Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Is it 'fair' that WGs who are popular pick & choose (+ignore) their punters?  (Read 5100 times)

Sylvester

  • Guest
Yes, of course it is.

 I don't understand the point of the question really, what is the alternative?  West8 knows the answer to this question as well as anybody, so I assume this is an exercise in devil's advocacy.

Online 385North

I'm sure there are plenty of WGs out there who are asking the very same question "it's not fair; why don't those lovely guys on UKP pick me?!?!"
 

Offline cueball





And it clearly seems quite a few WG owe their rising popularity to UKP.

You'd think we'd get a discount

Offline NightKid

They can pick and choose as much as they want, even those who aren't popular ... the problem I have, however, comes from the being ignored part.  :mad:
Also:

Also the more popular a prossie becomes on here the less interested I become  :unknown:

+4

Number chain!  :D

Offline claretandblue

Sounds nice  :drinks:
ha that genuinely wasnt a reference to you westie!in faxt i think the wg in question is one of the few in london you havent already met!

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,603
  • Likes: 1
Of course we pick and choose.  even those who don't have hundreds of reviews on here will still pick and choose and refuse to answer to some people they have seen before or seem to always be fully booked at the times they want.  Some people we just don't want to see again for one reason or another.  It could be they were pushy, or they were a bit rude or a bit off  or they could just be arseholes or hard to engage with who the girl doesn't want to have to see again.
Someone might think they are polite and the perfect punter but to her he may have come across as arrogant or rude or like I said impossible for her to engage with.  It could just be she took an instant dislike to you and didn't want to see you again.

That's the beauty of this job if we are Indie we can pick and choose who to see and who not too see and why would we want to see someone who we didn't like for one reason or another when there are plenty of nice guys we could see instead

Ben4454

  • Guest
 Agree. Plenty of working girls to choose from. Name and shame here.

west8

  • Guest
I'm sure there are plenty of WGs out there who are asking the very same question "it's not fair; why don't those lovely guys on UKP pick me?!?!"

If what I have been told on more than one occasion is even half true, the above isn't wide of the mark ...  ;)


ha that genuinely wasnt a reference to you westie!in faxt i think the wg in question is one of the few in london you havent already met!

Haha! Made me laugh reading it though, C&B. Still looking for another hot girl with a jacuzzi for some (covered) fun.  :wacko:

Offline The_Don

Up to them really.


Just like its up to punters, what W/G they call or try to book
« Last Edit: March 11, 2015, 09:53:25 pm by The_Don »

BeesKnees

  • Guest
Some people we just don't want to see again for one reason or another.  It could be they were pushy, or they were a bit rude or a bit off  or they could just be arseholes or hard to engage with who the girl doesn't want to have to see again.
Someone might think they are polite and the perfect punter but to her he may have come across as arrogant or rude or like I said impossible for her to engage with.

I can imagine that some punters take liberties with time on a punt, like start round 2 with 10mins left knowing they won't pop. I remember being told that some punters don't even shower properly and they stank despite "taking one". The wg bit the bullet with the same level of enthusiasm she normally gives. The punter had a good time, but wg not so much and the punters number got blacklisted

Online webpunter

Sounds nice  :drinks:
Soapy tit-wank in the jacuzzi seems very nice.  Not sure about the other 3 hours though

Max Pleasure

  • Guest
I don't see how fairness comes into it.  Popular girls will chose and the basis of the choice is up to her.  If she doesn't chose me I can just move on, and find someone who actually wants my business.

Offline akauya

[...]
Also the more popular a prossie becomes on here the less interested I become  :unknown:

+5

Absolutely spot on... the more some punters swoon over an "amazing", "best ever" prossie the less I want to see her. I much prefer finding new blood or visiting prossies recommended via PM.


bensonhedges20

  • Guest
Its always going to happen.

You either get bumped as the punter before you has extended or you have zero feedback and they would rather have a sure thing than have their time wasted.

If you want better success say to them during the normal message that you were reccomended her by one of her regulars. Its sure to help.

I cant recall a meet in the last 6 months where a girls phone (if visible) hasnt vibrated, flashed or gone off during the meet. Its fair to say theu receive many calla,emails and texts per hour so they can bump and choose whats better financially for them.

Lastly, they would never turn you down for repeat business if you are clean and respectful.

This applies in any business. If a supplier of mine is low in stock and i need something he will hold it knowing i will  either go elsewhere if i cant find it or knows i spend alot.

Its unfair to blame escorts as they know for a fact that we will go elsewhere if they are unavailable.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2015, 01:36:31 am by bensonhedges20 »

bensonhedges20

  • Guest
+5

Absolutely spot on... the more some punters swoon over an "amazing", "best ever" prossie the less I want to see her. I much prefer finding new blood or visiting prossies recommended via PM.

Thats true but dependant on area. In London, Manchester i avoid the popular ones.

