External Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members Only Cost: £150 for 45 minutes
This review highlights the consequences of the flawed Adultwork (AW) feedback system to the disadvantage of both the escort and the client.
Please read on and urge AW to change its misleading feedback system.Here is my review on Kasia of Twickenham, Greater LondonCommunication: All communication was via text messages. Kasia replied to my messages in a timely manner.
The location:The location was nearer the town centre but was not very easy to reach. Apple maps got me to within a few yards from the location, but it did not account for two or three railway bridges near Kasia’s location. These bridges had barriers which did not let vehicles through, so I was stuck. I was struggling, but eventually I found my way around those bridges and reached the location 2 minutes before the scheduled time.
The location itself was a small block of flats with private parking for residents only. I then called Kasia and she advised me to park there. The inside was OK. I wouldn’t call it luxurious but it was good enough for the task.
The girl:I found Kasia to be a very sexy lady. She has that slutty look to her. Age is around late 30s.
The punt:My AW feedback is very impressive. It gives the impression that I am so handsome and muscular that women cannot resist me. Sadly, all this AW feedback insofar as my looks are concerned is completely false.
The reality is that I am a 62-year old, partially bald and extremely ugly non-white man. Ladies that leave this fake AW feedback for me only do so as a favour in return for me leaving them with positive AW feedback. I do not set conditions for me leaving positive AW feedback for them. In fact, I encourage them to say the truth and not be afraid of it. Yet, being decent human beings they keep leaving me with positive but misleading AW feedback.
The whole AW feedback mechanism is flawed because punters fear retaliatory negative feedback if they were to leave escorts negative AW feedback.
Kasia, like many ladies I have seen before, seemed very excited about seeing me. The words “I can’t wait to see you”, “Counting the minutes” etc. from an escort prior to the meeting are quite common in my case, and Kasia mentioned the same exciting words pre-punt.
When Kasia opened the door, the reality was in front of her. I turned out to be anything but the Prince Charming she was expecting. There was no decent welcome for me, not even a smile because Kasia’s mind was occupied in disbelief as to what she was expecting and what was there in front of her. She seemed to be in a state of shock.
Anyway, I handed over the cash and then took a shower whilst Kasia was about to go through the motions.
I don’t blame Kasia, but sadly, everything except for Kasia’s oral on me, was too mechanical. This robotic theme continued right until the end.
The kissing was very half hearted, even though I had insisted that without kissing I could not get hard. It was LFK in short bursts, and it lasted for only 2-3 minutes in total.
Next was Kasia’s oral on me, which was very satisfactory. No complaints here. I usually receive enjoyable and quite prolonged blow jobs because my ugly face is three feet away from my penis. I wish I had a giraffe's neck, which would have distanced my ugly face even further!
I then went down on Kasia, but she wasn’t interested. She reluctantly agreed to let me do it, but after a minute of it, I relieved Kasia from the boredom.
Even though I consider myself to be very good at providing reverse oral, my partially bald head spoils things for the lady. Surely it must be agony for the lady to be turned on by my tongue on her and then for her to glance at my partially bald head to get totally turned off.
I was now 10 minutes into the 45 minute punt when Kasia grabbed a condom. These 10 minutes must feel like 10 hours to Kasia judging by how bored she was.
All this time, Kasia hardly talked. It felt as if I was with an inflatable doll.
I then reminded Kasia, that I was aware that she found me boring, but she said that she is like this with everybody, and doesn’t talk much or make much noise, if any.
I foolishly believed Kasia, so instead of trying to get the job done quickly I was naive in prolonging Kasia's suffering. I then reminded Kasia that I specifically requested anal in advance, and that perhaps she could let me enjoy that.
Kasia was very hesitant but agreed to let me probe her ass. There was no effort on Kasia’s part to guide me, so I became limp and gave up.
I should change my user name from iq129 to iq-zero because my monkey brain was still not getting Kasia's hint that she was thoroughly bored. I therefore suggested that Kasia play with herself or let me provide her with oral so I could see her squirt, but she said she cannot squirt, so that idea was abandoned.
Kasia then wanted me to finish with vaginal intercourse, but I wasn’t hard enough, so I requested that she finish me off with her mouth which she did.
It was the worst possible ending, because instead of swallowing or at least letting me complete my ejaculation in her mouth, when I was about to come, Kasia let go and all my semen fell on my stomach.
At least for Kasia, her suffering was now over. She must have had a huge burden lifted off her shoulders.
I thanked Kasia for her time, and I left soon afterwards.
Conclusion:The above account of my punt suggests that this should be a negative, but no, because that would be misleading.
The purpose of reviews is to help other punters make better decisions in investing their time and money on seeing a particular lady.
My review is from my experience, which I firmly believe is not representative of the vast majority of punters, so this doesn't warrant a negative or even a neutral.
If this review was to be a negative, a lot of punters would just see the headline ‘negative’ and move on elsewhere without properly reading the review. That would not be fair to this lady. A negative review would also discourage punters from seeing an attractive lady who is very likely to provide a top quality service, unless the client is as ugly as me and has misleading positive AW feedback.
I will therefore rate this review as a positive. Why should it be anything less than a positive when Kasia was not at fault?
If you were to take a girl out for a meal and force feed her something that she dislikes so much that she vomits, then would that be the girl’s fault for not enjoying the meal?
Using the same analogy, I feel that I force fed Kasia when she was already under the shock of being deceived by my fake AW feedback.
I therefore recommend Kasia whole heartedly. All her previous reviews here attest to that.
As for AW feedback, it is time that both punters and escorts feel free to be honest about their experiences without worrying about retaliatory feedback.
Topic: Kasia Ann of Twickenham (Read 5126 times)