Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: How much does a popular Adultwork girl earn? - you'd be surprised  (Read 23781 times)

Offline Sedlmayer

Well it never ceases to amaze me, the constant debating of earnings, whether they fiddle tax or benefits, what they spend money on. Have fixed up a punt today with a stunning teen 44 years younger than me. None of those questions will be uppermost on my mind on the day. Those that can do. Those that can't or don't seem to endlessly discuss. And yes will review shortly after.

Top man.  :thumbsup:

Offline west8

Didn't he get a temporary ban for a paedo remark aimed at JRC before Xmas? Now he's made another one.......

Re-read the wanker of the week thread. Specifically the parts where a certain person was nominated for his comments in which he tried to justify that a 14 year old was 'old enough'.

Sick, but that was his opinion ... not mine.


Nasty! People have been banned for this. You also made a veiled threat about me recently too.

Minimus cerebrum: No, I didn't.
« Last Edit: January 15, 2015, 03:42:58 PM by west8 »

Offline PumpAction

Re-read the wanker of the week thread. Specifically the parts where a certain person was nominated for his comments in which he tried to justify that a 14 year old was 'old enough'.

Sick, but that was his opinion ...

It was 12 years old. 14 is milf for him.
Completely irrelevant though and cheap and gratuitous.
« Last Edit: January 15, 2015, 03:51:57 PM by PumpAction »

Offline hendrix

Well it never ceases to amaze me, the constant debating of earnings, whether they fiddle tax or benefits, what they spend money on. Have fixed up a punt today with a stunning teen 44 years younger than me. None of those questions will be uppermost on my mind on the day. Those that can do. Those that can't or don't seem to endlessly discuss. And yes will review shortly after.

Correct  :thumbsup:

And if they did pay the correct amount of tax and then put prices up to maintain profits as any sensible business would do, the whiners would complain about the price rise!  :sarcastic:

Who gives a fuck about all that when you're balls deep in a top girl?.. Maybe that's the problem.. Too much bitterness and envy and not enough punting.

Offline Quesadilla

Re-read the wanker of the week thread. Specifically the parts where a certain person was nominated for his comments in which he tried to justify that a 14 year old was 'old enough'.

Sick, but that was his opinion ... not mine.


Minimus cerebrum: No, I didn't.

Big difference between a philosophical debate about the age of consent and actually having underage sex something I categorically said I would never do.   

Suggest you get your facts straight Snake8 - firstly this didn't happen in the WOTW thread, and I was not nominated for WOTW during that discussion.  Somebody else was nominated in another thread I defended them in WOTW playing devil's advocate as I often do. 

You really ought to think before making baseless accusations fucktard. 
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline Quesadilla

It was 12 years old. 14 is milf for him.
Completely irrelevant though and cheap and gratuitous.
Same goes for you fucktard no.2 - making baseless accusations is not big or clever.
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline west8

Big difference between a philosophical debate about the age of consent and actually having underage sex something I categorically said I would never do.   

Suggest you get your facts straight Snake8 - firstly this didn't happen in the WOTW thread, and I was not nominated for WOTW during that discussion.  Somebody else was nominated in another thread I defended them in WOTW playing devil's advocate as I often do. 

You really ought to think before making baseless accusations fucktard.



Here are the facts. This is what you wrote:

Quote from: Quesadilla
I am also not trying to suggest that every real pervert / paedeo should get away with it by saying "he / she was asking for it".  I'm just telling you that sometimes at least, when an adult who has an affair with someone underage says "but he/she seduced me!" it actually can be true and I can say that from my personal experience.

Offline Quesadilla



Here are the facts. This is what you wrote:
Quote from: Quesadilla
I am also not trying to suggest that every real pervert / paedeo should get away with it by saying "he / she was asking for it".  I'm just telling you that sometimes at least, when an adult who has an affair with someone underage says "but he/she seduced me!" it actually can be true and I can say that from my personal experience.

Not going back down this track again as it obviously evokes strong knee-jerk reactions in those that have kids (but perhaps can't remember being kids). 

The above is somewhat taken out of context - as I made plain, based on my own personal experience at 12 years old I was sexually mature for my age and would have been extremely grateful for an older woman to take my virginity.  I also stated that I fully understood that if a woman had done that they would have been breaking the law. 

To reiterate - the age of consent is entirely arbitrary - it varies from country to country and through history.  In this country it's been perfectly acceptable in the not-too-distant past to marry girls as young as 9! 10-12 years of age was common up to 1875 when it was raised to 13 and then raised again in 1885 to the current age of 16. 

The law is the law and I abide by it but the great thing about a democracy is that laws can be discussed and reviewed and citizens can have an opinion on them as I do.

Discussing a law in both a historical context and arguing against it from personal experience does not make me a lawbreaker. 

Making baseless accusations drawn from a philosophical discussion makes you a twat.  :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: January 15, 2015, 04:33:23 PM by Quesadilla »
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline sam55

Given that most of them would struggle to hold down a minimum wage job in Tesco due to flakiness, unreliability etc, it's not such a bad income.

I know that's the generally accepted view of prossies, but I have to say in my experience it's mostly true!

