Popular media on UKEscorting.com

Author Topic: UKP Regional WG Hot Lists or Top Tens: anyone think they would be useful?  (Read 2836 times)

Offline west8

Tonight I started reading the 'outside' London reviews for the first time and there seem to be some real crackers appearing in the home counties. Often for bargain prices compared to central London.

As virtually every review is scrutinised by the members here, I think it's safe to say that 99% or more are accurate and as such extremely useful when it comes to making sensible punting decisions and avoiding bad WGs.

That said, it's not easy for someone from another area of the country to see the various groups of 'popular' regional girls without trawling through many, many reviews.

Which led me to thinking about how convenient it would be to have a regional UKP hot list or top 10 or whatever, based solely on the number of positive reviews each girl has accumulated on here in her particular region.

eg London would look something like:

Adele
Platinum Cindy
Michelle Independent
Hot Ameera
etc


Anyone think it would be useful to have the regional 'highlights' on a single page?

Offline ram2184

Banning reason: Previously banned troll


Offline 306

yes good idear  name the best in each area untill they vanish or become shit
may be nik could put up a tag
Banning reason: Constantly making nonsensical useless posts + Constantly ignoring admin requests

Online CoolTiger

I spotted a West Midlands thread on top punts in the past 6 months, and inspired by that, created a similar one for the East Midlands.

East Mids:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=50543.0

West Mids:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=49379.0

Anyone think it would be useful to have the regional 'highlights' on a single page?

No. It would just give the increasing number of forum fanboys more opportunities to tout their favourite pro$$ies.  :mad:

Offline Sedlmayer

No. It would just give the increasing number of forum fanboys more opportunities to tout their favourite pro$$ies.  :mad:

Sir, my thoughts exactly  :drinks:

Offline west8

I'm not sure you see what I'm suggesting. The 'lists' would be generated automatically by script, not by us punters.

The reviews are already aggregated on each review page:



What I'm suggesting is that there could be a single page (for example on the Punting Wiki) where a 'top ten' girls list is auto generated from the existing reviews.

No punter could influence that list - it would be generated server side.

So all we'll get are love struck fluffies flooding the reviews section trying bump their favourite whore.  :thumbsdown:

UKP is here for the benefit of punters... not pro$$ies - they get too much airtime as it is.  :mad:

Offline west8

So all we'll get are love struck fluffies flooding the reviews section trying bump their favourite whore.  :thumbsdown:

UKP is here for the benefit of punters... not pro$$ies - they get too much airtime as it is.  :mad:

That's also not possible. Site rules make it clear that each punter can only review a particular girl every X period of time.

The rules are already in place to ensure that only the girls who we, the punters, rate the best can make it onto the lists - via our collective reviews. ;)

eg, if I go to the 'Scotland' section, there is no way to see the 10 most (positively) reviewed girls. Other than reading dozens and dozens of reviews.

Offline cueball

So all we'll get are love struck fluffies flooding the reviews section trying bump their favourite whore.  :thumbsdown:

UKP is here for the benefit of punters... not pro$$ies - they get too much airtime as it is.  :mad:

Agreed, I get where west 8 is coming from but the fluffies could potentially swamp it...

Eg... I could podge dirty doris 3 times a week and put 3 reviews up per week putting dirty Doris top of the pops

Offline west8

Agreed, I get where west 8 is coming from but the fluffies could potentially swamp it...

Eg... I could podge dirty doris 3 times a week and put 3 reviews up per week putting dirty Doris top of the pops

You couldn't - the rules prohibit multiple reviews of the same girl by the same reviewer.  ;)

Offline cueball

That's also not possible. Site rules make it clear that each punter can only review a particular girl every X period of time.



I didn't realise that rule existed

Offline cueball

You couldn't - the rules prohibit multiple reviews of the same girl by the same reviewer.  ;)

I can't find that rule?

That's also not possible. Site rules make it clear that each punter can only review a particular girl every X period of time.

