Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: When was the date of YOUR last STI test?  (Read 3705 times)

 
Everyone should be getting an arse swab too regardless of whether you indulge. I was told STIs can be passed through saliva from oral into the back passage.


As far as i know there is no swab that involves the japseye anymore.

I have an idea what an "arse swab" would involve but have never been offered one. can you explain more lillywhite. I've got a feeling that if I asked for one at my local clinic they'd raise their eyebrows... great as they are

Online Lilywhite

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 328
 

As far as i know there is no swab that involves the japseye anymore.

I have an idea what an "arse swab" would involve but have never been offered one. can you explain more lillywhite. I've got a feeling that if I asked for one at my local clinic they'd raise their eyebrows... great as they are

I go to a sex worker specific clinic and they say we (girls and guys) should be swabbed up the ass as saliva can run down from the genitals into the ass. So even if no one is going there, it's important to make sure nothing has found it's way into the hole.

Offline StevenS

 

As far as i know there is no swab that involves the japseye anymore.


I've had a number of tests over the years (4 in the last 12 months) and all have involved the "stick down the dick". Sounds worse than it is. All clear by the way!

Online fredpunter

I've had a number of tests over the years (4 in the last 12 months) and all have involved the "stick down the dick". Sounds worse than it is. All clear by the way!

sounds to me like they just don't like you

Offline StevenS

sounds to me like they just don't like you

Could be right fred. The run up the nurse takes, feels a little over the top

I've had a number of tests over the years (4 in the last 12 months) and all have involved the "stick down the dick". Sounds worse than it is. All clear by the way!

Thinking about it, it must be about the capabilities and the way the testing lab is set up?


Somewhat naively I guessI hadn't really considered the need for regular testing if using protection.  As I am in a relationship but sex is far too infrequent for my liking I'm starting to feel a little guilty that I could be passing on something that's gonna be somewhat unexplainable....  Haven't embarked on anything yet but guess even if using a condom isn't fool proof?


Offline Old monk

Read Smiths post again guys, it has an awful lot of wisdom about it.

One error though, the fact that the WG can show you a dated cert is no guarantee that she was clear on said date. She will only be clear on said date + gestation period of any specific disease.
So if cert says clear on the 15 th of the month add a few days for bacterial shit like gonorrhoea, add 30 odd days for stuff like syphilis and up to whatever it is for HIV.

It takes this time for stuff to show up!! So girl clear on 15 th said month isn't really worth the paper it's printed on to you!!

Offline Trelf

No swab up the japseye for me when I went!
Banning reason: Touting agency, Trolling others who post negatives about that agency and slagging off UKPunting using different identity

Last results from 29/08/14 were all fine. I'm gonna go ASAP and wait for the results before I punt again.

Offline smiths

Read Smiths post again guys, it has an awful lot of wisdom about it.

One error though, the fact that the WG can show you a dated cert is no guarantee that she was clear on said date. She will only be clear on said date + gestation period of any specific disease.
So if cert says clear on the 15 th of the month add a few days for bacterial shit like gonorrhoea, add 30 odd days for stuff like syphilis and up to whatever it is for HIV.

It takes this time for stuff to show up!! So girl clear on 15 th said month isn't really worth the paper it's printed on to you!!

Thanks, and thats why i put at best in brackets. ;)

Offline smiths

Somewhat naively I guessI hadn't really considered the need for regular testing if using protection.  As I am in a relationship but sex is far too infrequent for my liking I'm starting to feel a little guilty that I could be passing on something that's gonna be somewhat unexplainable....  Haven't embarked on anything yet but guess even if using a condom isn't fool proof?

Condoms can break or get a hole or holes in even of course so they arent foolproof thats for sure, but obviously safer to use than not.

Offline dilettante

Still haven't had the conclusive 3-months HIV test after that druggie skank in Dudley I was dumb enough not to walk from, who has now had to hide her FB after I left stinking comments on it.  Thankfully have survived long enough to make my 1000th UKP post, anyway!  :hi:

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

I try and go every 3 months. I always have a blood test, urine test and throat swab. Last time I went (December), I also had a course of 3 Hep B jabs which I believe give me a year's immunity.

Offline SUMO61

Condoms can break or get a hole or holes in even of course so they arent foolproof thats for sure, but obviously safer to use than not.

And the WG has to have an STI in the first place, so the probabilities here of broken condom occurring at the same time the WG has an STI are beyond tiny...

Its easy to imagine that WGs are riddled with STIs, but the truth is, they are probably not. Twenty years of punting, several STI tests and i've never caught a cold. All i've every suffered from is anxiety reading forums like this and the internet  ;)

Offline dilettante

Quote
... which I believe give me a year's immunity.
I sincerely hope you live longer than that ...  :(

Offline smiths

And the WG has to have an STI in the first place, so the probabilities here of broken condom occurring at the same time the WG has an STI are beyond tiny...

Its easy to imagine that WGs are riddled with STIs, but the truth is, they are probably not. Twenty years of punting, several STI tests and i've never caught a cold. All i've every suffered from is anxiety reading forums like this and the internet  ;)

I was of course answering the point about condoms being foolproof, they arent but they are safer than going BB obviously.

I havent caught anything i know of STI wise in over 30 years of punting and fucking civvies, the point is the next WG COULD be the one to infect me, i know that but accept the risks for the rewards on offer as i see them. ;)

Offline ik8133

I've just looked up my local GUM clinic and it asks that your register prior to being seen, asking to give details such as name and address, contact and GP details, does this happen in other GUM clinics as well, I though that you could be totally anonymous? 

They do however state that they have a confidentiality guarantee, hope it's full proof.  :scare: 

Offline Marmite

As Smiths said above a clear test is just a snapshot in time.  The same test done a day later could provide a different result.  Tests need to be done frequently.