Offline Quesadilla



Here are the facts. This is what you wrote:
Oh, and let's be clear for all reading this - the ONLY reason you're now resorting to pathetic ad hominem attacks is that you have been soundly embarrassed in this thread yet again, with your pathetic OP, complete failure to justify anything you've asserted and frequent lying and u-turning to try and get you out of the hole you seem determined to keep digging.  :sarcastic:

Dig away mate your chickens are coming home to roost.  :sarcastic:
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline Sedlmayer

Re-read the wanker of the week thread. Specifically the parts where a certain person was nominated for his comments in which he tried to justify that a 14 year old was 'old enough'.

Irrelevant to what I was saying. YOU, snake8, got a temporary ban for insinuating that JRC liked to punt under-age girls.
Now you're back making paedo slurs against members again. You've learned nothing.

Your comments on this thread have been inconsistent with your original post about popular prostitutes living in "penury".
You've squirmed and slithered, as you always do - now you're trying to say that your comments only refer to girls working zone 1 hotels and the reason they have no money is that they blow it all in what I presume are rip-off West End nightclubs (you quote names that us proles have never heard of because we're too busy earning money and shagging prostitutes).

The truth is obvious to the genuine guys on here.
Your original post was very clearly intended to lead to a revelation about a certain prostitute of your (probably over-familiar) acquaintance), which you wished to tease us with a little bit before you dropped your "bombshell".
A couple of us  issued a spoiler, predicting what you were going to do - since then your comments have been an incoherent series of irrelevant baseless assertions and ad hominem attacks. Your big idea now is to ostentatiously put people that disagree with your nonsense on your ignore list. Posting a screen shot of that list was described by someone other than myself as the most childish post they'd ever seen.......

The sooner WOTW is open again, the better. Snake8, Uberwanker, WOTY, wanker extraordinaire.
A wankers' wanker.
« Last Edit: January 15, 2015, 05:28:12 PM by Sedlmayer »


Re-read the wanker of the week thread. Specifically the parts where a certain person was nominated for his comments in which he tried to justify that a 14 year old was 'old enough'.

Sick, but that was his opinion ... not mine.


Minimus cerebrum: No, I didn't.

What did you mean here then?

Thank you for not denying my accusation. We both know which girls you have been interrogating recently.

I just wonder why.

Always remember this: money can never buy loyalty .. but it can and does buy a FUCKLOAD of disloyalty.

Oh btw why would anyone spent their punting time interrogating anyone about you?  :rolleyes:

You really are so far up your own arse you should consider a career as an endoscope!  :sarcastic:


Turnover not profit:



nice summary,so as has been said before a central london like platinum cindy for instance is probably clearing around 150k i reckon.
of course what is not being factored in here is that there are some punters with more money than sense who will be either giving their girls either large tips on top or other gifts

Offline socks

Fairy snuff! Possibly a bit late in the day and I'm jet-lagged having flown back from Munich... :lol:
  :hi:
furry muff  :cool:

Turnover not profit:



I'd be surprised if any wg did 8 1 hour appt's a day. Not realistic in reality.

tcm

Offline superchamp

Turnover not profit:



Apparently the average volume of cum in a single ejaculation is 2.75ml so at one extreme a WG has to mop up/bin/swallow about .75 litres of spunk per annum and at the other extreme just over 5.00 litres  :hi:

Apparently the average volume of cum in a single ejaculation is 2.75ml so at one extreme a WG has to mop up/bin/swallow about .75 litres of spunk per annum and at the other extreme just over 5.00 litres  :hi:

I am sure an artificial insemination clinic would pay a small fortune for 5 litres of prime baby glue!

Sounds like a way for the impoverished (as suggested by West8) prossie to increase her paltry earnings!

I can offer good financial advice ladies as well as impale you!   ;)

  :lol:


Offline unclesweetheart

My biggest outgoing last year was games consoles.  :blush:

What is it with WGs and gaming? Just asking. Not at all interested in it myself.
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy + Sharing account with banned member (Atticus Finch aka Sylvester)

Offline Sienna_Bronze

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 288
What is it with WGs and gaming? Just asking. Not at all interested in it myself.

I don't know? I'm not into it at all, I thought it was more of a mans thing?
Banning reason: Trolling

Offline CupidStunt

I'd be surprised if any wg did 8 1 hour appt's a day. Not realistic in reality.

How long is a shift in a back-to-back parlor, and touring sp's? You sure it's not realstic or just hoping?

Offline berksboy

     8 in a day is easily done and dont forget there is only 50mins in a prossie hr .

How long is a shift in a back-to-back parlor, and touring sp's? You sure it's not realstic or just hoping?

In a parlour maybe, as a lot will be half hour punts with a queue of guys waiting. But not for Indy's doing hour or longer punts. Think about the logistics of it....

tcm

Offline smiths

In a parlour maybe, as a lot will be half hour punts with a queue of guys waiting. But not for Indy's doing hour or longer punts. Think about the logistics of it....

tcm

Some WGs that advertise as Indies can be available for 14 hours or more in a day though so could fit in 8-10 punters if they are that popular. Personally i view it that ALL WGs work back-to-back bookings wise cashing in while they can, although i accept some dont work like this but i wouldnt know for definite which do and which dont.

In a Parlour both the WGs and pimp/s want to do back-to-back bookings of course so cram in as many punters as they can. The old knock on the door is the sign the WG needs to get you out as she has another punter. Plus in an amazing manipulation of time some parlour clocks steal time off punters, that time throughout the day can add up to squeezing another punter in. :hi:

Offline berksboy

"Think about the logistics of it...."  Yep 8 x 50 mins into a 10hr day is ................... not hard to do !


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)