Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Is it 'fair' that WGs who are popular pick & choose (+ignore) their punters?  (Read 3680 times)

Offline Sylvester

Yes, of course it is.

 I don't understand the point of the question really, what is the alternative?  West8 knows the answer to this question as well as anybody, so I assume this is an exercise in devil's advocacy.
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy (Atticus Finch)

Offline 385North

I'm sure there are plenty of WGs out there who are asking the very same question "it's not fair; why don't those lovely guys on UKP pick me?!?!"
 

Online cueball





And it clearly seems quite a few WG owe their rising popularity to UKP.

You'd think we'd get a discount

Offline NightKid

They can pick and choose as much as they want, even those who aren't popular ... the problem I have, however, comes from the being ignored part.  :mad:
Also:

Also the more popular a prossie becomes on here the less interested I become  :unknown:

+4

Number chain!  :D

Sounds nice  :drinks:
ha that genuinely wasnt a reference to you westie!in faxt i think the wg in question is one of the few in london you havent already met!

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
Of course we pick and choose.  even those who don't have hundreds of reviews on here will still pick and choose and refuse to answer to some people they have seen before or seem to always be fully booked at the times they want.  Some people we just don't want to see again for one reason or another.  It could be they were pushy, or they were a bit rude or a bit off  or they could just be arseholes or hard to engage with who the girl doesn't want to have to see again.
Someone might think they are polite and the perfect punter but to her he may have come across as arrogant or rude or like I said impossible for her to engage with.  It could just be she took an instant dislike to you and didn't want to see you again.

That's the beauty of this job if we are Indie we can pick and choose who to see and who not too see and why would we want to see someone who we didn't like for one reason or another when there are plenty of nice guys we could see instead

Offline Ben4454

 Agree. Plenty of working girls to choose from. Name and shame here.
Banning reason: Ignored admin warning after temporary banning and signed up to malicious troll anti-UKP site

Offline west8

I'm sure there are plenty of WGs out there who are asking the very same question "it's not fair; why don't those lovely guys on UKP pick me?!?!"

If what I have been told on more than one occasion is even half true, the above isn't wide of the mark ...  ;)


ha that genuinely wasnt a reference to you westie!in faxt i think the wg in question is one of the few in london you havent already met!

Haha! Made me laugh reading it though, C&B. Still looking for another hot girl with a jacuzzi for some (covered) fun.  :wacko:

Online The_Don

Up to them really.


Just like its up to punters, what W/G they call or try to book
« Last Edit: March 11, 2015, 09:53:25 PM by The_Don »

Offline BeesKnees

Some people we just don't want to see again for one reason or another.  It could be they were pushy, or they were a bit rude or a bit off  or they could just be arseholes or hard to engage with who the girl doesn't want to have to see again.
Someone might think they are polite and the perfect punter but to her he may have come across as arrogant or rude or like I said impossible for her to engage with.

I can imagine that some punters take liberties with time on a punt, like start round 2 with 10mins left knowing they won't pop. I remember being told that some punters don't even shower properly and they stank despite "taking one". The wg bit the bullet with the same level of enthusiasm she normally gives. The punter had a good time, but wg not so much and the punters number got blacklisted

Offline webpunter

Sounds nice  :drinks:
Soapy tit-wank in the jacuzzi seems very nice.  Not sure about the other 3 hours though

I don't see how fairness comes into it.  Popular girls will chose and the basis of the choice is up to her.  If she doesn't chose me I can just move on, and find someone who actually wants my business.

Offline akauya

[...]
Also the more popular a prossie becomes on here the less interested I become  :unknown:

+5

Absolutely spot on... the more some punters swoon over an "amazing", "best ever" prossie the less I want to see her. I much prefer finding new blood or visiting prossies recommended via PM.


Offline bensonhedges20

Its always going to happen.

You either get bumped as the punter before you has extended or you have zero feedback and they would rather have a sure thing than have their time wasted.

If you want better success say to them during the normal message that you were reccomended her by one of her regulars. Its sure to help.

I cant recall a meet in the last 6 months where a girls phone (if visible) hasnt vibrated, flashed or gone off during the meet. Its fair to say theu receive many calla,emails and texts per hour so they can bump and choose whats better financially for them.

