I didn't overlook that . . .
Yes you did. You completely omitted that. Nice try.
. . . which is why I included the bit about you being the 'little spoon'
That merely establishes you to be a complete fantasist (as we can see from your devotion to this prostitute) and has nothing to do with anything I have said. Nice try.
- you're perfectly nice to WGs in person but are secretly someone who hates women (let's be clear - no one would discuss any woman WG or not the way you have if they didn't harbour deep-rooted feeling of resentment for them).
Really? Let's get this straight. My point has been to assert that when one hires a prostitute, one is essentially hiring her orifices. That is indisputable. If a punter were to hire a prostitute and then be refused access the the very things he paid for (the orifices) he would quite rightly feel ripped off and probably come on here to create a very negative review. In fact, there are many such reviews on here. So don't lie to either yourself or us by pretending that prostitution is anything other than hiring out one or more of your orifices for money. It isn't. If the use of those orifices is not part of the bargain, then it is not prostitution. Are you too stupid to understand this basic concept? You might not like the reality of it, because you are either a fluffy cunt or a female, but that reality is immovable, whether you like it or not. And no amount of crying by you about its characterisation as such is going to change that.
I note that you didn't deny being female.
I am done responding you you on this thread, you are clearly getting a lot more out of it than I am.