In Edinburgh or Glasgow you have next to no choice

JV547845

  • Guest
But is actually fair and reasonable that punters are being ignored by said girls when it's blatantly fucking obvious that those same girls are available, but are actively choosing to ignore the majority of comms?

Life's not fair or reasonable.  They're not running an off license.

squeezebox

  • Guest
+5

Absolutely spot on... the more some punters swoon over an "amazing", "best ever" prossie the less I want to see her. I much prefer finding new blood or visiting prossies recommended via PM.

For me it would be something inbetween.

The ones reviewed by "respected" forum member(s), including the fawned over ones, would be a safe bet for future bookings. However, discovering new/fresh pussy is part of the punting experience and is highly recommended.  :drinks:




Offline smiths

For me it would be something inbetween.

The ones reviewed by "respected" forum member(s), including the fawned over ones, would be a safe bet for future bookings. However, discovering new/fresh pussy is part of the punting experience and is highly recommended.  :drinks:

And me, a mixture of rated WGs and taking a risk in search of a gem on occasion is my modus, the latter sometimes pays off, sometimes doesn't. ;)

Offline Jimmyredcab



My message to WGs who require AW feedback - fuck off.


+1000

Prostitutes are ten a penny, my money, my rules.     :hi:

Offline akauya

Thats true but dependant on area. In London, Manchester i avoid the popular ones.

In Edinburgh or Glasgow you have next to no choice


Yes, I appreciate that. Sometimes I forget how lucky London punters are to have so much choice.


Offline Norman8796

Yes, they have obviously earned the right to pick and choose, good luck to them.

Quesadilla

  • Guest
They can pick and choose as much as they want, even those who aren't popular ... the problem I have, however, comes from the being ignored part.  :mad:

Why does that bother you - if they've picked and chosen - and chosen not to see a particular punter - then why wouldn't they ignore you?  It's the same as you blocking a WG on AW isn't it?  They don't need to explain why - in fact I'm pretty sure if they did you would get even more annoyed as you would not like the reasons.

Offline NightKid

Why does that bother you - if they've picked and chosen - and chosen not to see a particular punter - then why wouldn't they ignore you?  It's the same as you blocking a WG on AW isn't it?  They don't need to explain why - in fact I'm pretty sure if they did you would get even more annoyed as you would not like the reasons.

Being ignored as in not bothering to reply to my request to meet with a simple no.
A prossie can choose not to accept my business, and not even explain her reasons why, but at least have the decency to let me know.

Thing is, most don't.  :angry:

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 13
  • Reviews: 28
There could be any number of reasons ie client using threatening tone or making WG feel unsafe, timewasters with stupid questions with no intention of booking. Usually If the client communicates clearly in a reasonable manner there should be no problem but if the WG is uneasy for some reason then for peace of mind her safety must come first.
Here's a few more:
* sounds like an Indian man
* sounds like a black man
* Asks for a quickie
* Asks for 30 minute booking
* Bumps a one hour booking off for an overnighter
* Man posted a picture of his cock and it is too big
* Prossie ran out of cocaine (= no bookings)
* Hangover
* Having a "fat day"

Quesadilla

  • Guest
Being ignored as in not bothering to reply to my request to meet with a simple no.
A prossie can choose not to accept my business, and not even explain her reasons why, but at least have the decency to let me know.

Thing is, most don't.  :angry:

I can think of a few reasons to be honest - the simplest being that having decided a punter is not someone they ever want to see then why would they waste even one second of their valuable time on them? 

If you got an AW flirt from someone you weren't interested in would you send them a polite no or just delete and block? Personally I delete and block and even resent wasting that much time on them.  :unknown:

Offline NightKid

I can think of a few reasons to be honest - the simplest being that having decided a punter is not someone they ever want to see then why would they waste even one second of their valuable time on them?

Ah, there we go - white-knighting lousy comms. Really?
I'm not one for clichés but another case of you couldn't make it up.  :dash:

If you got an AW flirt from someone you weren't interested in would you send them a polite no or just delete and block? Personally I delete and block and even resent wasting that much time on them.  :unknown:

Polite no, everytime. And a thanks for calling/replying. Business and personal. It's common courtesy. Duh.
Where's your so-called fluffy "manners" now?  :rolleyes:

Quesadilla

  • Guest
Ah, there we go - white-knighting lousy comms. Really?
I'm not one for clichés but another case of you couldn't make it up.  :dash:

Polite no, everytime. And a thanks for calling/replying. Business and personal. It's common courtesy. Duh.
Where's your so-called fluffy "manners" now?  :rolleyes:

Hardly white knighting - just telling it like it is.  As a real-world example of what I'm getting at - I often send multiple emails out to tradesmen on checkatrade for work I need doing - guess what, the top five or sometimes even ten most popular never bother to reply!  They don't have the time to reply unless it's a job they really want/need.  They don't know a thing about me so by not even sending a polite "sorry can't help this time" they run the risk of me not coming back to them in future with another more interesting job.  It happens all the time in the world of small business - not sure why you struggle to grasp that?

