Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.






Author Topic: Bath Babes  (Read 159690 times)

Albert

But surely this isnt of any interest for public discussion? We hope Pete will accept our offer to compensate.

I think it is, as you yourself said and I quote " more to follow", and dont forget, as it is out there on the public domain that one of your ladies left a guy in a hotel when he hade made a booking to see her, and was stood up, we want to know what the outcome was, as those who leave it there are hardly likely to get our bookings, whereas the places that care are going to deal with it and make sure it does not happen again, and I assume their reputation goes up as being fair to the punter.

Well I visited Tammy at Bath Babes on Friday and I have to say that it was one of the best punts in almost 20 years of punting.  I'll try to put a review on Tammy's page at Adultwork so won't repeat the details here unless I get booted off as happened the last time I tried to post a review.


SOD.

Offline HPotter

I just noticed that Steff and Nicole have now gone from bath babes, shame, saw both girls and both very nice.

Offline bathbabes

Glad to hear that Mr P. Both girls having personal problems at the moment so taking a break, but we're sure they'll be back.  Tammy got a great AW review recently - will be posted on her site.

Offline sparktj

Am I correct to assume that Nicole has morphed into Natasha ?  Details on her are sketchy (only her name and 1 pic on Bath Babes site) but her AW profile includes feedback comments I made previously on Nicole.  Would love to know why the change.


Offline Mellow

Am I correct to assume that Nicole has morphed into Natasha ?  Details on her are sketchy (only her name and 1 pic on Bath Babes site) but her AW profile includes feedback comments I made previously on Nicole.  Would love to know why the change.
Can the wgs do that? Strikes me that if they can, they can just as easily swap and change at will. Maybe there's something i'm missing here, but doesn't it make it difficult to appraise the herd?

Offline Mellow

Will PM you!
FFS. That's helpful.  :(

Whenever I read that remark, it leads me to believe that someone is on the proverbial damage limitation exercise and usually made in order to protect themselves at the expense of the general body of "punters"

Offline HPotter

FFS. That's helpful.  :(

Whenever I read that remark, it leads me to believe that someone is on the proverbial damage limitation exercise and usually made in order to protect themselves at the expense of the general body of "punters"

Or Maybe to protect the WG ? Thought of that ?

Offline PuntingPete

Or Maybe to protect the WG ? Thought of that ?
Which on this occasion I believe to be the case so maybe the subject should be dropped.

Regarding the problems I previously had with Nicole, they have been sorted amicably between us. It seems the delay was due to my Yahoo e-mail address being a complete tosser.  :)

Offline HPotter

Quote
Which on this occasion I believe to be the case so maybe the subject should be dropped.

My thoughts indeed.

Offline Fannytastico

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 508
being a complete tosser.  :)
My thoughts indeed.

Joke!!!! Couldn't resist.

Offline Mellow

I booked Nicole a few weeks back but unfortunately she let me down & left me with the cost of a hotel room. Shame I was really looking forward to it.  :dash: 

Or Maybe to protect the WG ? Thought of that ?
Of course I thought of that. But dismissed it as yet another piece of random shite spewed out for the benefit of yet more nasty and overly trusting fluffy clients.

If this particular wastrell, is running from stalkers, bad Frs or family, she hardly did a good job of it. So that's why I dismissed it.

Offline Tarquion

And as for bareback - yawn...! Got so fed up with the endless rants on PN about this. No matter how much discussion i doubt anybody is going to change their punting habits and hope this board won't be trawling over the same old ground.

I remember reading about this on a different board a few years ago. There used to be a bareback link off of the bath babes site.
http://barebackbabes.co.uk/ Which is a dead link now.
Some of the highlights from the other boards thread were:

Quote from: Coastman
Yes, the Bath Babes have been offerng barebackers since they started.

The word on the block is that the owner recruits the girls from the Bristol red light district then puts them up as internet escorts at much higher rates. Of course, as the pictures reveal, the girls have drug problems and are often happy to bareback for the extra money.

Some of the Bath Babes - notably Annie who is often pregnant - are very highly rated but there are lingering health concerns about them.

Bath Babes have updated their compendium of websites since I last visited.

In particular, 2 new "18 year old" barebackers listed - Tiffany and Tasha. There are plenty of pictures of them in action on the site but here's the face ones,
For more,

http://www.tasha.thebathbabes.co.uk/tiffany.html

http://www.tasha.thebathbabes.co.uk/tiffpics1.html

Good to see that the Bath Babes boss is still trawling the Bristol red light district in search of new talent.

That's Annie. She has been with Bath Babes for 2 or 3 years now and during that time has had 2 babies. She obviously doesn't want a 3rd as she has stopped advertising bareback.

They say she is 19 now which would have made her 16 when she started working with them. That would be about right.

Before that, she worked the RLD.

By all accounts she is a very good punt - and now a legal one.


