Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: miss-erika - timewaster  (Read 4869 times)


1 review(s) for miss-erika (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


https://www.adultwork.com/1417865

Another waste of time, after a reverse booking bid which was within hours of the meet time she does a disappearing act  :angry:

What is the point, no response to texts, emails etc..at least have the f'g courtesy to say she's changed her mind or bidded in error!

 :dash:


1 review(s) found for miss-erika linked to in above post (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)

Offline James999

Perhaps its a Private gallery scam, they often bid on reverse booking sin the hope they will get a couple of £ from the PG.

Looking at the first pic in her gallery  :vomit: its obvious she's a lot older than 32 (looks mid 50's) way bigger than a size 8 - 10 FFS she has a beer gut ! And wonky boobs from what looks like a botched boob job.

If she was real then her no show did you a facour  :scare:

 :lol:

Yeh agreed, was only meant to be a quicky anyway!

Does get my goat though when they do such things, but as you say maybe worked out for the best and money better in my pocket!

Offline Ali Katt

Perhaps its a Private gallery scam, they often bid on reverse booking sin the hope they will get a couple of £ from the PG.

Looking at the first pic in her gallery  :vomit: its obvious she's a lot older than 32 (looks mid 50's) way bigger than a size 8 - 10 FFS she has a beer gut ! And wonky boobs from what looks like a botched boob job.

If she was real then her no show did you a facour  :scare:
Feet look bigger than a size 3 as well, look like a 5-6 (average for a woman) to me, size 3 is really, small.

Good evening gents .....just like to thank you for your childish comments about me... being a 50 year old women i  can see your immaturity and male banter makes you both feel better about being knocked back by a whore with a wonky gone wrong boob job not to mention my man size 6 feet, and the gut on me "wow" i almost have the same problem as you ... ive not seen my fanny for years i know how you guys feel now.....
Lets clear things boys.... im not a time waster i wanted the job but after reading this about me im glad i didnt go. you make it look like i pissed you about which was not the case at all. i did get back to you but your were after a service that i do not offer so in the long run i wasnt right for what you were looking for. all you had to was talk to me in a proper manner not go about it like louts its un called for.     

Offline James999

makes you both feel better about being knocked back by a whore

That may help you deal with your issues, but the reality is you have not "knocked back" anyone, none of us have tried to book you and been declined  :dash:  we have simply laughed at you, something I suspect happens a lot  :hi:

Offline mattylondon

Lets clear things boys....   
I always find it flattering to know that a lot of you prossies secretly read UKP without having the guts to post until you've been mentioned! Obviously it's made you angry, hence the need to post. I think that's fair enough, personally, but perhaps a more resonsive e-mail via AW or a PM explaining why you didn't get back to the OP sooner may have been more constructive?  :hi:

And I ain't your 'boy'. I wouldn't punt you if it was offered to me for free, after looking at your shitty blurred and minimised photos? How an earth do you get the business? You're not in domination mode on here hun. Just stick around for a while and you'll soon find that out if you continue in that vein. As for the knocking men back comment. You're surely not being serious?  :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: February 12, 2012, 11:15:04 PM by mattylondon »

matty, im glad your flattered ive come out my way because i wanted to  say was  i was  offended by the remark so i decided to stand up for myself why shouldnt i?i didnt think what you put was nice and un true and very unfair.i have got the guts to put my views across and i did. its not after a battle of the sex's im just saying i was pissed of .....!!!

Offline mattylondon

matty, im glad your flattered ive come out my way because i wanted to  say was  i was  offended by the remark so i decided to stand up for myself why shouldnt i?i didnt think what you put was nice and un true and very unfair.i have got the guts to put my views across and i did. its not after a battle of the sex's im just saying i was pissed of .....!!!
Absolutely nothing wrong with taking offense if you felt his post was unwarranted and incorrect. I simply feel it would've been better for you to direct your annoyance at him via PM, in the first instance and then if he didn't retract (if he was in the wrong or misunderstood the situation), by all means make it known publically you'd been reasonable. That said, I'm only saying that's the approach I would've made if new.

If you come on here all guns blazing, with your first post, that's sometimes the reaction one receives. I shall apologise for the rude way I commented re punting you, but stand by the quality of your photo's, which are bloody awful! Whoever is guilty of taking them should be on the end of your whip! If I'm in the area, I'll come around and whip the pair of you for subjecting me to that quality of picture?! :hi:
« Last Edit: February 13, 2012, 01:29:21 AM by mattylondon »

Offline mattylondon

James could do with a good whipping, so PM him. I'm sure you'll find him most accommodating.  :hi:

Offline ladyteeny

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 392
Good evening gents .....just like to thank you for your childish comments about me... being a 50 year old women i  can see your immaturity and male banter makes you both feel better about being knocked back by a whore with a wonky gone wrong boob job not to mention my man size 6 feet, and the gut on me "wow" i almost have the same problem as you ... ive not seen my fanny for years i know how you guys feel now.....
Lets clear things boys.... im not a time waster i wanted the job but after reading this about me im glad i didnt go. you make it look like i pissed you about which was not the case at all. i did get back to you but your were after a service that i do not offer so in the long run i wasnt right for what you were looking for. all you had to was talk to me in a proper manner not go about it like louts its un called for.   

bullshit.  not once in that lot did you say sorry for doing a disappearing act... oh no, you sign up here so you can have a futile whinge about 'i wanted the job but AFTER reading this lot i'm glad i didn't go;.. bollox, you were obviously never going to go in the first place.  you might have found this site, and that report about yourself, but i'm betting it won't be the last. you ARE the time waster, you made an agreement and "disappeared" a few hours beforehand.  what happened? sick relative? car accident? babysitting troubles? do us a favour dearie.

Offline mattylondon

bullshit.  not once in that lot did you say sorry for doing a disappearing act... oh no, you sign up here so you can have a futile whinge about 'i wanted the job but AFTER reading this lot i'm glad i didn't go;.. bollox, you were obviously never going to go in the first place.  you might have found this site, and that report about yourself, but i'm betting it won't be the last. you ARE the time waster, you made an agreement and "disappeared" a few hours beforehand.  what happened? sick relative? car accident? babysitting troubles? do us a favour dearie.
Indeed and despite some of my rudeness, that's exactly the point. If she'd got back to the OP, in good time, via AW, this thread wouldn't have existed. It's the very fact that she only reacted publically, after a negative review on UKP that irritates. To literally join up in order to whinge, never looks good in my book.

A genuine misunderstanding wouldn've been dealt with via AW or PM. And that's why I agree with you Lady T, that I don't believe her. These people that sit there lurking and reading UKP as guests irritate. As do those who've been a member over a year and all they do is read the threads, but never post, such as our current friend online wildrose4u. And what is she up to? Zero posts in a whole year?! There should be a bloody cull of such members, in my opinion!  :mad:
« Last Edit: February 13, 2012, 02:07:51 AM by mattylondon »

Just noticed a response :D

Lets get one thing straight - when I put RB requests I am very clear of my desires and get fed up of WGs that then bid indicating acceptance of all my 'likes' but then when challenged/checked back down or even worse say yes then refuse when with them.

Rude and a time waster!

I am not perfect but not rude nor a liar - all she needed to do is say 'sorry i misread' etc not mess me about! :dash:

I note it took her 2 months to respond  :lol: perhaps I should of waited that time for the response!
« Last Edit: February 13, 2012, 08:52:56 AM by The President »

there was an apology in my text when we spoke you know there was and as for a bulshitl lie or excuse with cars and sitters give me a break. it was a misunderstanding that can happen some times and was not ment. my point of getting in contact with you on here was to clear the air like adults. im not arsed about anyone eles option on here only the person it concerned in the first place. so getting back to the president it WAS CROSSED WIRES and not intended for a spat on line for everyone to throw their pennies worth in when its clearly nothing to do with them. to put a close this im sorry if pissed you off.... end of....!!!!

Offline mattylondon

there was an apology in my text when we spoke you know there was and as for a bulshitl lie or excuse with cars and sitters give me a break. it was a misunderstanding that can happen some times and was not ment. my point of getting in contact with you on here was to clear the air like adults. im not arsed about anyone eles option on here only the person it concerned in the first place. so getting back to the president it WAS CROSSED WIRES and not intended for a spat on line for everyone to throw their pennies worth in when its clearly nothing to do with them. to put a close this im sorry if pissed you off.... end of....!!!!
Then don't join a bloody forum, where it's out in the open for everybody to comment!! And don't give me that bullshit about it just being between you and him!? You fully intended your pathetic 'winge' to be read by a wider audience or you'd have simply sent president a PM or contacted him via Adultwork, like you should've done in the first place.  :hi: It's prossies like you that give the rest a bad name. I should take that whip of yours and administer some corporal punnishment to you myself! :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: February 13, 2012, 06:16:31 PM by mattylondon »

Offline James999

for everyone to throw their pennies worth in when its clearly nothing to do with them.

Of course it is, you are offering a service and as users of such services it is important that we know who offers a good service and who is reliable, and who offers a poor service / is unreliable

In the same way manufacturers of shit cars don't like it when Top Gear review them, where as decent manufacturers love the publicity.

It's not our fault you let the guy down  :dash: and you clearly have an attitude problem  :manhater:

Offline mattylondon

In the same way manufacturers of shit cars don't like it when Top Gear review them, where as decent manufacturers love the publicity.
And this prossies a malfunctioning Reliant Robbin!  : :scare:


Well any apology is better than not receiving one I suppose however in the manner its been put its not quite sincere.

