Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: How much does a popular Adultwork girl earn? - you'd be surprised  (Read 23863 times)

Offline Quesadilla

As always West8 is living in cloud cuckoo land.

A WG charging just £100ph and taking 1 booking per day 6 days a week 48 weeks of the year is on almost £30k - that's almost £5k more than the national average salary.

I can't think of many WG's who charge as little as £100ph and take so few bookings so I'd say the realistic range for a decent WG is more likely £40-130k. 

Let's not get into the whole tax argument - many WG's do pay some tax - otherwise they wouldn't be able to buy so much crap without falling under HMRC's watchful eye - but you only need to declare "enough" to suit your lifestyle - certainly less than would take you to the high rate tax payer brackets - and then the rest is tax free.  For a civvy who is earning £100k it's depressing when you see that actually you lose about £30k in tax! A smart WG who avoids paying tax on the top end could well be £15-30k better off again.

Regardless of expenses that is a fuck load of cash for someone to earn without any specific qualifications, training or experience.  It's a job almost any woman can do either full time or part time in addition to studies or a full time day job.  It offers total flexibility and autonomy, can be done from the comfort of your own home or while on the road. 

The civvy / legit life is hardly that great by comparison.  First there's discrimination in the workplace which means even a well qualified and experienced woman typically earns 10-20% LESS than any of her male counterparts (depending on job). I don't know about you but that would piss me off.

Partly because of the generally lower pay I've known plenty of women who take second jobs to earn extra cash - evening jobs which include bar work, waitressing, telesales, cleaning.  Earning a pittance with hardly less unsociable hours than escorting and far from glamorous.

And if you're a young woman who actually enjoys sex (shock, horror, yes many actually do) your other option is go to your local meat market (ie night club/Tinder) get chatted up by some drunk twat who might just about to be able to afford to buy you a drink and a kebab before clumsily groping you.  Repeat ad nauseum til you get bored of random encounters and find a "decent" bloke for a "long term" relationship - ie the same boring sex over and over again, in ever decreasing frequency.

As for risk of STI's - a civvy chick is much more likely to bareback once she trust her partner, but as we all know there are lots of boyfriends and husbands who could easily be banging other civvies or WG's anyway.  The bareback angle just increases the risk and for a civvy chick of course without any suspicion that her partner has contracted say gonorrhoea if she is infected but asymptomatic (as is very common) she is far more at risk of long-term permanent damage than a WG who is tested monthly.

I suspect the social stigma is probably the biggest issue. Even this is changing as sites like Seeking Arrangement and Whats Your Price look to make sugar-daddy / mutually beneficial type arrangements more socially acceptable.  Just prostitution by another name.

So as career choices go I'd say escorting is really not so bad. 
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Yep, that's exactly what I thought - he's becoming very predictable  :D

He's obviously building up to revealing some girl's financial details! I can guess who. I suspect it's some sinister form of leverage against her in case she decides to seek some form of payback for his suspicious revelations on here!

 :unknown:

« Last Edit: January 14, 2015, 04:49:14 PM by Bigus Dickus »

Offline Sedlmayer

 :drinks:
Yep, that's exactly what I thought - he's becoming very predictable  :D
:drinks:

Offline OakTree


So as career choices go I'd say escorting is really not so bad.

When you put it like that it doesn't sound so bad but even if you put the social stigma aside the fact is most women would find being a prostitute totally abhorrent.

Offline Sedlmayer

He's obviously building up to revealing some girl's financial details! I can guess who. I suspect it's some sinister form of leverage against her in case she decides to seek some form of payback for his suspicious revelations on here!

 :unknown:

Spot on. Spot fucking on. :thumbsup:

Offline Tjkooker

Why should a genuine punter care what a prossie earns.
Banning reason: Outing and trolling a punter because he posted a negative about his favourite prossie. White-knight fluffy that pretends otherwise.