It is possible. Mr fluffy does a sickly review for the object of his affections..... waits for X amount of time, then puts in another one - or he just creates another account.

It's just another avenue for touters to exploit.

Offline west8

I can't find that rule?

I've read that multiple times on here. Reviewers are supposed to add to an existing review, not create a new one. I thought that each reviewer was only permitted to review a certain girl every 12 months, unless the Review changes from a positive to a negative (or vice versa).

Hopefully Nik or Admin can clarify.


It is possible. Mr fluffy does a sickly review for the object of his affections..... waits for X amount of time, then puts in another one - or he just creates another account.

It's just another avenue for touters to exploit.

Of course it could be exploited. But we've all seen how easily the touters/fake punters/fluffies/pimps/WGs posing as punters get exposed - and banned.  :)

Online RedKettle

The numbers you refer to are total reviews I believe - I assume you want the ratings to be on number of positive reviews only?

Offline cueball



Hopefully Nik or Admin can clarify.



For your idea to work westie I think the multiple reviews on same prossie would need clarifying by the above

Offline Sylvester

I think it's a good idea.  And the information already exists anyway, it is just a matter of aggregating it into a single location.

And there is nothing to stop people from swamping the site with reviews now.  Not sure why it would be any worse if this were adopted.
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy (Atticus Finch)

Online AnthG

Which led me to thinking about how convenient it would be to have a regional UKP hot list or top 10 or whatever, based solely on the number of positive reviews each girl has accumulated on here in her particular region.

Really nice idea I think. Simply as a lot of new members come along asking who should I see.

Its easier just sending them a link to that topic.

The only issue I can think that would need clearing up is what about girls who change their name. Should it be every review they have received or just the ones for her current name.

I've read that multiple times on here. Reviewers are supposed to add to an existing review, not create a new one. I thought that each reviewer was only permitted to review a certain girl every 12 months, unless the Review changes from a positive to a negative (or vice versa).

Hopefully Nik or Admin can clarify.


That rule was dropped. I read a post by admin in some thread no long ago, that multiple reviews for the same girl by the same punter is now allowed :hi:

Found it!  :drinks:

You can create a new review thread for every new punt with the same girl.

It was different before, but the old rules dropped to make it more simple.

Online smiths

Found it!  :drinks:

Absolutely correct, admin changed the rules on reviews so now a punter can do a new review on a WG he has already done a previous review on even if both reviews or more are positives.

 What he did advise is not to take the piss and do constant reviews on the same WG though.

A good suggestion as long as it takes minimal admin. If abused at least it will flush out the fluffies, Sergei's and stealth WG's.  :hi:

I don't think it would be useful. Punting is such a personal thing. We each have different needs and interests.

Conceptually, it would completely miss the point of punting which is individual satisfaction. An aggregation of fan reviews would be like the bestseller lists: I am not interested in E. L. James, I prefer Tolstoy or Guy de Maupassant. I understand the sentiment behind the idea but it would be a fluff-fest for fanboys and indulge a herd mentality which could be open to abuse by touts.

When I see a review on here, the first thing I do is click on the link to see if I would be interested in fucking the WG in question. If yes, I read the review, if no, I don't bother with the review and move along. There is also a voyeuristic element to reading reviews, akin to punting by proxy, which is only satisfied if one is interested in the girl to being with. In other words, if the WG does not meet my visual needs, I am not interested in how good her service is or how well reviewed she is.

A punter can do a search on AW and list his requirements. He can then find a suitable WG in respect of which he can search the reviews on here. This suggestion of a 'top ten' list would be a reversal of that process, and is underpinned by the mistaken premise that needs may be satiated because someone is on a list. Again, because of the personal nature of punting, I cannot see how that could be the case.

In summary: the idea misses the personal nature of punting, would be open to abuse and the utility it could potentially provide is already open to punters searching both AW and here, so no, I do not think it would be useful.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2015, 02:11:15 pm by Dave2014 »


Latest media on UKEscorting.com