Ubon Thai Therapy - Leeds (B&S - walked)

[wakefieldlad13]

Ubon and the other shops connected with it does have a number of active VS adverts, though not in Ubons name and these all show B&S pics and names (basically the girls are locals and are looking after their own discretion)

This is one of the VS adverts they currently have live, External Link/Members Only and the displayed number is the one i used to make contact 07547394899

This is one of the websites they also use
External Link/Members Only

I was under the impression that a specific girl i know was working at Ubon so i had coms and arranged to see said girl later that day, all confirmed by text


On arrival i parked in the housing estate behind the shop, not a great area but in all the years i have been visiting this place, it has always proved to be safe for both man and motor
It was a very busy day on York road, and anyone who knows this place knows that the entrance is not very discrete so i sent another text asking for the door to be unlocked as i had arrived, however, i still had to ring the bell and was left waiting for a few mins

The door opened with the girl behind it and in i stepped as the door closed behind me

I looked round to see a different woman to the girl i was expecting

You got booking she asked
Yes i replied, i messaged earlier and booked with x girl

Oh, i not know that girl
Followed by, its ok, how long you want?

At that i took out my phone (this was not my punting phone as that was in for repair) and showed this woman the messages including the return message confirming my booking with the girl i asked for

Oh she said, i not know anything about that, i not do phone, someone else do that, and then said today we have Naree who is busy with another customer and me, im Cherry

I recognised the woman, i have seen her out with some of the other girls from here, though i dont know anything about her other than her Thai name, she would be maybe 55-60ish or at least looks it

She again asked me how long i want? and i replied that i was not happy that the person i had booked to see was not actually working!

Followed by, no, its ok, im not staying, then turned and left

Im unsure who was manning the phones, but they would not have recognised my number and maybe wouldnt have tried to B&S me had they known, no excuse IMO, hence i walked

30 mins later i was in Sabagnna in Halton, review to follow

[scouting]

Ubon, booked a specific girl by name but was allocated Cherry, i walked

Narrative such as this needs to go in the body of the review mate, you could type it as a first line.
The title of the review should only have SP Name - Location - (B&S / TOFTT / SCAM label if needed)

I've left Cherry in the title as she was the girl you walked from, if you want it changed to the girl you booked please say.

[wakefieldlad13]

Ubon, booked a specific girl by name but was allocated Cherry, i walked

Narrative such as this needs to go in the body of the review mate, you could type it as a first line.
The title of the review should only have SP Name - Location - (B&S / TOFTT / SCAM label if needed)

I've left Cherry in the title as she was the girl you walked from, if you want it changed to the girl you booked please say.

The new title is now misleading, even though Cherry was NOT appealing to the eye, the negative was NOT against her, and in the current context her name should not be in the title. the red was against the shop and the coms as Cherry herself may have proved to be a really good and worthwhile provider

This is a genuine review, made as per rules, a booking request was made and accepted and would most likely have been moved from the massage thread had i not included the allocated girls name
And whilst i erred in judgement, as per rules regarding the title, IMO, the title would have been more appropriate without ANY providers name at all, and the only reason i put Cherrys name there was because of the current position of moving reviews without a name, and she was the allocated girl on arrival

Maybe a more appropriate title would be, UBON, LEEDS, B&S walked


Naming the girl i believed i had booked would be wrong as it was the 3rd party info i had received which was incorrect, the B&S came as a result of the person doing coms confirming to me that said girl would be available at my time

A perfect example of why in some cases, unnamed reviews should be accepted

[scouting]

The new title is now misleading, even though Cherry was NOT appealing to the eye, the negative was NOT against her, and in the current context her name should not be in the title. the red was against the shop and the coms as Cherry herself may have proved to be a really good and worthwhile provider

This is a genuine review, made as per rules, a booking request was made and accepted and would most likely have been moved from the massage thread had i not included the allocated girls name
And whilst i erred in judgement, as per rules regarding the title, IMO, the title would have been more appropriate without ANY providers name at all, and the only reason i put Cherrys name there was because of the current position of moving reviews without a name, and she was the allocated girl on arrival

Maybe a more appropriate title would be, UBON, LEEDS, B&S walked


Naming the girl i believed i had booked would be wrong as it was the 3rd party info i had received which was incorrect, the B&S came as a result of the person doing coms confirming to me that said girl would be available at my time

A perfect example of why in some cases, unnamed reviews should be accepted

I agree with you mate. With the current poll underway there appears to be a moratorium atm regards un-named reviews. I was asked to refer them to the Mods and they are not moving them atm. There is no such relaxing of the use of narrative in the title though. I was just trying to find a solution which didn't foul any of the rules. I'll amend it, if a Moderator makes further changes so be it.