Last night I watched a C5 documentary about the White House Farm murders of 1986, of which Jeremy Bamber was convicted, and for which he remains in prison; and I have just read the
Guardian's investigation, published in the paper on 27 February:
External Link/Members OnlyAs I often say when responding to claims of a miscarriage of justice, I was not a fly on the wall either during the events or in the courtroom. All any of us has is the evidence presented in an investigation, together with our own instincts in the matter – the latter of course being a shaky premise for establishing guilt or innocence.
There is, however, much here that is troubling, the overwhelming fact that points towards Bamber’s innocence being the simplest. The silencer for the gun used in the murders was afterwards found – in slightly suspicious circumstances – in the downstairs cupboard where it was usually kept. If Bamber was the killer and had used it, it would have made no sense whatsoever to put it back there rather than dispose of it.
The
Guardian article explains this puzzling matter in detail, as well as giving the rest of the case for Bamber's having been wrongly convicted. The evidence of Bamber's ex-girlfriend and the role of the relations who inherited White House Farm following Bamber's conviction each give serious cause for concern.
Finally, surely no rational person would plan murders like these and believe that he – the obvious suspect, since he stood to inherit – would get away with trying to pin the crime on his sister?
This appeal jury of one joins the
Guardian and C5 in finding Bamber not guilty.
Andrew Malkinson served 17 years in prison for a rape he didn't commit. Bamber has so far been inside for 41.