Do WG's get regularly tested?  Difficult to know, but I suspect the good ones do.  This forum provides a means to identify good service providers. 

If a WG is good at her job and tries to provide a high standard of service she may well look after herself to a high standard.  A WG who is indifferent to her clients may have lower standards of personal care.  This may not always be true but as far as I am concerned it is another reason to seek the best.

They do however state that they have a confidentiality guarantee, hope it's full proof.  :scare:

Confidential.... a very over used word.  I think many people use false details.

Offline LL

A very apt question LL - Happy to answer it.

The SexyPorsha BB session happened on 04.12.2015. I just checked my phone and her 'thanks - no regrets - it was soooo good message' was received on the following morning (05.12.2015).

I hope she will be tested more frequently now. I know I certainly will!  :vomit:
Have you talked to your GUM clinic about what happened?  Being tested more frequently won't be sufficient. They will tell you to abstain from sex, protected or not, for the next 3 or 6 months (depending upon the screening period which I forget but the GUM clinic staff will know!). If you've got any respect for the girls you see and other punters then you'll follow their advice.

Offline west8

That won't be happening LL. Sure, I will be rather careful in terms of which services I partake in, but the most interesting thing these past few days has been the reaction of the usual girls I have seen.

They find the hypocrisy of certain punters to be hilarious.

Not only have many punters who rushed to label me a public health hazard engaged in serious cock/pussy play .. a few nameless idiots have even pressed girls for bareback - and been refused.

Perhaps that is why the girls - knowing full well about this thread - have no issue whatsoever with meeting me.

Even more amusing is the fact that a handful of nameless but well reviewed girls who openly sell themselves as receptacles for bodily fluids from every Tom, Dick and Abdul have been the most vocal.

So either all the girls are wrong and us punters should stop seeing them all, or (the truth) the more vocal punters are deluding themselves that they are 'safer' by avoiding certain girls.

Fact of the matter is a simple one ... punting really isn't for the faint hearted!

Moreover, a certain known barebacking girl still has an 'open' sign hanging over her gash ... but I guess the punters don't give a shit.

Brilliant!  :vomit:


Have you talked to your GUM clinic about what happened?  Being tested more frequently won't be sufficient. They will tell you to abstain from sex, protected or not, for the next 3 or 6 months (depending upon the screening period which I forget but the GUM clinic staff will know!). If you've got any respect for the girls you see and other punters then you'll follow their advice.

+1  :thumbsup:

Some people just like chasing the bug, or they're ignorant / selfish / retarded...  :wacko: :wackogirl:

That won't be happening LL. Sure, I will be rather careful in terms of which services I partake in, but the most interesting thing these past few days has been the reaction of the usual girls I have seen.

They find the hypocrisy of certain punters to be hilarious.

Not only have many punters who rushed to label me a public health hazard engaged in serious cock/pussy play .. a few nameless idiots have even pressed girls for bareback - and been refused.

Perhaps that is why the girls - knowing full well about this thread - have no issue whatsoever with meeting me.

Even more amusing is the fact that a handful of nameless but well reviewed girls who openly sell themselves as receptacles for bodily fluids from every Tom, Dick and Abdul have been the most vocal.

So either all the girls are wrong and us punters should stop seeing them all, or (the truth) the more vocal punters are deluding themselves that they are 'safer' by avoiding certain girls.

Fact of the matter is a simple one ... punting really isn't for the faint hearted!

Moreover, a certain known barebacking girl still has an 'open' sign hanging over her gash ... but I guess the punters don't give a shit.

Brilliant!  :vomit:

I've not seen anyone support you on here and I don't trust your word as I find you very self-serving and two faced

I see you are still slagging off the girl you did BB with on one hand saying she's still working but on the other hand you also use her message to you about her negative test result to suggest that you are disease free and continue to punt.  :vomit:  We all know why you've started this publicity stunt thread. Your weasel words are wasted on the vast majority of people on here.

I think your recent posts on here show you are a person of appalling character. You mentioned on a thread about Aspergers Syndrome recently and I think you brought that up because you are familiar with the symptoms! You are a swivel-eyed loon! Get some help!

 :wacko:


Offline LL

Not only have many punters who rushed to label me a public health hazard engaged in serious cock/pussy play .. a few nameless idiots have even pressed girls for bareback - and been refused.
Seeking out other examples of unacceptable behaviour will not justify your own.

So either all the girls are wrong and us punters should stop seeing them all, or (the truth) the more vocal punters are deluding themselves that they are 'safer' by avoiding certain girls.
I don't think you can criticise a punter who avoids girls who are known to have recently seen somebody who openly admits to barebacking other prostitutes. Certain girls might be liars and just as reckless as you. However, I believe that the majority are not. I don't think you're the authority on this such that you can offer "the truth" as you arrogantly claim. If you carry on punting as normal in the next few months that is risky behaviour and affects not just yourself. Don't take my word for it or your prossies' word for it. Ask at the clinic.

Offline Tjkooker

A very apt question LL - Happy to answer it.

The SexyPorsha BB session happened on 04.12.2015. I just checked my phone and her 'thanks - no regrets - it was soooo good message' was received on the following morning (05.12.2015).

I hope she will be tested more frequently now. I know I certainly will!  :vomit:

That's a miracle, you got tested in Dec 2015 and came back in time to tell us.  Don't you just hate it when liars forget to proof read before posting. If you didn't live in such a fantasy land you would have noticed that mistake. Especially as you made it twice.
Banning reason: Outing and trolling a punter because he posted a negative about his favourite prossie. White-knight fluffy that pretends otherwise.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)