Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Price or quality  (Read 1720 times)

Online cueball

My two penneth to this thread is price AND quality, my limit is 120 quid per hour but do your research, aw feedback can be useful for cross referring if a wg is pukka, use the reviews on here.

You can get a cracking wg in my area for tops 100 quid an hour.

I've made mistakes in the past with cheap and expensive but that's the nature of our hobby. I must admit I've had much much more good experiences but I try to do my homework.


£70 an hour ---------------- :vomit:



Fuck me is that John Prescott in Drag?!?

In my limited experience in punting price doesn't guarantee quality. I learned that the hard way.

Offline Mij

I tend to go for quality these days (through research largely on here or friends' recommendations) as the opportunity for having meets now are few and far between, so try to ensure a good time.

However, I guess as many of us have learnt though experience, a high price is certainly no guarantee of good quality. One of my worst punts ever was with a well-published /well-reviewed (on AW!) Killergram girl....£350 for an hour....it was utter, utter shite! I've had far better experiences for less than a 1/3rd of that. These days I will rarely go above £150 an hour for an outcall unless it's someone I know who can deliver all I want...and usually in that case it's a longer booking so again the hourly rate usually drops down.

Like Hendrix, I have certain likes that I desire (although not as, ahem, "varied?" as his!), and this does tend to drive the price up a bit...but I measure it all now by the size of my smile after the meeting...and if I'm still thinking about it 2-3 days later! :-)

It's not called "punting" for nothing, y'know!

Offline smiths

It depends what you mean by cheap.  :unknown: :unknown: :unknown:

If you pay £70 an hour don't be surprised if she looks nothing like the photo or wants to add on extra charges.

Pay peanuts, get monkeys.     :bomb:

Those who i have actually punted with recently and charged me £60-100 an hour have looked like their pictures and not charged me extras in the main.

 In punting pay peanuts, get monkeys doesnt necessarily apply as you yourself agreed for many years until a year or so ago. Up until then you agreed there is no correlation between price and how good a WG might be, which is the reality. :rolleyes:

Offline Quesadilla

Quality first, then reliability/consistency, services, availability, then price. 

My average punting price is £150ph (averaged out over my bookings which tend to be 2-3 hours). In my experience this is what I need to pay to get the combination of services / reliability / quality and availability that I need. 

Have had very poor results under £120ph - either the services list is incomplete, the quality is intermittent at best or the waiting times simply too long - and likewise not seen any improvement in quality above around £175ph which is the most I would pay as a matter of course.  Above this figure have yet to see any improvement in quality / services / reliability etc.

Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline Jimmyredcab



In my limited experience in punting price doesn't guarantee quality.

I agree entirely, you could pay £250 an hour for a crap punt, however the further you dip below that £100 threshold the greater the risk ----- despite what some knowalls will say to the contrary.  :hi:

Offline smiths

I agree entirely, you could pay £250 an hour for a crap punt, however the further you dip below that £100 threshold the greater the risk ----- despite what some knowalls will say to the contrary.  :hi:

Thats knowalls who actually punt with cheaper WGs so know what they are talking about unlike yourself. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline Quesadilla

Thats knowalls who actually punt with cheaper WGs so know what they are talking about unlike yourself. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
I'm always on the lookout for the mythical £100 (or less!) punt that so many - yourself included - are always talking about. Every now and then I go through someone's reviews to see if they are on to something.

Firstly - as I've done this elsewhere and offended a punter - that really is not the point of the exercise - I am in no way looking to criticise a fellow punter especially one who contributes so much to this forum.  But just to point out that we do all have different tastes, not just in services, but in looks / age etc - and even for an old hand like yourself it does genuinely seem like you don't exactly have a glut of high quality punts at £100ph.

