Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Posting AdultWork Private Gallery pics on UKP  (Read 3418 times)

Offline Jimmyredcab

At least some punters understand that we are normal people after all.

Princess, the only way to be totally safe is to not post face pics at all on Adultwork, of course that could have a negative effect on your bookings.

Once pictures are on the internet they are there for life ---------------------- I should know.       :(

Online Michelle Independent

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 328
Yes Jimmy but you know best that i am not recognizable from my pics on the street. Unlike some other unlucky girls tht dont know better than that.

Offline yorkshire123

At least some punters understand that we are normal people after all.

Sorry I must have missed the post when a member stated that you are abnormal?
Its simple for me, if a prossie doesn't want her anonymity put at risk then don't post a face picture be it in the private or public part of their AW profile gallery.
Personally I agree with the no face picture from PG & wouldn't do it unless said prossie proved to be a con artist however I still stick to my original post, the minute you sold me your pictures they then belong to me.
Banning reason: Making false malicious allegations against admin

Offline Mr Jones

Does anyone know how to do this. I want to post some as she is fine with it.

1. On the picture you want to insert, right click and select copy image location
2. Click on the insert image icon and paste the image location between the brackets.

or

a) copy the image url
b) click the 'insert image' icon, paste the image url

Offline PeppyG

Yes Jimmy but you know best that i am not recognizable from my pics on the street. Unlike some other unlucky girls tht dont know better than that.

Like the ones who post ID in the verification pictures for everyone to see?

Offline Happylad

Depends what pics you are talking about and this has been an issue in the past. If the girl in question has no face pics on general display I think it's totally unacceptable to post PG (or from some other source that a punter has somehow discovered - eg Facebook or Instagram) face pics on here. For the most part we're not talking about porn stars here. For me it's totally inappropriate and furthermore I suspect it will be a can of worms in the long run

+1

I hold no brief for the members of the Oldest Profession, but I certainly do not believe that all its members should be subjected to all manner of dirty tricks as a matter of course.

What the OP is suggesting is quite appalling, and it`s the sort of thing that gives all punters a bad name.  The OP, and several other contributors to this thread, seem to believe that paying to LOOK AT the photo`s (which is all that they are there for) somehow gives the OP the ownership of them and the right to do what he wants with them.  It does nothing of the kind; if the OP pays to enter a cinema and watch a film this does not entitle him to video the film and show it publicly, nor does the admission price to a football match entitle him to televise it and broadcast it; what he is suggesting is breach of copyright - theft, if you like it put more bluntly

Furthermore, perhaps he should look at it from the pro$$ie`s point of view - just how would he like it if she (or any other pro$$ie) got hold of a photo of him and posted it in THAT OTHER FORUM whose name we dare not speak - he would be posting here like a shot screaming his head off about the dirty trick being played on him by the wicked pro$$ies - but it is not beyond the bounds of possibiity that if he does what he suggests word will get around on AW and that is precisely what will happen, to which my response would be "serve him right".

Offline Gordo987

Depends what pics you are talking about and this has been an issue in the past. If the girl in question has no face pics on general display I think it's totally unacceptable to post PG (or from some other source that a punter has somehow discovered - eg Facebook or Instagram) face pics on here. For the most part we're not talking about porn stars here. For me it's totally inappropriate and furthermore I suspect it will be a can of worms in the long run

Well, I've never understood why some prostitutes are dead against having face pics on their AW page. Plenty of them do, and I would never punt with a woman whose face I've never seen. But if her face isn't showing in her PG, then I don't see how it could be posted on here :wackogirl: If, however, she's happy to show her face for a couple of quid in her PG, there is no "privacy" issue; its only a question of money. Also, if she offers Webcam services I assume she shows her face there too. Lets face it (pun intended) if you make your living out of sex, you can't be all that precious about what bits of your anatomy get looked at by prospective customers, can you?  :unknown:

Banning reason: Sending abusive PM to admin

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
Furthermore, perhaps he should look at it from the pro$$ie`s point of view - just how would he like it if she (or any other pro$$ie) got hold of a photo of him and posted it in THAT OTHER FORUM whose name we dare not speak

Stupid argument.
The punter is not the one SELLING FOR PROFIT his pics to the WHOLE WORLD like a prossie does on her profile.

Offline Loverat

For me it's totally inappropriate and furthermore I suspect it will be a can of worms in the long run

I fully agree. A very foolish precedent to set.
Banning reason: Constant issues with UKP, problem fixed you're banned

Offline Gordo987


... I certainly do not believe that all its members should be subjected to all manner of dirty tricks as a matter of course.

WTF? Who suggested anything of the sort? Are you sure about holding "no brief"?  :wackogirl:
Banning reason: Sending abusive PM to admin

Offline Gordo987


What the OP is suggesting is quite appalling


WTF 2. I said quite clearly that I am just wondering

Banning reason: Sending abusive PM to admin

Offline Happylad

Stupid argument.
The punter is not the one SELLING his pics to the WHOLE WORLD like a prossie does on her profile.

WRONG, you`re arguing from an entirely false premise. The pro$$ie is NOT selling the property in her pics, she is selling the right merely to look at them in situ, just as an art gallery sells you the right to look at the pictures on its walls, but NOT the right to copy them or take them away. Furthermore, I think that if you have another look at AW Rules you will see a clear statement that the photographs are NOT to be copied or reproduced, which is why AW deliberately made it as difficult as it could for copying to be done.

