wants the thread removing as, for some reason, she has started receiving threats (unspecified) from a female allegedly as a result of this thread. Why it was as a result of this thread and not the orginal auto-censored FR I don't know. Furthermore why she wanted right of reply on UKP but didn't write a rebuttal on auto-censored which as far as I know is still permitted I don't know.
Of course there is also no way of knowing whether she is actually telling the truth, but whether or not it is true why it has started happening as a result of being mentioned on UKP and not on auto-censored I don't know.
What I do
know however is that it in her interests to have the thread removed and prostitutes have certainly frequently been known to lie to preserve or promote their interests.
I also know that Smiths is an experienced punter and a respected member of UKP, so personally I know who I am definitely more likely to believe.
UKP is here to expose poor service and attitude and not to protect it, therefore the thread stays.
I suggest Ms Amari starts to provide good service and hopefully she will get correspondingly good feedback.
Either that or she sticks to porn, and from her posing solo examples I have seen this doesn't seem to involve much interaction with others or particularly hard work.
In the unikely event it should be discovered that a member of UKP is making threats against anyone they will have their membership terminated.
However UKP will continue to fight for decent service for punters, and the information of experienced and respected punters will be valued more highly than that of prostitutes with dubious reputations.
This is only fair, as everywhere else concerning the paid sex scene on the internet, it is the other way around.