Tonight I didn't have much time so only went through the last 1 page of your reviews - 25 punts.
10 negatives
1 neutral
14 positives
Of the 14 positives 6 were £120ph or more. Some as high as £150ph. Even some that were £100ph or less offered services that I always go for like CIM and rimming at an extra fee taking them up to £120ph or more.
1 profile no longer active
1 you labelled "nearly neutral"
1 to me had quite limited services
2 aged over 40 (definitely no good for me - have had one ok punt over 40 but to me that's not the point of punting as I'm over 40 myself and spent the last 6 years married to a 40 year old)
3 definitely not very attractive to me (you labelled them yourself as 1) "hard look...attractive enough" and 2) "isn't a stunner but I fancied her enough to stay" and 3) one with a verification pic that I thought was as plain as you can get that you found "attractive enough".  Clearly beauty is in the eye of the beholder we all have our taste but definitely these were big no's for me and a number of punters have criticised me for not being very discerning about looks! :)

So that left 2 possibles / borderline. 2 * 30 year olds - generally still a bit older than I prefer - 1 with stretchmarks (not a dealbreaker) and 1 offering no DFK and working out of a brothel renowned for profile swapping (not promising from a reliability perspective)

I also had 2 that I had already hot listed having read your reviews already - thank you very much.  :hi: Sensual Brigit and English Rose Paris who is currently touring Kensington - she is therefore currently local but typically I am still skint til payday so will likely miss her. However even if I had £150ph to burn - with no CIM and no rimming I would likely end up weighing it up and going elsewhere as I know I can get those services reliably for that kind of money (and A levels which is another particular like of mine). 

Sensual Brigit is the only £100ph option and that's when you include CIM and rimming - so she is most definitely a bargain and if she's still around next time I'm up that way I will definitely say hello!  :drinks:

Unfortunately you are the other side of town to me and maybe the market genuinely is a bit different over there. I am originally from Tottenham, lived in Walthamstow 10 years, went to school in Green Lanes, had mates Turnpike Lane, Manor House etc so I know some of your stomping grounds quite well and definitely some of it is a bit less well off than where I punt around Surrey / SW London.  Where I am it does seem that £150ph is the benchmark for a decent punt.  I have had one or two "ok" punts for less but from WG's who have either since put their prices up, or have proven not reliably good enough to go back to again.

So although I totally agree there is no direct correlation between "price and quality" I continue to see that the specific "qualities" I look for in a WG don't seem to be available much below a certain price.  No doubt the price I pay for where I live and the specific traits I'm after. :unknown: 
« Last Edit: January 13, 2015, 10:22:13 PM by Quesadilla »
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline smiths

I'm always on the lookout for the mythical £100 (or less!) punt that so many - yourself included - are always talking about. Every now and then I go through someone's reviews to see if they are on to something.

Firstly - as I've done this elsewhere and offended a punter - that really is not the point of the exercise - I am in no way looking to criticise a fellow punter especially one who contributes so much to this forum.  But just to point out that we do all have different tastes, not just in services, but in looks / age etc - and even for an old hand like yourself it does genuinely seem like you don't exactly have a glut of high quality punts at £100ph.

Tonight I didn't have much time so only went through the last 1 page of your reviews - 25 punts.
10 negatives
1 neutral
14 positives
Of the 14 positives 6 were £120ph or more. Some as high as £150ph. Even some that were £100ph or less offered services that I always go for like CIM and rimming at an extra fee taking them up to £120ph or more.
1 profile no longer active
1 you labelled "nearly neutral"
1 to me had quite limited services
2 aged over 40 (definitely no good for me - have had one ok punt over 40 but to me that's not the point of punting as I'm over 40 myself and spent the last 6 years married to a 40 year old)
3 definitely not very attractive to me (you labelled them yourself as 1) "hard look...attractive enough" and 2) "isn't a stunner but I fancied her enough to stay" and 3) one with a verification pic that I thought was as plain as you can get that you found "attractive enough".  Clearly beauty is in the eye of the beholder we all have our taste but definitely these were big no's for me and a number of punters have criticised me for not being very discerning about looks! :)

So that left 2 possibles / borderline. 2 * 30 year olds - generally still a bit older than I prefer - 1 with stretchmarks (not a dealbreaker) and 1 offering no DFK and working out of a brothel renowned for profile swapping (not promising from a reliability perspective)

I also had 2 that I had already hot listed having read your reviews already - thank you very much.  :hi: Sensual Brigit and English Rose Paris who is currently touring Kensington - she is therefore currently local but typically I am still skint til payday so will likely miss her. However even if I had £150ph to burn - with no CIM and no rimming I would likely end up weighing it up and going elsewhere as I know I can get those services reliably for that kind of money (and A levels which is another particular like of mine). 