It seems Bath Babes boss, Calvin, has been out in the Bristol red light district on a recruitment mission. He has unveiled another young girl who he is offering out for bareback - Kelly.

http://www.kelly.thebathbabes.co.uk

or at https://www.adultwork.com/415253

Note that the bareback is described as "Special Service"  and there's an extra charge of £50 for it.

Quote

Q. Are you genuinley a bareback babe?
A. Yes i am! I also have someone you can watch fuck me first if you like sloppy seconds!

Quote

I'll take your spunk in my young mouth (and maybe swallow) or you can fuck my tight teen cunt bareback and dump your load in there. If you like sloppy seconds you can watch me being fucked and filled by an older guy first before entering my sticky fuck-hole. You can also piss on my, spank me, I'll rim your asshole and if you don't want me to take your load in my mouth you can dump it over my schoolgitl face



NuaghtyTeenTiffany still has an AW profile and is still offering bareback.

Quote from: Lupus
The guy running this operation seems to have no worries about taking advantage of these girls and their addictions. I really hope fate or the law catch up with him. Really don't get how one human (just) can do some thing like this to another human. Operations like this one are a big part of why punting struggles to be accepted by the non-punting public. Imagine how looks that some so called punters book and see these girls. I wonder given the new changes to the law on consent, if these girls would be able legally to give consent. For example if a girl is drunk then she legally isn't able to consent. So if she is out of her head on drugs surely she wouldn't be able to consent. So it legally it could be argued that it would be rape to see one of these girls. I hope that this operation gets closed ASAP.

Mailaw


Quote from: linford
dont none of you think its fucking heart  breaking to see girls that young doing somehting so fucking desparate?


This was an eight page thread from another site started in 2006, I have editted together a number of coastman's posts but copied them all verbatim, just out of order.

Offline PuntingPete

Is it me?? I do not see the relavance of your post. 

Tasha is not listed on the Bath Babes website.

Tiffany is not listed on the Bath Babes website.

Annie does NOT offer bareback services.

Calvin is NOT & never has been the 'boss' of Bath Babes

This subject has been raised before & is getting quite boring.  :dash:


Never met any of the bath babes so I can only comment on what I've seen on t'internet.

I have seen them advertising parties fairly recently where Tiffany/Tasha was listed as being there with Annie & some others.  Don't know if bareback was going on there but after seeing that advert along with threads on other forums it certainly put me off from seeing any of their girls.

Most of us take risks when seeing prossies, such as indulging in OWO & CIM, & I'm certainly happy to take that risk as the chances of catching something is relatively small, but I wouldn't want to risk seeing someone who happily parties with well known barebackers as you just don't know & isn't worth it IMO. 

Granted, seeing anyone is a risk because they could be bareback fucking anyone & you wouldn't know either but I'd rather it was someone who doesn't blatantly advertise it as a service.  Ignorance is bliss.

Offline Tarquion

Is it me?? I do not see the relavance of your post. 

Tasha is not listed on the Bath Babes website.

Tiffany is not listed on the Bath Babes website.

Annie does NOT offer bareback services.

Calvin is NOT & never has been the 'boss' of Bath Babes

This subject has been raised before & is getting quite boring.  :dash:

Well Tasha and Tiffany were listed is the point I had copied.
Annie's age when she joined BathBabes is a concern.

Well bareback is a choice punters get to make.
Pandering underage brasses is just wrong!

I haven't added a smiley because I find that trivialises a serious issue just abit.  :scare:

« Last Edit: March 12, 2011, 11:16:13 PM by Tarquion »

Offline Mellow

Well bareback is a choice punters get to make.
Pandering underage brass is just wrong!



Where is the suggestion that BathBabes recruits underage women for the purpose of paid sex?

Offline Tarquion

Quote
They say she is 19 now which would have made her 16 when she started working with them. That would be about right.

That bit, again this is me copying another thread rather than making comments myself, just to cover my own libel suit.

They say she is 19 now which would have made her 16 when she started working with them. That would be about right.

Ladies never lie about their age don't you know  :blush:



Tasha is not listed on the Bath Babes website.

Tiffany is not listed on the Bath Babes website.


No they aren't but one of them was listed on either their website or yahoo group page as being at one of their parties not too long ago.


Well bareback is a choice punters get to make.


I agree with you, my choice is not to see anyone who offers this & anyone who is associated with them.

Offline Tarquion

https://www.adultwork.com/118293

Age:23 Member Since:10/10/2005

That the math here may be right would be of real concern to me.

Offline Mellow

https://www.adultwork.com/118293

Age:23 Member Since:10/10/2005

That the math here may be right would be of real concern to me.
I reckon BathBabes should stand in the naughty corner until that's excused. No doubt we'll each get one of those "will pm you's"

Offline SteveNova

https://www.adultwork.com/118293

Age:23 Member Since:10/10/2005

That the math here may be right would be of real concern to me.
But the maths doesn't indicate a problem to me - I'd love to have known her in 2005 when she was 18  :cool:
« Last Edit: March 13, 2011, 06:05:04 PM by SteveNova »






Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)