Offline west8

He's obviously building up to revealing some girl's financial details! I can guess who. I suspect it's some sinister form of leverage against her in case she decides to seek some form of payback for his suspicious revelations on here!

 :unknown:

Oh look, it's minitum cerebrum yet again, racing to conclusions.

For the record:I have no financial details for any girl. Nor do I wish to have the financial details of any girl.

If you had read between the lines of my Michelle review (move to Brum / London house prices), the penny might just have dropped vis-a-vis who had inspired this topic.

I don't want to add you to ignore as I like your reviews and your sometime good humour, but after reading the white knighting to Ben's review of Adele and this tripe, I might have no choice.

Offline alenski

to get back to the question how much does a popular girl earn    i would say about  £ 150 k a year.what do i base this on. my regular in the ne.she is very popular needing to book a week in advance and works from 10 to 9 every day shorter hours on the weekend.assuming 25 clients per week would give her a income £3.000 a week.she has an accountant and she assures me she does pay tax if only to avoid being hit by a gigantic tax bill.she  owns a cottage in her own country and is investing in property there and is currently paying tax at the rate of 40%.as an escort she is highly accomplished and is educated to degree level.she is exceptional of course.

Offline Tjkooker

Oh look, it's minitum cerebrum yet again, racing to conclusions.

For the record:I have no financial details for any girl. Nor do I wish to have the financial details of any girl.

If you had read between the lines of my Michelle review (move to Brum / London house prices), the penny might just have dropped vis-a-vis who had inspired this topic.

I don't want to add you to ignore as I like your reviews and your sometime good humour, but after reading the white knighting to Ben's review of Adele and this tripe, I might have no choice.

Oh I'm sure he will be most offended when you pretend to put him on ignore. Your ego won't let you!
Banning reason: Outing and trolling a punter because he posted a negative about his favourite prossie. White-knight fluffy that pretends otherwise.

Offline west8

As always West8 is living in cloud cuckoo land.

A WG charging just £100ph and taking 1 booking per day 6 days a week 48 weeks of the year is on almost £30k - that's almost £5k more than the national average salary.

I can't think of many WG's who charge as little as £100ph and take so few bookings so I'd say the realistic range for a decent WG is more likely £40-130k. 

You're miles off even assuming a minimum of one per day at £100. Days can often go by without a penny (not that any girl would ever admit it on a forum like this).

Moreover, £30K is peanuts in London terms - even Zone 4/5/6.

Offline west8

Oh I'm sure he will be most offended when you pretend to put him on ignore. Your ego won't let you!

Troll #3 just added:



Bye TJ ..  :drinks:

Offline Tjkooker

Banning reason: Outing and trolling a punter because he posted a negative about his favourite prossie. White-knight fluffy that pretends otherwise.

There seems to be an assumption that there is consistency.  I know some great ones that get more requests for bookings than they are willing to do, who were on aw for quite a while before things took off. I know of three I saw in 2014 who had about 2/3 a week until things took off, not by choice, and the timeline of their profiles and review feedback etc lack matched it, and I could see on their profiles why it would be.

Also, some put rates as high as they can maintain clientele, whereas I know some don't raise above their rates they think are fair.  There are also those who go in for a short bit, those that see it a few years work to save up, those that do it but give up when it doesn't take off, those that know what they will do and want the cash/ time ratio, those that want maximum cash and minimal work, etc etc.

I think there is a huge range, and there probably is a big difference between average and the proportion of wgs who are average for wgs in income.   

Offline James999

Oh I'm sure he will be most offended when you pretend to put him on ignore. Your ego won't let you!

West8 pretended to ignore stealthshagger the other day and ended up looking a right twat (Again)  :sarcastic:

West8 pretended to ignore stealthshagger the other day and ended up looking a right twat (Again)  :sarcastic:


Habbit, I am sure.

Offline smiths

:cry: I'm hurt. Genuinely.

