analqueen1 / Charlie

[john_n]

External Link/Members Only

First I got to say I wonder why so few from London go to see this great woman (or not reviewing her). It took me only 20-25 mins to get from Central London to her nearest train station. It's also only a few mins walk from the train station to her location. Had some minor problems finding the correct house, but after a quick phone call Analqueen1/Charlie guide me to the correct house.

Rang the bell and was greeted by a petite (5'3") and good looking woman dressed in black sheer stockings and underwear. She lives in a nice looking house in a quiet area and I was brought up to her bedroom. As mentioned in another review it's a great view when walking behind her up the stairs to the bedroom. Charlie is a bubbly girl with a great personality and someone I found it very easy to speak with as it was my first time with her. Up in the bedroom she had put on one of her gangbang videos on the TV to set the mood. Was offered the usual drink and opted for water as it was early in the day.

As you see from her profile this girl absolutely loves anal and if you are up for it, willing do anal during the entire booking. This was one of my reasons to see her, but due to some personal shortcomings everything I had planned didn't happen. Will come back to that later in the review. The  booking started with a little chat as that is something I prefer rather than go straight for business. We discussed the list of things I had sent Charlie that I wanted to experience.

Started with getting a few of her buttplugs out and me inserting them into her ass. Used three different buttplugs and kept fucking her ass with them for some time. We then got a couple of her dildos out and I used them to fuck her pussy for a few mins. Got to suck on her large erect nipples and it seems she enjoyed having them played with. Charlie then said it was enough attention on her and that it was time for me to get some pleasure. I didn't complain and it was time to get my dick out and into her mouth. She knows how to suck cock and I was having a really good time as she was DT'ing me. Time to fuck so on with the mac and position Charlie on her back. Started with mish position,legs on my shoulder and fuck her gently/slowly. Swap between holding her legs to the side and on my shoulders while fucking slowly and full throttle.

Now I want to try what I came for, so get her in doggie position and getting ready for some analsex. I just got to say OMG her ass is tight, I don't have a huge cock, but I had problems entering. I blame some on this session being after 4 1/2 hrs+ of punting the day before, but Charlie is REALLY tight and I did manage to enter for some anal in doggie position. It just felt fantastic and in hindsight wish I'd stayed in that posistion longer than I did. Asked if I was ready to try to fuck her ass while she was sitting on her bar stool. Really looked forward to it, but I just wasn't able to enter her ass again while she sat on the bar stool. Back to fucking her pussy again and now it was about time to blow my load and sent it all into her mouth.

The session ended with us talking for some time and I'm 100% sure I will be back. Feel I got some unfinished business and her ass isn't going to get the better of me next time Charlie is 100% genuine and a really nice women do be around. I highly recommend her and she is more than willing to do everything listed in the "Enjoys"-list in her profile

[password02]

I hope you got the OK from HD  to book AQ as she is 1 of his fav girls ????

Good update and review

[john_n]

I hope you got the OK from HD  to book AQ as she is 1 of his fav girls ????

Good update and review

Hehe...  Had to bow before him and kiss his feet first, but apart from that all went well

[Clooney]

I'm definitely gonna book her this year. All reports sound spectacular.

Only trouble in I believe evenings and weekends only, but I'm sure that can be overcome.

If I leav work bang on 5.30 I reckon I could be at hers by 7pm.

Is she into talking dirty? I'd love to see her totally dolled up in her shirt but classy little black dress goin from sophistication to anal slut in a heartbeat.

Is it really that easy to get to her from central London?

[john_n]

I'm definitely gonna book her this year. All reports sound spectacular.

Only trouble in I believe evenings and weekends only, but I'm sure that can be overcome.

If I leav work bang on 5.30 I reckon I could be at hers by 7pm.

Is she into talking dirty? I'd love to see her totally dolled up in her shirt but classy little black dress goin from sophistication to anal slut in a heartbeat.

Is it really that easy to get to her from central London?

I didn't do any dirty talking, but wouldn't be surprised if she would do it

I took the train from Liverpool Street Station and was at her station after 20 mins. Got to say this was at 12 as my booking was at 1pm.
Guess it might be a bit different during the busy hours, not UK based so I'm no expert on London traffic

[Hornydevil247]

I hope you got the OK from HD  to book AQ as she is 1 of his fav girls ????