May I suggest if you respond to RBs again you take the time to read them! If you still feel you can offer a service thats different at least list the differences in the response and finally if approached by the punter that you respond in good time even if to say 'no thank you'

If you do respond to a RB with a short time scale expect to be contacted and for him to expect a quick response?!

We all live and learn and I respect you in that have at least the bottle to apologise and post on here in response although perhaps not in the best manner!

Only future feedback and a self reflection on how you approach things will allow future punters to know your true character.

I did not leave -ive on AW (and believe me there are ways around doing it eventhough bookings werent confirmed) and therefore you do have a clean sheet to continue, in here I have said nothing that is untrue and only you can reflect on your responses to other members on here. We are of various characters but in hindsight I do feel your post was somewhat 'asking' for the types of responses you received. I wish you well in the future albeit without my business and perhaps some others on here too ;)
« Last Edit: February 13, 2012, 06:27:55 PM by The President »

Offline mattylondon

Well any apology is better than not receiving one I suppose however in the manner its been put its not quite sincere.
Don't be naive president. You would've received fuck all of an apology, had you not posted it up on UKP. Again, UKP is showing that it can't be ignored, even by the poor SPs. :hi:



Offline SuffrageforNuffrage

Absolutely nothing wrong with taking offense if you felt his post was unwarranted and incorrect. I simply feel it would've been better for you to direct your annoyance at him via PM, in the first instance and then if he didn't retract (if he was in the wrong or misunderstood the situation), by all means make it known publically you'd been reasonable. That said, I'm only saying that's the approach I would've made if new.

If you come on here all guns blazing, with your first post, that's sometimes the reaction one receives. I shall apologise for the rude way I commented re punting you, but stand by the quality of your photo's, which are bloody awful! Whoever is guilty of taking them should be on the end of your whip! If I'm in the area, I'll come around and whip the pair of you for subjecting me to that quality of picture?! :hi:


Hi chaps,

You guys know this more than most (same as us WG's):

"There are three sides to every story; yours, mine, and the truth"  ;)


In my (humble) opinion, perhaps the 'moral' of the story (post) is that a degree of discretion and most importantly a sensitivity and deference to the demographic and majority populas of the arena in which one is posting.  In my mind, the reaction to miss-erika's posting was almost certainly inevitable. 

To put it another way, imagine if, let's say, Matty was to rampage into the belly of the SAAFE forum boards, submitting what could be construed as an antagonistic/defensive/accusatory reply to a post initiated by an established, identifiable, member of said forum which is, of course, a collective of individuals sharing views/interests/activities deriving as a result of a 'common' ground (as is the whole point of any and every forum)       

Miss-erika, I am in no way seeking to 'knock' a fellow WG, but I joined this site with a genuine interest in acquiring a rare opportunity to 'put myself in the other person's shoes', gain further insight into the experiences of SUs, with the hope of pinpointing any short-comings in the service I aim to provide, perhaps learn of issues/likes/irks that have not and would not occur to me that I may easily be able to include/exclude/prevent/ensure in my portfolio, and with a genuine hope that I might add a small contribution, here and there, that might actually be of interest/use, to some members.

As such, as I hope will be quickly evident to members, I have no interest in 'flying anyone's flag' WG's or otherwise, and am most definitely not some sheep, bleeting the same baaaaaahhhhhh's of any particular group/movement/forum etc, but seek to keep any offerings; pragmatic, objective, logical and unbiased (as humanly possible!)  Most important of all (I believe) is to keep emotion out of it!  Emotions and 'common sense' arguments have no place in rational argument/discussion/debate, only factually based, non-emtoive, measured and considered input, can serve any real purpose. 

Perhaps, miss-erika, this is perhaps why your post (what should have/could have easily been a quickly resolved matter???) had the consequent 'snowball' effect on the discussion?  If (as I'm sure is the case) your intention of posting was to explain the misunderstanding, smooth the issue out, wrap the issue up with the OP and move on mutually more content than before, I think on a forum in which the 'tag' (??is that what it's called???) is:

 
"Where the punter comes first" (and no, the double entondre is not lost on me you cheeky ***** ;)

a more contained, self effacing, apologetic approach may have served the purpose better and I suspect (ready to stand corrected lol) garnered a more sympathetic acceptance.  As you do say yourself, Matty, the comments about miss-erika's service were indeed a bit 'potent', which in all fairness you retrospectively accept and duly apologised for (was a bit too personal in my own opinion) and the strength of your pervious points equates to the lack of necessity for them.  Your post had enough weight, as it stood without that, as you fairly deduced, anyway. 

It seems a simple matter of '........when in Rome'

Cheers xx


Offline James999



Offline Ali Katt

And the award for the most boring,most long-winded first post goes to...
There's a lot of words, but they say nothing.




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)