Sensual Brigit is the only £100ph option and that's when you include CIM and rimming - so she is most definitely a bargain and if she's still around next time I'm up that way I will definitely say hello!  :drinks:

Unfortunately you are the other side of town to me and maybe the market genuinely is a bit different over there. I am originally from Tottenham, lived in Walthamstow 10 years, went to school in Green Lanes, had mates Turnpike Lane, Manor House etc so I know some of your stomping grounds quite well and definitely some of it is a bit less well off than where I punt around Surrey / SW London.  Where I am it does seem that £150ph is the benchmark for a decent punt.  I have had one or two "ok" punts for less but from WG's who have either since put their prices up, or have proven not reliably good enough to go back to again.

So although I totally agree there is no direct correlation between "price and quality" I continue to see that the specific "qualities" I look for in a WG don't seem to be available much below a certain price.  No doubt the price I pay for where I live and the specific traits I'm after. :unknown:

And if you looked at the next 25 reviews there are less negatives. I choose to take more risks lately in search of a gem. The point is my reviews on here recently arent everyone i have punted with, so my reviews dont show the whole story. I will do a negative review every time to warn other punters but i might not do a positive or at least not straight away.

I have experienced the downsides to posting positive reviews, WGs put their prices up to cash in while they can and expect me to pay the new higher rate and/or they become much harder to book. Great for them, bad for me so sometimes i put my self interests first. I would say though smart WGs keep me on the old rate.

What a punter chooses to pay is up to him, my posts challenge those like redcab that post ALL WGs who charge under £100 an hour are skanks, totally disproven bollocks. As to what i will pay i have posted i am prepared to pay up to £200 an hour maximum, £190 being the most i have paid so far recently, i dont restrict myself to just cheap WGs, i have learnt the best way for me to punt is to be flexible up to that max. Why £200 an hour, its an arbitory figure but one i will probably stick to, and crucially it gives me a lot of choice anyway.

What is the most deciding factor when picking a WG? Do we think with our money and pick someone ok with a cheap rate or do we think if there cheap there must be something wrong.

What makes you decide what girl to pick?

The attitude of the WG often dictates how well a potential session can transpire, irrespective of her rates. You can
get a feel for gauging her attitude via initial communications (email/phone calls) with respect to her mannerisms
and whether she expedites queries promptly and politely. In addition cross-check for example her profile, does
she do what's listed, is she transparent with her pricing structure and upfront about extra fees/charges?


Offline Old monk

The only thing that counts when discussing whether a WG is value is your experience, end of!!
If you paid £60 and had a whale of a time she was value, and likewise if you paid £1000, and had a whale of a time it's still VALUE.

It may be more than I can afford but if you can, then that's all that matters. Value can only be decided by your experience against what you are happy to pay.

Offline Quesadilla

And if you looked at the next 25 reviews there are less negatives. I choose to take more risks lately in search of a gem.

What a punter chooses to pay is up to him, my posts challenge those like redcab that post ALL WGs who charge under £100 an hour are skanks, totally disproven bollocks. As to what i will pay i have posted i am prepared to pay up to £200 an hour maximum, £190 being the most i have paid so far recently, i dont restrict myself to just cheap WGs, i have learnt the best way for me to punt is to be flexible up to that max. Why £200 an hour, its an arbitory figure but one i will probably stick to, and crucially it gives me a lot of choice anyway.
I will definitely have a look further back in your reviews later this week.

Agree it's good to be flexible on price - I have no objection to paying less but I generally wont take the risk of seeing an unknown - and as you rightly say if someone is well reviewed here they are likely to be either harder to book or put their prices up.

