Even bl**dy Saafe is wary of the professional Mr 10/10 . . .
When it comes to fluffy reviews, I can sort of tolerate Steve2 (for instance) as it's his
business and he doesn't hide the fact. I do mostly ignore his reviews (no offence Steve) but at least they say "she exists" and he's been around long enough not to take the piss. But with flurries of high ratings, remember
UKP has a cracking reputation and it will go down the swanny if a lot of punters simply lack discrimination. Prossies will play the game (it's their business) and only the savvier ones, once that
genuinely provide top service, will feel undervalued and punters will even look elsewhere for discriminating information.
A scale is only meaningful if it works. There's no "scale" involved if most girls get 10/10 and the one that doesn't turn up gets 1/10. Better to think of ten or twenty punts and spread them evenly across the ratings, explicit or not, so some are 2/10, some 3 and so on. If some fluffies can't distinguish between the vfm of one prossie versus another, they are thinking with their dick, which means the prossie effectively owns them.
Some illustrative comments below from the prossie forum, and bear in mind these are the ones they were forward enough to make!I just received an email from a guy blatantly promoting the writing of fake reviews. I'm flabbergasted honestly how he's tried to dress it up as a genuine business proposition. He's even attached a fake review for me to read.
He claims to be a professional copywriter, and offers to post these reviews online. Just confirms what I guessed anyway, that theres an awful lot of fake reviews around!
Just ignore him sweetie and let him carry on writing fake reviews for those who clearly need them, sad acts! X
Yep I got it too, loved how he tried to make out client's want to see a well written review that uses proper grammar and flows lol. Here was me thinking they just wanted to know that you were A: genuine and B: good
I had a guy offering this a few years ago and AW not only removed him but every review he had written too.
With people writing fake reviews be it on AW or elsewhere it makes a mockery of the whole thing. Nothing beats a good honest review even if it is not 100% flattering (I want to know if something is wrong). However fake ones make every single review worthless as if fakes keep getting put up people wont believe real ones either.
You could offer a discount or extra time, but I wouldn't write this on your profile, as then it can make your feedback look not so kosher, as it were. That is- if someone has been effectively endorsed to write something nice, then some clients may not believe the feedback.
(more will offer than actually give it)A sensible comment about another punting site, and a disreputable site at that
One other policy which may or may not have changed was the one which would get you instantly put on the No Reports list if you were seen to try to solicit good reviews by offering discounts, which might be worth keeping in mind. Plus reviews you have effectively bribed/paid somebody to write aren't going to have much credibility in the eyes of other punters as opposed to ones you've earned, surely?
I'm not that convinced though, as that site was known, if not for fake reviews, for reviews that were always
'highly complimentary.'Requesting a review or report in exchange for discount or extra time is not something I personally agree with.
In my opinion it may not be a true representation of the lady or how the meeting went if the client is just writing it
to gain discounts etc. Reviews are supposed to be genuine descriptions of the girl and session so that other men
can decide if they might want to see that girl
Personally I no longer use numerical ratings as it sucks of AW anyway for a start; but some sense of comparative value is necessary for a review to be worth anything. If a girl is "10/10" or even "8/10" then the question implied is, compared to what??
My guess is that punters that are constantly praising to the skies every girl they shag either have no sense of proportion, or are on happy pills, or are tarting it up to please the prossie in the hope of a discount. This, as the comments from the prossie site I think suggest, is so common that not only do experienced punters treat the reviews with a pinch of salt but prossies realise it is doing them no favours either.
When I fuck an EE who was, how shall we say, "okay" then I think, if I give her a rave review, even a positive, that is extremely unfair to top performers. In Edinburgh for instance, I have twice rated Sweet Petite very highly as her service is pretty well outstanding in all respects, even if she is older than most of my punts. Were I to rate equally highly someone who isn't in the same ball park, then both reviews would be meaningless, gratuitous, and offensive to the ethos of the forum. If I review Lanya, who has put on a bit of weight since she started and not quite the sweet innocent she convincingly portrayed a while ago, I balance this with the fact that she's reliable (which I am entitled to *expect* though so not a positive, just lac of negative) and the fact that she does one of the best gagging deep-throats around in the past year.
There is a large qualitative difference between the GFE and sensual massage of a top provider and a foreigner who gives a "nice" once over. There is a large qualitative difference between the blow-job that hits the back of the throat for five or ten minutes of enthusiastic gagging and someone who does a smiling knob-lick.
In other words, these people who "never have a bad punt" are not doing punters a favour and in addition are pissing on the genuinely good service providers. Give 'em Moet or Irn Bru and they'll go yeah, tastes good! Not only should they not be let within a mile of champagne, their effusive praises should be marked with a
DAFT KNOB sign.
