Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: That Khloe Sexy Girl Everyone's Talking About (NW9)  (Read 4103 times)


65 review(s) for khloe sexy girl (62 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline tristen92

Saw Khloe recently after the rave reviews on here. The fact that she's fairly local and hasn't had much (if any) negative comments whatsoever made it a no-brainer. Though I found her profile/pictures a little plain looking and wasn't overly attracted to her beforehand, the abundance of posts praising her looks/attitude meant I couldn't not see her. With regards to the basics; her comms are very good and her spoken/written English also good. Her place is less than 5 minutes from Colindale tube station and is easy to find.

While this is a positive review, I think the only thing that put a downer on it for me was the unrealistic expectations that the prior reviews gave me. I imagined some flawless, Angelina Jolie resembling goddess to open the door and start playing Tomb Raider with my dick. This was my fault and unrealistic fantasy aside; she looks early-30s and is a good-looking woman, without being gorgeous. Her body mirrors those sentiments; nice enough but again my expectations clouded my thinking. Visually, her arse is her selling point; she has a bit of a stomach and average sized breasts. Her personality, however, is the difference - very cheeky and bubbly throughout - with a spontaneity about her which was refreshing for me. From licking my ears and face relentlessly to shoving her hand in my mouth, you never know what to expect. This is what's made her a UKP favourite I think - and though the aforementioned is an acquired taste, I digged it much like other members.

In terms of the actual sex, her OWO is good but doesn't attempt or entertain deepthroat of any kind. Very vanilla but doesn't use hands much at all which made a nice change. Position-wise, she'll do whatever you want - we went for doggie and mish mainly; the former being the personal favourite as watching her arse recoil through the mirror as I pounded was a pretty sight. She was noticeably more into mish and seemed “on the verge” before I had to cum. She did actually look a little disappointed so who knows - but she perked up and chatted thereafter. Only went for the one pop despite her being eager to please and asking me if I wanted more - I usually lose all appetite for it after a long, hard fuck so decided it'd be best to leave it.

So I am a part of the fan-club and will be going back to see her at some point; great VFM and we gelled personality-wise better than I have with any other escort. The only thing stopping her being a pretty much perfect punt is her inability to deepthroat even slightly – it’s the main thing I look for really. However, the one note-worthy comment on my part is that aesthetically speaking I think this forum has been a little generous. She is attractive but her quality of service, personality and enthusiasm is what makes her such a good punt.

As a final note; if anyone has experienced the other prominent Colindale girls as well as Khloe, if you could inform me as to how they compare it'd be much appreciated.

https://www.adultwork.com/ViewProfile.asp?UserID=2668244
« Last Edit: March 10, 2015, 06:27:06 PM by chefboyxo »
Banning reason: STD scaremongering


65 review(s) found for khloe sexy girl linked to in above post (62 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative)

Offline NightKid

While this is a positive review, I think the only thing that put a downer on it for me was the unrealistic expectations that the prior reviews gave me. I imagined some flawless, Angelina Jolie resembling goddess to open the door and start playing Tomb Raider with my dick. This was my fault and unrealistic fantasy aside; she looks early-30s and is a good-looking woman, without being gorgeous. Her body mirrors those sentiments; nice enough but again my expectations clouded my thinking.

All I have to say about this bit is; never buy into the hype and always go in expecting to be underwhelmed. That way, the good punts are easily elevated into great before you even know it.

Other than that, good review.

Thanks for very objective - this time - review. I hope you didn't tell her to put prices up.  :hi:

Offline tristen92

Yea it was a rookie error to go in with that preconceived perception, lesson learnt, but still was very enjoyable and only a minor disappointment.

And Type_O; I wouldn't be surprised if she did - very switched on, says she has a tonne of regulars and she was fully aware of her UKP hype. A girl clearly in demand.
Banning reason: STD scaremongering

Offline SamLP

Glad you enjoyed the punt and I agree with the perception going into the punt. I found her attractive but not a stunner. I rated her 7.7/10 in my review. However, her attitude and service is top and that's the most important part of the punt. I haven't been able to rebook her, she's a busy and popular girl.

Quote
... she looks early-30s and is a good-looking woman, without being gorgeous. Her body mirrors those sentiments; nice enough but again my expectations clouded my thinking. Visually, her arse is her selling point; she has a bit of a stomach and average sized breasts.
 
So I take it the photos are flattering?
There is no evidence of a belly there and she looks slim and trim with a great shaped bust.
5 years old I guess?

She did have bad reviews but had a previous profile. A couple of the pics were those of something model before. It might have been crystal or kristal model or not. She made a new profile when her last one had a minus rating on feedback.

Not that this has a bearing on current performance, but just pointing it out.

Offline tristen92

So I take it the photos are flattering?
There is no evidence of a belly there and she looks slim and trim with a great shaped bust.
5 years old I guess?
Her body is nice enough, but yes, she does have a slight belly and isn't as toned as the pictures make out. But she's still an attractive girl and well worth a visit.
Banning reason: STD scaremongering

Offline NightKid

She did have bad reviews but had a previous profile. A couple of the pics were those of something model before. It might have been crystal or kristal model or not. She made a new profile when her last one had a minus rating on feedback.

Not that this has a bearing on current performance, but just pointing it out.

D'you happen to know what her previous profile was again?

