Escorts that will only meet after many CAM sessions SCAM?

[jac0bin]

Has anyone noticed a lot of escorts who tick they escort but will only meet with clients after a number of cam sessions?
Or they say they have to feel 'comfortable' with probably hours of cam sessions if true and significant cost to the poor fool who believes them?

When I checked a couple I noticed that all the feedback or comments were on the camming as opposed to meeting.
Theses escorts need to be exposed and I'm wondering if this is the place of should I name and shame those in the scam section.
Has anyone else noticed this?

[akauya]

Has anyone else noticed this?

Not really because I don't do camming that much, especially not on AW - why pay when you can watch free on External Link/Members Only

[smiths]

Has anyone noticed a lot of escorts who tick they escort but will only meet with clients after a number of cam sessions?
Or they say they have to feel 'comfortable' with probably hours of cam sessions if true and significant cost to the poor fool who believes them?

When I checked a couple I noticed that all the feedback or comments were on the camming as opposed to meeting.
Theses escorts need to be exposed and I'm wondering if this is the place of should I name and shame those in the scam section.
Has anyone else noticed this?

When i see such profiles i move on, i have zero interest in camming and most certainly wouldnt ever pay for it. As to naming and shaming if they are advertising as cammers its up to punters to pay them or not. If they are actually promising a punt after the punter has paid for some cam sessions its pretty naive to take their word that would happen in my view. My advice is check with admin about naming and shaming, how i see it is only the punter who has been deceived can name and shame as only he would know what was promised.

[Anadin]

I like to cam with escorts before I see them but if it's a requirement then you know it's a scam. I also don't trust anyone with loads of camming feedback and no escorting feedback and often they'll have an insanely high price per hour, not much point in naming and shaming as the scam is pretty obvious.

[potato]

I also don't trust anyone with loads of camming feedback and no escorting feedback and often they'll have an insanely high price per hour, not much point in naming and shaming as the scam is pretty obvious.

I don't know, if they are named as obvious cam scammers on UKP then they are Googleable ( is that a word? ) and it might lead them to change their game..

[SmackmaBitchUp]

I feel it's an easy way just to get you to cam so they make there money! Most will make you want to die to see them and then Kerrrrching! Your paying a fortune for the pleasure!!!
This one popped up and I would luv to smash her back door in but I'm thinking with the brain cells not dick this time 

 External Link/Members Only

[starman555]

Here is a scammer..You will NEVER get to meet her.....External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[SmackmaBitchUp]

Here is a scammer..You will NEVER get to meet her.....External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Fuck me it's Olive from on the Buses! 

[CatBBW]

Here is a scammer..You will NEVER get to meet her.....External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I'm looking for the "red hair" and "voluptuous figure" she talks about in her profile - because all I see is a slim, mousy-haired lady

Oh yes, and in her text she says she has green eyes, but in the stats under her profile pics it says Blue.

[Boundless]

Not really because I don't do camming that much, especially not on AW - why pay when you can watch free on External Link/Members Only

Ahh, another fan of Chatterwank. 

Considering it's free it is sometimes far more preferable for me than seeing some 60 quid smelly slag.

[sushi]

I feel it's an easy way just to get you to cam so they make there money! Most will make you want to die to see them and then Kerrrrching! Your paying a fortune for the pleasure!!!
This one popped up and I would luv to smash her back door in but I'm thinking with the brain cells not dick this time 

 External Link/Members Only

With £80 for the half hour and £180 for the hour its obvious maths isnt her strong point and bareback on her likes list?.. Obviously a cam scam. £4 a minute in private.

[Ben4454]

Never fall for these kinds of hoops. Either she is using a business strategy to make more money or she is a hap. Which means half assed prossie who is treating the site as a  enhanced dating website with the added bonus of getting paid. These types give crap rip off service anyway.

[Thepacifist]

I would never cam, I see it as a waste of money. I prefer the real thing 

[cueball]

No camming for me neither, if a wg insists on camming first then I won't be one of her punters. It's just a get more money out of you bollox

[shrewsmale]

Only one I would consider it with is emily_balfour as she genuinely is just picky it seems. You need to be loaded mind

[CBPaul]

Personally I don't see the point of camming, it's either the real thing or using something from the plentiful supply of free wank fodder.

Can't say I've seen loads of profiles like this but then again I'm not specifically looking for them. I would move on, no way I would jump through that sort of hoop in the vague hope that I might get to meet and shag her.

There are plenty of profiles with the escort box ticked but the girl has no intention of ever escorting, just camming. They just want to catch as many as possible for a cam session.

[west8]

I'm guessing the cammers fulfil an obvious gap in the market - guys who live in relatively remote locations with poor transport connections.

I often read posts on here where members complain of living in 'punting deserts'. Perhaps they are more likely to pay a cammer.

