Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Important Date for your Diaries 15th Jan  (Read 3914 times)

Offline Mansell

After all the rumour and wondering what had happened before Christmas some great news.

Lily's back from the 15th Jan.  :cool: key an eye on her profile as dates and pics will be up then.

Better form an orderly que, but sorry guys I got the first booking on the 15th already  :yahoo:

That will make your day, certainly made my'n.

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Offline OscarC

She was back working yesterday, albeit as a duo with Eva.  :D

Offline Mansell

Looking forward to your review of that one  :lol:

Offline dino1990

haha availability for 15th Janury - 3.15pm til 3.45 pm haha

Offline OscarC

Yes, as fantastic as the duo experience was, I think on reflection I prefer to see them individually. Will post review later this week.

And looks like you beat me to getting the appointment next week.... ya bugger!  ;)

Offline Mansell

haha availability for 15th Janury - 3.15pm til 3.45 pm haha

It was quite a bit longer than that last night, but some lucky buggers got in quick  :lol: :cool: :lol:

Pole position  :yahoo:

Offline Benja73

Funny how nobody thought to mention it until such time as nearly all times gone.

Saying that, I 'might' be one of those lucky fellas too... :P

The fishman 2014

  • Guest
Already booked in :-). Will be my 2nd meet with her and can't wait

Toshiba

  • Guest

eeeasy

  • Guest
After all the rumour and wondering what had happened before Christmas some great news.

Lily's back from the 15th Jan.  :cool: key an eye on her profile as dates and pics will be up then.

Better form an orderly que, but sorry guys I got the first booking on the 15th already  :yahoo:

That will make your day, certainly made my'n.

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
She hasent got many enjoys........

Online toon972

Seeing her in duo shortly and was going to ask for first dibs when she started back,looks like I am last.

Dino

  • Guest
Lily's back from the 15th Jan

...and with that post goes many guys chances of any type of booking till about May... Haha

Due to all the interest in these ladies, I look forward to reading the sudden influx of review's we are likely to see appearing for their 1-on-1 & duo services.

Hope you's have fun guys!

Offline Spartacus123


Been there done that

This  :timeout: :timeout:

I'll probably pay her a visit one all the fuss dies down (again)

Good to see her back on the scene though

Offline Third Man

form an orderly rabble methinks!

Offline Granty

Is she back with Amour but under a different name? Says on her AW profile she's "proud to be represented" by them, but can't see her on there?

Offline Mansell

Is she back with Amour but under a different name? Says on her AW profile she's "proud to be represented" by them, but can't see her on there?

Would expect to see it on 15th when she starts again.

Online billabong

Have you seen the statement on AW saying we cannot link to her on there or armour and specifically mentions punting websites, just never saw that before? Something to hide maybe!

Barry Shipton

  • Guest
Have you seen the statement on AW saying we cannot link to her on there or armour and specifically mentions punting websites, just never saw that before? Something to hide maybe!
Says she doesn't want her profile linked from here or the new External Link/Members Only which Admin has set up. But that doesn't even list her yet because there are so many girls to add!

It's a bit naive as the whole point about the web is nobody needs to ask permission to link to you - it just happens. How does she think Google works? And she's only popular because of the great reviews on here.

No doubt connected to the thread row about girls flat sharing. We don't want to unintentionally upset any escort - especially not the good ones - and we certainly don't want to compromise her identity if she has problems. Perhaps she could let members here know what the problem is - I don't think she is banned?

Offline Mansell

Says she doesn't want her profile linked from here or the new External Link/Members Only which Admin has set up. But that doesn't even list her yet because there are so many girls to add!

It's a bit naive as the whole point about the web is nobody needs to ask permission to link to you - it just happens. How does she think Google works? And she's only popular because of the great reviews on here.

No doubt connected to the thread row about girls flat sharing. We don't want to unintentionally upset any escort - especially not the good ones - and we certainly don't want to compromise her identity if she has problems. Perhaps she could let members here know what the problem is - I don't think she is banned?

I just saw that and thought to help I would edit the link out of my original post, but you can't do that, otherwise I would have. Have asked Admin to do it. As you say Barry, don;t want to make any hassle for her as she is one of the good ones, at least you guys keep saying that and I look forward to finding out.  :D

Barry Shipton

  • Guest
I am not sure Admin will take too kindly to that idea - it's not up to Lily to decide who links to her profile.

If girls have a problem with being outed or identified then I think everyone on here understands and acts very responsibly. But I think the problem here is over flat sharing and duos.

I don't want to revive the argument in this now locked thread - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=45445.0

I can see the problem - Stacey and Amour want to act responsibly and stay within the law and don't offer duos or have two girls working from one flat. But some girls like Lily and Tori offer duos - and if two bisexual girls want to have fun and invite a guy to join them who am I to complain?

But if they do that - and advertise it on Adultwork - then they take a risk as under our stupid laws the place they work in becomes a brothel. But UKP isn't the problem here for highlighting what services these girls offer - it is our stupid laws and the Police if they bother to poke their nose in.