Good update and review

Hello Mr PW

My permission was not needed. I recommended Charlie to John. 

HD

[Hornydevil247]

I'm definitely gonna book her this year. All reports sound spectacular.

Only trouble in I believe evenings and weekends only, but I'm sure that can be overcome.

If I leav work bang on 5.30 I reckon I could be at hers by 7pm.

Is she into talking dirty? I'd love to see her totally dolled up in her shirt but classy little black dress goin from sophistication to anal slut in a heartbeat.

Is it really that easy to get to her from central London?

Hi Clooney

You can book her for an evening booking or weekend with notice.

Whilst she is virtually on my doorstop, I can leave work in London and be at the local station near to her in under and hour.

HD

[Riprock]

Does she ever go on tour?  Sounds like a genuine anal freak!  You don't get many of those.

[Herges Adventures]

If she is at Potters Bar, quick trains from KX take 15 mins... 

Might have to make the trip; she sounds excellent ! 

[Hornydevil247]

Does she ever go on tour?  Sounds like a genuine anal freak!  You don't get many of those.

No she does not. Sorry

HD

[Hornydevil247]

If she is at Potters Bar, quick trains from KX take 15 mins... 

Might have to make the trip; she sounds excellent ! 

Hello

The nearest mainline station to her is fed from London Liverpool Street

HD

[UberX]

She looks very rough 

External Link/Members Only

 

[Milflover]

What's her nearest  station, as I don't drive

[ram2184]

She looks very rough 

External Link/Members Only

 

i agree with you 

look like a grandma's ass

[Clooney]

What's her nearest  station, as I don't drive

I think her nearest station is Cheshunt, isn't it? Can someone else confirm?...

[Hornydevil247]

She looks very rough 

External Link/Members Only

 

Hi Uber

You posted  the same shit on another review of her. Seeing as you like a geezer birds then why not try the Clapham Tranny. External Link/Members Only

i agree with you 

look like a grandma's ass

Hi Ram2184

When you actually contribute with a review then maybe people may view you other than a dickhead

HD

[password02]

Hi Uber
You posted  the same shit on another review of her. Seeing as you like a geezer birds then why not try the Clapham Tranny. External Link/Members Only

Hi Ram2184
When you actually contribute with a review then maybe people may view you other than a dickhead
HD

Funny - 

[john_n]

Nice one HD

Thought about saying something, but since I'm new here I was "afraid" to be shot down

[Herges Adventures]

Hi Ram2184

When you actually contribute with a review then maybe people may view you other than a dickhead

HD

 

[password02]

Hi Ram2184

When you actually contribute with a review then maybe people may view you other than a dickhead

HD

 

+1 even more funnier 

[Hornydevil247]

Nice one HD

Thought about saying something, but since I'm new here I was "afraid" to be shot down

Hi John

I don't normally get involved with trolls or whatever they are called on here.

You saw Charlie, Crocketman also and both of you had a great punt. That's all that counts.

HD

[Quesadilla]

Nice one HD

Thought about saying something, but since I'm new here I was "afraid" to be shot down

Don't worry mate we can recognise the genuine punters from the twats and trolls. Not sure what anyone gets out of criticising a girl they've never seen and is not to their taste.

And Ram people in glass houses (or with vast arses) should maybe not cast aspersions. I for one would tap Analqueen's arse gladly if she wasn't the wrong side of town for me.

[UberX]

Hi Uber

You posted  the same shit on another review of her. Seeing as you like a geezer birds then why not try the Clapham Tranny. External Link/Members Only

Hey Mr. Fluffydevil24/7 yes you are right I have reacted in another thread. The picture looks like Charlie just came from disposing her poo.    Anyway I am not a anal fan. I do not mind to fuck a tranny girls as long as they have a pussy.. I shall suggest you you better try your anal adventure with some of this tranny girls.

[Quesadilla]

Hey Mr. Fluffydevil24/7 yes you are right I have reacted in another thread. The picture looks like Charlie just came from disposing her poo.    Anyway I am not a anal fan. I do not mind to fuck a tranny girls as long as they have a pussy.. I shall suggest you you better try your anal adventure with some of this tranny girls.

Fucking the hole made by removing a dick does not constitute fucking a pussy.

If you can't even tell the difference between boys and girls I think we'll treat your taste in women as suspect at best.

