Hana - Soho

[Coconutta]

Website: External Link/Members Only
Location: Nice near Carnaby Street in Soho. Nice building in a good location

Girl: Older Thai lady, my guess would be between 50 - 60 yrs old, nice body for her age.

Price: £120

Duration: 1 hour

Services: Massage, rimming, OWO and BB sex (CIP)

Action: This was my first visit to Hana after reading many reviews here. Booking was easy and was given clear instruction to the flat. Good conversation after handing over money and I started by giving her a massage, applied oil and started off with shoulder rubs, this slowly got more erotic as I gave good amount of CC swipes and legs strokes. I then jumped on and apply my cock to the mix, rubbing up and down her back. This then escalated into me sliding into her warm pussy raw, which felt incredibly nice as she was wet and very tight. She pointed her arse up and gave me good access but I stopped soon after as I was about to come.

I laid face down and allowed Hana to go through her massage routine, it felt so so at the time and I was actually left with quite a bit of pain days after on my shoulders, it is certainly not her strongest skill. At around 30 mins mark she started to clean me up and stuck her tongue deep into my arsehole, it was probably the best rimming I have had, on par with Laura Top in Shoreditch. Hana alternate between rimming and blow job from the same position, it was extremely pleasurable! After maybe 10-15 minutes of this I got up and hammered her from behind raw and came inside her.

Since the punt I have had all clear from STD tests, I appreciate this might not be for everyone, but Hana is an exceptionally skilled in what she does and I would see her again.

     

[rebelscum]

Pretty sure this review is a bit late for the 6 month rule, even if it occurred at the end of December, given we are now two days into July, 7th month of the year?

[joninbristol]

I had no idea she did full sex, let alone bareback or splashing your spunk inside her.
None are listed on her profile.
Not in London often, but will be giving her a miss based on this.
Thanks for the heads up.

[o4b]

I was aware she offered fs, but no more than that. Anyone else had a similar experience?

[MLawro93]

I had no idea she did full sex, let alone bareback or splashing your spunk inside her.
None are listed on her profile.
Not in London often, but will be giving her a miss based on this.
Thanks for the heads up.

Another one in the sin bin. Seen her once but never again. Not worth the risk, and really reckless behaviour from her if true 

[Iloveoral]

Pretty sure this review is a bit late for the 6 month rule, even if it occurred at the end of December, given we are now two days into July, 7th month of the year?

I’m happy to let this one go, over a few weeks, he hasn’t reviewed since 2022, so this is appreciated

[rebelscum]

I’m happy to let this one go, over a few weeks, he hasn’t reviewed since 2022, so this is appreciated

I bow to the decision of one of our mods then.     Someone will need to shift it back into the Reviews section though. 

[Iloveoral]

I bow to the decision of one of our mods then.     Someone will need to shift it back into the Reviews section though.

[Iloveoral]

@coconutta dont leave it so long between reviews next time please matey

[patelprat]

Listed as 32 on AW, but is really in her 50s/60s?!

Now I can tolerate a few years age difference, but that is taking the piss.

That alone would warrant a neg or neutral at most (if it were me reviewing).

[jamiekinkxxx]

Listed as 32 on AW, but is really in her 50s/60s?!

Now I can tolerate a few years age difference, but that is taking the piss.

That alone would warrant a neg or neutral at most (if it were me reviewing).

but it's not

[puntingking]

Listed as 32 on AW, but is really in her 50s/60s?!

Now I can tolerate a few years age difference, but that is taking the piss.

That alone would warrant a neg or neutral at most (if it were me reviewing).

As in my review of her back in December last year - 

It would be a positive if I thought she was attractive/younger.

She is possibly the oldest wg I have ever seen. 

If anyone wants to see her, just go and relax. Maybe close your eyes and think of a hot 20 something year old. 

I still think it should be a neutral.

I would have much rather a hot young woman who only provided me a massage with hand job for this price than a 50+ year old with rimming and owo. Maybe this is just me. I like women in their prime look years.

[puntingking]

Thanks for the review op 

Just to say, it is your review op and you get to decide which rating you go for when rating a sp.
Nobody can decide it for you, only you. 