It's no good just saying don't link to us. Maybe they should just offer duos discreetly to regulars and not advertise or try to do it legally - but outcalls to a hotel is about the only way it is sort of legal in the UK.

Offline AnthG


It's no good just saying don't link to us. Maybe they should just offer duos discreetly to regulars and not advertise or try to do it legally - but outcalls to a hotel is about the only way it is sort of legal in the UK.

But as established on that thread, Eva working from their house one day and Lilly working from it another is them both breaking the law.

She is trying to censor discussions about her - most likely because two threads about her have become quite ferocious. The first a bunch of people going to crazy land saying she has quit due to being an on the side drug dealer (which would infuriate anyone). And then the second complaining about Amour letting them both work from the same flat when Amours policy is this shouldn't be happening.

Saying because she is annoyed at the people saying this stuff about her on those threads that she wants no more discussions about her or links to her profile is not the right way to go about it as she must know that is not ever going to happen.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Barry Shipton

  • Guest
Have to agree Anth - if she had to change flats and identities because of being outed or had some crazy stalker then I think members on here would be sympathetic.

But you can't stop people on here giving their opinions - and nobody's saying she's bad at her job, quite the opposite!

greychap

  • Guest
Have to agree Anth - if she had to change flats and identities because of being outed or had some crazy stalker then I think members on here would be sympathetic.

But you can't stop people on here giving their opinions - and nobody's saying she's bad at her job, quite the opposite!

I dont think escorts can always choose to have it both ways, this site probably got her most of her work from talking about her and the reviews so to say you cannot link is a little unfair.

Who knows exactly what the situation is but if it is to do with offering duos then don't offer it and write about it all over her adultwork profile either offer discreetly if you want to do them as a incall for the ones you know will want them or advertise it for outcalls only.

I find it odd if it is for the reason of being worried for not running things on the legal side because if that was the case they why advertise it on the profile in the first place.

It could just be ukp served its purpose for getting her enough customers and now she does not need ukp and does not like being discussed any further and links going to her from her. Either way not always good to bite the hand that feeds you.

Offline Mansell

All I'm saying is BRILLIANT  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Been doing enough reviews recently, you'll have to make one up yourselves.  :cool:

Offline OscarC

Yes, saw her yesterday as well. Fantastic as always   :P

themademan2

  • Guest
Says she doesn't want her profile linked from here or the new External Link/Members Only which Admin has set up. But that doesn't even list her yet because there are so many girls to add!

It's a bit naive as the whole point about the web is nobody needs to ask permission to link to you - it just happens. How does she think Google works? And she's only popular because of the great reviews on here.

No doubt connected to the thread row about girls flat sharing. We don't want to unintentionally upset any escort - especially not the good ones - and we certainly don't want to compromise her identity if she has problems. Perhaps she could let members here know what the problem is - I don't think she is banned?
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=34976.msg479430;topicseen%23msg479430
They did get caught out and banned for touting

Offline AnthG

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=34976.msg479430;topicseen%23msg479430
They did get caught out and banned for touting

Can I ask as looking through the posts by Archie78 it doesn't specifically mention by anyone in any posts afterwards it was either Lilly or Eva.

Was it definitely proven it was them or just a possibility it was them or was this person banned for being a re-reg previously banned person?

I ask as it would be seriously dodgy by Lilly/Eva if they were reviewing other girls on Diamonds and saying they are only a 6.5 out of 10 in looks etc. Just seems a bit like unjustly bashing the competition which is pretty nasty thing to do and in my personal opinion way worse than self reviewing themselves.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=34786.0
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

greychap

  • Guest
Can I ask as looking through the posts by Archie78 it doesn't specifically mention by anyone in any posts afterwards it was either Lilly or Eva.

Was it definitely proven it was them or just a possibility it was them or was this person banned for being a re-reg previously banned person?

I ask as it would be seriously dodgy by Lilly/Eva if they were reviewing other girls on Diamonds and saying they are only a 6.5 out of 10 in looks etc. Just seems a bit like unjustly bashing the competition which is pretty nasty thing to do and in my personal opinion way worse than self reviewing themselves.


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=34786.0


If she or them was bashing the competition which we don't know for sure and you said it was a nasty thing to do would you still see her/them if you fancied her and at a price you would want to pay or would you decide not to and stick with a principle??????

Offline AnthG

If she or them was bashing the competition which we don't know for sure and you said it was a nasty thing to do would you still see her/them if you fancied her and at a price you would want to pay or would you decide not to and stick with a principle??????

In all honesty I do not know. It depends on many factors. The main one I guess is if I personally believe the person did it or not. So how strong the evidence is of their guilt. Or if the evidence is not strong if I personally believe their guilty.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Mansell

Too much guessing & supposition going on for me. Personally wasn't around when the Archie post stuff was going on, so just going to judge as I find.

Had a great time and Yes, I will see here again.  :D

Offline johnny34

Can I ask as looking through the posts by Archie78 it doesn't specifically mention by anyone in any posts afterwards it was either Lilly or Eva.

Was it definitely proven it was them or just a possibility it was them or was this person banned for being a re-reg previously banned person?

It was not proven, just a possibility i think. Admin only started providing the reason for banning more recently.