Always makes me chuckle when a poster i dont rate says they have me on ignore. Its brilliant, i will still reply to their rubbish if i choose to but i wont have to read their rubbish in reply. :hi:

Offline west8

I always wondered what a tintinabulation of trolls would look like - now I know:





 :drinks:

Oh look, it's minitum cerebrum yet again, racing to conclusions.

For the record:I have no financial details for any girl. Nor do I wish to have the financial details of any girl.

If you had read between the lines of my Michelle review (move to Brum / London house prices), the penny might just have dropped vis-a-vis who had inspired this topic.

I don't want to add you to ignore as I like your reviews and your sometime good humour, but after reading the white knighting to Ben's review of Adele and this tripe, I might have no choice.

Crack on old chap! I am not in the least arsed!  :thumbsup:

Offline Tjkooker

Always makes me chuckle when a poster i dont rate says they have me on ignore. Its brilliant, i will still reply to their rubbish if i choose to but i wont have to read their rubbish in reply. :hi:

I really like Snake8's replies though. As each one shows just how many lies he is prepared to spout to try and excuse his error or deflect his bullshit.
Banning reason: Outing and trolling a punter because he posted a negative about his favourite prossie. White-knight fluffy that pretends otherwise.

As it looks like he won't get banned, we might as well stick to thread topic.

I think there is a huge diversity in incomes and how wgs work/save/spend/how much they are at the office/conveyor belt or a few clients, duration of the work, etc.

I should add, I know that some of the reasonably popular wgs here have tried their way in associated trades at the same time as starting up, like porn, modelling, glamour modelling, stripping, nude non escort massage type things,  etc.

Offline Quesadilla

You're miles off even assuming a minimum of one per day at £100. Days can often go by without a penny (not that any girl would ever admit it on a forum like this).

Moreover, £30K is peanuts in London terms - even Zone 4/5/6.
You said "popular". No way a popular girl doesn't average the equivalent of £600 per week.

All the "popular" girls I see - including regs - are all definitely pulling way more than this  - all but one of them part time between day jobs / studies - and all but one is London based.

All the evidence I need for this is trying to book "popular" girls and having to wait at the very least a few days and sometimes as much as a week to find a slot - and I am very flexible on dates/times when I want to see someone.

And I am not talking about girls like Patinum Cindy or Adele or Little Katie who are so popular they literally can't keep up with demand and are booking weeks or even a month ahead.

So I say again you're in cloud cuckoo land.

If you are talking about the drug addled alcoholics you admit to favouring then I doubt they qualify as popular. At least not by my definition.

Or do you somehow define "popular" differently?
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Online RedKettle

I think a good looking girl with a reasonable personality who approaches it in a business like way could earn excellent money - £150k as mentioned above.  However most are not like that!

However a girl as I describe could probably earn similar money in one of many other professions and with a longer earning life ahead of her!

Offline Tjkooker

You said "popular". No way a popular girl doesn't average the equivalent of £600 per week.

All the "popular" girls I see - including regs - are all definitely pulling way more than this  - all but one of them part time between day jobs / studies - and all but one is London based.

All the evidence I need for this is trying to book "popular" girls and having to wait at the very least a few days and sometimes as much as a week to find a slot - and I am very flexible on dates/times when I want to see someone.

And I am not talking about girls like Patinum Cindy or Adele or Little Katie who are so popular they literally can't keep up with demand and are booking weeks or even a month ahead.

So I say again you're in cloud cuckoo land.

If you are talking about the drug addled alcoholics you admit to favouring then I doubt they qualify as popular. At least not by my definition.

Or do you somehow define "popular" differently?
Stop it.. I'm starting to warm to you again Q.

Any decent prossie will be seeing minimum 2 per working day. So would easily earn £1000 in an average week.
Banning reason: Outing and trolling a punter because he posted a negative about his favourite prossie. White-knight fluffy that pretends otherwise.

They also wouldn't work 7 days a week and 365 days a year if they had clients each day, otherwise they wouldn't last long at all I am sure.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)