[Hornydevil247]

Hey Mr. Fluffydevil24/7 yes you are right I have reacted in another thread. The picture looks like Charlie just came from disposing her poo.    Anyway I am not a anal fan. I do not mind to fuck a tranny girls as long as they have a pussy.. I shall suggest you you better try your anal adventure with some of this tranny girls.

Hi Uber

I'm only interested in real women whether it be their pussy or arse.

HD

[NightKid]

Hi Uber

You posted  the same shit on another review of her. Seeing as you like a geezer birds then why not try the Clapham Tranny. External Link/Members Only

Hi Ram2184

When you actually contribute with a review then maybe people may view you other than a dickhead

HD

You do realise people are allowed to have an opinion right? For the record, I think she looks pretty rough in some of her photos too & have taken her off my hotlist thanks to some of the white-knight comments.

One more thing, reviews aren't the be-all and end-all of UKP that most fluffies are trotting out these days ... the 4 out of 6 cheerleading positives you've given her explains why. 

[ram2184]

Don't worry mate we can recognise the genuine punters from the twats and trolls. Not sure what anyone gets out of criticising a girl they've never seen and is not to their taste.

And Ram people in glass houses (or with vast arses) should maybe not cast aspersions. I for one would tap Analqueen's arse gladly if she wasn't the wrong side of town for me.

the thing is i am not advertising my arse in aw

[Herges Adventures]

One more thing, reviews aren't the be-all and end-all of UKP

Be pretty pointless if no-one wrote them 

[Clooney]

I think that responding to someone else's review by slagging the girl's looks off is pretty poor form.

Just as some guys like tranny girls (no having a pop at that either by the way) it takes different shapes and sizes to make the world interesting. I've fucked girls from 16 (when 16 myself I hasten to add!) to 55 and size 4-6 to 16-18. I choose carefully, so have thankfully had few problems.

Also, this nonsense about being "fluffy" is bollocks too. A real fluffy review borders on the useless - floral fawning language, no real detail, etc.

Quesidilla in the past and now HD have been accused as such. Their reviews are written clearly and by people who obviously have manners and regard for the ladies in question, but they are always useful reviews. Just because they are not dripping with misogyny doesn't make them "fluffy" it's bollocks.

Also, I do recall Quesedilla writing a negative review quite recently. Fluffies would tend not to I'd guess, so this fluffy nonsense is totally bogus.

[Quesadilla]

I think that responding to someone else's review by slagging the girl's looks off is pretty poor form.

Just as some guys like tranny girls (no having a pop at that either by the way) it takes different shapes and sizes to make the world interesting. I've fucked girls from 16 (when 16 myself I hasten to add!) to 55 and size 4-6 to 16-18. I choose carefully, so have thankfully had few problems.

Also, this nonsense about being "fluffy" is bollocks too. A real fluffy review borders on the useless - floral fawning language, no real detail, etc.

Quesidilla in the past and now HD have been accused as such. Their reviews are written clearly and by people who obviously have manners and regard for the ladies in question, but they are always useful reviews. Just because they are not dripping with misogyny doesn't make them "fluffy" it's bollocks.

Also, I do recall Quesedilla writing a negative review quite recently. Fluffies would tend not to I'd guess, so this fluffy nonsense is totally bogus.

Exactly - I've had a couple of mingers that I've reviewed negatively to warn fellow punters, and at least in part as a result of that I choose my punts very carefully which is why the rest of my reviews range from positive to glowing.  HD also clearly chooses to see - and see again - girls who are well reviewed hence it might seem that his reviews look "fluffy". 

Since my last disaster I've mainly stuck to the well trodden path of regulars which is why I've had no reviews of late - nothing to add to what I've already said about them without it sounding like cheerleading. 

This whole fluffy thing is partly bullshit - there's a whole spectrum of punters who have a variety of different attitudes to punting.

But there's a huge difference between glowing reviews of a top notch girl and fluff that is dishonest, touting or cheerleading. I'm guilty of one but never the other, and it's clear from other reviews of girls like AnalQueen and those girls that myself and HD have seen that our reviews are not hyperbole. 

I never rave about a girl where I don't put my money where my mouth is and see her again and again - so as far as I'm concerned I have very little to gain from cheerleading as it just makes my regs more difficult to book.  But the alternative is simply not reviewing at all which would defeat the object of this site. 