D'you happen to know what her previous profile was again?

Forgot the precise name but looking for it as we speak. I'll update if I find it. She also had a neg on here on that profile I'm pretty sure.

She did have bad reviews but had a previous profile. A couple of the pics were those of something model before. It might have been crystal or kristal model or not. She made a new profile when her last one had a minus rating on feedback.

Not that this has a bearing on current performance, but just pointing it out.

From the record her last active profile was https://www.adultwork.com/2260891 as Hot Khloe model. Can't remember exactly the minus rating perhaps I missed that.

 :hi:
« Last Edit: March 11, 2015, 05:26:59 PM by lewishamguy »


2 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline NightKid

Forgot the precise name but looking for it as we speak. I'll update if I find it. She also had a neg on here on that profile I'm pretty sure.

From the record her last active profile was https://www.adultwork.com/2260891 as Hot Khloe model. Can't remember exactly the minus rating perhaps I missed that.

There we go, cheers.


2 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

She definitely had one with only negative feedback, then hidden feedback, and not the one above.

Offline west8

If Khloe isn't a good example of how a change of ID and Profile, vastly improved comms and excellent service can lead to a turnaround in fortune, I don't know a WG who is.

16 very positive reviews on here in less than six months. Must be a forum record?

If only all the girls followed the fine example of consistent service set by Michelle, Khloe, Cindy, Adele, Dee, Ameera and Lindsey.

Seven sure-fire successful London punts (among others).

Offline smiths

Forgot the precise name but looking for it as we speak. I'll update if I find it. She also had a neg on here on that profile I'm pretty sure.

I don't recall seeing that, its not on here now under her present or immediately previous name where all 16 reviews are positive.

Offline SamLP

There was a topic which for some reason wasn't written as a review. Only read it now, but it's not recent. I don't think it holds much validity tbh but it's a funny old thread.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=24261.0

Offline NightKid

She definitely had one with only negative feedback, then hidden feedback, and not the one above.

Well, even if we disregard that, she has this thread (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=24261.0;all) that showed her being a bit odd even then.
Doesn't show up on the old profile reviews list though cause the OP didn't post it in the correct board and mark it as a proper review.

Edit: Sam beat me to it, again. Curses!  :D
« Last Edit: March 11, 2015, 06:07:20 PM by NightKid »

I will keep looking. I think it was Krystal or cristal or the like and model in the name. Negative review here and also minus feedback rating on aw then hidden feedback. Had a couple of her current pics on it.

Offline BeesKnees

There was a topic which for some reason wasn't written as a review. Only read it now, but it's not recent. I don't think it holds much validity tbh but it's a funny old thread.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=24261.0

I remember that thread! Is it right to dig up old news? I think her current levels of service sound better than her initial beginnings. Punters need to be informed of the most recent review/info rather than the old stuff. She's learned from her mistakes, like the mouthwash smokers breath thing

Offline west8

Well, even if we disregard that, she has this thread (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=24261.0;all) that showed her being a bit odd even then.

Doesn't show up on the old profile reviews list though cause the OP didn't post it in the correct board and mark it as a proper review.

Edit: Sam beat me to it, again. Curses!  :D

I think that every single reviewer on here would agree that Khloe is zany. It's what sets her apart from the WG hoi polloi.

Offline smiths

There was a topic which for some reason wasn't written as a review. Only read it now, but it's not recent. I don't think it holds much validity tbh but it's a funny old thread.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=24261.0

Well found Sam. :thumbsup: Fucks know why Tazz didn't do an actual review of that pisstake of a punt. Most certainly not been my experiences of her fortunately.

Offline smiths

I remember that thread! Is it right to dig up old news? I think her current levels of service sound better than her initial beginnings. Punters need to be informed of the most recent review/info rather than the old stuff. She's learned from her mistakes, like the mouthwash smokers breath thing

There is a possible consequence to a WG EVER offering a punter bad service, it can come back and bite her on the arse, in my view that's right and proper and as it should be. Her service fortunately for a number of us has vastly improved since then, and for ME its now that matters with a WG like Khloe.

I remember now that the profile I'm thinking of had a fake feedback at first, then 3 real ones, all negative (or 2). And it went downhill and she hid feedback. Then deleted profile, accumulating all of one positive and multiple negative.

I only bring it up in case it is of relevance in future. Whatever her service is now is what people will care about, as I said.

Offline smiths

I remember now that the profile I'm thinking of had a fake feedback at first, then 3 real ones, all negative (or 2). And it went downhill and she hid feedback. Then deleted profile, accumulating all of one positive and multiple negative.

I only bring it up in case it is of relevance in future. Whatever her service is now is what people will care about, as I said.

Do you mean fake then real on here or A/W and if on here was it definitely the same WG as in her free pictures on her present profile can you recall?

Offline NightKid

I remember that thread! Is it right to dig up old news? I think her current levels of service sound better than her initial beginnings. Punters need to be informed of the most recent review/info rather than the old stuff. She's learned from her mistakes, like the mouthwash smokers breath thing

There is a possible consequence to a WG EVER offering a punter bad service, it can come back and bite her on the arse, in my view that's right and proper and as it should be. Her service fortunately for a number of us has vastly improved since then, and for ME its now that matters with a WG like Khloe.

What smiths said.




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)