However it's a different story on AW - if you send a message and a WG decides they don't like your tone, or maybe they've linked you to your profile here and don't like the way you post, then they literally never want to see you under any circumstances - so why on earth would they want to waste a second on you?  Especially for the popular girls who get 100 messages per day.  They will simply look for any reason to delete a message and not have to reply because they just don't have the time. 


Offline NightKid

*The usual fluffy crock of shite.*

Sorry, I don't deal with bullshit so you'll have to excuse me for ignoring your bullshit-riddled diatribe.

Edit: See what I did there?  ;)
« Last Edit: March 12, 2015, 02:07:58 pm by NightKid »

Quesadilla

  • Guest
Sorry, I don't deal with bullshit so you'll have to excuse me for ignoring your bullshit-riddled diatribe.

Edit: See what I did there?  ;)
NightKid, one day you might grow up to be a man.  :drinks:

306

  • Guest
everyone these days are too lazy to say
 no not today
,or no thanks .
or i am busy

they just take the easiest action
no reply

greychap

  • Guest
After just 10 minutes on here today, I've seen two threads complaining about two popular London girls that seem impossible to book. They're not.

Both owe their ridiculous popularity to the reviews they have accumulated on here over the past 3-6 months. No need to name them.

Now, it does seem (from my experience) that the girls in question are being very, very picky in who they see for a first meet and (more interestingly) who they see once, but then (for no apparent reason) refuse to see a second time.
Its called life!!!

If a girl is popular and has built up quite a few regulars and decides she will only see the clients at the moment that she gets on with better or choose one punter over another because one she really likes and the other is hard work and a pain its human nature they will go with the better option.

There body there choice. I think we would all try and do the jobs that we get on better with then choose one we don't over it.

As long as they don't stand a punter up with not telling them then that would be very rude.

StPunt

  • Guest
'fair' doesnt come into it. try once, no response move on.

Siadwel

  • Guest
'fair' doesnt come into it. try once, no response move on.

Exactly my attitude.

jcdmj12

  • Guest
That assumes she has met them both before. Judging by the comments on other popular WG threads, many members are having difficulty booking a WG they haven't met before.

But as others have said, always better the devil you know. I'm sure WGs think the same.

Every time a WG meets a new person, she is taking a risk; at one extreme, they may turn out to be violent or abusive, or more likely they may be smelly, obnoxious or annoying.  If I was a WG, I'd put efforts into building up a good regular base to cover my desired income, then pick and choose enough new punters to make up for customer churn.

Offline Norman8796

Every time a WG meets a new person, she is taking a risk; at one extreme, they may turn out to be violent or abusive, or more likely they may be smelly, obnoxious or annoying.  If I was a WG, I'd put efforts into building up a good regular base to cover my desired income, then pick and choose enough new punters to make up for customer churn.
quite correct yet the only risk a punter takes is wasting a few quid, which if he can punt in the first place is probably immaterial.


Offline smiths

quite correct yet the only risk a punter takes is wasting a few quid, which if he can punt in the first place is probably immaterial.

Its most certainly not immaterial to me, the fact I can afford to punt is neither here nor there, I keep my end of the deal, arrive on time, clean with the agreed cash and I expect ALL WGs to keep their side of the deal and offer me a good service for my money.

A punter also takes a risk of meeting and dealing with low life scum, some punters have posted about being threatened and even robbed though thats fortunately not a common occurrence going on posts on here over the years.

Offline Norman8796

:unknown:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=45267.0

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=49120.0

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=37659.0
at 75 quid an hour what do you expect?, Tower Hamlets?? These are not as big in terms of risk to opening the door 10-12 times a day to members of the sex that commit the majority of violent crime.

Offline smiths

at 75 quid an hour what do you expect?, Tower Hamlets?? These are not as big in terms of risk to opening the door 10-12 times a day to members of the sex that commit the majority of violent crime.

Above you posted the only risk a punter faces is wasting a few quid, that is not true and examples were given by Don. No WG or punter should experience violence obviously.

And at whatever a WG charges what I expect is a good honest service in exchange for my cash.

Offline Norman8796

Above you posted the only risk a punter faces is wasting a few quid, that is not true and examples were given by Don. No WG or punter should experience violence obviously.

And at whatever a WG charges what I expect is a good honest service in exchange for my cash.
why? What makes you think that somebody who is selling their body, possibly compromising their future emotional wellbeing deserves such a mechanical, transactional view. Be honest, a few quid is a few quid you make it sound like life or death. These are fellow humans you are talking about.

Offline smiths

why? What makes you think that somebody who is selling their body, possibly compromising their future emotional wellbeing deserves such a mechanical, transactional view. Be honest, a few quid is a few quid you make it sound like life or death. These are fellow humans you are talking about.

I have no idea why you posted what you did, but it wasn't true was it so that was pointed out to you. At least get it right when you post, how hard is that.