Do you really want to split hairs on this?
What difference in service will Cindy provide at £140? Does it matter that she told everyone about the price rise?
My point isn't about the price rise, like said. It's the fact you quickly rejected publishing a review because her prices changed. If she provided you with a good service and had good attitude, what's wrong with writing a review and putting a footnote saying the prices were different when you saw her?
Some people have a power trip over their reviews. She wants to make money, and isn't cheating you on service and artirude
Gina's first review on here is the opener in this thread. February 25, 2015.
A few days later - seeing bookings increase - she has to make a decision.
1. The sensible option: leave the rate unchanged and build up a solid and trustworthy selection of reviews in the bank of Gina. That would be the medium term approach to success.
2. The foolhardy option: note the phone is busier and show your gratitute to MrSmiley for the free exposure by increasing your rate quite considerably - by 30% in fact - to £130.
Now, which of the above seems like gross opportunism?
As for the issue of password's review, no-one on here has the right to tell him or any other prolific reviewer what they should or should not do with their own fucking reviews.
Except of course for Adam and Nik.