[password02]

Some excellent points made in the last 2 posts from Mr C and Mr Q -

[john_n]

If all you can contribute with is negative remarks about a girls looks, keep it to yourself.

[SaneOnes]

If anyone has anything bad to say about Charlie's looks then they either haven't seen her or are living in an airbrushed deluded lala land.

[herbie007]

Thanks for the review john and glad you enjoyed. 

I've spoken to AQ, she sounds very horny indeed and right up for a bit of bum fun, so planning to go see her as soon as I’m up that way.

[NightKid]

Be pretty pointless if no-one wrote them 

It's equally pointless when they're mostly repetitive erotic short stories. We're here to share information, not get each other off.

I think that responding to someone else's review by slagging the girl's looks off is pretty poor form.
Again, it's an opinion. People are going to have it whether you like it or not.

A real fluffy review borders on the useless - floral fawning language, no real detail, etc.
Yes, and that includes cheerleading too. I already know what punter A thinks of prossie B from his first review of her, what else are same-ish subsequent positives supposed to tell me besides he'll probably end up white-knighting her when she's criticised?

... but they are always useful reviews.
I disagree. And judging by the response I received here, it seems I'm not the only one.

Just because they are not dripping with misogyny doesn't make them "fluffy" it's bollocks.
This shoddy defence again. Alright, since you fluffies place so much credence on reviews, I challenge you to find me one on UKP that's completely misogynistic in nature/tone, without a single valid criticism attached, even from the harshest of hardliners.

Also, I do recall Quesedilla writing a negative review quite recently. Fluffies would tend not to I'd guess, so this fluffy nonsense is totally bogus.
You do realise he was a self-confessed fluffy before that incident happened, don't you? Pick a better example. 

[NightKid]

Since my last disaster I've mainly stuck to the well trodden path of regulars which is why I've had no reviews of late - nothing to add to what I've already said about them without it sounding like cheerleading.

I never rave about a girl where I don't put my money where my mouth is and see her again and again - so as far as I'm concerned I have very little to gain from cheerleading as it just makes my regs more difficult to book.

See, Clooney? Even your mate gets it. Good on you, Q.

I'm guilty of one but never the other, and it's clear from other reviews of girls like AnalQueen and those girls that myself and HD have seen that our reviews are not hyperbole.

But the alternative is simply not reviewing at all which would defeat the object of this site. 

Nobody (not even me) is saying that we shouldn't review. But pointless, cheerleading re-reviews that serve no purpose but to brag are just that - pointless.
And then the same fluffy cunts use that obsolete bump in their review count to negate other valid opinions, which is what many feared might be the case when it was first introduced.

Admin gave us that function to make searching for reviews convenient, not for individual wankers to abuse it and feed their own ego with. 

[Quesadilla]

It's equally pointless when they're mostly repetitive erotic short stories. We're here to share information, not get each other off.

Also, I do recall Quesedilla writing a negative review quite recently. Fluffies would tend not to I'd guess, so this fluffy nonsense is totally bogus.

You do realise he was a self-confessed fluffy before that incident happened, don't you? Pick a better example

I think we need to define our terms - if fluffy means cheerleading / touting / white knighting then I would say I was never fluffy. I post genuine reviews based on my experience.

Fluffy here also seems to be used separately by some as a term of derision for those who post long detailed reviews and wax a bit lyrical. Personally I prefer reading that type of review as it gives me a much better feel for what I can expect from a wg. So that is naturally the type of review I write. There is room for both types of review and as a concession I always include a summary up front so you don't have to read the descriptive or "fluffy" bit. 

Fluffy also seems to be a flash point for disagreeing about attitudes to wgs. If at one end of the spectrum you might have an extreme case where a punter is a total mysoginist with zero reapect for women and sees them just as a means to empty his balls then at the other end would be a complete fluffy who thinks a wg is his girlfriend and suffers major EAS, white knighting and touting for his favourite at every opportunity. 

I actually don't think any regular contributor on this site sits all the way at either extreme - we are all somewhere off centre, some maybe more extreme than others.

As with the left/right divide in politics however the further left or right you sit the more it makes everyone else look like they are the ones at the extreme - just at the opposite end of the divide.

So I think for the most part the fluffy issue is bullshit. None of us want fake touting white-knighting reviews that are inaccurate.  We all just want to find better punts.