Personally I see no point whatsoever in paying to 'look'. Especially when it's actually cheaper to pay for the real thing.

[akauya]

Ahh, another fan of Chatterwank. 

Considering it's free it is sometimes far more preferable for me than seeing some 60 quid smelly slag.

Yes, it can be good, although probably 90% of the girls vary from munters to passable, there are some stunners there doing unspeakable things to their fannies and arses - and all for free

I don't watch it that often and only when I feel like watching something different to hard porn. You can only see so much of hard cocks ramming into anuses until you get desensitised - which is not a good thing. So sometimes watching a beautiful girl cavorting naked can be a good change of scene.

[Boundless]

Yes, it can be good, although probably 90% of the girls vary from munters to passable, there are some stunners there doing unspeakable things to their fannies and arses - and all for free

I don't watch it that often and only when I feel like watching something different to hard porn. You can only see so much of hard cocks ramming into anuses until you get desensitised - which is not a good thing. So sometimes watching a beautiful girl cavorting naked can be a good change of scene.

There's a lesbian couple on there that live together and it's obvious by their lovemaking that they are totally besotted with each other. I find it difficult not to get the tissues out when I see them online.

[adindas]

This is an ancient trick, similar to what is so called an advance payment.
I wonder if the punter still fall into this trap as the trick is already well known since  the early day.
Moreover there are a lot of other WGs out there to choose from ...

The exception of course if Cam-Corder is what you are really after. 

Has anyone noticed a lot of escorts who tick they escort but will only meet with clients after a number of cam sessions?
Or they say they have to feel 'comfortable' with probably hours of cam sessions if true and significant cost to the poor fool who believes them?

When I checked a couple I noticed that all the feedback or comments were on the camming as opposed to meeting.
Theses escorts need to be exposed and I'm wondering if this is the place of should I name and shame those in the scam section.
Has anyone else noticed this?

[Mr Farkyhars]

I also don't trust anyone with loads of camming feedback and no escorting feedback and often they'll have an insanely high price per hour, not much point in naming and shaming as the scam is pretty obvious

Naming and shaming would save each punter from ploughing through the feedback in order to reach the conclusion you describe.. so very much UKP territory in my view, much as we point out dodgy WGs with escort profiles.

[Aspen]

I would never cam, I see it as a waste of money. I prefer the real thing 

It's pointless nonsense, but it seems there are a lot of mugs out there that will pay for it because they are too afraid to go and actually meet someone.

Same with the private galley scams. I avoid all profiles that have either PG or cam, because 99% of them are not there to escort. That narrows the field down a lot, but still 90% of what's left are no good either.

[Anadin]

It's pointless nonsense, but it seems there are a lot of mugs out there that will pay for it because they are too afraid to go and actually meet someone.

Bloody hell you lot are judgemental, what makes you think we're too afraid to go out and meet anyone? Camming is merely live interactive porn, it's usually way too expensive for me to enjoy but a short session to see what an escort looks and sounds like is awesome.

Naming and shaming would save each punter from ploughing through the feedback in order to reach the conclusion you describe.. so very much UKP territory in my view, much as we point out dodgy WGs with escort profiles.

Nowt wrong with doing it if you want but there's a lot of them and there wouldn't be any escorting feedback to plough through if she was a just a camgirl, there very rarely is.

[Aspen]

Bloody hell you lot are judgemental, what makes you think we're too afraid to go out and meet anyone? Camming is merely live interactive porn, it's usually way too expensive for me to enjoy but a short session to see what an escort looks and sounds like is awesome.

Oh well I don't particularly like porn either. YMMV

And I don't speak for anyone else here either. It's just a viewpoint thrown into the ring. The point about discussion and debate is that one can see different aspects when they hear about the experiences of others.

What I find quite surprising is that there are so many girls 'apparently' making a lot of money just camming. That's not a problem for me, and anyone who wants to pay to do that it's up to them. No judgement there. Where it does really grate is that there are those that use the lure of escorting to entice cammers when there is never any chance of an actual meeting taking place. There must be a lot of guys get sucked into that to justify the apparent camming figures, and yes I do think they are mugs, because they think they are going to meet the girl and that's never gonna happen.

The PG scams are somewhat similar, but the effect is greater because they clutter up the pages so you can't see the wood for the trees.

[Thepacifist]

Bloody hell you lot are judgemental, what makes you think we're too afraid to go out and meet anyone? Camming is merely live interactive porn, it's usually way too expensive for me to enjoy but a short session to see what an escort looks and sounds like is awesome.

Nowt wrong with doing it if you want but there's a lot of them and there wouldn't be any escorting feedback to plough through if she was a just a camgirl, there very rarely is.

I'm not judging anyone here, if you enjoy a cam session go for it.