Lastly, they would never turn you down for repeat business if you are clean and respectful.

This applies in any business. If a supplier of mine is low in stock and i need something he will hold it knowing i will  either go elsewhere if i cant find it or knows i spend alot.

Its unfair to blame escorts as they know for a fact that we will go elsewhere if they are unavailable.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2015, 01:36:31 AM by bensonhedges20 »
Banning reason: Troll

Offline bensonhedges20

+5

Absolutely spot on... the more some punters swoon over an "amazing", "best ever" prossie the less I want to see her. I much prefer finding new blood or visiting prossies recommended via PM.

Thats true but dependant on area. In London, Manchester i avoid the popular ones.

In Edinburgh or Glasgow you have next to no choice
Banning reason: Troll

Offline JV547845

But is actually fair and reasonable that punters are being ignored by said girls when it's blatantly fucking obvious that those same girls are available, but are actively choosing to ignore the majority of comms?

Life's not fair or reasonable.  They're not running an off license.

+5

Absolutely spot on... the more some punters swoon over an "amazing", "best ever" prossie the less I want to see her. I much prefer finding new blood or visiting prossies recommended via PM.

For me it would be something inbetween.

The ones reviewed by "respected" forum member(s), including the fawned over ones, would be a safe bet for future bookings. However, discovering new/fresh pussy is part of the punting experience and is highly recommended.  :drinks:




Online smiths

For me it would be something inbetween.

The ones reviewed by "respected" forum member(s), including the fawned over ones, would be a safe bet for future bookings. However, discovering new/fresh pussy is part of the punting experience and is highly recommended.  :drinks:

And me, a mixture of rated WGs and taking a risk in search of a gem on occasion is my modus, the latter sometimes pays off, sometimes doesn't. ;)

Offline Jimmyredcab



My message to WGs who require AW feedback - fuck off.


+1000

Prostitutes are ten a penny, my money, my rules.     :hi:

Offline akauya

Thats true but dependant on area. In London, Manchester i avoid the popular ones.

In Edinburgh or Glasgow you have next to no choice


Yes, I appreciate that. Sometimes I forget how lucky London punters are to have so much choice.


Yes, they have obviously earned the right to pick and choose, good luck to them.

Offline Quesadilla

They can pick and choose as much as they want, even those who aren't popular ... the problem I have, however, comes from the being ignored part.  :mad:

Why does that bother you - if they've picked and chosen - and chosen not to see a particular punter - then why wouldn't they ignore you?  It's the same as you blocking a WG on AW isn't it?  They don't need to explain why - in fact I'm pretty sure if they did you would get even more annoyed as you would not like the reasons.
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline NightKid

Why does that bother you - if they've picked and chosen - and chosen not to see a particular punter - then why wouldn't they ignore you?  It's the same as you blocking a WG on AW isn't it?  They don't need to explain why - in fact I'm pretty sure if they did you would get even more annoyed as you would not like the reasons.

Being ignored as in not bothering to reply to my request to meet with a simple no.
A prossie can choose not to accept my business, and not even explain her reasons why, but at least have the decency to let me know.

Thing is, most don't.  :angry:

Offline Ali Katt

There could be any number of reasons ie client using threatening tone or making WG feel unsafe, timewasters with stupid questions with no intention of booking. Usually If the client communicates clearly in a reasonable manner there should be no problem but if the WG is uneasy for some reason then for peace of mind her safety must come first.
Here's a few more:
* sounds like an Indian man
* sounds like a black man
* Asks for a quickie
* Asks for 30 minute booking
* Bumps a one hour booking off for an overnighter
* Man posted a picture of his cock and it is too big
* Prossie ran out of cocaine (= no bookings)
* Hangover
* Having a "fat day"

Offline Quesadilla

Being ignored as in not bothering to reply to my request to meet with a simple no.
A prossie can choose not to accept my business, and not even explain her reasons why, but at least have the decency to let me know.

Thing is, most don't.  :angry:

I can think of a few reasons to be honest - the simplest being that having decided a punter is not someone they ever want to see then why would they waste even one second of their valuable time on them? 

If you got an AW flirt from someone you weren't interested in would you send them a polite no or just delete and block? Personally I delete and block and even resent wasting that much time on them.  :unknown:
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)