It is the details within a review that matter most.   



Cheers mate 

[patelprat]

She has a lot of positives on here. My guess is that people booking her off the back of reading reviews here are already prepared for her to be a fair bit older than her profile age, so it's mostly not an issue for them.

But for others who don't see all these reviews, I feel she really should align her AW profile age closer to her real age, or at least be in the same ballpark. I know it's mostly about the service, but we do also care for accurate physical descriptions. She looks quite a bit younger than 50/60 in the AW photos.

I reviewed a lady once on here who had a similar age disparity, but her service and enthusiasm was great. So I gave her a neutral for being misleading on age.

[folma322]

The last photo her gallery is accurate representation of what she looks like. I dont even think the main photos in her profile are photoshopped either just good lighting and angles.

[patelprat]

The last photo her gallery is accurate representation of what she looks like. I dont even think the main photos in her profile are photoshopped either just good lighting and angles.

It's hard to tell. I'd put her at maybe early 40s from the photos, but as you say, photos can be made to make someone appear a bit younger than reality, depending on the lighting, filters used etc.

[jamiekinkxxx]

She has a lot of positives on here. My guess is that people booking her off the back of reading reviews here are already prepared for her to be a fair bit older than her profile age, so it's mostly not an issue for them.

But for others who don't see all these reviews, I feel she really should align her AW profile age closer to her real age, or at least be in the same ballpark. I know it's mostly about the service, but we do also care for accurate physical descriptions. She looks quite a bit younger than 50/60 in the AW photos.

I reviewed a lady once on here who had a similar age disparity, but her service and enthusiasm was great. So I gave her a neutral for being misleading on age.

That was your review so you are entitled to do what you wish, but this review is the OPs so why are you implying he should have scored differently?

[patelprat]

That was your review so you are entitled to do what you wish, but this review is the OPs so why are you implying he should have scored differently?

eh? I never once implied that he should change his score.

i'm simply giving my OPINION re the age (last time I checked we were allowed to give our views/opinions on here), I respect OPs rating. I never once said he should change it. I'm just saying how it would have been for me if I met an SP 20+ years older than advertised.

[patelprat]

Reading through some of her past reviews i also find it odd that the OP said he got BB from her...doesn't seem like her MO, but I guess you never know.

[jamiekinkxxx]

I guess you don't know the meaning of the word imply, as I never once implied that he should change his score.

i'm simply giving my OPINION re the age, I respect OPs rating. I never once said he should change it. I'm just saying how it would have been for me if I met an SP 20+ years older than advertised.

You made a clear value judgment to the OPs review and implied clearly that your logic is superior to his, esp as you clearly stated that is what you would have done in your bracketed comment at the end.

[patelprat]

You made a clear value judgment to the OPs review and implied clearly that your logic is superior to his, esp as you clearly stated that is what you would have done in your bracketed comment at the end.

can you just back off me for once in your life please?

you have no idea I was thinking that. I have never seen or read the reviews of this SP before today, so to me the age would be a surprise, but not to those who went through her reviews like the OP did, so i'm sure he knew what to expect. I even wrote that.

[jamiekinkxxx]

can you just back off me for once in your life please?

you have no idea I was thinking that. I have never seen or read the reviews of this SP before today, so to me the age would be a surprise, but not to those who went through her reviews like the OP did, so i'm sure he knew what to expect.

Don't take it personally PP. I am just commenting on a thread as I read it 

[LLPunting]

OP, with all her popularity there doesn't appear to have been any reporting in the past year at least that she was a BBer and in the years I've been aware of her (never seen because looks didn't appeal) I don't recall ever seeing the service on her profile. At what point did you negotiate this service?  Did she advertise it unsolicited in comms?

[Jonestown]

I’ve seen Hana twice and I wouldn’t like to guess what her actual age is, if you look at her face then you get one impression but if you run your hands over her body you get a totally different one, which ever decade of life she is in she has a very lush body, and it’s hard not to agree that anyone from this forum has no excuse for being surprised at her looks /age. I’m also surprised the OP got BB/CIP, although Hana’s limits do seem to be fairly elastic and vary day to day.