Offline Gordo987


Furthermore, perhaps he should look at it from the pro$$ie`s point of view - just how would he like it if she (or any other pro$$ie) got hold of a photo of him and posted it in THAT OTHER FORUM whose name we dare not speak - he would be posting here like a shot screaming his head off about the dirty trick being played on him by the wicked pro$$ies - but it is not beyond the bounds of possibiity that if he does what he suggests word will get around on AW and that is precisely what will happen, to which my response would be "serve him right".

WTF 4. Calm down dear and stop getting you knickers (used advisedly) in a twist. Read what I have written and what others have replied. Actually, I wouldn't mind at all. :D
Banning reason: Sending abusive PM to admin

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
WRONG, you`re arguing from an entirely false premise. The pro$$ie is NOT selling the property in her pics, she is selling the right merely to look at them in situ, just as an art gallery sells you the right to look at the pictures on its walls, but NOT the right to copy them or take them away. Furthermore, I think that if you have another look at AW Rules you will see a clear statement that the photographs are NOT to be copied or reproduced, which is why AW deliberately made it as difficult as it could for copying to be done.

This isn't about terms of sale but HOW the person came to have access to the pics.
A punter sending his face pic privately to a prossie (or vice-versa) is TOTALLY DIFFERENT from a prossie selling her pics to the WHOLE WORLD for profit.

Any pics posted for Sale the operative words being For Sale means you buy ..there yours. If she doesn't and is foolish to think they won't , want them passed on... Then she shouldn't have a PG. Face or not she runs the risk that they will be shared....

Offline Loverat

Seems like some people have an exaggerated sense of entitlement.  Just because you can physically do something does not mean that it is right.
Banning reason: Constant issues with UKP, problem fixed you're banned

Offline jsparky

WRONG, you`re arguing from an entirely false premise. The pro$$ie is NOT selling the property in her pics, she is selling the right merely to look at them in situ, just as an art gallery sells you the right to look at the pictures on its walls, but NOT the right to copy them or take them away. Furthermore, I think that if you have another look at AW Rules you will see a clear statement that the photographs are NOT to be copied or reproduced, which is why AW deliberately made it as difficult as it could for copying to be done.

+1

Just because the punters pay for it meaning you have the right to view in private, it doesn't mean you have the right to circulate it in public.

From another perspective, if you have taken nuke photos of your gf/wifes/etc., just because you have the right of photos doesn't mean you have the right to circulate them in public domain.

Remember the revenge porn on Tulisa? or other celebrities?



What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

Offline Gordo987

WRONG, you`re arguing from an entirely false premise. The pro$$ie is NOT selling the property in her pics, she is selling the right merely to look at them in situ, just as an art gallery sells you the right to look at the pictures on its walls, but NOT the right to copy them or take them away. Furthermore, I think that if you have another look at AW Rules you will see a clear statement that the photographs are NOT to be copied or reproduced, which is why AW deliberately made it as difficult as it could for copying to be done.

No. I can reproduce and republish a photograph that's in the public domain as long as I am not charging anyone. And if I have a flat that overlooks Chelsea football ground I can't be stopped from watching all their games and nor can I be prevented from asking my friend to join me on the balcony.  :cool:
Banning reason: Sending abusive PM to admin

Offline yorkshire123

+1

Just because the punters pay for it meaning you have the right to view in private, it doesn't mean you have the right to circulate it in public.

From another perspective, if you have taken nuke photos of your gf/wifes/etc., just because you have the right of photos doesn't mean you have the right to circulate them in public domain.

Remember the revenge porn on Tulisa? or other celebrities?

How your examples have any relevance to prossies selling photo's beats me  :unknown:
Banning reason: Making false malicious allegations against admin


What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

Offline Steve2

If a girl or anyone else doesn't want them shared, then they should not put them on the internet full stop. Anything on the internet is likely to come back and bite you at some point in the future


Offline Gordo987

+1

Just because the punters pay for it meaning you have the right to view in private, it doesn't mean you have the right to circulate it in public.

From another perspective, if you have taken nuke photos of your gf/wifes/etc., just because you have the right of photos doesn't mean you have the right to circulate them in public domain.

Remember the revenge porn on Tulisa? or other celebrities?

Lets face it pal, you really don't have a clue do you?  :wacko:
Banning reason: Sending abusive PM to admin


What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

Offline Loverat

If a girl or anyone else doesn't want them shared, then they should not put them on the internet full stop. Anything on the internet is likely to come back and bite you at some point in the future

So let's all make sure they get bitten then, eh?
And let's discourage them from putting up photos in case they get published on here.
Banning reason: Constant issues with UKP, problem fixed you're banned

So let's all make sure they get bitten then, eh?
And let's discourage them from putting up photos in case they get published on here.

I doubt they would get discouraged maybe a tiny minority... The simple maths for them is it generates money... And AW is not a site they go on for dates.. But each profile is there for one reason to generate money! Be it escorting or pics ...

Offline Happylad

This isn't about terms of sale but HOW the person came to have access to the pics.
A punter sending his face pic privately to a prossie (or vice-versa) is TOTALLY DIFFERENT from a prossie selling her pics to the WHOLE WORLD for profit.

You simply don`t get it, do you?  She is not SELLING her pics, she is giving him, for a small payment, a limited (in time) licence to INSPECT the pics - no more than that - just as a cinema gives a licence to watch the film, or a football club to watch the match, and AW makes it quite clear that the pics are NOT to be copied or reproduced.  She is certainly not giving him the right to post copies all over the  nternet If you want to reduce it to legal terms it`s a matter of copyright, and to go on and copy the pics and reproduce them elsewhere is simple theft of copyright just as the copying and pirating of films or music is theft of copyright.


Online cueball

I won't be posting pg pictures, not from any feelings of protection of the prossies privacy but because I won't pay to open their bloody galleries.


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)