C'est la vie!
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Online Malvolio

Looking at the London board, there are always some girls who get talked up and become the forum darlings for a few months.  That's still a small proportion of the WGs out there who have had good reviews.

Offline The_Don


Unfortunately you are the other side of town to me and maybe the market genuinely is a bit different over there. I am originally from Tottenham, lived in Walthamstow 10 years, went to school in Green Lanes, had mates Turnpike Lane, Manor House etc so I know some of your stomping grounds quite well and definitely some of it is a bit less well off than where I punt around Surrey / SW London.


If you're from Tottenham, you know the Farm, the Rec and Lordship lane.

Manor house, the Ladder and St Ann's

Walthamstow, Palmerston Rd, Markhouse Rd

I know all the above. I don't often go south of the river but have done. Most of my punts (In calls) have been North and West London due to A406 / A1 / M25.  For South London, A205, Blackwall Tunnel or dartford crossing. Easy going with a car at the right time of day.

As for £100 and below, seen these:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=3711  < was £80, now £100 and I never paid extra for CIM

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=1 < £80 + £20 for CIM

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=3945 < £100 no CIM

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=3725 < £80 for all service on likes, apart for anal


I've taken some (punt) chances and not been lucky in some cases, that a risk. I some time take, in trying to find those gem's.  But some of my chances have been very rewarding. And I stated it before, not all the W/G I've seen, have been reviewed here.

I can understand, that punters have different tastes and values. Thus what they consider to be a good punt (one person gold is another rubbish etc)


I choose to take more risks lately in search of a gem. The point is my reviews on here recently arent everyone i have punted with, so my reviews dont show the whole story. I will do a negative review every time to warn other punters but i might not do a positive or at least not straight away.

I have experienced the downsides to posting positive reviews, WGs put their prices up to cash in while they can and expect me to pay the new higher rate and/or they become much harder to book. Great for them, bad for me so sometimes i put my self interests first. I would say though smart WGs keep me on the old rate.



+1 and totally understandable

Offline Quesadilla

If you're from Tottenham, you know the Farm, the Rec and Lordship lane.

Manor house, the Ladder and St Ann's

Walthamstow, Palmerston Rd, Markhouse Rd

Oh yes!  :cool:

I know all the above. I don't often go south of the river but have done. Most of my punts (In calls) have been North and West London due to A406 / A1 / M25.  For South London, A205, Blackwall Tunnel or dartford crossing. Easy going with a car at the right time of day.
Yup - used to live in Walthamstow and commuted all over - Docklands, SE London via Blackwall, Ladbroke Grove via North Circ etc.  Outside rush hour it's not too bad - I can still make it round the North Circ from mine in Surbiton to Walthamstow in 50 mins on a good day, or up the A3, across to the A12.


As for £100 and below, seen these:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=3711  < was £80, now £100 and I never paid extra for CIM
Vivien no 1 was one of the borderline ones on Smiths review list - a bit taller than my usual type but worth a HL based on the reviews for sure.  :hi:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=1 < £80 + £20 for CIM
Cleo - the "super-enhanced trout pout" in her own words - I can just about tolerate a well done boob job but a trout pout is a huge :vomit: for me - but to each their own!

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=3945 < £100 no CIM
Khloe Sexy Girl - no CIM is usually a deal-breaker and another one that looks like she's got a bit of a trout pout going on so probably not for me.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=3725 < £80 for all service on likes, apart for anal
Daria's been on my HL for ages - would have seen her over Christmas but then she was away.  Definitely will see her soon!  :thumbsup:


I've taken some (punt) chances and not been lucky in some cases, that a risk. I some time take, in trying to find those gem's.  But some of my chances have been very rewarding. And I stated it before, not all the W/G I've seen, have been reviewed here.

I can understand, that punters have different tastes and values. Thus what they consider to be a good punt (one person gold is another rubbish etc)

Cheers TD - much appreciate the tips.   :drinks:
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline Steve2

Q

I'd second Sensual Brigit in N4 as an excellent choice

Along with Xena and Nicole in Harrow / Wealdstone

All 3 provide a 1st class service at an extremely good rate


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)