[patelprat]

OP, with all her popularity there doesn't appear to have been any reporting in the past year at least that she was a BBer and in the years I've been aware of her (never seen because looks didn't appeal) I don't recall ever seeing the service on her profile. At what point did you negotiate this service?  Did she advertise it unsolicited in comms?

Agree, this would be useful to know, because to be honest, as it stands, the bb/cip claims being made on this review seem at odds and hard to reconcile with her past written history here.

[puntingking]

This is good information by the op, I applaud the op for his honest review of bb service with Hana.   

[ManofEast]

Crazy you got fs without an extra charge and it was bb! I find that hard to believe when I met her she was very particular with what she did and how. I guess if you've seen her before or she took a fancy to you who knows 🤷

[Harryhood]

Indeed, recently she wanted £100 for RO, previously this was on offer without a charge

[Jonestown]

Indeed, recently she wanted £100 for RO, previously this was on offer without a charge

Clearly she didn’t want to do it with that punter, maybe he hadn’t shaved that day ?

[patelprat]

OP still hasn't given details on how the BB/CIP came about (pre-agreed or spur of moment) in a first meeting, when there is nothing in her history on here to indicate she might be up to offering this to anyone. She doesn't even officially offer protected sex on her profile/comms.

This is a significant thing now being associated with this SP on here, and some who may otherwise have thought about seeing her will now avoid her due to this review.

[puntingking]

OP still hasn't given details on how the BB/CIP came about

Give the op some time, he may well respond to this when he next logs in. 

[LLPunting]

Give the op some time, he may well respond to this when he next logs in. 

Let's hope so, he failed to respond in the days after the question when he was about.
Ruining a girl's rep and targetting her to be harassed by bbers if she isn't one should have consequences.
Anyone using that other site with cred here able to say if she's been confirmed over there?

[folma322]

I've seen Hana maybe 4/5 times now, only on the first visit did i ever get FS which i reviewed here https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=446791.0 Subsequent visits were more aligned with what everyone else was reporting. She initiated in the first meet but hasn't bought it up since. Having read her reviews before and after my meet with her, only one other review mentions FS but that OP didn't partake.

Would be interesting to know who initiated what in OP's meet.

[puntingking]

Let's hope so, he failed to respond in the days after the question when he was about.
Ruining a girl's rep and targetting her to be harassed by bbers if she isn't one should have consequences.
Anyone using that other site with cred here able to say if she's been confirmed over there?

But the op review did confirm it 

BB sex (CIP)

[LLPunting]

But the op review did confirm it 

I have a bridge to sell you

[patelprat]

Ruining a girl's rep and targetting her to be harassed by bbers if she isn't one should have consequences.

This is what worries me and why I keep going on about it, even though I have never met this SP and have no desire to.

It's hard to repair a reputation, so this ideally should be spot-on/corroborated, or retracted in my view.

[Harryhood]

OP still hasn't given details on how the BB/CIP came about (pre-agreed or spur of moment) in a first meeting, when there is nothing in her history on here to indicate she might be up to offering this to anyone. She doesn't even officially offer protected sex on her profile/comms.

This is a significant thing now being associated with this SP on here, and some who may otherwise have thought about seeing her will now avoid her due to this review.

Prior to this she had requested RO from me and always messaged me afterwards with Thank you.
She then told me she now doesn't offer this to anyone, because she gets very 'itchy ' afterwards and had to goto the Doctor. She wouldn't even let me lick my fingers before I inserted them.
I'll probably visit her next week and will send an update.

[Coconutta]

OP, with all her popularity there doesn't appear to have been any reporting in the past year at least that she was a BBer and in the years I've been aware of her (never seen because looks didn't appeal) I don't recall ever seeing the service on her profile. At what point did you negotiate this service?  Did she advertise it unsolicited in comms?

There was no negotiation, it all happened naturally and we both enjoyed it!

[puntingking]

There was no negotiation, it all happened naturally and we both enjoyed it!

Thanks for confirming